>most critics like it
It’s official, movie criticism is fucking dead
>most critics like it
It’s official, movie criticism is fucking dead
Other urls found in this thread:
Or maybe that means it's a good movie you autistic faggot.
I still prefer the original for the vibrant colors.
Most of the critics didn't like it. It's the average moviegoers/disney fans eating it up. I don't care that people like it but there are some huge flaws with the movie that the fans won't accept.
Longcat is long.
It has a 55% critic score on both RT and Metacritic.
If anything the audience score is higher than the critic score
only 37% of top critics did
Most professional critics are just some dudes, you could be one. I know personally of a kid right out of school that got a job as a professional reviewer, no kidding.
Score isn't the end-all of what you'd like but since most reviewers aren't special anyway, just go with total score of ALL PEOPLE. It's what they LIKE anyway.
The best around is the imdb rating but also metacritic is good. Only problem is you want at least 1,000-2,000 votes to avoid friends and family fixing it.
It's literally being a blogger
And newspaper/magazine film critics are bloggers with connections
Most of my friends and family thought the movie was awkward and difficult to connect with. Not sure who all these people are who thought it was amazing.
Can anyone tell me who the fuck watches this shit?
I work at a school, more kids than all the cunnyposters on Yea Forums would ever ask for and nobody, fucking nobody wanted to see it. Kids openly joked about how shit it is and how their parents had already shown them the actual one.
Shill harder
Some professional critics are literally paid shills. RedLetterMedia was recently laughing at some shill on a podcast that admitted he was shilling for Disney for Star Wars.
Another reason to say fuck them and only look at the score of all regular viewers. Not only most pros are regular viewers anyway but some are also literal shills.
Its metacritic rating is 55. Its the audience faggots who are rating it 91-94
Is it THAT bad?
Nostalgic normies who care about "muh 90s" culture, people who don't appreciate the creativity of animation and would rather think a soulless hyperrealistic CGI film would be more mature than a silly animated version, people who think it's the same movie because it released this year meaning it's for "a new generation" as if the 1994 one wasn't timeless, and the rest are Beyonce fans.
The audience for it are undeniably divided, but there's still fuckers who want to see it regardless of the negative reception.
I'm starting to think these scores from "regular viewers" are being influenced by paid shills too.
#beyonceisnala
They are, but it's the best you get. Sometimes it's just subjective anyway.
e.g. I like sci-fi so much that I find a lot of 6.5s of the genre to be great.
>that first tweet
Literally Yea Forums.
lion king? more like lion faggot. nice twitter posts you queeahs
Nope. Most say it would work better as docu.
That's fair. I wish more people would be reasonable like that, rather than proclaiming everything they like as 10/10.
Disney basically takes dying franchises and milks them until they die completely. It's what they do. It's what they did with Marvel 10 years ago. It's what they did with Star Wars a few years ago. It's what they did with Pixar when they purchased it when it was running out of steam.
Now they decided to rape their own children too.
The company is dead.
Support new independent stories. Fuck the conglomerate. Never paid them. If you can't resist until find a way to watch for free.
>It isn't as humanizing and emotional as the original but it's wayy more powerful.
What did he mean by this?
>most critics like it
Barely.
Critics of any kind are a joke.
>It's what they did with Marvel 10 years ago.
Is that why they just released the second highest grossing movie of all time and all of their recent movies break a billion?
Not him but you missed the point
Marvel in 2008 was practically dead. Comics were barely moving off he shelves and past attempts at movies were laughably bad and over a decade ago from then.
The mouse bought them while they were on their lowest and squished trillions out of the corpse
This is what makes it official? Not 11 years of "movie critics" dick sucking amateurish capeshit movies that are shot, directed, written and acted like soap operas?
On the upside, audience score is going down slowly but surely
Was at 93 last night, now it's 89
>most critics like it
still rotten on the tomatometer
Having an unfavorable opinion about Disney movies is not allowed. You're just criticizing for the sake of criticizing! How can anyone not enjoy watching animals trot around and sing with dead ass eyes??
Regular viewers are god damn crybaby manginas that will review bomb a movie because Brie Larson said she didn't care what they thought, and your SJW types that will upvote a movie because it has a transgender black woman in it
I don't trust them at all
This movie ruined the three most important aspects of Lion King: the expressiveness, the art style/background, and the characters. Everyone sees it'a soulless remake with no attempt at trying to be better than its animated counterpart.
Out of everyone I think Rafiki suffered the most
youtu.be
There's like 3 times more emotion in this scene than the entire running time of the remake
But the first Avengers is a good movie user! as long as you ignore the script and cinematography and directing and fx and acting and plot
The original Lion King is a masterpiece that Disney will never top again, no matter how hard they try
Imaging caring about reviews for a Disney film.
It's almost as if "muh soul" reddit nostalgia isn't valid criticism.
So they make good business decisions.
And this is bad, because...?
Disney has critics eating out the palm of their hands.
Say one negative thing and you're blacklisted from all premieres/preview screenings.
less kinography in the name of the almighty dollar mostly, fewer risks, fewer unknown directors, more rehashed IP I don't want to see. I haven't paid for a disney film since inside out, which was an original concept
I don't see how that would affect things enough for 90% of them to sell out. Most reviewers either have a following or are salaried, people will still want to hear what they say and I don't see how that would majorly change their financial situation
I don't get the bottom one. Soldiers can't inform people of stuff?