Who will play him in the inevitable biopic?

Michael Shannon

That actually fits pretty well lol

Good, it changed mine too.
I only follow laws i agree with, i am not a machine, its mainly why i don't pay for movies anymore, most of the time i can barely watch them.

Attached: 157.gif (300x100, 101K)

image the smell

>Teddy will die in jail

At least he doesn't have to see the dystopia he tried to prevent...fucking technophiles...

Attached: 8ce.jpg (680x698, 37K)

>implying (((they))) want anyone to come into even biased contact with badthink
if they did it would be someone short, ugly, and balding as subconscious manipulation

You are now based and Tedpilled.

To OP, pic related, though is pretty good I must admit.

Attached: stan mad men.jpg (700x450, 56K)

i can see the reasoning why someone might be anti-tech but people who seriously believe life should revert back to berry-picking and deer-chasing can't convince me

>In 2016, it was reported that early on in his imprisonment Kaczynski had befriended Ramzi Yousef and Timothy McVeigh, the perpetrators of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and the Oklahoma City bombing, respectively. The trio discussed religion and politics and formed a friendship which lasted until McVeigh's execution in 2001

~terrorist bros~

Attached: 1548737653139.gif (200x200, 23K)

I normally would have agreed with you but read his manifesto and then start researching hunter-gatherers (though some versions of the manifesto include some of his other writings where he talks about hunter-gatherer tribes since he's studied a lot of anthropology) and it'll start to make sense. That being said obviously one can't deny the comforts of technology, it's the price(s) you have to pay that are the issue.

Attached: 1561297716957.png (614x676, 538K)

This would have been a good movie, and bonus points for a comedy of them trying to escape prison.

Oscar Isaac as Ramzi Yousef
Ryan Gosling as Timothy McVeigh
as Ted

I feel the same way but if you read the manifesto he actually does make a very strong argument.

what's the argument then if it's so good?

>nigga so dumb he can only think on extremes.
yeah doofus, either freeze the house or set it on fire, theres no middle ground.

A simple summary is that while technology itself is comfortable and convenient, it comes with too many issues, chief among them losing various types of freedom, the inability to escape the technological society, environmental destruction, individual lack of control and an assortment of mental and health issues resulting from being forced to live in an extremely unnatural environment. The manifesto is actually an easy read.

Queen Latifah

Man the CIA fucked him up. I legit feel bad for him

i'll read it if it's not that long, but i'm pretty sure most people would prefer those issues, as opposed to watching members of your family die from infection, or starvation, or be killed through brutal sacrifice by another tribe, as well as a myriad of other issues.

He's still a terrorist who harmed and killed random innocent people. People who idolize him seem to forget that.

Can your mind emulate a cenario that isan't on extremes? can't you really think of a confortable zone on technology dependency?

Existence was better when it was survival of the fittest and the strong dominated and destroyed all the weak. Nowadays, it is so dysgenic and every fucking weakling and basedboy is allowed to repopulate and bring our existence closer to its end.

this is literally the glow in the darks narrative though. they framed him as mentally ill to discredit his ideas and humiliate him in court because they were afraid of his 100000iq legal moves

>no stop talking about ideas you need to broadcast how aghast you are at society's mores being violated
whatever normalfag

Attached: CVQxGnGUwAAdCoD.jpg_large.jpg (1000x702, 169K)

You speak as if you're not a weakling yourself who would get his head smashed open in a instant if things were that way.

are you this poster?you misunderstood my post. i said i can understand why some people are anti-tech, but i don't agree with people who believe the solution is to revert back to caveman's times. eliminating certain recent inventions (I don't know, unlimited internet access?) sounds more reasonable than complete reversal.

>survival of the fittest
why should humans waste the fact they were born with a big fucking brain? that's like giving monkeys wings and telling them they shouldn't fly because it's dangerous.

Hunter gatherers tend to be well fed, and as others have said, you don't have to be a hunter gatherer, he's really addressing things post-industrial revolution and the greater technological system. You could easily make the argument that we're dying of horrific types of infection/disease that humans normally wouldn't be exposed to, massive wars that otherwise wouldn't exist, and all other assorted risks of living in modern society. Just as an example:
>Nearly 1.25 million people die in road crashes each year, on average 3,287 deaths a day. An additional 20-50 million are injured or disabled. More than half of all road traffic deaths occur among young adults ages 15-44
The point is that you are already willingly giving up tons of freedoms and taking tons of risks with your safety with things that are totally outside of your own control and to boot, you can never escape these issues. Kaczynski tried by living like a hermit in the forest and not even he could escape it.

Attached: ted in montana.jpg (500x392, 98K)

I have nothing against discussing his ideas, just against people who hold him as an idol. Worshipping a murderer is idiotic. His fans should remember that he would have no qualms blowing them up.

>"i live in the wrong decade :(" EXTREME edition

Attached: 1561331337790.png (454x520, 13K)

Few people who like his ideas "worship" him, and for the most part he wasn't blowing up random people (except for when he bombed a plane), he was going after specific targets. I doubt most of his "fans" are in the fields of the kind of people he was bombing. Again though, most people disagree with how he did things. But it's also idiotic to say that just because he murdered people he didn't have some extremely salient points.

>lets drug up a 17 yo, pet him against a prosecutor and completely destroy his worldview
The CIA is a madhouse

"worshipping" any person is idiotic. people appreciate him based on liking his ideas. it's you that came along and decided to change the subject to
>yeah ok guys but be sure not to have too good a general opinion of him because he killed people
as if a 'general opinion' was somehow important

Paul Bettany already played him in the biopic

That show wasn't really the biopic, and it was complete bullshit and horrible.

More than likely if the system experiences a type of collapse, the outcomes are either that the state surivives and tightens their control on individuals and life becomes even more bleak and unnatural or we find a sustainable middle ground with a significantly reduced population using small scale tech living very different lifestyles that are more closer to what is going to give the more healthy and fulfilling lives

It's inevitable that technology and our unsustainable resource consumption will lead to this unless you're still hoping Elon Musk types will solve these issues, which would still lead to the state and technology increasing it's control over individuals and diminishing quality of life

my first time it took me about an hour to read but judging by what you've said thus far I'd say about three for you

what is "unnatural"?
even if society collapses, it's also inevitable that it just rebuilds itself and its technology. i am fine for arguing a middle ground, but to think that people will ever lose the desire to create or invent or discover is ridiculous.

wow you sure showed me

This.
It wasn't that bad. They're doing more. The next one is on the '96 Olympic bombing.

Sneed

>to think that people will ever lose the desire to create or invent or discover is ridiculous.

It may seem that way. However, as Kacynski points out, only one culture on earth really has this insatiable drive for industry and control over the environment. There have been plenty that don't, such as Native Americans. If the culture could change, permanent destruction of industry could be achieved.

The show was fucking awful. Cliched, badly acted (unless you liked their depiction of Ted Kaczynski acting like a Jared Leto villain), badly written. And it wasn't even about Ted nor was it anything like a realistic depiction of either the investigation or his life, so it wasn't a "biopic" in any case, it was just a fictionalized depiction of an FBI agent vs. TV Kaczynski.

The sad thing is they had a lot of material to work with. They should have cut out the FBI profiler crap and made it something like a Greek tragedy with Ted's brother betraying him.

Attached: his-brother-received-_1-million-reward-for-turning-him-in-photo-u2.jpg (650x367, 48K)

Based.
Come visit.

me too

Sitcom when?

How can we make him more into a meme?

Attached: improved.png (1640x2160, 71K)

He's already sort of a meme, considering he was basically a boomer version of the average guy on here (incel, autist, hated modern society, wanted a sex change operation, afraid of women, attacked leftists, couldn't keep a job, NEET). The only difference is he had a high IQ.

John C. Reilly
I like air conditioning, indoor plumbing and supermarkets btw

Just go to Africa and live with the friendly tribal negroes.

what culture? and that doesn't even encapsulate the entirety of human desire. actually i'd say people don't in general have a drive to "control industry or the environment", that sounds like a biased statement from an environmentalist. i think people fundamentally want to communicate and understand. communication with creative expression and to understand through physical measurements and theories for example- these both require tools and are impossible to perform if you live in a world without the bare minimum of technology.

Well it's called Manhunt. The whole premise of the show is the FBI hunting down their man, so of course they're the focal point. It wasn't meant to be a docudrama, but as far as I can tell it was still pretty accurate. It was a lot better than you're giving credit for. Either way I'm looking forward to the next one.

>it was still pretty accurate
Profoundly wrong. And again, it wasn't a biopic ( the topic of the thread), it was a fictionalized version of the Kaczynski hunt, which by necessity was full of shit because they never would have got him if it weren't for his brother turning him in. The protagonist (the profiler) is not a real person.

Every single major world leader has killed more innocent people than Ted did.

Where can I discuss his books with people, who actually read them? Especially Anti-Tech Revolution
Is the topic too hot for everyone?

Attached: TJK society development.jpg (720x1104, 234K)

I want to read Anti-Tech Revolution but I don't want to buy it online and my library doesn't have it. I do want to discuss his ideas though, I did read the manifesto and a lot of his letters.

No idea where though other than the occasional threads that pop here on 4channel.

>tl;dr - le clown world

archive.org/details/KaczynskiAntiTechRevolutionWhyAndHow_201803

Here you go

I should have said I didn't really want to read it online as I like to make notes in my books (yeah I know), but thank you anyway, I was getting close to breaking down and reading it online.

>what culture?

Western culture

Me, except it's going to be a sequel

based

Paul Bettany did in Manhunt Unabomber. Did no one watch it?

Attached: f79623127f95568380656acd2e740a40.png (1384x803, 1.05M)

Attached: 1562019801984.jpg (1024x537, 131K)

He explains it in his manifesto. His work never would have gotten even a percentage of recognition it has now. It was sadly a necessity.