Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot film

Maybe it's just 21st century cynicism but I think it's very obviously a dude in a costume and the fact that anyone thinks it being real is more realistic and even worth defending is frustrating.

t. literally an actor who played a monster in a costume

I enjoy these threads

Why does having played a monster in a costume any special insight, beyond what anybody else might provide?

>very obviously a dude in a costume

I think the only thing stopping me from agreeing with you is the sheer length of its arms.. Those are some abnormally long n hefty hangers..

this footage is FROM THE 60S!

>I see great costumes in 2019 so this
AMATEUR footage from the 60s can totally look great!!

PGF is irrefutable proof of the existence of cryptids, retards are unable to comprehend

it's obviously a dude in a costume being hold up at gun point by a sasquatch (notice how he looks towards the camera in sheer fear for his life)

Let’s say it *is* a costume. It doesn’t fit like what you would envision as an “ape suit.”
There’s either some kind of structure or shell in it that keeps it from wrinkling, hanging loosely and/or bunching up
That or it’s perfectly tailored to the person wearing it.

Locomotion looks similar to normal humans, like said the arm length is the only thing off-putting anatomically. A monkey suit isn't hard to acquire or build. I think they did a good job fashioning the costume, perhaps. Which would explain the arm length. False hand props when held outright can also create a "long arm" look. But desu the arms aren't even that long if you consider the leg length is a visual trick. will post a pic after this one

I set the last post up to auto and the file didn't go through but the post did, so here's what I meant to post with it

s29877.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/bigfoot-patterson-gimlin-footage-stabilized.gif

Attached: 92483c89bc.jpg (253x353, 18K)

Damn arms look long in a photograph? I guess my preconceived assumptions are wrong and there really is a giant apeman species living in the forests of North America of which there has been no evidence of since, no stool, or skeletons, no footage, even when everybody has had the ability to take picture and record for decades and rangers have patrolled these areas for longer. Even though there's no logical phylogenic reason of explanation of its habitat, surely these people of outstanding intellect and reason who go chasing after apemen in the woods are really onto something.

Still waiting for someone to recreate a costume on film that authentic.

#
Yeah everybody ignores the fact that patterson was already a bigfoot researcher, who had already written a book about the supposed creature and was in the process of creating a faux documemtary in which gimlin was going to star in, as well as the fact that they were out in the woods that day specifically to capture footage of bigfoot to gain publicity/funding for the film. Even if you do believe its real youve got to admit its all super convenient.
Also nobody ever brings up the footprints that they took casts of from that very enounter because ... well look at them

Attached: __5472955_orig.jpg (785x800, 241K)

because a hollywood studio wont go out and shoot a black bear and use its fur and probably skin to make a suit.

How can you say looks authentic. It just looks like black fur. The same guy that cast was a taxidermist, wouldn't be that hard to get some.

>the original film has never been shown (which would have of course included alternate takes, failed attempts, what they were filming before and after etc)
>Went out to look for Bigfoot and found him the same day - weird how often UFO nuts are the ones that manage to take photos of them ay?
>on the day they claim to have flown the tape to be developed all flights were grounded due to whether indicating that they didn't get it developed when they say and possibly didn't film it when they said
>Patterson had secured funding for a Bigfoot psuedo-documentary and it was with this funding that he rented the camera used to capture the footage (they even took photos of hunting bigfoot that turned out to be in his back yard)
>next door neighbour claimed Patterson said he'd pay him 1k to dress up as big foot for the mockumentary - even trying on a bigfoot costume (he drove down to spend the night with them the night before the footage was captured hmm)
>the costume was also paid for by the company he was making the show for (though he requested that extra fur be sent to make the arms longer)

Basically Patterson said he'd film some fake bigfoot stuff for a company but then pocketed the money himself and pretended it was real when it got famous

>better than what hollywood could produce
blurry shakey 16mm footage shot from a distance is going to hide all flaws from a suit. It looks terrible in the stabilised footage. Its ass cheeks dont even move
Also they had stuff like his is in 1927. Ape suits, good and bad were everywhere. They were the fo to movie monster, even before king kong

Attached: a8550a036b362776f5ae4f33d0909ec7.jpg (500x643, 44K)

>can't be re-created
>means it's real

I dare you to make the same exact pancake as someone else. Go on, make a batch of perfectly identical pancakes.

Attached: CORRILLA.jpg (768x960, 100K)

>There’s either some kind of structure or shell in it that keeps it from wrinkling, hanging loosely and/or bunching up
>That or it’s perfectly tailored to the person wearing it.
>can't even tell how many fingers this thing has the film is so blurry and low resolution
>oh but i can tell if it's wrinkling or hanging loosely or bunched up
You can't see any of that shit.

Are you suggesting pancakes aren't real?

I think he is

it was a hell of a stroke of luck but I can see why he wouldn't want to share the profit when he actually did find bigfoot

It doesn't even look convincing in the shaky footage. It looks like some retarded hillbilly glued fur to a football helmet. The costume looks fake as fuck, it looks worse than the worst b-movie monster costume.

The stabilised footage is also pretty damning. It looks just like a guy in a suit, and the soles of the feet are pure white. It's clearly a costume.

Attached: 1428365370553.gif (1593x1124, 3.29M)

The pancakes he made last week are not real cause he ate them and we can’t replicate them.

You fucking kidding me? MTV put Chris Pontius in a damn gorrilla suit and fooled people up close in a hotel of all places.

Why does Sasquatch trigger people so much?

Crazy story if he actually is scamming people. I can see why he wouldn’t want to share the money with that company. Cause he’s a scam artist.

How can they be? If I show you a blurry photo of a pancake in the woods of North America taken in the 70s could you, or any modern costume department accurately recreate it?

Bigfoots are hard to see but easy to hear. Every researcher eventually has heard them.
youtube.com/watch?v=wTsdbKUwenI

what do the jews have gain by hiding a big monkey in the California redwood?

Authentic in that no reproduction has ever come remotely close to reproducing it. Why can't someone just recreate it and be done with it?

I think it's fake but I see the white sole argument a lot. Could the ground just be chalky and dusty because it looks like it on the film

You have to understand the technology to make that suit and that video simply don't exist. Scientists worked for months trying to replicate it and they couldn't. The best makeup artists and costume designers to this day are baffled how something like that could be made.

where did they get a 50 meter tall jap to play godzilla?

I think this is bigger than that. The world cabal isn't interested more in bigfoot than okapis

In the 60s? yeah they probably would

Holy fuck
This is so fucking fake. How the fuck you can be so stupid to belive this kinda shit ?

Attached: 1558457148171.jpg (471x388, 14K)

How come nobody can recreate this?

could be real

50 years and this is the best footage big foot fags have.

non conspiracy here, is big foot existing that hard to belive? the footage might be fake but we discover new species of animals all the time

I agree. A wild animal would move differently. He just walks straight with coherent movements.
Like a human would.

Hiroshima

Yeah dude any time now they'll find dinosaurs in the amazon

wood cutting industry would be affected because if the hairy nigger variant is recongized as a species it would automatically become categorized as endangered and making any treecutting in the pacific northwest impossible to do legally

Attached: 51YlwNNjStL.jpg (500x494, 34K)

Because it has too many variables.
Not same light, not the same costume, not the same person and not the same positions the original camera man

This is the kicker. Assuming it is a hoax, why would they add this pointless detail to the costume?

What? Of course this can be recreated.
It’s just that everyone doesn’t care so much that nobody wants to spend their time and resources on recreating it. It's pointless. It makes no sense to recreate these frames to deny them.

They could just buy a skin

finding a different kind of gorilla isn't that far fetched

also this

for fun. retard.

it has been established that bigfoot has human like inteligence

New big species, especially species that are not outwardly similar to any other species, are extremely rare.

99% of new species are tiny, small, or so similar to another species that we didn't even realize they were a different species

why wouldnt you want to tittyfuck hairy bigfoot tits after being out in the wildernes

...

Well, it lives on a kinda populated area, many people hiking, cameras, and big animals like that should leave some kind of proof behind them, something that big must move to eat a lot.

I'm in the ''I want to believe'' camp on this but retards like you always put me off. You squatchfags always spout pure conjecture as if it's fact.

>they have human-like intelligence
>they can impersonate other animals

Are you the Jane Goodall of sasquatches?

And to top it all off, this species is supposedly on the outskirts of civilization. I could believe something of this scale being undiscovered in some third world shithole's unexplored forest, but not in fucking rural America.

Who seems to know he should go from point a to point b.
He moves like bigfoot from a town.

>It’s just that everyone doesn’t care so much that nobody wants to spend their time and resources on recreating it.
You're wrong, people have tried multiple times, the pic in the OP is one of the results. It's from an old BBC miniseries that completely failed at recreating the PG film. It's basically been forgotten now because they tried to pass it off as a complete success when it clearly wasn't.

People are always asking Bigfoot truthers to produce some sort of evidence of its existence, yet when confronted with something like the PG film, they immediately consider it faked. Most alleged Bigfoot footage is very easy to prove fake but the PG film still has no reasonable explanation as pointed out. The narrative will always be that it's a guy in a suit though, because that's a much easier premise to accept than the possibility that it could be an undiscovered species.

This is a lie, no scientists even care. Hacks working for animal planet dont represent the entire scientific community. And who are these make up artists? Theres only bill munns who has like 5 mediocre credits to his name. The thing about the planet of the apes make up artist is a misquote. There were rumours that he made the suit but he denied them and said that if he was involved hed have done a better job

No other species of ape evolved to stand upright other than Homo erectus.
New species are discovered all the time but it would be a big deal to discover an as yet documented genus of the same species as humans, that not only once existed, but is still living when the final other homo genus is commonly believed to have died out/been bred out of existence about 12,000 years ago

>breasts on a great ape
>pointless detail

It's a nice touch.

What the fuck are you talking about. Look at literally every bigfoot costume ever. Didn't some guys convince the world they had a frozen bigfoot until they thawed out the costume?

That's suburban sasquach, which unlike the shit OP is posting is 100% the real deal.
rawwawwwarraarrrr rawwawwwarraarrrr

The arms reach slightly below his butt which is normal. He just has short legs which makes the arms look longer

>t. literally an actor who played a monster in a costume
What monster
If you don't want to, atleast tell us what kind of monster it was

Exactly, a Yeti living on some fucking asian isolated mountains is more believable than a bigfoot on an average forest where everybody can go with no problems.

They were the original furries.

They keep trying, but they always fail

Attached: screen-shot-2013-04-19-at-10-13-41-am.png (605x303, 299K)

>those milkers
jesus christ

definite proof of the mommysquatch

For the same reason Patterson drew bigfeet with tits in his self published book about bigfeet before he miraculously found one. He liked to portray bigfoot tits. When he drew bigfeet by hand before he allegedly filmed one, he sometimes drew boobs on them.

Attached: bigfoot boobs.jpg (500x374, 33K)

Those guys had one shitty photo of the thing in ice that not many people believed but the news gave a bunch of coverage to anyway. Of course it was proven fake within a matter of hours. The massive influx of fake shit like this is why it's so hard for people to consider the possibility of bigfoot being real.

>Women naked
>Men in costume
Based, noone wants to see a naked man!

Imagine being mentally retarded enough to believe this bigfoot shit, how do you retards even function?

He drew like 50 pictures of Bigfoot in his book, and only two of them have breasts. It's because he was fascinated by the Roe encounter which he covered in the book.

Attached: patty-breast-bounce.gif (153x168, 489K)

The reason the particle collider they planned to build in the U.S. was cancelled was because they allocated ALL of the funding that was going to build it to instead try to reproduce that suit and they failed.

>tfw you'll never mate with a female sasquatch, producing a tribe of squatchmen that you will carry out night raids on small towns with

The sasquatches eat their feces and skeletons.

>someone sets out to research X topic
>after time and effort they discover much about X topic
>research is invalidated somehow
I don't get this type of reasoning

Got your bigfoot right here

Attached: 1563295387767.webm (458x600, 2.98M)

clearly a guy in a suit

look at the soles, rings a bell dipshit ?

I love all this shit flinging going on. The people who have actual bigfoot encounters don't give a fuck whether or not you believe them

>here there fellow humans how about you let me have some of those pik-a-nik baskets!?!

>guy draws bigfoot tits
>later...
>guy makes a costume with bigfoot tits
It doesn't matter if he only drew one bigfoot with tits. The point is, the premise of this post
>Assuming it is a hoax, why would they add this pointless detail to the costume?
is that the fact that it has tits is something no one would think to add, and therefore this is a point in the authenticity column. But, in fact, Patterson absolutely would think to add tits. And when he fabricated bigfoot from his imagination in the past, he did indeed add tits. The bigfoot tits are not some inexplicable thing that no one would ever think to add to a costume. They are a detail that Patterson is actually documented as having added to bigfoot portrayals in the past.

Patterson footage or BBC thing?

Why cant someone just find bigfoot dead or alive and be done with it? Or even provide new footage?
Why can no one find any hair, blood or scat? Any evidence of it feeding or its nesting areas? Where are the bodies, the bones? This isnt some tiny rat in the deepest parts of the amazon thats gone undetected for years, its a supposed 7 foot tall ape man wandering around north california. There arent even any convincing tracks, not even the prints patterson and ginlin took on the day that the footage was taken looks real.
Why is this one intance of blurry footage the sole lynchpin that determines its entire existence?

couldnt this just be the howling from wolves echoing in a valley or something

>he still thinks its fake
kek
good goy

>No swinging arms
>Woobly walk
And thats why is fake. The difference between staged walk from point a to point b.

in North America it is

And I assume most people don't care about someone who has most likely misidnetified a bear walking upright, as they sometimes do.

didnt think i would start fapping when i first entered this thread

>he still thinks it's bigfoot and not 3 grays standing on top of eachother in a bigfoot costume to throw us off the trail of the real bigfoots

>the real bigfoots
You mean the ones that keep pulling those loch Ness hoaxes?

what technology?

This one knows too much...

youtube.com/channel/UCVJLEQ0AoKBwD0I_IzSO5wg
this channel made me give it the benefit of the doubt
in particular his talking about the fossil record, evolutionary pressure, and early native descriptions of them in the PNW matching up with believable ape behavior
I'm not entirely sold, nor do I definitely believe that were this species to have existed that they're still necessarily around or that the Patterson footage is real

>And I assume most people don't care
You not being one of them, clearly

>They are a detail that Patterson is actually documented as having added to bigfoot portrayals in the past.
I'm just think that people always use his book as evidence that he was fascinated by female bigfoots, and use this to explain the breasts on the PG figure. I'm just pointing out that Patterson was obsessed with Bigfoot in general and there isn't really anything to suggest he was specifically fascinated by the breasts, except for his drawing of the Roe encounter and the cartoonish looking one posted Personally, I think if he went out of his way to make breasts for a costume, it would be much easier to identify the fakeness of it. Most people don't even notice the breasts when they watch the footage, so it just seems like a really pointless risk to have taken.

I'm more sympathetic to the idea than most. However, even if I was adamant it wasn't real, merely discussing it doesn't mean I care about it in the way you do. Childish as fuck, my dude. Literally ''I know what you, but what am I'' tier.

''I know you are but what am I''*

I had a stroke, I apologize.

I like some of this guy's videos and he's put me in the I want to believe camp, but he loses me when he starts talking about government cover-ups and shit.

Been waiting for the video of this since like eight Bigfoot threads ago

Based centrist.

Does being like 95% sure it's not real make me a centrist?

I don’t really get how the breasts add any extra credence to the Patterson film. How is bigfoot having milkers supposed to convince me they exist?

Of course not, but that wasn't what you implied

Because its so absurd that you will think its not a hoax.
And its his fetish apperantly.

look at that fucking great quality of hair
the way the light shines on it like real hair

look at this shit hollywood costume hair

I just can't fucking believe people still doubt this is real. Bunch of fucking idiots.

Do you have any evidence it's real?

It's not so much the doubt of this video that gets me, it's the flat out denial of all the occurrences prior and after.

I'm normally a skeptic, but god damn this makes me fucking wonder.
>the hair
>the arm length
>shoulder movement when turning back
>that strange gait

It's clearly an upright walking bear in a gorilla suit

this is the only bigfoot i care about

Attached: salma-hayek-64773891_369677740386071_4501206847557292014_n.jpg (1080x1080, 192K)

Are people stupid or do they just not care about shit like this? The pyramids: literally unbuildable with modern technology. Their architecture still baffles engineers. Patterson Gimlin: impossible to recreate even with cutting edge makeup and costume design technology. Even with cgi.

I don't know what they're trying to hide but my guess is it ties in with the California wild fires. I've had a theory and researched the connection for over 20 years and you can trace a connection between big foot sightings in the north west and devastating wild fires further south. Perhaps the fires drive them north or perhaps the bigfoot are migrating south and the wildfires are some how started by bigfoot activity.

>stacking a bunch of stones on top of each other
>impossible with modern technology

Attached: 200.gif (263x200, 1.07M)

It's just that there's nothing to learn. Until we find proof of how pyramids were built, speculation is just going to frustrate people. Maybe bigfoot exists, but we have nothing to say about it until we find one. The honest thing is just to say that we don't know.

THICC

the california fires started because all the gum trees you dumbasses planted over there finally started exploding. bushfires like that happen every year around here

they set forests on fire so that the world can't find their poop

>The pyramids: literally unbuildable with modern technology
where the hell did you get this idea

it doesn't matter how many times Pattersonfags get btfo, they'll still make the same shit thread.

Some guy on YouTube.
youtu.be/iP0Nf7INvwg

What if someone goes and discovers your exact filming location and recreates it with a guy without a suit and he's the same size.
>well it was female so it was smaller

>The pyramids: literally unbuildable with modern technology
Did you mean Stonehenge?

The idea is that is so absurd no hoaxer would even think to do that. But Patterson had drawn bigfeet with tits before he shot the hoax film, and self published those drawings. Patterson proves he not only would think to give bigfoot tits, it's almost a signature, it's a very unique embellishment that he has previously used in other fictional representations of bigfoot.

It doesn't look fake though. looks more convincing

seems smarter than the average bear

>doing a hoax
>dont bother with details that make the hoax more convincing

you're literally braindead

why did the first one wait for the second one to catch up and then it disappeared? how in the fuck could something that big just disappear like that?

they took a big guy, and glued hair on to his naked torso, and added fake breasts to make it seem less like a dude.

I have a friend who has hundreds of trail cameras on his very large property in northern wisconsin. He legit has bigfoot footage but sees no point in showing it to anyone but his friends.

Oh shit, does his dad work for Nintendo too?

Bigfoot is in Peter Caine's freezer

There’s nobody even down in Loch Ness, you all need to stop looking for me.

based foot fag

Well that settles it then. Someone claims to have seen bigfoot, I guess the hunt is over.
/thread

>SQUATCHED!

me too

formerly chuckson sneed film

even if it's fake what amazing is how good the costume is. that's a mystery right there.

Bigger feet.

Attached: Elizabeth-Debicki-Feet-3981208.jpg (4888x3208, 2.68M)

Fucking kek

Yeah, but that shit (Godzilla) never looked real. Did the Godzilla costume fool you? For real?

>>posts still photo

It's real tho.

you mean like the denisovans?

Ups forgot link.
youtu.be/yXKpzpdJ9pw

I'm still recovering from that salma thread from earlier

it's gyno, bro.

>Not selling it to one of those bigfoot shows
Fake and gay

that sasquatch has some big hairy tiddies

what is?

Based internet soldier