Gives reasonable criticism

He once stopped a review of a supernatural movie to rant for an entire solid 2 minutes about how ghosts and god and the afterlife don't exist.

>rapes your horse

Attached: 1563009833892.jpg (500x428, 68K)

I watched his videos for years and enjoyed them because I too am a cynical contrarian faggot.
But I mean I watched his stuff literally for years before finding out he was a horsefucker. I like that his content is focused and that he doesn't force his faggotry on others.

>gives reasonable dogfucking
>introduces normies to dogfucking
>falls for dogfucking
>is actually successful in dogfucking
>has dogfucking

Why is he called a dogfucker?

Attached: TP-Sheriff-Dept-mug-in-scene1.jpg (1520x1138, 286K)

But he's an incel tho

Because he fucks dogs.

And admits it?

with verve.

Yeah

Attached: spike-rugrats-6.13.jpg (210x240, 10K)

I see, interesting.

Attached: Screenshot_20190710-171510-582.png (480x351, 147K)

>yeah so it has good cinematography, good writing, no jumpscares, good atmosphere, really fun
>but the characters acted totally irrationally in that one scene when they were about to die, I mean anyone with half a brain could tell that the logical solution would have obviously been to just fuck the dog
>anyway, if it wasn't for that plot hole I would have given it a 7/10, but now I'm gonna have to give it a 4/10

>the cinematography was good/bad/lacking/mind-blowing
>the score was good/bad/lacking/mind-blowing
>the editing was good/bad/lacking/mind-blowing
>the story was good/bad/lacking/mind-blowing, and by the way here is my autistic nitpicking
Wow great review Adam! I'm totally with you that a movie isn't more than the sum of its parts.

Attached: 1562593600562.jpg (622x621, 54K)

To be fair most modern movies really aren't.

Isn't this the guy who said every movie before 1980 is automatically bad?

These. He has no idea what he is talking about. Of course you don't have to know about old films when talking about newer ones online, but his reasons for not watching and disliking older films are retarded. He still talks about technical side of filmmaking, older films are often more technically impressive and better looking than newer ones. Also he shouldn't call himself a film critic. Film critic should be somebody with a certain film knowledge. Armond White, Mark Kermode those are film critics.

highly doubtful since he would be in jail then

Dude is legit a virgin, has admitted it himself

The guy doesn't have the brain functions to follow the plot in a simpleton's movie like A Quiet place.
Sure modern movies aren't anything special, but to read off a list of how you felt about each of its aspects is bringing the whole genre down. Mind you, I've never seen him bring up themes except when he rehashes reddit discussions for his Synecdoche New York video essay.

Thank God

It's legal in Canada so he says.

That's true. Kubrick's techniques of composing backgrounds with the scene itself are alone far more impressive than most CGI nowadays.

fucking canada

HAHAHAHAHA so funny and le ironic! Based dogfucker!
>virgin response: but you're being ironic too!
have sex!

so does this dude actually fuck dogs?

>The guy doesn't have the brain functions to follow the plot in a simpleton's movie like A Quiet place
Specifically how?
Saw the review, didn't see the movie.

Of course it's more impressive. People like Antonioni, Kubrick, Bergman, Tarkovsky, Dreyer, Wilder, Kurosawa, Mizoguchi, Visconti, Ford, Hitchcock etc. made films which are more technically impressive than the shit that's being made today. Just look at the chase scene in Stagecoach.

>93% of every video is just trailer clips repeated over and over and over and over and over again
>sometimes they're related to what he's talking about
>the other 7% is some shitty animation or non-movie content
>he doesn't even edit his videos anymore

He's unwatchable if you actually pay attention. The videos are utterly pointless unless he can freely use footage from the movie.

yea, hes also a furfag so no surprise there

When did he say older movies are bad because they're older?

Hes just milking for Patreon money. His last proper video is 6 month old. Everything else is just:
>So I just saw this and it was oooooookay
>I give it a 6 out of 10
Wow, thanks Adam. Cool review

Attached: 1474264178600.png (1319x554, 171K)

>youtu.be/jy-eDZkhljg

>liking Kurosawa means you're fake
I guess 8 year old me was an infatuated pseud for loving the hidden fortress

This might be the most retarded shit he has ever said.

dogfucker enabler

>has sex
With dogs

I really like him. My favorite e-celeb

He fucks dogs

>objective perspective
>criticism
my sides

>The alsatian sensation, the terror for terriers, the man who will make your shih tzu's shit loose, he's got a noodle for your poodle and a plug for your pug, for him, it's legal if it's with a beagle, IT'S ADAM, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN

Attached: 1537825639046.webm (720x404, 1.51M)

>GUYS MAKING THIS TOP 10 LIST IS TAKING A LONG TIME
9 months out of every year

fpbp

>has sex
woof woof

>so he says.
they recently made it legal to marry animals.

It’s just a stupid argument. There are many people who pretend to enjoy older films (pretty much anybody who tells you Citizen Kane is the best film ever made) to look smart, but there are still plenty of great older movies. The technological limitations normally meant filmmakers had to be a lot more creative and thus made films that were more highly crafted.

Canada is really going to shit

youtu.be/BYWNFwwOqYQ
Look at this idiot

I sincerely do not understand how someone who does youtube as a "full time job" can not have an output of at least one quality video a week. It can not take more than 40 hours to research, shoot and edit one 10 minute video.

>has sex
yeah, with dogs

>(pretty much anybody who tells you Citizen Kane is the best film ever made)
It's a fantastic film, though, and I can understand why somebody would say it's a favourite of theirs. I think we're well past the point of plebs saying it's the best film ever made, if there's any group of people who try to make themselves seem educated on film nowadays it's the people who act like Citizen Kane is outdated in any way and has lost some of its appeal because it's been so "influential" or whatever which is exactly what Quentin and YMS say in this video

Fpbp

D O G S

dogfucker

>...with dogs

Based

what video is this from?

if only charles foster kane fucked dogs he'd rate the movie 10/10

Attached: 67567.png (1162x1032, 39K)

how can the pyramids be great if we have skyscrappers and really tall buildings around the world, its 2019 guys!

he's right.

I can tell just by looking at this guy that he fucks dogs

couldn't agree more desu
you've all been tricked into liking those """movies""" when nowadays we get better ones every year

White boys fuck dogs

>nose
Also dogfucker

He considers the fact that a child sang the end of a line a half step higher than the key of the song, something that is barely noticable to be valid criticism of the Lion King...
Let that sink in

>White boys
He's canadian though

thats a pretty good point but at least he doesnt exclusively focus on the plot and writing like many other youtubers

/thread

based

>It didn't bring anything new to the genre
He's just cinema sins with a nazally voice. Fuck off

>half step higher than the key of the song
>something that is barely noticable

Holy shit show me the episode . He kicked the shit out of that dog.

It is barely noticable because most people literally required a video with the two notes blaring in the background to notice it.

Advertising this pedophile furry again?

people are plebs

and you're an autist

>older movies are less impressive because they used less technology

that's literally what makes them more impressive , they get an incredible image across by thinking outside the box and using movie magic

So because he's age-ist against old movies, reads reviews like a catalog and cuts videos with shitty trailers to avoid copyright strike, he's a dogfucker?

Attached: 1559093733355.jpg (640x619, 69K)

youtu.be/xOz2cvHDDJc

Here you go wise guy, point out the exact moment it happens. You shouldn't have a problem since it's so noticable.

I went deaf yesterday in an accident

yea

i thought this was contrapoints for half a minute

he fucks dogs he does

>taking the opinions of an unwashed virgin

no

...So we're not allowed to enjoy old things? Is that what he's saying? I'm more impressed by what old movies had for technical workings - they lacked a lot of what modern movie-makers have at their beck and call.

Based

FPBP and /thread

He doesn't enjoy them obviously so he takes consolation in thinking that everyone that does is faking it

All I want is to find 1 (one) youtuber who reviews films and has a good knowledge of film/film history. Is that too much to ask for?

Can't watch him anymore since he unapologetically and eagerly fucks dogs on the reg.

can't believe wasn't banned from twitch for raping a dog on stream

this pretty much

...

...

I watch his videos but he is a pleb who fucks dogs

...

How could one man be this based?

He thought Citizen Kane was famous for being the first real movie

it is

...

>"And I'm giving this Labrador's anus a 6 out of 10. Maaaaybe a 7, I'll seeeee"
>*the dog begins whimpering in pain and fear*
>"Quiet! QUIET!"
>*Adam begins beating the poor dog whilst shilling Sardonicast*
>"Hmph! A-and one more thing!"
>*Adam kicks the dogs in the ribs and into a dark closet which he closes and locks. As the dog continues whimpering, Adam pants; his grotesquely fat face is red and sweaty*
>"AND FUCK MARK ENGLISH!"

>introduces normies to kino
That's literally all he's good for, he constantly shows up Ralph and Alex on the podcast with his recommendations and discussion picks.
In saying that, I don't think any of his followers would watch something like Norte, despite him always mentioning it.

Attached: brendan-fraser.jpg (763x731, 107K)

Based Mark

I only watch his old review, cause it was pretty funny and good.
Now it all garbage.

i like some of his older videos and still watch some of his more recent releases if he's recommending films just to see what else is out there but I think politically and socially he's kind of a strange weirdo.

any1 else on that ?

>dogfucker
>I think he's kind of a strange weirdo
o rly

*schlop schlop schlop*

Attached: 1555322028986.jpg (249x166, 7K)

Chris Stuckman and Jeremy John are both shit but they at least have the decency to put out content on a regular basis

alcoholic dogfucker*

Based on all accounts

>has sex
with dogs

based

Attached: giga chad.png (500x500, 107K)

james rolfe (avgn) unironically has an impressive knowledge on film, especially horror

don't ever reply to me again

Name the better ones of nowadays.

i dont mind people being elitist cocks about film if they have the knowledge to back themselves up, but this man is the biggest fucking pseud on the internet.

A quick look through his imdb reveals that he's never seen:
>taxi driver
>gone with the wind
>psycho
>it's a wonderful life
>12 angry men
>ed wood
>chinatown
>king kong (neither the original or peter jackson's remake)
>blue velvet
>the graduate
>scarface
>texas chainsaw massacre
among others

He's right tbqh.

Based

this. only problem hes not very critical usually but still, when it comes to silent films of lon chaney (not german expressionism tho) up until the 90s hes got a really good knowledge of all kinds of horror

The plot and the writing are the core of any film

Attached: 1560877855032.jpg (750x393, 27K)

No, he happens to be a dog-fucker who is age-ist against old movies, reads reviews like a catalog and cuts videos with shitty trailers to avoid copyright strikes. Dog fucker is not an insult, it's a legitimate description of the person in general.

Based
Watch his reviews other than his quickies

Based

>are usually

>suspiria (1977)
>man with a movie camera
>haxan
all masterpieces that completely btfo your argument

Once you fuck a dog, every other aspect of your life becomes completely irrelevant, you’re a fucking dog fucker, shut the fuck up.

>Implying those films didn't have a script
Yeah, i don't think so

He's just a long form CinemaSins.

stop pretending to be me

they'd be fucking shit if you were grading them purely on their story

>caring about opinions of some gay fury dogfucker on the internet
Thats a yikes from me.

hey dog
it's just you and me tonight
everyone else is asleep

hey dog
if i was to fuck,
i won't fuck so deep
though i doubt i'm gonna
you can slorp me up if you wanna

You call people pedophiles because they fuck kids, not because they make shitty pizza.

He fucks dogs - he's a dogfucker.

Not even an insult - just a fact.

How?

based and redpilled

His favorite movie is The Holy Mountain. Only a true degenerate would claim a Jodorowsky film as their favorite.

Attached: 0cvhsve.gif (360x169, 1.79M)

>mfw listening to him talk about going to fur conventions on Sardonocast like it's completely normal

He's such a fucking strange person. Ralph and IHE just chuckle and go along with it awkwardly.

Attached: 1562947983170.jpg (572x858, 59K)

Incorrect, any story, even the simplest, can be good/memorable if well executed, Star wars is an example of this.

Because he's abnormally vocal about being pro -bestiality.

Attached: 1549202766815.gif (330x166, 2.11M)

let's ignore his terrible opinions and dogfucking for a moment
how can anyone listen to his lazy whiny gay voice for more than 30 seconds?

>confusing plot with story

Hi Adam how's your dog dildo -collection going?

No he isn’t

Hmmm, no. Nice try kid.