Why does Yea Forums hate that 8K is already being sold and will replace 4K by 2024?

They still master most films in fucking 2K no one is going to support 8K when after all these years they barely support 4K. LCD tech is shit and any backlight thing is going to look garbage. It's all hype.

I honestly don't care about 4k or 8k.

more like ultraJEW

>Barely

I'm not a normie who watches cable tv.

Streaming is 4K and every movie coming out is 4K Dolby Vision

They still dont do 1080p 60fps lmao

>most content isn't actually filmed in a resolution that comes close to 8K
>the closest thing you have is 70mm and IMAX
>35mm at most resolves to a 6K digital resolution
>most things today aren't even shot in 35mm film but on digital cameras
>most things in recent years have been shot and mastered at 2K or 4K
>but muh software upscaling!

you are literally retarded if you think just because a movie comes out in 4k means its just a 2k master upscaled to 4k

means its not*

Stranger Things seasons 3 was shot in 8k

better than standard 1080p
Dolby Vision/HDR > resolution

Yet 4K TVs are the standard, dumbass.

not really, 720p is the "standard"

kek

Human eye can’t even separate 4K from 8k. It’s all just buzzwords

Retarded ape or shit bait

wtf are you talking about?
Walk into a store. It probably has like 3 or 4 models of 1080p

Correct but also the human eye can’t tell the difference between 1080p and 4k

enjoy your upscaling

>720p is the "standard"
Then why are 4K TV's being sold? Why did I see 8K TVs being sold yesterday?

Because that's where the technology is. It's only broadcasting that is behind.

Prove all that shit

>It's only broadcasting that is behind.

The most important part

It SUPPORTS up to 8K at 120fps but that's literally just to future proof it. Native 4K 30fps will be the standard.

not him but just because something is being sold doesnt mean its the standard
1080p is the standard atm because most households today use a 1080p tv

>8K Blurays will finally be worth your money instead of 1080p Blurays that aren't worth shit.
Barely anyone even buys 4K blurays. And you're saying there will be a guaranteed market for 8K blurays? Have you seen remastered blurays of old films? They all look grainy as shit. Without the widespread adoption of 8K capture, 8K is a stupid fucking meme at this point. I know the japs are doubling down on 8K in time for the olympics, but they're actually going to be capturing it in 8K so that makes sense. Having this blind loyalty for 8K just makes you sound like a fucking retard, OP.

That's really cute that you think it's actually 4k

I will.
I got a 65X950G for only 599 cause I work for Sony.

X1 Ultimate chip, nigga

>Streaming is 4K
i bet you think netflix 4k looks good

are you retarded my nigga

If you think broadcast TV is the future, you are a fool.

Streaming is the future.

>8K panels are the future!
>you'd literally have to sit a foot in front of the display to even notice the difference
Based

>expecting a shill to prove anything

>caring about broadcast tv

No one owns cable nowadays. At least out generation.

I'd rather download 4K rips/stream shit.

8K is trash. 16K is where its at.

What he's saying about panel size has some merit but that's about it

This.

>graphics cards aren't nearly powerful enough to game at 8K
I have a Titan RTX and I'm sure even an RTX 2080 can now play older games at 8K 60fps.
Playing older games like Postal 2, Classic!Battlefront II, Ys and Trails in the Sky in 8K would actually be very interesting.
Despite having a Titan RTX and the fact that I'm playing it on my 4K OLED TV (I will upgrade to the LG Z9 88" 8K OLED soon), I still mostly play older games.

Satan, there are many shows and movies which are 4K in Netflix but have no HDR like 13 Reasons Why and the first season of Stranger Things (the later seasons are indeed in Dolby Vision).
The opposite is also true, with shows that have Dolby Vision but are only 1080p, like Rilakkuma and Kaoru as well as the Godzilla anime movie trilogy.

>Rilakkuma and Kaoru

I thought this was 4K? it's clean as fuck.

8k is meme tech HDR is much more important, unless you’re talking about VR which you’re not.

>OLED gaming

That shits awful for gaming unless you’re playing the sims

I can see 8k Taking off if they still shot with film stock and didn't rely on computer generated graphics.

Maybe it's time to not worry about resolution so much, and worry about Range. HDR was a much bigger leap than 1080p to 4K. Sucks it's limited to 4K displays, and high end ones at that. It was a noticeable difference.

Hell for most people, 720p is enough because of small rooms and small TVs. What is it, like the TV needs to be larger than 42' to notice a difference between 720p and 1080p? I don't see me putting anything larger than a 60' in my living room anytime soon. Anything larger than that, a projector may be a better option.

Why the fuck would you watch movies in 60fps do you know how fucking stupid that is???

sports

It looks really great but it's just 1080p.
The Dolby Vision HDR, though, is purely amazing.
One of the most vibrant HDR series out there, even when you compare it to movies.

I got ~20fps on max settings with Crackdown 3 using a single 2080 @8K (it was so ridiculously sharp). So, we're not that far away.

You’re out of date, the cheapest Vizio comes with Dolby HDR other manufacturers swap between HDR10 and Dolby to try and rip you off but Vizio is stupid cheap and it’s the same guts.

>16K won't be around for a very long time
When a format comes out is actually irrelevant. These companies have the technology to release 16K today if they wanted to, but they don't because it's better for business to push for incremental upgrades. They'll only push for 16K the minute that sales of the previous batch of tech start falling.

OLED gaming is actually really great.
Silent HIll and Metal Gear in particular are amazing on an OLED TV.

Yh old games supporting 8k keep dreaming and not crashing or even running. You would get no benefits from playing old games in 8k.

It's still not practical playing games in 8k60hz as seen here.
youtube.com/watch?v=OcUv-TzVWUc
youtube.com/watch?v=FwBBQhKKm4g

Attached: 1545699020061.png (322x311, 20K)

Enjoy your ghosting

Honestly all you need is 720p. Anything higher than that is unnecessary, your eyes can't tell the difference.

I a neet when it comes to gaming. I can't deal with my eventual burn in

I'll wait for micro led

>Then why are 4K TV's being sold? Why did I see 8K TVs being sold yesterday?
It's a marketing gimmick.

QLED is a gimmick.

Every premium/midrange TV has quantum dots

>LinusTech

go back

QLED is anti reflective but that’s about it

Here's my counterpoint.
>You can't actually see in 4K or 8K.

Men can’t women can

8K makes sense if you're a baller who wants a 85" tv, due to ppi

Good rebuttal m8.

Attached: 1546804005147.jpg (340x275, 12K)

>8K

Attached: 1525384065550.png (644x800, 15K)

>It's a marketing gimmick.
It's not a marketing gimmick if 90% of the TVs on display are 4K.

>but muh 600 ppi chinkshit fagdroid

Remember chink shit like TCL insets adds into the TV during channel changes and boot

what lol?

because it takes 4 display ports and a professional grade graphics card with a $12000 television and trouble shooting to achieve

youtube.com/watch?v=OcUv-TzVWUc

youtube.com/watch?v=OcUv-TzVWUc

BTW no current nvidia or amd consumer card will do anything at 8k and there is absolutely no content

So the thing is that:
4K is not even the standard and 8K, with other meme resolutions, might not even be good enough by the time everyone has a 4K.

Hell I can spare a 4K tv at this point with little effort.

Meanwhile, there are technical limitations that need of very specific hardware to get the correct synchronization to actually run videogames on 8k at shit framerates but all of that effort is wasted when there is more effort on getting the fucking thing to work correctly.

The effort should be put on extending the drawing distance and getting 120 frames on 4K. Or economic 120Hz 4K monitors.

What is the point of a 8K Rig and a 16K Tv if mainstream games still suffer from popping textures and reduced draw distance?

By the way I got a giant ass sized Tv like that one Linus has, it causes me eye strains if I spend as much as a few hours a day with it, while I can look at my modest 4K monitor all day.

Giants sized tvs and oversized lawnmowers are pretty much boomer toys.

>It SUPPORTS up to 8K at 120fps
No it doesnt, unless it will sport 4 mini display port outputs it wont even do 8k 60hz

>he thinks it's actually 4k he's paying extra money for

Attached: 1440024408137.jpg (1198x1733, 293K)

turn down your backlight dork

Don't forget that tv isn't available for the public it's from Sharps commercial department.

What we need is smell-o-vision.

Attached: Smelly-Feet-4.jpg (500x335, 82K)

HDMI 2.1 has been finalized and will solve that problem

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI#Version_2.1

youtube.com/watch?v=1gxf6flnvNA

bruh. this looks good on my tv

>who needs talking in movies intertitles suits me just fine

And you're looking at 2 years minimum for it to be put into production and adopted by television manufacturers and as it stands now the only 8k televisions arent consumer grade and require connections with the manufacturer to ship. There are a few 8k tvs at best buy but they wont have hdmi 2.1

and you're also going to have to wait for nvidia and amd to adopt that as a standard and we wont be getting that until a hardware refresh and with RTX super just coming out that deff wont happen for the next two years minimum

AND THERE WILL STILL BE NO CONTENT IN 2 YEARS MARK MY WORDS

not him but
actually read
it says
>Ultra High Speed HDMI cables are backwards compatible with older HDMI devices, and older cables are compatible with new HDMI 2.1 devices

>And you're looking at 2 years minimum for it to be put into production and adopted by television manufacturers
Its already on this years tvs.

>HDMI

you fags are still talking about HDMI when it doesn't have the speed or throughput to do anything close to 8K you need Display Ports on TV's they also carry sound there's no reason to stick with HDMI

And do you think that means the old hdmi ports in current hardware will magically be able to pump out more data?

TV's from 2015 have HDMI 2.2 it's just a DRM firmware spec not hardware

Not on consumer grade as far as im aware, i know samsung and LG have 2019 models with 2.1 but i dont believe they are mass production product lines

It's all irrelevant. They just can't get people to buy TVs sooner than every 10 years anymore.

4k streaming on netfilx has the same bitrate as 720p blurays.

Attached: 1560691829813.jpg (700x700, 196K)

TV manufacturers wont support displayport so it doesn't matter

Cable TV still don't even have 4k channels and won't have them anytime soon. Imagine how fucking shitty 1080p channels will look on an 8k TV.

which is just fucking stupid

nah its purchasable tvs and also samsung has one or two

DirecTV has 3 4K channels 1 of those in HDR

>muh k's

so fucking tired of this shit

It would look exactly like it would on a 1080p TV.

>cable
>satellite
Ok gramps.

Broadcast TV can move easily to 8K and is most likely the first to actually have anything available.

The PS4 Pro and the Xbone S and X can finally support 4K RGB instead of 4K YUV (Xbone can output 4K but it doesn't play games in 4K).
Also, the Xbone S and X supports variable refresh rates but only newer HDMI 2.1 TVs support it.

Not even several thousand dollars gaming PCs can accomplish this on modern AAA titles. You'll be lucky if those systems can do 60fps at 1440p.

>Broadcast TV can move easily to 8K
They're "committing" to 4k ota in certain markets by the end of next year. Like 7 years or more after 4k tvs hit the market. I don't think 8k ota is as close as you think.

thats because it has hdmi 2.0 despite what idiots like will tell you a new cord wont suddenly make an old port produce more data throughput

When will we get 512K and what will it look like?

8k won't come to broadcast until VVC/AV1 codecs are more widespread which won't be for a couple more years, and ATSC 3.0 is just now rolling out so it will be a long time before that is updated for 8K

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATSC_3.0

old ports can be updated through firmware to HDMI 2.2 dumb dumb, of course they have to be 2.0 first

bruh moment

i think you're confusing HDCP with HDMI versions, HDCP can be updated, HDMI 2.0 cannot be updated to 2.1

let me know when they have 10-bit, even Amazon has produced HEVC 10-bit content

They've basically subsidized 4K tv sales to push the adaption rate, and even then many are still satisfied with HD (not FHD) resolution. 4K overshoots the market, and it's hilarious they're forcing 8K so soon.

did I get them confused?

>The standards are designed to offer support for newer technologies, including HEVC for video channels of up to 2160p 4K resolution at 120 frames per second, wide color gamut, high dynamic range, Dolby AC-4 and MPEG-H 3D Audio, datacasting capabilities, and more robust mobile television support.[1][3]

>wide color gamut

it does

what model tvs you guys have?

I don't watch tv.

50" Panasonic V series plasma

some vizio 4k shit i got on a black friday sale.

Im okay with it even though i barely have any 4k content.

i will say Blade Runner 2049 did look amazing in 4k on it though.

65in samsung 1080p 2013 model i got for free

65X950G

had a 55KS8000 before

im saving up for an 8k now
with AI upscaling tech, shits gonna look amazing

Buying a HiSense H9F this week

just bought 2 37" tvs for $70
still in pretty great shape

That's just not true. A properly mastered video at 4K resolution is noticeably better than standard 1080p, and I'm saying that as a person who hasn't bought any 4K equipment because I like old movies and many of the old movies I like aren't even properly mastered at 1080p yet.

16K hologram TVs are already outbeating 8K in sales this year alone

OP is a faggot.

LG OLED 4K W8 77"
Planning on upgrading it to a LG OLED 8K Z9 88" when it comes out (the other LG OLED 2019 models are out now except for the R9 and the Z9).
I also have a Sony D32E1WU BVM (yes, it's not a TV, but a professional monitor) for my retro games.

It's great being rich.

WHY ARE YOU FAGS ARGUING IF 8K IS WORTH IT
THERE IS L I T E R A L L Y ZERO (0) CONTENT AVAILABLE IN 8K
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO WATCH
WHY WOULD YOU BUY THIS?

Attached: 1547350474417.webm (460x252, 622K)

No one on tv has a screen big enough to benefit from 8k.
At current disc sizes and broadcast bitrates 8k does jack shit if not hurts image fidelity.

> graphics cards aren't nearly powerful enough to game at 8k
Depends on what you're playing, 8k PS2 games is entirely doable.

Attached: gsdx_20170831185913.jpg (7680x5760, 3.66M)

I would be content with a flawless 2k television maybe start with that first

Not with PCSX2, though.
But PC games from that era can be played in 8K 60fps.
For that, though, I would honestly prefer 4K 120fps since 8K would reveal more blemishes and 120fps is honestly much better than 60fps.
If an older game has severe problems with 120fps or even 60fps, I would go 8K if it's an older game.

upvote

>not having 32k

what's with all the cavemen in here?

There is a Linus Tech tip video on 8k.

You wouldn't believe what it takes to transmit a 8k signal at 60hz. The guy had like 3 dongles.

Attached: 8k.webm (982x634, 1.15M)

>implying you niggers have over 100inch screens or giant viewing rooms

Attached: viewingdistanceresolutioncomparison[1].jpg (875x625, 139K)

Keep dreaming console prole.....

65" @ 7 ft distance sounds reasonable

so anything above 4k is unnoticeable at that distance

Any non plen understands that anything over 1080p is a meme

No, it won't. Cable doesn't display in 4k. 4k blu-rays/players are just now starting to sort of sell and will take fucking years to even be half the install base that regular blu-ray has taken a decade to get to. 8k is the biggest meme out there right now. Hell gaming isn't even close. You're looking at the gen after this coming gen before consoles might be able to play 8k at sub-30fps. 10 years out at least.

Can’t wait to watch camrips of avengers 10 on my cellphone in 8k

> 8k
> needs more than 1 cable to actually work

impossible for normies

and half the time you have streaming 4k content, I wonder if the shitty data infastructure can keep up. I stream in 1080 and have trouble with my isp many times trying to keep up with that.

>4k streaming on netfilx has the same bitrate as 720p blurays
No point to having 4K content if the streaming services and ISPs can't keep up

Samsung Galaxy 8

4K streaming is compressed to shit you won't be getting good resolution all you'll be getting is HDR and not a lot has HDR

>first time use of AI technology in studying the images being displayed
so there's an AI watching my porn with me?

get a better ISP nigga

>tfw just upgraded to 4k tv from 720p
hehe

Most isps can't keep up with 4k unless you are in asia, or some european countries. A 4k movie is like 70gb+ and imagine the load on servers to try to give that to consumers.
It just isn't feasible atm

most places don't offer above 300Mbps

i have xfiinity 250 Mbps down and it rarely buffers when streaming netflix or amazon prime

That's just advertised you never get that in the us unless fiber

Why 16K is the real standard:

>16K is the actual huge leap from 4K
>16K will finally spur the creation of larger, cheaper panels, so everybody can have a home cinema screen
>16K will finally spur the creation of faster internet infrastructure so that more homes will get access to fiber and Starlink internet.
>16K Blurays will finally be worth your money instead of 4K Blurays that aren't worth shit.
>16K will create better camera technology so that everything will be filmed in true native 16K instead of upscaling
>16K is enough of a high standard that we will see a plateau in the formats for many years. 32K won't be around for a very long time and 16K will stabilize as the true standard for HD video
>Existing 4K and 8K videos will look better on 16K displays, because of advanced upscaling technology and lack of clearly visible pixels, so your existing content will immediately get an upgrade.
>16K displays will use much faster processors and even AI co-processors, so you won't have any issues with playing any content no matter how resource intensive.
>16K displays already have a number of huge improvements for LCD 16K panels, such as full-array local dimming with hundreds of backlights to cover an 16K panel so even an average 16K TV will always have superior contrast than even an expensive 8K TV today.
>Reviewers have shown that the 16K displays already available have superior color reproduction than the expensive 8K displays due to the first time use of AI technology in studying the images being displayed, so by the time 16K becomes the standard, 16K panel color reproduction will be even better, and an average 16K TV will outdo today's top of the line 8K TV. AI processing is only now just appearing in 2022 flagship 8K TVs.

Why does Yea Forums want to be 4K cucks for life? Because you only have a $200 HDTV from Goy Buy? Embrace the future, and make TV even better. 16K is already here, and it will improve your kino.

Attached: 16 K ultrahd.png (1024x809, 455K)

>2019
>he still doesn't have fiber

Which camera is capable of 16k ?

can someone, who actually understands this stuff help me out.

I get it, more resolution, more pixels, more detail. got it.

but at the movie theatre, what resolution is that? the projection has how many pixels? whats the resolution there? why are movies made in the 70s coming out on bluray and look amazing. I am guessing uncompressed is projection, and we compress for certain formats. so you cant exactly convert it to pixels, but if we were to do it for comparision sake, what would a projection movie resolution be at? how many pixels? am i making sense?

Attached: 1547882025823.jpg (1200x1032, 254K)

no camera is, RED just came out with an 8K camera

Only available in 25% of country glad you're enjoying life in Kansas City I'd kill myself.

I don't even have a 4K TV yet because the quality isn't that much of a leap from your standard 1080p HD BD quality. At that point you'd have to zoom in to see any major differences but it means nothing when you're 12 feet away from the screen. Unless you REALLY need to see the strands of hair or the actor's makeup, there is absolutely nothing to gain. It's such an unnecessary advancement when we've already peaked when it comes to home releases.

Film projection had a great resolution but degrades over time. In order to put it on home video chat, DVD, etc it gets compressed

This graph probably doesn't take into account chroma subsampling and compression artifacts

most digital movies are projected at 2k resolution (so between 1080p and 4k). its really hard to compare it to the physical film of the 90s and before but the digital standard of 2k is likely designed to be the same quality of the projectors that came before.

4k projectors are catching on but account for only about 20% of all projectors

VHS*. And the resolution is relative to the quality of the film? Maybe molecular sized pixels?

that's why we need based AV1

remember 3D televisions?

Remember what a huge leap forward that was in 3D broadcasting and internet speeds?

>the quality isn't that much of a leap from your standard 1080p HD BD
You might want to see an eye doctor senpai

I still have a 19" tube.

>2k resolution (so between 1080p and 4k).
2K is 1080p, 1080 is the lines, 2K is the pixel width (1920).

just stick a second one on top and stitch the images together

so movies are recorded in 2k? then how does 4k work?

The Rook is being recorded in 8k. Looks super sharp downscaled to 4k.

Attached: The.Rook.S01E02.2160p.WEB.H265-DEFLATE.mkv_snapshot_00.50.537.jpg (3840x2160, 1.32M)

>Muh darks are darker and muh lights are lighter
it's fucking nothing. VHS to DVD was a major fucking leap. HD 1080p to 4K is not a fucking leap.

ok technically 2K is 2048 × 1080

It's sold because retards like you will buy it

It's okay, boomer. You just have horrible eyes so it doesn't mean anything to you

This is disgusting. Who wants to see all the makeup and acne? I don't understand this sharper is better meme. You the visible it is, the more you see the flaws.

Upscaling. Machine learning fills in pixels based by nearby colors in adjacent pixels. Eyes are dumb lol

The thing is 1080p was never fully adopted. All your cable or satellite broadcasts are 720p for the most part, and OTA TV maxes out at 1080i.

Thank god there is no such thing as 2160i. 4k and UHD both mean 2160p and that's it. Then all you have to do is hope for a good encode.

You're right we should have kept movies black and white with no sound

I remember people i other threads that a high quality 35 mm film is akin to 8k digital in terms of detail. Old films shot on 35mm are remastered to digital fromats like 1080 and 4k. 8k may finally be the home video format that finally captures the full detail of old film quality. Though some larger format film could hold more detail.

And the true full power 4:4:4 color sub-sampling 1080p is pretty much nowhere to be seen.
Ironically, 4k allows 1080p television owners to finally get the most out of their TV.

That’s how I feel about 4k porn.

inthecrack has great 4k porn desu
a lot of studios look like trash at 4k though because the bitrate is horrific

>I remember people i other threads that a high quality 35 mm film is akin to 8k digital in terms of detail.
The film format may be theoretically capable of that level of detail in controlled conditions, but in reality a dozen factors mean most shots are too soft to resolve to 8k definition from a practical perspective.

A lot of old crappy 35mm movies are so soft they don't even reach the peak of standard definition quality.

>the theoretical resolution of traditional IMAX film, which is estimated at up to 12 thousand lines of horizontal resolution on the 65mm camera negative (12K) and approximately 6 thousand on a 35mm release print (6K)

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMAX#Film_stock

IMAX is 12K so were still not at perfection

It just looks awesome, don't know what more to tell you.

>Stranger Things seasons 3 was shot in 8k
Did they also render all the cgi in 8k? I don't think so. It would take up too much data.

no, it was mastered in 4K

imdb.com/title/tt4574334/technical

>12K

oh ffs

>still no 24k

Fucking plebs.

>4320p
So 4k. They used the best of everything to get true 4k and it didn't work well.

>So 4k
4k is 2160p.

Uh sweety, I don't call 1080p 2k. I call it 1k, because it's just over 1,000. 4,320 =/= 8,000+.

>Native 4K 30fps
no, it'll still be fauxK 30fps

Why is there always someone shilling a Yea Forums here?

utter retard

Attached: chrome_2019-07-22_03-43-42.png (564x288, 24K)

I JUST GOT MY 4K OLED 55 TV AND NOW IM SUPPOSED TO GET A NEW ONE?! NO! MY TV STAYS UNTIL I SAY SO!

There are more than resolution with Imax, like the 18,000 watts projector.

is it any fucking wonder the democRat party want open borders so bad

>tech expert
>doesn't know about DP to HDMI cords
I wonder why using two dongles connected to each other would mess up the connection

i feel like a brainlet in this thread. wtf is the difference between hz and fps? i thought they were the same thing

>Native 4K 30fps
It's cute that you think that

Crew visible in Emma Greenwell's eye in this shot.

Attached: The.Rook.S01E02.2160p.WEB.H265-DEFLATE.mkv_snapshot_05.24.366.jpg (3840x2160, 1.18M)

hz is for monitors fps is for film duh

You're not looking smarter than anyone in this thread by pointing this out because everyone else already knows it. You just look like a jack ass.

but they're both limiting factors right, there's no need to have a fps higher than 60 if your monitors hz is only 60

what hacks lol

The human eye can't tell the difference between 720p and 4K on a 40 inch screen from 5 feet away. Why would I even WANT to pay more for 8K? Do all you zoomers have 120 inch tvs that you sit 6 inches away from?

Attached: 1558449428707.jpg (500x354, 81K)

I swear I've heard having one of them doubled is actually helpful for "Gaming"

Happens everywhere in any show show presented in 4k.

That's what you get when you empower jews in your country.

>bluray failed to completely replace DVDs
>4K is barely even a thing right now
>please spend money on 8K lol
Come on now op.

Maybe upscaled to 4K with 20 FPS on average.

In the film days we at least had grain to soften all textures.

No

some medium format still cameras
stop-motion kino is back on the menu boys!

That's fucking disgusting. I don't wanna know how goddamn ugly most of them are behind the sheen and grain of the cinematic screen.

we absolutely should have

4x 8k cameras mounted in a rig together with the merge done via software

>"people look disgusting at this resolution!"
>goes back to posting stills of qts taken at such resolution

are they the weather, golf, and auction channels old man

Rca Colortrak E13159eg 13" Crt

>You the visible it is, the more you see the flaws.
this, normies just dont get it

I know right still photographers are fucking morons

in its defense blu ray came at such a shitty time. there is no doubt if streaming wasnt a thing it would have taken over dvds. what little amount of physical copies ive seen bought at friends or family's houses are all blu ray

Do I have to explain how 2048 x 1080 and 1920 x 1080 are basically the same thing and therefore 2K is 1080p and not between 1080p and 4K?

Utter retard

He's just pointing out the inconsistency between calling out how "2k" is a rarely used term and 99.9% of the time you hear 1080p. One could be forgiven for assuming 1080p is "1k" and if 4k is 4x 1080p then it must therefore be 4320p.

But of course it is not because that's not how any of this works.

Honestly all you need is 480p. Anything higher than that is unnecessary, your eyes can't tell the difference.

>Not with PCSX2, though.
Wrong.

Attached: gsdx_20170831184546.jpg (7680x4320, 3.39M)

Well, shit.
What GPU are you using?

Attached: 1558784168844.gif (800x800, 628K)

1070

Try it out, higher resolutions are basically free on PCSX2

This whole post is just you talking out of your ass and is filled with nonsensical terms and phrases.

and I thought you people had no clue what you were talking about when it came to movie preferences....

You guys have no fucking clue what you are talking about in this thread, it's fucking rick and morty reddit tier circle jerk.

>liberal arts major doesn't understand HDTV terminology
>these things don't make sense to me because they don't exist!
you right now

Wow.
I'm tempted to go emulate Dragon Quest VIII in 8K when I finally get an 8K TV.
Hell, I can just supersample it on my 4K TV now.
And this is coming from someone who usually plays games on original hardware.
This is gonna be the closest thing we get to an HD version of Dragon Quest VIII since the only official HD version (it's technically HD if you count the numbers) is an iPhone port.

I forgot to mention, I have a Titan RTX.
I might go play Xenosaga in 8K as well.
Is Dolphin also great with 8K?
Maybe I might play some Skyward Sword in 8K.

I really hope the Titan RTX can handle Breath of the Wild in 8K 30fps (the game has glitches in 60fps on Cemu).

I just tried it, the character outlines seem to be an issue, might be some way to fix them though.

Attached: gsdx_20190614015426.jpg (7680x4320, 3.8M)

Maybe I'll just emulate it in 4K.
But apparently, Breath of the Wild can run in Cemu in 8K 30fps with drops on a 1060 and an i7, while I have an i9-9900K and a Titan RTX so maybe Breath of the Wild can run buttery smooth in Cemu on my build.
Too bad Cemu still has no surround sound.

you're good at reading between the lines
you'd do well at a liberal arts major

Emulation as a rule is very CPU heavy, the GPU is generally doing fuckall most of the time and averages like 5-10% utilization especially when you're emulating older games so bumping them up to insanely high resolutions usually isn't much trouble at all especially when you don't have all those modern shader effects to deal with, just putting out more pixels for the same polygons is nothing for modern GPUs.

so you never had sex in real life i geuss, its like 4k porn but then with a stench if she didnt wash her cooch or eats grease

I prefer my 1080 panasonic plasma to my 4k led shitbox. If Panasonic made a 4k plasma I would buy it tomorrow.

I take off my glasses before fucking your mum

lel

16K is the real standard. Stupid pleb OP.

You know deep down that by 2024 it’s gonna be 32 or 64k and it’s just gonna be the same wankfest as ever

>You know deep down that by 2024 it’s gonna be 576 megapixel video

no

yes

>16K is the real standard
8K is a good plateau.

>I prefer my 1080 panasonic plasma
Waiting for MicroLED

lol

The human eye can't even see above 720p

Samsung 50" UHD 3840 x 2160, 60Hz (claims 120frames with Trumotion), HDR. But for kino I use a 1080p Kindle Fire tablet.

Stick to anime then you incels

thats having higher fps than hz reduces input lag

What kind of job do you have?

This. I've watched about 100 4k UHD titles and most of them don't take advantage of the format, especially all the 2k masters which have been standard for a decade now. Alien, Die Hard, Field of Dreams, The Quick and the Dead, and Coppola's Dracula are the best presentations so maybe those movies could be even better on an 8k format but everything else is not substantially better than 1080p blu-ray.

Attached: 1376776179172.png (614x536, 324K)

If it had something better to offer I would be more excited, but 4K is barely better than 2K (1080p for all intents and purposes) apart from better color reproduction, but we already have TV’s that are covering DCI color spectrum so how much more do you need?

Worth note to me the best format is film. 35mm negative has been shown to have somewhere around 3.5K resolution. If you have a photochemical process including dupes, composites, other things that you have to copy or alter the negative resolution drops fast. By the time it’s projected you’re getting about 2K worth of resolution from the film print.

What about 70mm you say? Ok I concede there that you probably need about 6-8K to cover the negative. But just like 35mm it’ll drop significantly when it comes to the projection print.

For me I find 4K to be enough as long as it has the full cinema color coverage. I saw Dunkirk on both 70mm 15 perf imax and 4K laser imax. Guess what, they looked about the same in detail and both were projected on a massive screen.

Likewise only time I found 2K not enough was at an old imax where the huge screen led to pixelation.

TL:DR we’ve been watching cinema at roughly 2K since the dawn of time; the reason 4K and especially 8K is a meme is apart from hdr, we’ve had cinema quality resolution at home now since the early/mid 2000s.

Attached: 883B7CD0-9DB9-4C2B-8494-6819C1B4CBD2.jpg (700x561, 47K)

this. still only one or two sports channels on cable and then it's prime and netflix originals. there are rips however, so there's that.

People still use 4k? Yikes.

Samsung Wall is the only remotely interesting thing coming out, TV wise.

youtube.com/watch?v=ZdAQONypZFo

LG OLED, bought it for the contrast, can’t tell the difference between 2K and 4K

>hz
what the display is capable of outputting
>fps
what is being outputted

cringe

>implying modern TVs last 10 years

>8k
You can see every pore, every stretch mark, every hair on these girl. lmao not sure if it'll enhance or destroy sexiness.
I'm not complaining.

How long until I can watch 4k on a phonr

>everyone looks miserable, and are super serious

Yup, that's a British TV show.

>How long until I can watch 4k on a phonr
Like 6 months ago

inverse.com/article/53572-sony-xperia-1-world-first-4k-smartphone