>James Bond is a codename
When and how did this retarded fan theory come about? Why did there need to be an explanation for why different actors play him? Is Superman a codename too because he's been played by different actors in different eras? Truly it is the first Reddit fan theory. James Bond is obviously one man, and each new actor is basically a reboot/starting the franchise over.
It doesn't matter. Don't worry about it.
wait I thought 007 was the codename and james bond was an actual persomr played by different people cause aging. is this more retcons so they can force that nigger down our throats?
>each new actor is basically a reboot/starting the franchise over.
I believe that at least Connery, Lazenby and Moore is playing the same character in the same continuity, having him naturally age from Dr No until A View To A Kill.
There's hints that Dalton Bond could be in the same continuity, but he's too young to have been an agent in the 60s.
Satan is correct. None of this shit matters at all.
Yes. Just like comic books calling heroes "legacy" heroes so they can kill them off and replace them with a nigger or a woman or a nigger woman.
They tried to say Thor Odinson was a codename and anyone could become him.
Its obvious retconning done decades after the established character was solidified. Utter kikery.
Perhaps they'll explain in the next Bond movie that this is the first time they've reassigned the 007/Bond name (therefore leaving the rest of the mythology intact)? But, really, these are fairly ridiculous movies to begin with so who really gives a fuck?
There's a wierd unexplained time split starting with Diamonds Are Forever, DAF happened in the same continuity as Dr No until You Only Live Twice, then ignores On Her Majesty's Secret Service.
Live and Let Die and The Man With The Golden Gun is in the same timeline, they are both connected by Sheriff Pepper and Golden Gun then connects them both to Diamonds Are Forever by a short apperence of a gangster from Diamonds Are Forever who get's killed by Scaramanga in the pre-credits scene.
Then The Spy Who Loved Me goes back to the On Her Majesty's Secret Service continuity, Dr No to On Her Majesty's Secret Service happened, but ignores Diamonds Are Forever, Live And Let Die and The Man With The Golden Gun, the hint is the references to his marriage.
Why would you opt in to consuming a product manufactured by 'kikes' to put a 'nigger' on screen? Serious question here: can you explain (in a rational way):
A. Why this matters?
B. Why this offends you?
>craig
>bond
This is my reaction whenever someone says anything about Trump or the Middle East or Russia or whatever other boogeyman.
I just do not care anymore. The fatigue is real guys and I don't care about this either.
It's been done before with DC without the legacy character being black or woman, that's why it's so obvious now when Marvel try to do it, like Spiderman has allways been a legacy character and replacing him with someone black has nothing to do with it.
Before the 00s, only villains or minor sidecharacters got replaced in Marvel comics.
I bet you're the kind of fuckbrain who'd cream his nerdpanty if Sean Connery had an 40 second cameo in a post credit scene in which he mentored Daniel Craig though. You fucking idiot.
>Ian Fleming
>Jew
Nice try, undercover leftie.
Ian Fleming was a based racist and a sexist womanizer, in his own words, James Bond was entertainment intended for heterosexual males.
>based racist and a sexist womanizer, in his own words, James Bond was entertainment intended for heterosexual males.
And it still is. Just like the Hindenburg was free heat and light for onlookers.
Just like your five seconds with Lando in the Melenium Falcon appearance.
Bodysnatcher innit
Why does it need to change to being for women, black nationalists and genderfluids instead then?
Do you enjoy looking at Craig's body? Is this why you are sad?
I might as well look at his body if that black thing replacement 007 shows up in a bikini. She's built like a fucking linebacker.
Spiderman existed for like 60 years before they turned him into a legacy hero.
It was kikery and always has been.
The series has run its course either way. Just end it.
James Bond was never good. It was schlock, which had a recent rebranding as serious spy action drama. Fuck niggers though 2bh.
wtf no, all of them are conected until pierce Brosnan for obvious reasons
Sean Connery pursuits Bloefeld cause he killed his wife in on her majesty secret service
roger Moore goes to the cementery to give flowers to his dead wife in for your eyes only and dalton on living daylights doesn't accept Lecter wife present and Lecter tells her that he was married once and she died
>Why did there need to be an explanation for why different actors play him?
Fuck that, I wanna know what their explanation for there being TWO Casino Royales then?
Straighter than looking at that manly monkey
wtf wheresw Lasahana Lynch in this poster?
cmon bruh