Killing Thanos during beginning of Endgame was a worse Blunder of the Century than The Long Night.
Bringing him back for Act 3 was BS. That was another Thanos. That was not Thanos from Infinity War.
WTF were Russos thinking?
Killing Thanos during beginning of Endgame was a worse Blunder of the Century than The Long Night.
Bringing him back for Act 3 was BS. That was another Thanos. That was not Thanos from Infinity War.
WTF were Russos thinking?
>muh headcannon
It may as well be the same Thanos. He learns he succeeds in his plans and he'd be willing to do it again. Right? I hear plenty this stuff on the Mauler Shitshow of retards where they act as if this changes the movie at all.
She is going to age like milk
Brie is cute!
There should have been no 3rd act Thanos at all
>going to
she already has
>going to
was everyone in universe 2 like: where the fuck did thanos go?
Then there is no third act.
I don't like how strong 2014 Thanos is. Why rely on henchmen when one can beat everybody else easily? He could have done everything himself easily years ago. Why wait until 2018? Because the MCU wouldn't exist if he did.
Because Odin and hela would destroy him individually let alone together
There's so many problems with Endgame.
How come normies hated Game of Thrones but gave Endgame a pass?
>same being
>same powers
>same goal
>same motivations
>same methods
>HUR DUR HE'S A LITTLE BIT YOUNGER NOW IT'S A TOTALLY DIFFERENT CHARACTER BLUNDER OF THE MILLENNIUM
You're retarded.
>Why rely on henchmen when one can beat everybody else easily?
It's like you've never read a comic book before.
I saw The Long Night and Endgame on their premiere weekend, and they were both disappointments. Endgame might have plot issues and lame humor that went on forever, but at least it didn't assassinate everybody's characters?
Characterisation that we saw Thanos go through in Infinity War was made irrelevant. How is that good?
Not seen Far From Home yet. Is the fact that Earth was shown as being borderline post-Apocalyptic in Endgame addressed? Or is everything back to normal somehow?
They're probably grateful they will never have to deal with him
Because you've already seen the characterization. You knew he was ready and willing to sacrifice everything precious to him in order to accomplish his goals. What difference does it make if that externalization of his internal traits isn't repeated for an audience that's presumably seen it before? How does it affect the final battle?
They thought "we need to have them fight Thanos but expecting them to stand a chance now that he has all the stones and has technically won is far-fetched."
I rather liked the second Thanos being young, more rash and trying to keep what he'd won, without having actually done the work to win that first time.
I don't think you know the proper context to use that word
I was constantly annoyed with how every big teammate in fiction always lear to characters being divided in groups. Then I gradually realized, through things like Infinity War, that having one gigantic action clusterfuck isn't smart.
The third act of Endgame was mediocre. I just didn't care about what happened on the screen.
Infinity War, however, had an engaging story that didn't rely on a trip down memory lane. I'm not saying the time travel segments were bad in and of themselves, but highlight episodes leave the audience disappointed. I don't need to be reminded about Tony's father, so I can feel bad when he kills himself with the Infininity Gauntlet. Just show the action progress without the nostalgia.
Thanos was much better in Infinty War and carried the movie.
The 1-st IW was about Thanos.
The 2-nd was about Avengers.
>Thanos was much better in Infinty War and carried the movie.
Because the entire point of the movie was building him up as a villain that can be a threat. EG is about the Avengers and them trying to undo his success. Thanos in IW already won, Thanos in EG is one that realized he already won and is convinced it's destiny so he gets very cocky and doesn't plan as well leading to the Avengers gaining the upper hand.
IF CAPTAIN MARVEL HAS BEEN PLAYING SPACE POLICE FOR TWENTY YEARS IN SPACE WHY HADN'T SHE EVER ENCOUNTERED THANOS BEFORE?! DUDE HAS BEEN GENOCIDING PLANETS ACROSS THE UNIVERSE. YOU'D THINK THAT WOULD BE IMPORTANT ENOUGH FOR HER TO GO STOP AND DO WHAT SHE WAS DOING. GOD I HATE THE INCLUSION OF CAPTAIN MARVEL. SHE FUCKS UP SO MUCH WITH WHY THE FUCK WASNT THIS BITCH DOING SHIT THIS ENTIRE TIME!
I just take IW as the conclusion to the MCU.
The folly of the good guys was that they killed almost every badguy who could have stopped Thanos and then lost because they were too weak to take the hard road to victory.
The problem is that it's the same Thanos but he acts like a nigger
endgame was satisfying
It was Thanos from infinity war, just younger
>As long it doesnt affect me, who cares who dies
>That old purple man attacks my homeplanet enforcing his patriarchy?
>Now i will punch him through the glass ceiling!!
The state of feminism now
How is it irrelevant if it's the same individual?
This It had several emotional farewells and it was the best timetravel mischief in mainstream kino that made everyone give it a pass.
He's not the same, he didn't colletc all the stones, he didn't sacrifesed Gamora, he didn't kill Loki, Vision, Colletor. He didn't fight Avengers of Titan.
He was just random guy who happened to know that in one of futures he killed halfo funiverse. Replace him with any other character and it doesn't change the movie.
The portals scene is based. I like when Pepper shows up.
judging how they edited her basically out of EG, Disney didnt want to release EG without Marvel having a female headline a film
Wait why was a giant lava monster a threat to Hela when he couldn't even touch normal Thor?>??????????????????????????
Because when Loki put his crown on the Eternal Flame he powered up.
Time travel to resolve a plot is just an admission that you've written yourself in to a corner.
Imagine if they had this ending for 15 years and every other their movie were just preparation for this.