Do Italians really do this?

Is this Salo? I saw it so long ago I don't even remember.

The book Salo is based off of is the most degenerate shit I ever read. Most of it is just in outline form as it was never finished, but I bet some of you bastards would actually fap to it. It's called "The 120 Days of Sodom" and is free on the web.

no, theyre a part of childhood.
violence is a last resort- which is usually doesnt come to unless the agitator becomes violent (because theyre not men), and rape is for fags (who rape each other)

Well shit, that's not very helpful. Where's this from?

Attached: 1558607522118.jpg (673x545, 90K)

yes it's salo. it's a shitty movie.

salo

Looks like Salo.

Moops

Oh okay. I've seen that years ago but dont remember this particular scene

Yeah the author (Donatien Alphonse François/Marquis de Sade) was fucking nuts.

Moors

Why was Salo such a cucked country?

Quick, everyone post their favorite Italian actresses!

Attached: D62pN0gWwAAAT4o.jpg (667x1050, 65K)

>Rape and violence are an essential part of manhood.

one thousand dollars says this poster complains that no women loves him

Nicoletta axin

It wasn't a country. It was the de facto capital of the Italian Social Republic.

Reminder Pier Paolo Pasolini was a communist and got what he deserved

Attached: 220px-Pier_Paolo_Pasolini2.jpg (220x296, 11K)

Salo you newfag

Very nice.

The Italian social Republic was also (informally) known as Salo

Sicilians

Passolini was a genius. This scene, specifically, is so disturbing because the camera is positioned behind these grids giving a voyeuristic position of these atrocious acts to the viewer, passolini even made sure the acts are not too explicit (like on tarantino movies), no gore, here passolini makes everything so that the audience, in a position of power, feel uncomfortable with it's own arousal with the scenes so perfectly well crafted, brilliant.

t. cazzo di fascista

Passolini is too advanced for Yea Forums

yes

Attached: salieri.jpg (852x479, 31K)

This flick was trash, Serbian Film is better shock schlock

For me it's Rebecca Volpetti

>pee pee poo poo have sex the movie

Attached: salo6.png (640x341, 243K)

Apparently they mixed marmalade and chocolate to make fake shit, so the reactions were real.

my favorite part is where all the teenage actors are laughing during the sickest shit in the film.

I heard that the atmosphere was a lot of fun during filming.

it would have to be, because otherwise it would be filmed child abuse - they were clearly having a good time, though.

S

>using google

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-07-22 10-54-20.png (909x985, 582K)

The actors were at least 18 I think

Valentina Nappi?

Yeah Google censors things pretty heavily

i don't have a source but I'm pretty sure there were kids as young as 15-16 onscreen. i'm ashamed to admit I own the Criterion edition.

No, but clown world does.

What's the Criterion edition?

Yeah. Yandex does a pretty good job when searching for an image.
Even manga/doujin pages have better results when I use Yandex.

Is that movie actually any good or is it just "OMGEEE SO SHOCKING XD" bullshit for normies to make themselves look cool like A Serbian Film is?

>Eight boys and eight girls aged from 12 to 15. All have been kidnapped and chosen because of their beauty. They are also all virgins and the four libertines plan on deflowering them, vaginally and especially anally. In the selection process, the boys are dressed as girls to help the four in making selections.

what does this reminds me of ?

Its only better on image research?

based

Life imitating art

Salo is one of the films in the Criterion Collection - you can see all the movies (nearly 1,000 and counting) at the Criterion site or at the Barnes and Noble site.

According to IMDB, some of the actors were indeed underage. I don't know if they were all shown naked though.

I thought it was horrible - king of Yea Forums Armond White is a fan.

it is actually very very good, but you’ll be disappointed if you go into it expecting edgelord shock value and cheap thrills

>him

>Four elderly women, chosen for their ugliness to stand in contrast to the children.

>Marie, 58, who had strangled all 14 of her children and one of whose buttocks was consumed by an abscess.
>Louison, 60, stunted, hunchbacked, blind in one eye and lame.
>Thérèse, 62, had no hair or teeth. Her ass, which she had never wiped in her whole life, resembled a volcano. All of her orifices stank.
>Fanchon, 69, short and heavy, with hemorrhoids the size of a fist hanging from her anus. She was usually drunk, vomited constantly, and had fecal incontinence.

>Four of the eight aforementioned studs.

>There are also several cooks and female servants, those in the latter category later being dragged into the proceedings.

I guess they were considered old in the 1770s or whenever the book was written.

Reminds me of when Cinema Snob reviewed it in character and started vomiting but pretending he liked it because it is on a lot of top film lists.

Is this film just a communist projecting his sexual deviance and fetishes? As if the fascists had this?

I'm gonna need a source for this, son.

Pasolini was an edgelord director who did a couple of sex positive/gay friendly films that attracted a god-awful hippie/commie fanbase.

He hated his new fanbase and was also pissed off that modern life was intruding onto Italy (the shit sequence was a metaphor for how Pasolin felt about prepackaged meals and fast food).

But mostly, he was pissed the fuck off that fascism was making a comeback in Italy by the 1970s in part due to the equally retarded bullshit being done by super violent, murder happy commies. This was in part because Italy, by killing Mussolini and surrendering before Germany and Japan did, was able to cut a sweetheart deal with the Allies during WW2 where only the top level supporters of Mussolini got hung from a rope for war crimes. The lower and middle level types who were part of the Mussolini regime got to go home and Italy was never forced to undergo a society-wide shaming process like Germany did to break their spirits and prevent them from ever starting shit again.

As such, as time passed, the lower and middle level members of the Fascist party eventually gained major positions of power and authority within the Italian government and began openly calling for the return of fascism to fight communism (as Russia really wanted to turn Italy commie).

Pasolini in turn made Salo as his warning that fascism was coming back to Italy and to utterly drive away the cancerous elements of his fanbase who were allergic to gore and rape.

He who lives by the sword dies by it
only niggers think it's manly to be violent

it felt fake deep to me - Passolini taking on de Sade's most challenging work and importing into the last days of Italian fascism, when it really just felt like a chance for dirty old men to film themselves doing things with supple teenagers.

It's probably more than 1,000 because multiple films come in one package sometimes.

Marquis de Sade?

i'm embarrassed to admit this stupid board got me into collecting them and I now have more than 200 - other than a few David Lynch and Russ Meyer titles, they make up the bulk of my DVD library.

Pasolin was a commie sympathizer who hated how hippies/commies were bullying him to make more gay bait/sex farce crap but also, hated how the only people who had the balls to stand up to the commies, was actual fascists who wanted to bring back the ways of Mussolini.

Also the shit sequence was Pasolini calling all modern food shit. And the sex stuff was Pasolini scaring away the hippies who wanted more gay/sex stuff from them by giving them rape scenes and non Safe Sane Consensual torture porn.

I should note that most of Salo's notoriety comes from the fact that it was once arguably the RAREST of all Criterion DVDS and sold for $500+....

Criterion had bought the rights when they first started making DVDs (it was subbed only BTW) and several weeks after it came out, they got served with papers from Pasolini's estate claiming that the person who sold them the DVD rights never owned said DVD rights.

The DVD was pulled from all stores (leading to a rumor that it was banned due to complaints over content issues) and Criterion waited nearly a decade to go back to the Pasolini estate to get the rights, due to the estate wanting way more money than Criterion was willing to pay.

By the time they did pay Pasolini's estate the money for the film rights, it had garnered a massive cult following and said estate sweetened the deal with Criterion by throwing in an English dub track for the picture, that they had discovered while the film was in limbo.

I didn't know that, but unlike most Criterion buys, I didn't even read the booklet that comes with Salo. I was non-plussed.

Former Criterion employee here.

We always knew about the English dub but the original release was subbed only, because of the fact that the people we thought owned the rights to it, only owned the rights to the Italian language version. We would have included the English dub then had we been offered it.

Also, content issues did play a role in why we waited so long to reissue Salo. The decision to release it was pushed by one executive who left the company he failed to double check to rights issues. No one really wanted to try and re-release it; but it's status as "the lost Criterion" made it an elephant in the room. It was by all accounts, the most heavily bootleg film of our collection. And one of the most requested OOP films we were asked to reissue. And to this day, it remains a consistent seller for us....

when a guest scans my collection of criterions, this one always gets pulled out - I assume it's due to the strange title, but the cover art Criterion chose was subtle genius at work.

Italians themselves have always been extremely evil people. It's part of their culture.

-Rome
-Catholic church
-Borgias
-Machiavelli
-Mafia
-Pasolini
-Deodato
-Coppola (muh Heritage)

It’s pretty unique and defies traditional classification but I would hesitate to call it good in any way. There is some nice imagery and cinematography but the “plot” is basically nonexistent and the subject matter is grotesque. The director was some sort of radical communist so I’m sure he was just using the film to take the piss and anger whoever was on the other side of the political spectrum. It backfired of course because he was a complete retard and managed to get himself murdered, possibly because of this film.

wtf I love Salo now