What's the big deal? Is this some normie shit?
What's the big deal? Is this some normie shit?
Whats the big deal?
Is this a dubs thread?
It is now, check 'em.
DUDE THE 60S LMAO
its a movie made for LA jackoffs
Leo sucked as Calvin Candie, anyone else agree? QT’s movies stopped feeling “real” after Jackie Brown. They’re just weird live action cartoons
taritino is only known for his “cool”, edgey dialogue. dont like anything else
cringe
Why is it considered cool among teenagers of Yea Forums to be dismissive of Tarantino? Serious question.
his work hasn't held up
you only need to watch one tarintino movie to see them all. the setting may change but the characters and rhythm of the dialogue is all the same
Yes.
These.
His films are made for teenagers.
because their parents think his movies are cool
i don't like meta hollywood movies
it looks awful and boring and too white
Whatever it is I don't understand it.
Watch more films and you might.
...and I might get pretentious enough to dislike all of the popular directors?
It's not pretentious to dislike some director. It's called an opinion and if you can explain it you are alright. Also popular doesn't mean good.
People who think tarantino is some genius are pretentious
It's more likely that they are retarded and think that they are above people who watch capeshit just because they watch Tarantino.
He was quite respectable up to Kill Bill vol 2. Being a good writer and director for over the decade is a task very few accomplish. Genius is a strong word.
Every movie that is about actors acting always gets accolades because Hollywood is bullshit
It's most likely because they are retarded and think that they are above people who watch Tarantino just because they watch Tarkovsky.
There are many better directors but anyone who denies his genius is some pseud desperate for contrarian cred.
>a thing is good and obscure
>ABSOLUTE GENIUS
>the thing then becomes popular
>'dude it really isn't that good look how commercial it is'
Explain his genius to me then.
Because it's easier to be contrarian than smart.
based moeposter
because he has a foot fetish and a weird face
>What's the big deal? Is this some normie shit?
kys OP.
Start with "Quentin Tarantino and Philosophy" by Richard Greene and K. Silem Mohammad, if reading isn't too difficult for you. There are dozens of books of critical analysis on Tarantino's work. He's probably the most-analyzed director in the last 30 years, far beyond standard film criticism.
I honestly hated Reservoir Dogs the first time I saw it. Sometimes it takes fresh eyes to learn to appreciate something.
Just give me a quick rundown i really don't want to be baited into reading a whole book about him.
It isn't the kind of thing that can be distilled into memetext. If you care about film as an art form it's a small investment to make.
life story short, he writes dialogue better than most plays, gets better performances out of his actors than most, and his allusions are(or at least used to be) more stylish than your average joe filmmaker
Yeet
He made some unique (for their time) movies in the 90s but the problem is that he never really evolved and just kinda made the same movie over and over. It's easier to not be fond of him now that he has an almost 30 year career to look back on.
People from California love sucking each other off and congratulating each other for living in California. This movie will win about 13 Oscars and be called Tarantino's masterpiece.
I do care about film the problem is i don't care about Tarantino. Well, after i read some other shit that i'm reading i might read that.
Well i find his characters to be caricatures and not real people. His films are completely immature and juvenile, it's like a 50 year old men trying to be cool in a high school party. He has a mind of 15 year old imo. This wannabe cool characters are fun for a little while not for 3 hours. He also comes into his films with his atrocious acting which is a pure ego trip (i'm talking about newer films, he was alright in his first). I don't get the playwright comparison. His characters all speak like him. It's all the same. There is no or very little distinction between male and female etc. The only film that has that is Jackie Brown which is his most mature film to date. Rest of his work is incredibly juvenile. As far as look of his films goes, they are alright but not some kind of visual masterpieces. The problem is really his juvenile mentality where everything has to be cool and exploitation and cool and exploitation. He rips off so many films it's unreal.
This
Cuckatino has sucked since Pulp.
Is this another movie where he changes history?
How are they going to incorporate the signature Tarantino violence when it's just set in Hollywood with movie actors?
They kill the Manson girls at the end.
Thats not Brad Pitt
Why do his movies have so much talking?
he has an obsession with blacks which triggers the racists. also the foot fetishism hits too close to home.
considering the early reviews aren't ecstatic, no. sounds like it's just another very good QT film.
Yes
What? It has the best reviews since Pulp.
because popular thing bad
Believe it or not it's actually 30yo manbabby neets seething about him. Pathetic, I know.
He never evolved as a director it's beyond pathetic at this point.
Brad Pitt simultaneously looks 50 and 20 with the work he's had done. Actors should really learn to age naturally.