Roger Ebert reviewed movies his entire life and gave Prometheus a 4/4...

Ebert was a pleb his entire life and frequently re-reviewed movies that got popular after he gave them shit ratings

But he was a boomer so everyone put up with it

they're not, unless you think roller coasters are "art"

his assertion as that they could never be art, he was a self righteous idiot and im glad hes dead.

>4 point rating system
retarded.
5 point is the patricians rating system

roller coasters can be art though? Artists have literally built roller coaster-like structures before.

this man is based!

Attached: 1559647360875.jpg (598x749, 39K)

Ebert reviews films relative to the type of film it is. He also gave Knowing 4 stars because he felt it was as good as schlop end of the world movies get, not that it was necessarily a good film in the grand scheme of things. He's still wrong a lot obviously, but that's how he reviews films.

The reddit hivemind is here, you fags are the definition of plebs, calling anyone else a pleb is hilarious. Sit down.

4 stars is what everyone used before the internet

Braid is art.

Attached: braid now we are all sons of bitches.jpg (1280x720, 140K)

>Ebert reviews films relative to the type of film it is
What a retarded fucking system. I'm glad he's dead.

just played that actually, and in no fucking way is it art. It's fun, and has cool puzzles. I actually had trouble with a few of them. I'm guessing you're referring to the gimmick at the end? It's about as artistic as the phrase "Real Eyes Realize Real Lies"

Did I just fall for Yea Forums bait?

wrong. only plebs did

No I'm referring to the subtext and the significance of the gimmicks in each level. The trick in the final level was no surprise if you'd been paying attention. Also the meaning of the secret ending.

Who the fuck marks out of 4

no

Please don't equate Wick to capeshit

>"no"

Wrong plebs use 5 and 10 stars

Decisive people.

I have review magazines from 89 that use five stars

>Please don't equate Wick to capeshit
It is capeshit tier you fucking retard why do you think it's any different, it's the lowest of the fucking low for plebs.

Anyone who has a brain

4 star system is bad you retarded memelord

>magazines
There's your problem who cares about magazines. Newspapers only used 4 stars before the internet and even after the internet. Read a fucking newspaper once.

How is it bad you fucking mong
.5/4 - horrendous
1/4 - shit
1.5/4 - bad
2/4 - meh
2.5/4 - average
3/4 - good
3.5/4 - really good
4/4 - great

It's an objectively better system. What, are you going to start defending the imperial system too now?

>It's an objectively better system
No it isn't IMDBpleb because retards only use 1 and 2 or 9 and 10 for most of their 10 star ratings

Explain why instead of shouting buzzwords to bait people.
Capeshit is bland, with stories all over the place and horrible pacing and tone issues.
John wick has a clear progression as the story progresses and the stakes rise, while the story itself is silly and just an excuse for nice action, good choreography and a set mood it wants for itself

Attached: 1563385590175.gif (179x587, 96K)

Chads.

Attached: ebert early.jpg (596x800, 124K)

>0.5
exactly what type of assburgers are you suffering with, user? Good God.

>this board is now so underaged they think rating out of 10 is patrician when it's vidya tier
Holy shit dudes, this place is fucking cancer

John Wick is bland and fucking garbage just like capeshit for retards who dont actually like cinema fuck off and die

Name a better Sci-Fi movie in the last 8 years. Prometheus is kino.

Attached: 1562612872743.jpg (1029x1638, 1.09M)

Never heard of 1/2 a star out of 4 stars? You must have never read a newspaper for decades.

>t. butthurt coot
Your time is over dinosaur

>larping as an """"oldfag"""" you are lower than the lowest tranny.

I'm older than you

Based

what a fucking pleb

Nope, I don't believe you. You're way too retarded. I'm probably old enough to date your mom, though.

thats an 8 point scale tard

4 stars is a good system tho
1-awful
2-bad but with redeeming qualities
3-good but with flaws
4-perfect

>0.5 RATING SYSTEM GOOD

Attached: 1561206478013.png (454x520, 13K)

What about totally neutral. You need 5 stars.

No shit it's an 8 point scale if you use 1/2 stars or a 4 point scale if you use whole numbers

2.5/4 stars is a legit rating
so is 3.5/4 stars (a rating Ebert gave Return of the King)

2/4 is equal to 5/10
It isn't rocket science

Roger Ebert also gave low scores to anything violent that teenagers liked. He was just a cunt, I'd piss on his grave. He's the entire reason horror movies get low budgets and no respect

You just said that 2 out of 4 is bad with redeeming qualities. That's not neutral. What's the equivalent of 3/5?

No that's what the other retard said 2/4 is average or meh

But Prometheus was violent and he gave it 4/4
and Aliens was loved by teenagers with ADD and he gave it a 3.5/4

2.5/4 --------- 3/5
3/4 ----------- 4/5
3.5/4 ---------- 4.5/5
4/4 -------------- 5/5

To be fair, if you have to compare your movie to fucking Star Trek of all things, that's not a good sign that it's a good movie.

Not to say that Star Trek is terrible or anything, just one of the single most corny and silly series around. For a horror-lite movie that takes itself seriously, that's not a good influence.

and
2/4 ---------------- 2.5/5

Average or meh are not synonymous though. If you have to use "or" in your system, it's not a good system.

Prometheus is barely watchable and stands as a testament to the relentles cope and retardation of contrarians. I know this is bait but in case it's not, please remove yourself from the gene pool as soon as possible.

no movie is truly neutral. You have to make a decision one way or the other user

Average and meh are both adjectives you would use to describe something as neither good nor bad, why are you so fucking stupid my dude?

Meh is not average, meh is below average. It implies you were overall bored with the movie, whereas average implies you enjoyed it, but it was nothing special.

>3/5 = 50%

Attached: 1546385174515.jpg (250x250, 11K)

Describe 2/4 in any fashion you wish its literally half of a good movie and half of a shit movie. I would call that meh.

it has huge huge flaws
but, its still one of the better sci-fi movies to come out in the last 10 years
Not that high of a bar to meet, but whatever.

Fuckoff you mongoloid go rewatch fucking starshit and avengers fucking uncultured swine.

The truth is that The Last Jedi, Prometheus and Alien Covenant are all pleb filters and pure kino

Ebert is sucking Siskells dick in hell

Siskel was always a better one.

Retarded contrarians. I hope you get well soon.

roger ebert is a retard

>contrarian
>three movies that have positive critic reviews
Seems you're the fucking contrarian

*(((Critic)))(((reviews)))
FTFY, sweatheart ;)

Better than (((((((((Audience)))))))))))) reviews of shitskins who literally enjoy EVERY and I mean every single trash marvel capeshit made recently.

You are severely mentally ill, contrarian.

John Wick and Avengers are extreme kino compared to the plot whole cluster fuck that is Pretentheus

>using reddit tier movies to tear down other reddit tier movies

Attached: 1561037368624.png (630x700, 161K)

You belong on /r/movies with the plebs who like nolan trash and avengers movies

They got close but no, they are not art.

>retard who only thinks about the plot
>calls John Wick and avengers extreme kino
BIG FUCKING YIKES

Attempting to put a dictionary definition to the word "art" is so ironic it makes my head spin.

haha get fucked nigger

It's funny because I don't think anyone care about video games as art anymore

Most people don't care about film as art anymore, case and point this /r/movies clone of a board with plebshit taste

1 2 3 4 5
It's right there in the middle.

Not him but nigga... come on now

Where's the lie? How many ratings are below 3? Two of them. How many are above? Also two. It's not a continuum. It's a series of discrete points.

Your mistake is your hidden axiom that 0/5 exists as a valid rating. I bet you think the 21st century started in 2000.