EVERYTHING'S MOTHERFUCKIN CGI

EVERYTHING'S MOTHERFUCKIN CGI

Attached: 1563101602.jpg (640x635, 57K)

even the gun is digital

Attached: 35t6.gif (540x297, 2.5M)

no wonder none of these movies have any weight or physicality to them

why did they have to cgi the gun? What's the point?

It's cheaper than getting a real gun.

Guns scare leftists like Sam

You're telling me they couldn't find a freelance welder with a few hours to make a real gun? Jesus fucking christ.

>shoot scene
>Disney execs voice complaints about gun looking too gun-like in the test screenings
>reshoot months later

OR
>Shoot scene once and digitally layer in whatever stupid shit the test audiences whine about to save money and time.

buy a fucking nerf gun and paint it black

scheduling probably, not having to fly people around as much

CG is cheaper than samuel l jackson's fee

Seriously? Was this cheaper? How could they not just give him a plastic gun and stick him in front of a piece of wood? Holy shit

Attached: cat cgi.jpg (1200x1199, 216K)

WHY MAKE THE FUCKING POTS AND TABLE CGI
WHY IS THE CHAIR GREEN NOW

>getting mad about cgi gun
>not getting madder about how Fury gets his eye patch from a cat scratch

Simply gives the director more options.
More and more things are moving to entirely digital because it makes it much easier to change in post, like in Thor Ragnarok, where they rewrote the story after shooting a couple of scenes so they simply changed the entire set from a NYC alleyway to a green field in the UK. Also simplifies shooting because everything can be done a Hollywood soundstage, no need to travel or schedule

I never understood this one. Obviously you needed a CGI cat for all the eldritch bullshit the cat did, but they couldn't find a real fucking orange cat for these scenes?

So that's why that scene looked greenscreened.

The fact that it wasn't noticeable means it's a good thing
And that's a good thing

I think they just decided to CG it to save the hassle involved in getting a cat to do... anything

That's retarded, there's perfectly trained cats out there, and probably a metric fuckton in hollywood. Training a cat ain't actually hard. Look up "cat circus".

but what if kevin faygo decided later on that the cat should be brown because tested better with the american kiddies?

just cgi a different color over the real cat

just because you can doesn't mean you should

This cat looked incredibly fake in every scene he was in. It was atrocious.

what if the cat was skinny and marketing said a skinny cat would be seen as promoting fatshaming?

It’s not a cost thing. It’s a control thing. With a CGI gun, they can try different iterations for what they want the gun to look like without doing any reshoots.

Control is more of a driver behind CGI-ing everything than cost. Major studios like to audience test every little detail to maximize their return.

No colors anymore I want my nerf to turn black

Attached: keith and mick.jpg (770x433, 61K)

How about the detail of why Jackson's finger is phasing into the fucking gun

>no wonder none of these movies have any soul
ftfy

Have to put those poojeets to good use. It's less expensive than actual props too.

Attached: 340945634.jpg (661x304, 59K)

>cgi is cheaper than finding a gun in the country with more guns than any other country on the planet

It would unironically be cheaper to just use a real gun.

Probably so it's easier to CGI it out for countries like Germany if needed

>Disney execs
it's a sony movie

or you could think for 3 seconds instead of 2 and use google
larson is allergic to cats

The background looked fake as fuck, the entire movie looked like a videogame and now we know why

>larson is allergic to cats
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>Major studios like to audience test every little detail to maximize their return.
if this actually works, it proves that audiences are shitheads since most movies fucking suck

amazing the kind of magic they can put on screen nowadays just by throwing a few million dollars into cgi

>so they simply changed the entire set from a NYC alleyway to a green field in the UK
Yeah well, "simply changed" is a euphemism, as the set was real and they had to painstakingly deselect Hela from every frame and put her on a generic meadow on a cliff in Norway. Starting out with greenscreen would've been the smart option.

Didn't notice in the movie.

Lucas was ahead of his time

And that's why everything looks fake and shit while costing about the same because even if you're not shooting on location you're still wasting the money on CG drones and render farms.

You're an idiot if you're ok with it as a viewer.

Thats not Brie Larson..

You're probably memeing, but he did push a lot of technological advancement in filmmaking with the prequels. ILM has been involved in nearly every big movie production of the last few decades as a result. Same as WETA taking off with LotR.

She's in the scene too.