Do you freeze immediately in space?

That's right; you shit yourself inside out then explode. What's left then freezes and floats around space for eternity ready to clog up the warp coil of some passing future spaceship.

No, you feel the spit boiling on your tongue and then you pass out. You can survive if you get brought back into a pressurized atmosphere within three minutes.

No. Rather when you are exposed to vacuum, all the air that's inside of your body blows out (in your lungs, throat and mouth), followed by your body being hit by both the unshielded heat of the sun and the coldness of space

Theoretically you could survive for some moments if you're caught in that shit

Nah, your body fluids boil and the pressure differential also causes you to involuntarily puke, piss, and shit yourself because your guts can't hold their contents in. Your body will swell a little bit, whichever side of your bare exposed skin is facing away from the sun will freezer burn while the sun facing side will just get a normal kind of burned. You will eventually freeze through-and-through simply because your body will slowly radiate away it's internal heat but that will take hours or more if you're wearing a suit that helps trap some of that heat in.

This scene scared the shit out of me when I was a kid but no, not even close. The biggest danger is having too much air in your lungs and suffering damage that way.

No, you can survive for a little bit actually, as seen in 2001 a Space Odyssey.

Only good Martian movie is riddick1

No, the vacuum means that the heat on your person will slowly radiate away, but that doesn't matter too much over the timescale in question, and if you're in strong enough sunlight you won't really cool down at all. The liquids on your surface, like your eyes and lips and inside of your lungs, will actually boil away because of the loss of pressure. The low pressure is also why if you don't breathe out (counterintuitive, I know), your lungs may explode. You'd still suffer a lot of subdermal hemmorhaging and temporary blindness as all your surface blood vessels burst, but that would just cover you in bruises, temporarily blind you, and give you a nosebleed.

In the end though, the pressure differential encourages all the gases in your bloodstream to come out of suspension via your lungs, so oxygen deprivation kicks in within moments and you lose consciousness in something like 10-20 seconds, before dying swiftly thereafter of asphyxiation. If someone rescues you within a couple of minutes it might be possible to revive you and you may suffer no lasting effects. Like and say though, you'd probably shit yourself as all the gases in your guts come shooting out of your arsehole.

For you

no, radiation heat loss is slower than convection or conducted. you could even get roasted if you are close enough of sun. Space stations and satellites have serious issues with overheating.

>all the gases in your guts come shooting out of your arsehole

Attached: 1506729822021.png (520x390, 50K)

yes

Attached: heyarnold.gif (450x282, 1.27M)

>he believes in space
Tell me have actually seen this void called "space" yourself? Have you bothered to verify its existence through evidence that would prove its existence beyond resonable doubt? All you have is the word of others, writings of old men and highly detailed pictures to fuel your beliefs, muchlike the God fearing folk you no doubt love to harass in your spare time. You believe the words of these withered old farts with fancy papers that prattle on about techno jargon thinking its complexity yeilds credence to its factuality but chide the Faithful for their devotion based on the words of ones they believe. In truth the faith of these folk is far stronger than your parroted techno drivel, for faith by definition demands unwavering devotion and belief without proof, whereas your own fancy scriptures encourage verification before acceptance yet you preach about concepts you've yourself taken on faith. Pathetic.

Attached: 1546619185425.png (500x441, 321K)

>Theoretically you could survive for some moments if you're caught in that shit

No thanks.

Eventually yes. Not immediately like older sci fi films.

wasn't he on Pluto when that happened?

Is there any proof to the claims posted in this thread or is it just conjecture?

Have we thrown a rabbit into space to see what happens?

Attached: 56612433cPw.jpg (1024x1024, 229K)

>1 atmospheric pressure change
>explode
Go back to school.

>Do you freeze immediately in space?
No, you vomit and shit yourself first

impossible to know for sure, never been tested and never will. radiation from van allen belts would kill any human long before they got into space.

No, if you don't exhale your lungs will explode due to gas expansion from the pressure drop, however.

If you do exhale, you have about 15 sec of consciousness before hypoxia sets in anyway. You do not instantly freeze because skin is an excellent insulator and a vacuum doesn't leech heat that well by it's very definition. It would be a painful and confusing, but quick way to die regardless, however.

You can use corpses. We already experiment with them if you give consent

You chimps need to die.

Didn't the nazis do experiments on humans and US and USSR on animals?

a corpse can't generate heat via metabolism like a human can. so pretty shitty simulant

You can't reach space, so no. The dome is the limit.

>technically space isn't a true vacuum
Can anyone elaborate on this?

A couple people have been exposed to hard vacuum before, usually in space suit tests where accidents happened.

If the body doesn't freeze when it's colder to begin with wouldn't that prove it?

True vacuum would be a void in which there is literally nothing, absolute emptiness. The vacuum of space still has tiny quantities of stuff in it, it's enormously spread out but there are particles of gas and dust in space.

bullshit, my vacuum runs plenty hot you drooling retard

Just let the Chinese do their thing. They're known for unethical experiments

In the long run you will get vacuum dried. But otherwise pretty intact.

Your blood boils, as the boiling point for any liquid lowers in a vacuum

If you flew a spaceship far enough it would get wear and tear from low density gases impacting and such eventually

There was an accident early on in the Apollo program wherein an astronaut completely lost pressurization in his spacesuit while in a test vacuum chamber. He exhaled and lost consciousness within 10 secs, as his skin inflated within the suit due to the escaping gases. The last thing he remembered before passing out was a metallic taste on his tongue as the saliva boiled away (the taste was due to capillaries in his tongue bursting, thereby tasting iron from the hemoglobin).

However, the test was immediately stopped and the chamber repressurized. Within about a minute he came to with no lasting damage besides some superficial bruising and the skin swelling went down completely within hours.

Your body maintains pressure inside the skin.

Incorrect, your mucous membranes would have all moisture boil away (tongue and mouth, eyes and nose) but the skin is a great insulator and only swelling would occur, but your blood wouldn't boil.

Interesting. Some Jackass guys could then briefly jump into space and get back.

this user is right, all other answers are wrong

>Jackass 4
>opens with a close up of Knoxville mouthing the words "Hi, I'm Johnny Knoxville and welcome to Jackass!" and then promptly passes out
>everything else is dead silent as the camera pans back
>Wee Man and Pontius float by also unconscious

I could see it

Heat loss via radiation would be slow as fuck.
> HURR DURR, IT'S COLD IN SPACE, THEREFORE YOU FREEZE INSTANTLY
is a shitty Hollywood meme of crappy writers who can't into physics.

The lack of pressure, with all the resulting effects, would fuck you up eventually, but you would go unconscious within 15 seconds from lack of oxygen anyway.

Depends how close you are to the sun, if you are close you’d burn to death, in space itself you’d freeze

i don't think so. princess leia organa floated herself through space and she was ok.

There was the Soyuz 11 accident, where three cosmonauts died from exposure to the vacuum of space.

You freeze and then gravity of the sun grabs you and you explode

Attached: Sunshine.webm (934x392, 2.88M)

The half facing the sun gets hundreds of degrees and the other half freezes.

Technically, losing pressure in a suit would cause frost to form on your skin and eyebrows.

You wouldn't freeze solid, but the rapid expansion of gasses WOULD greatly cool down the area, freezing any surface moisture briefly before it liquefied and boiled away.

Faster than that because your blood would boil due to lack of pressure.

no, space is flat
flat things don't freeze
have you ever frozen a flat tire? thought so

There is like one atom per cubic meter on average. In practical terms, space dust, gas, micro meteorites, and of course neutrinos, which are fucking everywhere.

True vacuum doesn't exist because of quantum fluctuations
I am smart

This, losing heat takes forever but gaining it is stupidly easy.

Attached: I Happen To Be An Expert.png (581x671, 407K)

No.

youtube.com/watch?v=KO8L9tKR4CY

Vacuum is kinda overrated. The pressure difference from normal atmospheric pressure is the same as being 10m under water, just in the other direction.

Space Navy fleet admiral here, space bends

You forgot solar radiation exposure. I think something like a minute of that will be enough to kill, so no chance of revival.

Where did this meme come from?
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan–Boltzmann_law
>physics.stackexchange.com/questions/67503/how-fast-would-body-temperature-go-down-in-space
>Maybe you'll freeze in 4 hours or so. You'll be comatose at 31 degrees C, which linearly interpolated, only takes about 13% of the time, or 39 minutes. Hypothermia should only take 12-13 minutes. Loss of hope, probably sooner.
Stefan-Boltzmann law, statement that the total radiant heat energy emitted from a surface is proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effect_of_spaceflight_on_the_human_body#Vacuum

No
Despite being cold, there's not enough pressure for water to solidify and not enough matter for your body heat to transfer to rapidly; all moisture on your body boils
What kills you is when all the oxygen is sucked out of your lungs and you suffocate before anything else could even harm you

Nazis did vacuum experiments on live humans and US and USSR on animals

If you're in a low earth orbit, you might catch a good sunburn, but that's really probably about it. Further away, yeah, but likely a lot longer than a minute, the lack of oxygen seems more troublesome tbqh.

now how fast would hypothermia set in, comparatively, if you were to swim in a liquid at 3 degrees Kelvin?

This is unironically correct, but worded poorly. The vacuum of space makes heat diffusion very slow. Meanwhile, the low pressure would mean your blood would start to boil.

What ends up happening is that your blood tries to escape your body. If you're exposed to vacuum for a few seconds, you'll just end up with bruises all over your body. Any longer and your eyes will turn red with blood, you'll get something like a stroke/heart attack and you'll die.

web.archive.org/web/20090211142921/http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/970603.html

that episode scared the shit out of me at the time

D E N S I T Y

That's not the point. I'm not making the argument that radiation is faster than conduction nor convection. Only that radiation isn't as slow as people think.

Attached: Dab.gif (498x359, 408K)

My vacuum always overheats when the floor has a lot of dog fur on it, so that's a lie

wouldn‘t your eyes start boiling and instantly dry out?

Just looked it up, apparently you suffer from hypoxia long before anything like that happens. Basically, oxygen escapes your blood and your brain gets hit with a load of blood without any oxygen in it. This causes you to pass out all within about 15 seconds.

Don't know about the eyes, but apparently an astronaut recalled saliva evaporating off of his tongue.

thoughtco.com/human-body-in-a-space-vacuum-3071106

fascinating stuff

>Do you freeze immediately in space?
No. Dumping excess heat is actually a big problem in space.
You'd actually boil and desiccate in your own juices. It's going to take a long time for your body to radiate away those 98.6 degrees.

>evaporating
BOILING off his tongue.
And he wasn't an astronaut, he was testing a suit and one of the seals failed in a vacuum chamber.

He looks so smug.

I don't know irl, but in space operas they usually survive at least few seconds in space.

>a dildo floats by
>puke and shit skits in zero g
I want it

no, that was their trip to the moon.

no they went to the whole solar system, if memory serves he did that so the one girl would stop going further and further out for souvenirs

you're actually right, looks like my dumb 9 year old ass thought it was the moon.

humans have no business being in space, besides they mainly use it to spy on us.
Space exploration (if any) will be done by robots.

Attached: gallery-1470855802-nrol49-patch-1.jpg (480x393, 35K)

so event horizon was the most realistic?

>absolute emptiness.
This is what fascinates me. Even what we consider "absolute emptiness" is still something in space; space-time is still a material where physics can happen on a quantum substrate of matter (virtual particles, foam, fluxations, etc.). True nothingness is a space where physics cannot occur. Even superblack holes and the most powerful supernovas can't rip apart the fabric of reality. It's like a hidden tablecloth that never rips no matter what you do to it.

I watched a record of 2 russian cosmonauts talking during launch. They discuss about how ridiculous was the ceremony before the launch andhow space is actually boring shit but if they quit all they have left is to lie on sofa and wait for death. Damn it was depressing.

That's like denying the will of exploration within the human condition. People want to discover new things and see if they can tame it and colonize it.

what about the "space", if you can call it that, between the event horizon of a black hole and the center of it? surely all the matter must get sucked in further into the black hole, including virtual particles, so that would technically be a pure void.

>everyone in this thread giving a different answer
((science)) is a fucking joke

Attached: 1562698804806.jpg (1080x1215, 139K)

nope, once that black hole evaporates there's still the same exact space left; no rips or holes or tears. It's just getting stretched and returns back to flat normal space.
The whole virtual particle copy thing / holographic universe theory might be bullshit though. It's pure theory and no way to test it.

>((science)) is a fucking joke
Are you dumb? People are spouting common misconceptions as fact.
Read my posts.

Actually, black holes do make holes in reality, the reason nothing can escape from inside one is that due to bending of space there is literally no way out, it wraps around itself

>andhow space is actually boring shit
Because they are just floating around in a tin can doing middle school experiments and doing sports 6 hours a day.
It is nothing like science fiction tries to tell us.

Except in the absence of heat there is cold dumbass

Tim Robbins does.

that's the thing though, it just bends/warps it. It doesn't break it. If it did, then there would be permanent damage to the fabric where it occurred.
It's a manipulation of the gravity field, not much different than other fields. We can trap light the same way using electromagnetic fields in a lab setting.

>Except in the absence of heat there is cold
there is no "cold" in thermodynamics

No your blood boils because there is no pressure
You die before that however

Thermometers* do read cold though dumb kike

keep in mind that the universe is too young for a single black hole to have evaporated yet, so we can't know for sure what will happen when one vanishes.

plus it is unbelievably uncomfortable to get there and back, basically being strapped into a tiny little space unable to move for hours while cramped by everything and everyone around you, all while being hot and knocked around by G forces

reentry is even worse

Attached: QNxyV.jpg (991x617, 147K)

your insult doesn't change it

lol look at this retard calling others one

no, you do freeze eventually but it takes for fucking ever

>If it did, then there would be permanent damage to the fabric where it occurred.
According to whom? How do you measure space that doesn't have objects in it to give scale or points to map coordinates around? Same with time,it's not a thing on to itself but just a way to describe order of events

Attached: 1557695930711.png (500x646, 272K)

actually, if you remember to exhale you could survive up to 90 seconds with no long-lasting consequences
after that shit goes downhill fast

That's because you saw the same 2 cosmonauts who have been up multiple times before. New astronauts have an entirely different opinion. Also the quality of life for Russian cosmonauts is worse on the ground than it is in space, so they feel forced to go up just so they can get away from their shithole country

There is lack of movement

She had the force though....

You'd eventually freeze. There's no air to absorb your body heat, so even though it's cold in space, you'll stay warm for a while.

What do you mean?
There is no definitive answer because we don't throw away people into space to see if they explode.
retard

Attached: 1523333748667.png (581x720, 338K)

true lack of movement is impossible in the universe, there will always be at least some energy no matter how thinly it's spread

who knows, maybe they'll be able to produce tiny black holes at one of those particle accelerators that can evaporate within an observable time frame.

"cold" as a definition doesn't exist in thermodynamics.
My professor for themordynamics had a good analogy to get this across but I forgot lel

problem with those black holes is that their lifespan is lower than what we can observe

How much space in our sun system is filled with deadly radiation from the sun?

Short answer: No.

Longer answer: It depends.

Is the sun shining on you? Exposed to space, the fluids in your skin would boil, while the side not exposed would be considerably colder. You also generate significant heat. You would freeze dry.

Nazis did vacuum experiments on live humans and US and USSR on animals

Space is really cold in the shade and really hot in the sunshine

Doesnt change what? Are you fucking stupid?

The space itself has no temperature

imagine your frozen crops flying through space for 4 billion years only to get picked up by chance by some alien species who has the technology to bring back the dead.
What a fascinating nightmare it would be living among an alien race long after humanity has long gone extinct by either its own hand or some space catastrophe.

>Are you fucking stupid?
since you don't know the difference between thermodynamics and a thermometer I guess from your point of view I look stupid. Cause your brain can't explain what I mean.

Measures temperature of things in said space

>spells it wrong again
Thermometers* dont fucking have definitions "in them". They read temperatures and your thermometer* professor is a dumbass if he thinks they dont read the cold

uff

Attached: 1562210438970.png (540x447, 58K)

na, we can observe ephemeral shit that lasts in zepptoseconds. I'm sure they can measure the effects of a micro blackhole within that time frame

we literally can't observe things that happen to fast
we can observe part of the aftermath sure, but the direct event? not a chance

>you just dont know what i mean
>its a real word i swear
Wow the damage control

Thats what I thought. Zero arguments. Stay btfo with your shitty memes

>we don't throw away people into space
humanity is the gayest thing in this planet
I bet dolphins would do if they could

uff

Radiative heat loss isn't faster or slower than convective or conductive, it all depends on the conditions

>quality of life for Russian cosmonauts is worse on the ground than it is in space
It's amazing how westfags can just look at any place in Russia through a webcam today yet they still think it's just like in their movies.

Attached: samara-russia-april-25-sculpture-cosmonaut-next-to-the-museum-and-exhibition-center-samara-space-on- (1300x877, 150K)

Stay in school learning zero actual real world skills kid. Pathetic they cant even teach how THERMOMETERS* work

Yeah, that's why they do all the space missions at night

cat's out of the bag, m8, you can stop now.

humans have no business being in ocean, besides they mainly use it to spy on us.
Ocean exploration (if any) will be done by robots.

uff
keep going you amuse me

that is unironically the case.

We in the West know what you did to Communists from our countries who sought refuge in USSR

Stalin had them murdered

This is an american post.

Attached: 1486988420191.png (256x302, 158K)

Well what happened? To the people?

Your lungs would immediately empty of air, unless you held your mouth and nose shut. Any open wounds would start bleeding due to pressure differential.

An user earlier said your eyes would get bloodshot, but this is not true. -1 bar (or 0 bar, vacuum, at absolute pressures) would be no different than experiencing 1 bar (absolute) of underwater pressure, which is the same pressure you'd experience at a 10 metre depth.

Basically close your eyes, nose and mouth, and you'll be fine (until you run out of air). Don't be exposed to sunshine, since solar radiation would fuck you up pretty good. In the shade, with infinite oxygen, you'd die from overheating, not from freezing.

Attached: 1315277350746.jpg (264x282, 5K)

Thermometers can only measure heat. If something is colder than something else it has less heat. There is no cold to measure.

What the fuck are you even trying to say here? Also stop double replying to my posts you dumb cuck.

more

no, enough

If there is matter there it is not a perfect vacuum. There is matter there, just very small amounts.

that’s literally it

Rent free eurocuck

Except thats false dumb shit. 0 degrees is fucking cold. And guess what a thermometer will measure it

like we ever in outer space .. dumb mutt

kek

Decent b8.

do you know what "Thermo" in thermometer means, user?

Let's see if we can convince Elon to take the crew up in his spaceship. Maybe Jackass 5 can be on Mars.

>get btfo "y..youre baiting"
Everytime. Also
>still double replying
And yes it means temperature dumbshit. Do you know what it means?

>0 degrees is fucking cold. And guess what a thermometer will measure it
0k has never been measured even in laboratory

Based retard

Retard

no, it comes from the greek Thermos, which means "hot"

Just because you say its false doesnt mean its false you retarded faggot

He's not retarded. He's just being a smart ass because he's "technically" right, since the ideal vacuum/space is nothing, and nothing can't have a temperature. The objects in vacuum can have a temperature though.

Attached: 1562331250942.jpg (720x439, 32K)

No hes not technically right fellow retard. Thermometers read thermal energy which is what we call heat. Cold is not something that actually exists it's just what we call less hot

>Event Horizon

youtu.be/wp70vEiAn7E?t=276

Dear quadruple Satan, your feeling the cold when you're losing your own heat

when you have a barometer, you're measuring pressure, not vacuum.

wont you be microwaved by radiation first?

Russia is the HIV capital of the world.

physlink.com/education/askexperts/ae127.cfm

imagine the smell

you mean even more than Africa or the big gay club that is San Fran?
you're a moron, moron

He's actually closer to truth than you think. There is nothing in space for it to be cold, no air to freeze you up. In the sun's shade, your body heat would radiate just enough to keep you from freezing up. You'd suffocate before dying from cold.

I meant in shade, away from the sun.

space is gay

I bet you orefer the deep sea, fishman

there are more starfish in the sea than there are stars in the universe

Whataboutism