Opinions on this motherfucker?
Opinions on this motherfucker?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
*dogfucker
Adam, pull UP your pants and step AWAY from the dog.
He fucks dogs
like the zillionth film reviewing e-celeb who knows nothing about film but acts like an authority
stop promoting these channels gaylord
I don't like him as a person because he seems pretty dickish and he's okay with people raping animals. As a film reviewer, he isn't much better. He has absolutely no respect for the history of film, nor does he know very much about it. He's made several comments in the past about the subject of film history, and his knowledge of it is so pathetic that I could have pointed out its stupidity when I was 15 (the whole Citizen Kane thing was just embarrassing). His reviews are extremely nitpicky. In his YMS for Frozen (the horror film, not the Disney one), he spends a great deal talking about how there's a light on the characters at night, and concludes that it's bad filmmaking because of how unrealistic it is. I personally don't like the film very much, but this criticism shows that he knows absolutely nothing about the art of filmmaking. Cameras are much less sensitive to light than the human eye is. In order for a camera to pick up on anything at all at nighttime, there has to be a light, and Frozen did do a pretty good job at not making the light too noticeable. This may seem a bit specific, but I think it nicely shows the core flaw in his criticisms. He has this weird standard of absolute and total realism, something that is seldom demonstrated or even attempted in film. I have absolutely no idea how he finds any enjoyment in film at all, and if you took the films from his top 100 list, you could easily make YMS styled reviews on all of them. The only possible use his videos can have is that they're sometimes entertaining, but even then, you have to turn your brain off in order to enjoy them.
Also he fucks dogs.
this
also this
If you are going to watch any eceleb review movies at least watch ralphkino
Ralph is becoming YMS lite. They’re on that shitty podcast together.
i like his opinions but sometimes hes too technical, like he just forgot how to watch films for the sake of entertainment
pretty good analysis desu.
>So I just saw [recent movie] and it was preeeetty dumb. I'd like to point out that I'm not saying I didn't hate this movie, just that there is a lot of problems that stopped me from really liking it. Skip to this point if you don't want to hear spoilers, but there was this one scene where a character did something dumb that didn't make any sense. The whole time I was thinking "WHY ARE YOU DOING THAT, I WOULD NOT DO THAT". Also, I feel I should point out that in the theatre I was watching this in, a guy was on his phone the entire time. I asked him to stop but he still continued, so I had to get one of the employees to deal with it. There was an argument for some time before the guy got kicked out. Why come to a movie just to sit on your phone? Anyway, despite my criticisms, I still think this movie was okay, but also really dumb and I give this one a 6/10.
At least Ralph knows a bit about filmmaking. He also makes way more positive reviews than dogfucker does
>Opinions on this dogfucker?
FTFY
this but let me reiterate that he fucks dogs
Yeah Ralph doesn’t tend to hyperfocus on plot holes and shit like dogfucker does. Usually he’ll at least bring up technical aspects of the movie and talk about most of the aspects like the music, lighting, and editing. YMS just kind of run through the plot and talks about plot holes whenever they appear.
>6/10
It seems like he has a specific idea of what constitutes a good movie and his channel is 90% just judging things into this standard. They're entertaining reviews but you don't really gain any understanding of the films by watching them.
I just watch his reviews for the schlocky shit like the Saw franchise. I don't care if he fucks dogs. He could fuck every animal on Old McDonald's farm.
Yeah hes fun to watch to trash bad movies the oldboy comparison was great but he also fuck dogs so theres that
What are your opinions on MatPat’s wife Stephanie?
you seriously thinks dogs are the only animals he fucks
Realism fags know NOTHING
They should watch documentaries if they give so much a fuck
kek
this. why does everyone go straight to dogs?
Where does this he fucks dogs thing come from?
Sound like it could generate a laugh of two.
Not smart. Unlikable. Fucks dogs.
He thinks if you can't be against bestiality if you're for killing animals for food or something like that, basically he's as uninformed about animal rights as he is movies
/thread
Possibly the worst movie "critic" on youtube.
Oh, that's disappointing.
Personally I find people being assbalsed by his statement and calling him a dog fucker way funnier.
As far as I'm concerned, animals don't (and shouldn't) have rights, they can't be victims, and you can't commit a crime against an animal.
You can commit a crime against people which somehow involve animals (for example like killing someone's pet, since the pet is their property, or hunting endangered species), but punishing a human for something that was done to an animal and has no negative impact on a person is unforgivable, as humans > animals.
This is not to say that I tolerate senseless violence towards animals, but you get the idea.
Tasteless film festival pleb who pretends to know about cinema despite never watching movies made before the late 1990's.
I can't tell if he's really based or really dumb for the effort he puts into people criticizing him. Sometimes it's convo, but sometimes it's just a essay of him covering his ass for being obstinate
All youtube reviewers must fucking hang
Woof/10
I think people are just mad that he's one of the more popular movie reviewers on Youtube when he's a lot more misinformed than he'd have you believe. I'd rather listen to those dumb pretentious arthouse sluts on Letterboxd review movies
I agree with everything said ITT. He's a pompous dilettante, but he has a decent taste in -modern- film. His top 20 or whatever yearly lists is good for finding shit that passed your radar.
citizen kane is pretty good example on how good this reviewers do their research
it just had the feel and cuts of modern movie with some new cam techniques, that's it
why even watch anything else than red letter media?
Welles is one of my favourite directors but I genuinely cringe whenever I see an overly-praising review of Citizen Kane as if it really is the best film ever made when it really fucking isn't. It's fantastic, but its entire legacy has been created by a legion of basic bitches who want to seem interested in film but aren't interested in actually delving deep into the world of cinema.
Even then I only really watch BotW and Re:view. With each HitB it seems like they're more and more dissatisfied with the state of cinema, and nobody can be bothered to watch them review genuinely good but less popular movies. Everyone just wants them to talk shit about the superhero movies they don't like.
Things like this
>youtube.com
and this
are why I've never been able to take him seriously as a critic. Always going on about how smart he is but mostly bitches about little details and seems to have at best a shallow grasp on film technique and history after years of doing this as a job. And to think I used to think Stuckman was the worst it got.
also dogfucker, obviously
Wish he'd change his picture.
>he liked memerunner 2049
I used to check this guys reviews out before I figured his tastes and points of criticism differ largely from myself. Thought his reviews were decent like 4 years ago and it gave me an alright idea of where to look for good movies but after watching all of his "favorites" I came to the conclusion that were different species when it comes to reviewing movies.
His points of criticism in movies if some of the most petty shit around. If a mysterious plot point is not spelled out for him and backed by multiple sources then he nitpicks the most idiotic things. "why are the baddies doing this?" "why cant they just do this instead of doing that?". Sometimes these thing don't have answers and its up to interpretation. Was Cobb actually still in a dream at the end of inception? Why were there copies of everyone and how does the system work in US? I don't need this shit spelled out for me for it to be a good movie, there were hints littered throughout and what matters wasn't the destination, it was the journey. And Adam, the self-loathing fag horsefucker, cares only about the destination and couldn't care less about the experience of actually watching the movie.
He's right. It's not rape if there's no coercion. Dogs hump people all the time. There's nothing wrong with a woman just taking her clothes off and letting a dog have a way with her.