Subtle symbolism

ITT: Shots that should be taught in every film class

Attached: A39B643A-942E-4948-B225-7658F1D27308.jpg (764x401, 33K)

hmmm

>it's a close up on June's face episode

DUDE TAGARYENS

Attached: MUDDA.jpg (1280x720, 136K)

goddammit should I watch this or not?

>R*dditors unironically believe this

>look at tv
>it's an ugly woman staring at me and bitching

Might was well read a fucking book.

Attached: 1551749397627.jpg (768x1024, 198K)

Holy shit, she's like an angel or maybe even a bird leaving the cage it was in. woah

>role gets famous for "RELIGION BAD"
>actress is a fucking scientologist

>Elizabeth (((Moss))) is in a show
>9/10 shots will be well focused close ups of her smug fucking face
>half the time her shrill hobgoblin voice is added in post
my hate goes right past fuck and into SUCK

torrent it if you do

There's one good episode, showing when the evil religionists first took over. SJWs are blocking the road and the army just opens up on them with a saw.

>subtle

Which episode?

Attached: 1563401922809.png (500x522, 105K)

May as well just go to work. Fuck that for a joke.

I'm a 5 or so episodes into season 2. Seems to be a bit stale. Is it worth going on?

>dude scientology lmao

Read Oryx and Crake instead.

did snyder direct this episodfe?

Attached: 1522365599762.png (1920x1080, 950K)

>this faggot's shitposting is actually true in his mind

Attached: 1558639039051.jpg (596x438, 79K)

Looks interesting, I'll probably pick it up. Thanks.

I'm going to teach a female-only feminist film class and show them this one day

Attached: 1553375638697.webm (800x480, 2.88M)

yeah I guess we should be mediocre instead of obvious
fuck you cunt, I want to see cool shit on tv

don't be posting webms like that without sources

Why did they kill her when the show was just starting to get good

"Schoolgirl report" on youtube. It's not even censored. and there's some pizza level stuff in there.

Why does she look like tarantella?

Do people unironically enjoy this shit show?

>LOOK THE DIRECTOR SHOWED A CLOSEUP OF THE MAIN CHARACTER'S FACE HALF IN LIGHT AND HALF IN SHADOW WHICH REPRESENTS THEM STRADDLING THE LINE BETWEEN GOOD AND EVIL

>Why did they kill her when the show was just starting to get good
Because they must destroy from within

It's for aging Netflix-addicted millennial mother types. The kind that have suspiciously dark-colored kids despite their white boyfriends.

>Elizabeth (((Sneed))) is in a show
>9/10 shots will be well focused close ups of her chuck fucking face
>half the time her shrill hobgoblin voice is added in feed
my hate goes right past fuck and into SEED

She was cute for one season of Mad Men before she hit the wall. I don't care to see Peggy meanmugging me in judgment over some stupid shit. They show entirely too much of this bitch's face in promo material.

Enjoy. There's a sequel which I haven't read but have heard good things about.

I think she cleans up well and looks really good when you can't really see that schnoz of hers, but yeah the other times she looks like a goblin

Attached: 38th+International+Emmy+Awards.jpg (546x820, 124K)

No. If it were Snyder, it would have meaning deeper than the blatantly obvious.

Attached: 1510014772867.jpg (935x1536, 204K)

Looks like an ugly little man in a wig. You could land a plane on that fivehead.

that's one ugly bitch, jesus

cringe
based but overall GoT is cringe

I'll watch anything post apocalypse/dystopian future, so I have been sitting through this shit show. But the last episode, with just her in a room mugging at that the camera, I had to shut that shit off.

Horrible fucking cliche

Nah

>obvious composition ≠ subtle symbolism
unless you're a fucking zoomer of course

Stop exaggerating, homos

Attached: elisabeth-moss-.jpg (1098x1128, 242K)

I know guys going bald who have better hairlines that that

Attached: 1551147004666.jpg (1024x904, 101K)

Of course a sign of intelligence isn't attractive to a frogposter like you

Attached: elisabeth-moss-tile.jpg (1920x1080, 419K)

Are you shooping these to fuck with me, user?

Attached: 1519172577619.jpg (450x444, 23K)

acquire intercourse you incel

>Shots that should be taught in every film class

Attached: powerful.png (1442x1078, 2.02M)

>If it were Snyder, it would have meaning deeper than the blatantly obvious.

Attached: 1.jpg (1280x720, 43K)

Subtly at its best

Attached: The S stands for Subtle.jpg (1236x512, 49K)

There is a lot of symbolism in Heathers

Attached: heathers-movie-screencaps.com-3268.jpg (1920x1040, 236K)

Exactly. It's not what he is, it's what the world *thinks* he is, even his own father.

>He'll be a god to them.

>find out it was written and directed by a woman

>She was cute for one season of Mad Men
Bro... dude... brah... amigo

gotta make that disney money

She's an easy 7 in a shitty show.

Attached: 1544780665532.jpg (2098x3135, 945K)

Further, the imagery of his films ranges from overt to very subtle, and it's relative crispness is there to convey how strongly any given principal character resonates with a concept. It's why Luthor shifts from saintly to diabolic iconography over the course of the film. It's not him that's changing, but rather his world's perception of him. It's also why the Batman is depicted with imagery suggestive of a god of the Underworld like Hades.

Superman gets strong, overt imagery that indicates he not only resonates with mankind's conceptions of a higher power, but he's capturing the attention of the whole world. Notice how the imagery grows stronger in the film only after Zod announces Clark's presence to the entire world.

Attached: 1502775101876.jpg (1625x2366, 474K)

Fucking based

More like look at my wife haha

Attached: 35342345566.jpg (800x450, 44K)

Here's some more subtlety for you. I bet you never bitched about Tony Stark as Hephæstus. It's not exactly great or even all that imaginative to depict him as the god of the forge, and even less so after Disney took over and fucking melon-balled his character. They could have done something interesting with that concept, but nah, let's keep shit nice, simple, and stupid.

Attached: IronManCarousel.jpg (590x325, 115K)

Your complete lack of an argument is exactly as telling as it should be.

based corrigan mogger

i found oryx and crake a little dated. too early 00s for my taste, especially for a book about a corporatist bioweapon dystopia.

Subtle as a brick in the small of my back

Bump

Attached: -1392746741.jpg (1280x720, 47K)

Can we have a Terry Davis casting thread?

Attached: 1546935035847.jpg (660x716, 53K)

This ones very hard to understand, only accomplished film students who have studied the medium for years can only even partly comprehend that complexity of this shot

Attached: 7E210DB9-5DC3-4FF5-8D39-EA8227D4945E.jpg (640x479, 19K)

Is this an Evangelion reference?

i once had that scene appear in a dream, except it was rabbis protesting, and the skaven riot police threw their gas globes at them

underrated

smooth brain detected

How did you tell them apart?

Tolkien is to creative literary genius what Martin is to hack pulp idiocy. They both so far surpass anyone else in their field that they will be remembered 1,000 years from now as a kind of yin and yang of fantasy, a Manichean duality of speculative letters. For every sublime, luminous beauty that Tolkien has gifted the world, Martin has cursed us with a tedious, banal ugliness. It is unfair to compare the two directly on any one point, because Martin is in every way the anti-Tolkien, patently sterile, parasitical, and inferior, but so much so that he becomes a monument in his own right, and counterbalances Tolkien. Could one exist without the other? Tolkien obviously could. But it is only by the contrast that Martin offers that we can truly appreciate the full depths and heights of Tolkien. Our understanding of Tolkien would be incomplete if Martin had never set pen to page. It is through only the abject failure and futility of Martin that we can approach an apprehension of the true scope and scale of Tolkien's hitherto inconceivable greatness. Perhaps this is what Tolkien had in mind when he wrote about the Music of the Ainur. If Tolkien is a subcreator in the image of Eru, truly Martin is like unto Melkor. It is only reflected in the awfulness of the one that we can fully see the goodness of the other.

Attached: 1560123457262.png (981x394, 510K)

Based!

Beautifully written user. Tolkien's work was the most worthy imitation of God's creation yet penned by man, while Martin's work is an ugly, petty struggle between blighted, sick personalities. Consider that the scripts for the show were written by hacks with even less talent.

Attached: 1539990258880.jpg (400x400, 19K)

God I hate her face so much

>subtle

that forehead is 40% of ther face

explains why all the women are ugly

I thought she was a Scientologist?

Seriously based

wow, this is deeep....

Attached: hmmm.jpg (400x518, 27K)

kek

Attached: skaven_storm_runner_by_uriak-dc9jctd.jpg (834x959, 87K)

FUCKING IMAGINE WATCHING THIS FEMINIST SHITFEST LMAO

WHO DOES THIS

Megamind live action when

She's a Scientologist. Of course she would star in a movie that criticizes Christianity.

Pure coincidence, Goyim.

Attached: american-flag-avatar.jpg (1200x670, 110K)

Martin will be known in the future as lazy writter who died from sickness induced from his overweight before he could finish his work. He will be forgotten, and in 20 years the only people who will still remember him are faggots, like myself, who read his shit before he died and now are eternally seething.

Mark my words.

Attached: 7675676.png (704x396, 366K)

That's kinda on the face, senpai. It's only subtle if you are a dumb dumb.

Attached: 1512451822953.png (400x400, 165K)

Attached: 1561374274362.png (1280x720, 463K)

PEANUT HEAD
PEANUT HEAD

they could've just had one hanging up instead

talk about beating you over the head

Attached: file.png (1920x1080, 2.93M)