Explain to me how this shit is rated 6.9 at IMDB

Explain to me how this shit is rated 6.9 at IMDB

Attached: 220px-Enemy_poster.jpg (220x311, 22K)

69/100 is a good score.

i havent seen any villeneuve movies pre-Prisoners ... are his earlier movies good as well?

it's a half hour long movie that takes 1.5 hours to tell

And what exactly was the point?

It's not just super-slow, it's also meaningless.

Incendies is kino,probabbly his best, which is why I can't undesrtand how the same person could have made Enemy.

Pretentious and utterly meaningless. I wish I could get back the time I spent watching it.

DUDE SPIDERS LOL

This

absolutely

Attached: pol unleashed.webm (1200x510, 2.99M)

It's not THAT bad.

LONDON
O
N
D
O
N

Incendies is pretty good

based, which one is it?

Plenty of great films have scores below 7 on pleb casual land that is IMDb

The Grey
Under the Skin
The Witch
The Tree of Life

Polytechnique

Attached: pol unleashed_2.webm (1200x510, 2.98M)

I haven't watched the witch, but the rest are shitty. I seriously hope you are joking

Under the Skin is literally, unironically, sincerely one of the best films of this entire decade.
A true pleb filter. Zoomer killer. Brainlet stomper. Plot point casual executioner.

Attached: Under The Skin.mkv_snapshot_00.34.47_.jpg (1920x1038, 724K)

precuel of this

Attached: 66t3u8a15av21[1].jpg (1114x720, 53K)

The Tree of Life is a masterpiece

Retards unable to understand it

people are too dumb

>he doesn't know the best films are rated between 2.9 and 4.9 on imdb

Attached: kot.jpg (358x358, 16K)