>title references Area 51 despite the fact that Lazar didn't work there >random clips and images sped up jarringly added to scenes for no reason - actually very distracting when Bob is trying to explain something >shitty CGI clips with no relevance to the content >unintelligible Mickey Rourke narration of meaningless lines of dialogue >awful camerawork, e.g. Bob is drawing something to illustrate a point and no attempt is made to show what it is for a few minutes >Super sekrit footage of conversation that got him raided is sped up so we can't hear it (why include it at all?) >Completely inconclusive - despite agreeing to do this dickhead's documentary, Lazar won't talk about Element 115, which he presumably stole from the lab
This thing is like it was designed by Eddie Bravo after a joint, it's bizarre
Also >entire section on cloud chamber experiment >no attempt made to explain what the experiment actually consists of or what it's trying to prove >no mention of whether or not they're showing the footage or just some random shit as usual
Wyatt Adams
It takes a special kind of retard to believe any of this
Out Of The Blue is an old one from 2003 but its a lot more serious that that Amazon trippy shit
Kevin Roberts
Tell us. We'll believe.
Elijah Evans
It was a very frustrating watch I just wanted to hear Bob talk about shit, the worst bit about that conversation they sped up was him at the start saying "we'll show it unedited" The JRE he was on was annoying too cos the other guy kept interrupting
Jason Jones
how does "lucid dreams" explain scars?
Ian Garcia
The more I look up about Lazar, the more I wonder why Rogan took the interview
Didn't his first wife suddenly 'an hero' while he was secretly already with his 2nd wife?
Jacob Thomas
She definitely died
Not sure about an hero though
James Martin
yeah I think Rogan did a better job just interviewing the Bob and getting the story. this whole bullshit documentary was terrible, Mickey Rourke as narrarstor was just distracting and I can't remember the name of the guys, but whoever it was that was with Bob on rogan and made the documentary, was terrible, he hurt the movies credibility more than bob ever could
Fuck me, back on web 1.0 they really dug deep into this
UFOboomers must be raging that zoomers only know him from Rogan and this BS documentary
Evan Gonzalez
SHE WAS CHEATING ON HIM AND RUINED HIS ALIENS GIG, YOU'RE GODDAMN RIGHT SHE HAD AN ACCIDENT.
Leo Campbell
How did she ruin his aliens gig
They're still interviewing him 30 years on without a shred of proof
Logan Gutierrez
He installed security cameras for a FBI honeypot brothel since he had no job after being fired from the project. Corbell and Rogan are shit at questioning. Corbell had proof that the S4 range existed with an old Russian spy satellite image before they destroyed the site.
>without a shred of proof Gets really awkward when the chief of DIA starts digging into Lazar's claims and actually finds the black project he worked on imgur.com/a/ggIFTfQ
Joseph Butler
>pic related Original satellite photo that were taken after Lazar made claims about a secret site at S4. They started photographing every day instead once a week because of it.
His fake educational background is enough to discredit him
Parker Baker
>"entire history of ufology" >a bunch of stupid government conspiracy bullshit including the widely debunked mj-12 hoax that probably came straight out of usaf counterintelligence embarrassing. read vallee
Henry Thompson
Your whole post is cringe. Don't try being an edgy movie critic anymore. Its embarrassing
Benjamin Harris
I agreed with his evaluation. This movie was very strangely made and I wondered about some of the same things. You can fuck off if you'd like.
Blake Perry
>lying about your educational backround to employers during a time where you could basically get away with any lie bc no internet discredits him
