LOL

twitter.com/twilightsthorn/status/1150647768341458945?s=09

Attached: Screenshot_2019-07-15-10-39-42.png (1280x720, 317K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=5vL2LwjiOSE
youtube.com/watch?v=BUmKLV55wfY
youtube.com/watch?v=UmPmpUTr22c
youtube.com/watch?v=pMDtibc13fc
youtu.be/kyJUQuaECrg?t=65
youtube.com/watch?v=GV3ZXOe779k
youtube.com/watch?v=mXblqtzy_tE
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

> that poor voice actor who has to compete with jeremy irons' scar

Attached: data.jpg (1440x1080, 1.05M)

why did they make this movie

From everything I've seen it's like the nu cast know they can't compete with the original cast on talent so don't even bother. Every performance sounds so fucking phoned in.

to make money off of depressed people in their late 20s/early 30s probably.

Because it probably was. Disney doesn't give a shit. The entire new cast was only hired because they're black celebs and the names Beyonce and Strange America or whatever the fuck his name is look good on posters and guarantee an audience.

More specifically, women in their late 20s and early 30s seem particularly interested in this trash.

youtube.com/watch?v=5vL2LwjiOSE

if they were gonna do a shot for shot remake they should have reused all the dialog from the original.

Seriously?

It's so bad...

Attached: 433.gif (433x250, 1.53M)

but I am massively depressed and 31, and there is no way I'd ever see this

Someone pointed out that of they just put out a redub of the original animation, it probably would have done better

Jesus fucking christ

Attached: lion king.png (571x253, 12K)

What exactly is so bad about this? It just looks average to me.

Attached: wtf3.jpg (564x629, 48K)

I'm going to be 32 in august. And same. Fuck this stupid movie.

LONG LIVE THA KANG

They should have done it like the Broadway play and have actual human beings playing the role instead of just CGI'ing everything.

Honestly what's the fucking point of remaking the film with CGI? It makes no sense. They would have been better off just remastering the original film and putting it back in theaters.

affirmative action

youtube.com/watch?v=BUmKLV55wfY

just because some of you don't like live action remakes doesn't mean every else doesn't either

I wonder if someone could dub the old movie over the new one

post menopausal women love it!

nostalgianiggers are easy money

>live action

But it's fucking not. It's just the same film done up in soulless CGI. If it was actually live action with the actors playing the parts themselves then it would have been cool.

I know, like, it’s a thing to hate Disney because they’re Disney. But holy fucking shit this is actually atrociously awful.

Like they actually care. They got Seth Rogen as Pumbaa for crying out loud.

It's true. Every person I know that supports these trash remakes are all women in their 30's.

This is when these movies start running their course. Jungle Book, that one that started it all, was actually good because the adaptation added to the spectacle, like with the giant monkey scene. They managed to enhance it. This, and all the other ones since, just take it away.

In any case, brace yourselves. This is just the start of another 10-year, 22-movie run just like with Marvel.

Are there any weed jokes?

>the way he falls down
>somehow looks worse than vid related youtube.com/watch?v=UmPmpUTr22c

>muh Jeremy Irons as Scar
>muh original Disney movie
They're both shit films for kids. The plot doesn't make sense, the comedy is cringe and the songs are fucking terrible.

Where does this 'Jungle Book remake was good' meme come from? It was still trash.
Baloo was just a straight asshole for no reason, Mowgli making those ridiculous inventions was pure cringe, Kaa was only around to give some awful flashback exposition, the elephants were changed into... nothing? I get that a British Army regiment is dated but is plotdevices with no personality the best they could come up with?

Not to mention the fact that Shere Khan was totally right all along, he wanted to keep humans out of the jungle because they'd burn it all down, which is exactly what Mowgli did. Then all the other faggot animals take Mowgli's side for no reason despite being terrified of him for burning their home down mere seconds ago.

Walken's Louie was pretty much the only change that was decent. Wouldn't even say it's better than the original but at least it was a reimagining rather than straight up ruining it all.

congrats you fit in user

It's pretty much the same.

Guess if you didn't grow up watching the Lion King, this new movie isn't offensive.

Funny that.

Attached: sea lion pulls loli.jpg (700x771, 213K)

Why would the jungle have a monarchy and why would a lion be the king?

No but he says Timon and Pumbaa are gay

I grew up watching it but I couldn't give two fucks either way
They're both children's movies

Will normalfags finally turn on Disney?

>Baloo was just a straight asshole for no reason

You might be confusing the real one with the Netflix version made by Gollum.

>

Yeah, they will turn on Disney to watch this on their streaming service

Nah the Bill Murray Disney version. He never actually cared about Mowgli, he was just using him to get at the honey he couldn't reach himself.

did you look at the sample sizes? since you took the time to screenshot and post this, I'm guessing you didn't.

Pretty much Aladdin. Who the hell can even match Robin William's genie? Now Irons? Good luck to them

There is no evil in his voice when he says that, he just says it.

I don't get it, what's wrong with it?

I'm pretty sure he takes care of Mogli in that very movie and even fights Shere Khan to defend him.

That way the Mouse couldn't get to have the bew and cool black celebs go on press tour to attract the "urban" demographic

Predict the box office
>$970 million

I am still confused why they are calling it live action.

Maybe you're depressed, but you still have some will and balls to be here and to not fall in the Disney's Consumerism Downhill™.

The people who are actually hyped about these movies have lost everything and any will to live free.

>twitter bio
>he/him
yikes

i guess you haven't watched the trailers

UNDER THE SEA
UNDA DA SEA

True I have not. Are there real animals?

I'm really surprised and astounded at your lack of aesthetic sophistication given the cartoon image you have attached to your post.

They filmed the locations with no one there and then added cgi animals.

Why does western lolicon art like Shadman look so wrong, edgy, mean, and demented? Just a "wrong" skeevy feeling from it. Meanwhile Japanese lolicon art looks wholesome in comparison.

:O

>Age 45+ - 8
Yapp, checks out.
These bitches in my age bracket are ALL fucking idiots.
And they are YOUR bosses in HR any other state jobs

>the only live actors in this film are plants
My nigga baobab better be mentioned in the credits

It'll make a fuckload of money. Casting niggers in almost every role ensured that people will defend it no matter what too. Disney might be evil, but they're not stupid.

had to come out with (((new))) shit to keep the rights. The mouse knows

What the fuck. Did he punch him in the fucking face

SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS

blacks are lion furries

>Men based
>women bad

Mufasa's hitting dat woah

Unironically China market

>all black cast
>except for evil villain, who is of course white
Oh boy, I don't nose

There's really not that much difference between gender groups though, especially when you consider sample size and how usually women are giving Disney movies an 8/10 minimum. The only people who consistently like this (at least, consistently out of 9 people) are moms and wine aunts who probably just want a movie to take their kids to. Somehow this movie is still going to make millions somehow, probably because even if people don't like it it's still made by Disney which means they have to see it to be "in."

>There's really not that much difference between gender groups though
>The only people who consistently like this (at least, consistently out of 9 people) are moms and wine aunts
uuuuh

It was a kino moment.

Attached: seal wants loli pantsu.png (742x426, 513K)

user those are literally 9 people. And no one ever thinks wine aunts have taste.

>New bad soulless
>Old good Soul
like a clockwork

>evil villain who is white
Are you talking about the reboot here? Because I'm almost 100% certain that Chiwetel Ejiofor is black.

*could have been

*Inhales*

Attached: 1563204680945.webm (627x480, 1.68M)

>lions punching each other

>They would have been better off just remastering the original film and putting it back in theaters.

They did do that.

Attached: 7016C616-5A1C-45B9-9C5D-489BC65FFFD5.jpg (1280x804, 279K)

OMG THAT OUT-OF-FOCUS 240p CROOKED PHONE VIDEO JUST PROVED HOW AWFUL THE MOVIE IS

DISNEY IS FINISHED LOL

I actually laughed when Scar sucker punched him, how could anyone working on this shit think that looks good? Is it just that all the alternatives are somehow even worse?

>0.02 mousebucks have been deposited into your account

Thanks for the original response too! That one is priceless.

Go to bed Favreau

I'm going to laugh so fucking hard in the cinema at this scene if my friends make me watch this.

Imagine being such a faggot contrarian that you defend this on Yea Forums

Attached: 1536248886679.png (334x393, 265K)

that bitch slap also scar looks like the boomer meme only lion version

Attached: 1525388794348.png (380x349, 77K)

Black people have flush EBT cash to burn and Disney empowers them to spend on jungle related content

it looks like someone jokingly dubbed over wildlife footage

It doesn't look bad because it's crooked or low resolution you faggot

Literally does

>watching it in a theater is going to magically fix the terrible lip sync animation that's present in every officially released clip so far

nope, locations were also cgi

lmao why tf did they change it so that scar scratches his face like a house cat

I'll be too amazed by the jaw-droppingly gorgeous visuals to pay attention to the exact lip movements, and I'll be busy singing along with everyone else in the theater during the songs

Kek fuck off with this shit bait

Was she okay ?

>"Let's make a photorealistic version of this!

Arrogance or stupidity; whichever it is, it's beyond imagination at this point.

Attached: mufasascar-e1503220724691.jpg (767x431, 28K)

>people enjoy stuff i don't, it can't be
you must live a very sad, isolated existence.

cringe

kino

Attached: 1552696349740.png (501x504, 18K)

Cgi = Soulless

the incredibly racist against black people chinese market... yeah ok.

you didn't read who's on the cast did you?

Yeah as if the chinks care who voices the characters
They eat up anything CGI

wtf was his problem

Wouldn't they have a Chinese dub with Chinese actors for the Chinese market anyway?

Good point. They sub normal live action movies but I dunno about cartoons with songs and shit

>mfw this looks better and is more fatefull to the original
>mfw i have no face
youtube.com/watch?v=UmPmpUTr22c

This is the future they chose.

she fine

youtube.com/watch?v=pMDtibc13fc

women are retarded

$$$$$$$

"long live the king" is probably the most iconic scene in disney animated movies history, how did they fucked this up so badly

"Can You Feel the Love Tonight" takes place during the day

>males 1006
>females 133
>adds up to 1139
700 trannies voted too, or what? Nearly half of the audience are trannies?

Attached: 444.jpg (306x429, 27K)

It's not about the movie. It's a way for women to check in and post that they're at the theaters being tolerant, diverse and so very progressive.

some people probably don't specify

I like how they're so brainwashed they instantly had the "maybe this sweet, innocent dindu got the part based on merit and vocals" lol...so naive.

Mowgli looked like a beautiful girl in that movie so I didn't watch it.

I know she's fine but is she okay?

To make money, and it's working

>in the original Scar actually removes Mufasa's hold on the rocks and makes him fall
>in the remake Scar just bitchslaps him and that causes Mufasa to lose his grip
not even that they could do right

AAAAAAAAAA NOOOOO

Attached: 1547997728548.jpg (510x590, 25K)

Attached: 1426624758464.jpg (576x440, 41K)

what exactly is the difference? He causes him to fall in both.

Holy moly this is such a pathetic shill cope why are you even here lol

Nostalgiafags will flock to it.

I was determined not to watch it, but for the first time in like 5 years my girlfriend wanted to go to the movies, so since she has joined me for a bunch of movies that she thought were utter shit, I'll join her for this trainwreck.
I made sure to order comfy recliner seats in the back so I can sleep, though.

Attached: 1562656226738.png (553x581, 303K)

fuck off normalfag, no one cares about your opinion

Thats literally the same sequence but worse because CG realistic cats can't into expressions because they're fucking cats.

The quality of the video doesn't indicate anything. Everyone knows the movie is visually amazing. But you can tell by that video they literally just did a shot for shot remake of an iconic scene instead of doing something original with it.

>instead of doing something original with it.
why do they have to? This is literally a fucking remake of the movie.

Lions don't punch others. He might've as well place a banana peel over the rocks and trick him into stepping onto it and thus falling, and that would also, as you said, caused him to fall which by your argument would make no difference whatsoever.

No. The early clips posted here have shown they're subbed.

>Lions don't punch others.
they slap at each other all the fucking time, what the fuck are you talking about?

He slapped him and caused him to fall, what exactly is your problem with it?

>Lions don't punch others.
youtu.be/kyJUQuaECrg?t=65

It's a different interpretation

what is: oceans eleven

It's average

Was he an incel?

Lion King was always a shameless Kimba the White Lion ripoff anyway, fuck it

wouldn't you say that by casting all females, that was the "doing something original with it"? How well did that work out?

this film looks like absolute shit for several reasons and while this scene doesn't hold a candle to the original it doesnt look bad, stop trying to be cool you autistic fags.

I think he was talking about the Clooney version being a remake.

never saw the original, how different is it? And the clooney remake was arguably successful, so what's his point?

>Ummm no sweetie you can't have the bad lion hold the good lion's paws in place before throwing him off, that wouldn't look right with our realistic designs
>Do you think this might be a story that doesn't really work when we lean too far into a realistic look?
>Nonsense

Attached: 1448937399756.png (610x418, 114K)

nigger what the fuck are you talking about

WOMEN ARE FUCKING RETARDED HAHAHA

>Geralt_forgets_he's_allergic_to_peanuts.jpg

Loooooooooooooool

>desna | 19 | he/him | pretty boy enthusiast | RT HEAVY/NSFW | (was gaydarkpit) | i organization xiii | dnfi u ship akrk

Attached: 1545607214607.jpg (565x546, 63K)

I'm not talking about the 2001 remake.
My point is that its a good remake and The Lion King isn't.

Holy fuck, Disney on suicide watch lmao.

you are a zoomer so this is just par for the course for you

What? Don't be stupid.

>The Lion King isn't.
have you seen it?

Opening weekend in China was kind of shitty though

Attached: Screenshot_2019-07-15 The Lion King (2019) (2019) - International Box Office Results - Box Office Mo (580x130, 7K)

>that butt after opening the thumbnail
Now that's a butt
*pffffth*
A puppity putt
*tthhhhhhfffffftt*
A huppity hup bup...
A cluppitty frup
*pfffth*
*pfffth*
Can I touch that butt?
That huppity flupp?
Can I hit it with the cup flup?
Or shuppity hup?

The animation and sound is identical. I do not see what you retards see.

Realistically that's how a lion would actually do it. They are trying to make them more like real life lions, not cartoon ones.

Well it just makes it look incredibly silly. Like a fan-edit of someone reciting hamlet over animal planet.

IT'S IDENTICAL. I DON'T SEE WHAT YOU RETARDS SEE.

LMAOING MY ASS OFF. THE ANIMATION. IT'S IDENTICAL. LMAO

I wonder if the whole cinema was hungry watching all those animals.

Yeah, it doesn't work in real life. They really should have just left it alone. If they want to be 100% truthful to lion behavior, simba would have to kill or kick out any males in the pride once he got older. Including his own father.

kek

That's maybe what annoys me most about these live action remakes, especially the ones with animals. They were cartoons because they were fantasy. There's nothing fantastical about real life.

>there are people who post on this board who will watch this movie
>inb4 b-but pirating isn't supporting i-it!

boomer women are mentally ill

True, jungle book was pretty good but we could have lived without it. They could just make new movies or even cartoon sequels. But new ideas are too hard I guess.

kill yourself

You really so dumb you can't see why the scene is bad since it's slightly out of focus and low res?

>posts (((modern))) "cartoon" character
well, there's your problem
you seem to already like bad things

it's gotta be bait; I refuse to believe otherwise

>mouse makes money from CGI Lion King
>people declare the original to be better
>they demand the first Lion King in theaters
>mouse makes money from old rope and merchandise
They can't lose at this point

>dude how can you not like Disney it's so magical

were there at least real rocks?

youtube.com/watch?v=GV3ZXOe779k

Live action remakes are cheap, pandering trash.

you fuckers better not let nostalgia turn you into hypocrites

Attached: truth.jpg (1920x1080, 778K)

>is a CG cartoon
>live action

Donald Glover is box office poison

I mean it's not awful, it just can't measure up to the original.

This. told my co-worker it was fucking trash and getting shit reviews, she STILL wants to see it.

>1006+133=1879
I don't understand

its actually not bad, just slightly towards bad when comparing directly to the first part of the video goddamn crybabies reminder to drop hollywood and disney all together, they were always worthless, everyone knows this.

Right except no-one fucking saw whatever the first one in that picture is

>Director: Jon Favreau
Oh it shows.

A scratch, it seems

cgi bad

>starting out with a still shot before the cartoonish zoomout

fucking why?

>NO SCAR, DON'T SAY IT
>NIGGA
>AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Jesus Christ, the Chronicles of Narnia had a Lion who could show more emotion.

That's because the people making Narnia gave a shit (for the first movie at least)

Based.
Cringe.

>being this zoomer

I really regret not seeing it. I have never seen Lion King in a theater.

Chinese market didn't exist in 1994

Disney Moms need to be purged.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Duh.

The villain is black too, dumb /pol/tard.

thumbmail image look slike a man in a lion suit laugying over a cliff, top kek

Except for maybe zootopia which was decent why has all of disneys 2010's output been hot garbage?

and try to guess what happend with the male director and creator of Zootopia.

what does any of that even mean

Attached: 1470658877896.jpg (720x720, 61K)

The way Mufasa falls of the cliff in the cgi one makes him look like a plastic model

Tangled was cute.

To answer your question, Disney started splitting the big talents of Animation amongst themselves and Pixar, so instead of one studio that's shit and one that's great, we've got two studios that are so-so.

Holy mother of SHILL

>there are grown adults on this board who enjoy the original Lion King

cringe and shillpilled

Attached: 1466710994235.jpg (792x792, 218K)

is this.....

It is, brainlet. it's literally the exact same scene except for the the photorealistic animation (which is pretty fantastic btw) and voice actors. You people are fucking retarded.

This. There's car ads, lipstick sets, everything. Disney are properly cashing in.

Yeah it’s the exact same scene except for the worse framing, voice acting and animation.

Why bother remaking something if you’re just going to make it the exact same except slightly worse

sneed?

top kek

I hate Disney.

>which is pretty fantastic btw
Fuck off shill, it looks like shit

/oursealion/

youtube.com/watch?v=pMDtibc13fc

it would just have been hamlet then

*SNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIFFFFF*

This movie will make so much money

this. Im going alone to remember those songs and the brief time I was happy 20 years ago. t. 30 year old boomer

...

Attached: 1533539370478.webm (480x480, 2.83M)

Why is the water so dirty?

Attached: B22A68F5-CDA5-4CB8-9518-AEB96F76B543.jpg (750x703, 95K)

This is unironically the song that plays when Simba reclaims Pride Rock:

youtube.com/watch?v=mXblqtzy_tE

>why did they make this movie
The average doofus only watches Disney or capeshit, even if most of them dont like black ariel theyll watch it because they dont want to try anything else, they dislike the "unknown" too.

so is this considered live action or CGI?

The best part about this movie is watching you pathetic losers seethe over it

Attached: fred.png (738x696, 487K)

Earn those rupees, Rajesh

This is an abomination.

Because the girls are drawn like crackwhores.

Kill yourself

nobody cares about that snowgook cunt

>Kill yourself

Attached: hqdefault-3.jpg (480x360, 30K)

Woah calm down Rajesh, take a nice shit in the street and come back, you need to be focused to defend this objective trash fire of a shit film

saw it when i was a kid, i remember that lion turning into an energy ball or something to fuck up some enemy animals.

Imagine defending this shitty leftist cashgrab.

The sad part is that there is real technical prowess here. That looks like a pretty real lion. The the face swipe is so silly looking that it breaks the drama of the murder.

I hope selling your dignity was worth having an idiotic sex partner who’ll give you a handy if you’re lucky

>people literally just don't tell their gender
>TRANNIES LEAVE REEE
LMAO

>facts hurtful
>u incel

It’s trendy to be politically correct, close minded with PC beliefs and spend time and energy impressing others

It makes total sense why a cash grab movie like this is doing well. People in general are shit and are too ignorant/prideful to accept this fact and change

Welcome to culture, 2019

based user
all i can think off when seeing these scenes
Shieeeeeeeeeeeet