What does a $5 milkshake taste like?

Milk and ice cream.

>plus tip

that tiny bag was 3 grams, that's not a small amount. 1 gram of dope is usually split into 10 bags, most dope addicts only use 1-3 bags per hit.

That's the point of the scene

Like this if you are reading this in 2019

like liquid sunshine

Like soggy cloth

Which flavor $5 Dollar shake Yea Forums?

Attached: JRSmenu.jpg (592x836, 76K)

Just in case anyone is wondering: OP made this thread as cloaked tangent thread to the blue milkshakes in Disneyland about the $20 or whatever blue milkshakes in the nu-StarWars land they recently made.
You can sage and hide as you see fit.

McDonald's

>t. Stretch Armstrong

>81▶
>File: JRSmenu.jpg (76 KB, 592x836)
I'll take the virgin shake dude

AHEM*

Attached: MCDONALDS FRAPPOOOOOOOOOOOOO.jpg (480x640, 39K)

It was weed

anything but spearmint is a waste

no, its tobacco. you can see the tobacco bag in the scene

As a british caliphate citizen i envy the american milkshake. We have nothing comparable here. The closest you can get is a McSlops tasteless slurry.

OI you got a loicense for the milkshake?

PARDON ME, MAY I CHECK YOUR LOICENSE FOR THAT MILKSHAKE?

Attached: Police Faggots.jpg (456x405, 73K)

pity the brit

Like a milkshake.

I
thought the same thing when I saw this thread

milkshakes are pretty easy to make at home as long as you got the icecream. thats what i do when im in Podunk nowhere on work.

117961437
vanilla ice cream
milk
chocolate syrup
combine and blend
Also adding malted milk is good but not for everyone

fuck the chocolate syrup, add peanut butter and vanilla extract.

a good milkshake will run you $10, period

>Thumbs up if you agree!
It's been long enough since I've seen this that it now elicits nostalgia rather than annoyance.
Thumbs up.

Enjoy the gold :)

Pulp Fiction doesn't take place in 1994, it's set in an anachronistic universe that borrows from the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s, and the QT metaverse.

>Weiner
Learn to spell if you're paying homage to kino, bitch.

There ARE american themed restaurants here that do sell them you mong.

With inflation today that would be an $8.64 milkshake.

Spearmint, or maybe Salted Caramel if mom order Spearmint.

>Uses a cell phone
It's the 80s at the earliest.

Gimme the $10 shake and fries combo, with Holy Aioli fries and a spearmint shake.

The events of Pulp Fiction can (IIRC) be definitively placed over a few days in the summer of 1992, based upon existing tech depicted in the film, the prize fight poster, and a few other clues. It's been a while but I will even hazard that this is all internally consistent. It's summer 1992 my dude.

Ben & Jerry's Cherry Garcia - Gluten/Dairy-free ice cream

Almond milk

Super diced fresh strawberries

Organic chocolate syrup

XL steel cup

Combine with freshly popped kettle corn.

Strawberry and I'll share with you babe

I will suck your cock like it's a religion.

are you sure you shouldnt be using onions milk instead?

There's no room for debate. It's not set in the 90s. Tarantino and critics have said as much. It's an anachronistic setting. Look at how Mia Wallace, Marcellus, Vincent Vega, and Jules dress. Look at Jules' jeri curl. No one wore those with sideburns in 1994. Note Jules' Fonzie reference. The young robber girl doesn't skip a beat. No young woman her age would know what Fonzie is like in the Kurt Cobain era. Look at Winston, he'd be cosplaying dressed like that in 1994.

The use of Dick Dale for the theme music, the use of 70s soul, that unlike Reservoir Dogs, isn't from a throwback Oldies station. Video games do not exist in this world. Note how there are zero games in pawn shop. In the early 90s, cartridge games and consoles were staples, because GameStop wasn't a thing.

Jack Rabbit Slim's is too classy to exist in the actual 90s, even in California, and its servers are dressed as 60s icons. It's not taking place in Marilyn and Buddy Holly's era, no, but it's not the 90s either, the spacious layout and parking lot, it evokes the Drive-In theater and roller skate burger joint era.

Even the casting of Travolta, who was a has-been before Pulp Fiction, complements the anachronistic headiness of the kino. Travolta conjures 70s and dancing. No one his age was dancing like that in 1994. Esp at a late night diner.

absolute state of the britons

its milk syrup and ice cream just go to fucking asdf or whatever and make on at home

You are a retard and just wasted all that time typing out evidence to support that fact.

dunno lol

>DURRR IT WASN'T DA 90's

Attached: pulp-fiction_nsx-3[1].jpg (960x408, 70K)

Not an argument

No further evidence is needed.

The car is not a confirmation that it's the 90s. Again, anachronism can mean things from the "future" inserted into a more ambiguous, romanticized past. Pulp Fiction is unstuck in time. It's not set in any one "era" or decade. It's basically like if the 70s never ended and stretched into the early 90s. There are literally academic books on this very subject.

>DURR THEY COULDN'T CGI EVERY MODERN CAR
Still a nebolous time frame.

A lot of emotional whinging which means nothing; nothing was physically preventing our timeless anti-heroes from dancing like goofs and wearing already-available bad fashion-at a later time. While Pulp Fiction was instantly cited by academics as the postmodernist film par excellence for the well-trod reasons you've trotted out again, now that I actually check, the "THURS JULY 16" date of the fight poster is the most pertinent thing: July 16 fell on a thursday in 1992. (But the year is absent) good job.

Consider also the timing of the gold watch flashback to present, a good 20 years or so, (just-about) minimum is supposed to have elapsed. I don't think Vietnam was necessarily over at the time of the flashback, but it was sure close-and here I am no hypocrite-judging by that late 60s/early 70s interior. I wanna say there's one or two other clues buttressing 1992 (in addition to development itself) but I regret I don't have a copy of the flick handy.

Oddly, you also half-misrepresent the interaction between Jules and Yolanda. She does indeed "skip a beat", but whether she actually knew the fonz or not is immaterial: it's a plain-stupid zoomer-tier error (regardless of your own age) to think that gen-X'ers and/or younger boomers wouldn't know who the Fonz is. Of course they did, taken as a group. Smash Mouth wrote a song about him a few years later. These people only had the television, they didn't have countless internet subcultures that they could disappear into. You also miss self-aware irony itself: consider the success of the film itself, and that our characters are conceivably (in-universe) wearing their goofy outfits as a form of semi-ironic oastal retro-chic.

Attached: poster2.jpg (1734x1230, 296K)

>There are mastabutory academic books written on nonsense
You don’t say?

You've countered none of the examples, because you're unable to discourse. Instead you attached a photo of Winston's car. Look at the other cars on the street. Just because it's a 90s car doesn't mean it's literally set in the 90s, for this specific film, generally yes it would be logical to assume it was the 90s or then-present day.

>What does a $5 milkshake taste like?

Even shitty Asian boba tea places charge that much nowadays for their gray market liquids.

>up your filthy diseased tranny buttboo
Ftfy

That's not me. There's no reason to counter your examples.
People knew who Fonzie was in the 90s, No video games is proof of nothing, Nostalgia restaurants were big in LA in the 90s and for fuck's sake, Butch is a man in his mid to late 30s that had a father that fought in the Vietnam War.

I'm convinced.

>that poster has no date, specifically because the era the film is set is intentionally, awesomely ambiguous and anachronistic

>that old school checkered cab in the bottom right corner.
Cabs like that did not operate in LA in the mid 90s. Look at that fight marquee. No boxing matches had marquees like that in the fucking NINETIES. Compare this movie's setting to Doug Liman's Go, Die Hard 3, or Trainspotting. This is not the Nineties. Is it a revisionist fantastical bong-hit version of the 90s? You could make that argument. But your own argument is baseless.

>VietNam with the ass watch
There's you one decent counterpoint, yet just because VietNam occurred in this film's universe doesn't mean it's a historically accurate and correlated version of the 90s as they occurred. Butch, like Vincent Vega, are not men you'd find in 90s Los Angeles. The 70s, yeah. 1980? Perhaps, with Butch's jeans.

Look at the title font and design. Those are 70s colors, the red back shadow evokes a stoned motion picture, a vintage projector, 70s fast food wrappers and colors.

>She does indeed "skip a beat", but whether she actually knew the fonz or not is immaterial: it's a plain-stupid zoomer-tier error (regardless of your own age) to think that gen-X'ers and/or younger boomers wouldn't know who the Fonz is. Of course they did, taken as a group. Smash Mouth wrote a song about him a few years later
This is you're biggest mistake itt. Yolanda doesn't stutter because she doesn't know the answer. She delays because she's 1) stoned 2) stupid 3) nervous 4) confused by her diminishing authority in the situation. She answers Jules, Fonzi is "Cool." He doesn't guide her toward that answer.

This means Yolanda isn't just familiar with the name Fonzi. Or that a character existed named Fonzi. Played by Winkler. No, Yolanda has trivia about Fonzi stored in her memory. This is highly unlikely if this were the early 90s.

>This means Yolanda isn't just familiar with the name Fonzi. Or that a character existed named Fonzi. Played by Winkler. No, Yolanda has trivia about Fonzi stored in her memory. This is highly unlikely if this were the early 90s.
Are you fucking kidding me? How young are you? Fonzie is one of the most iconic tv characters of all time. I was a kid in the 90s in Australia and knew who Fonzie was and would have given the same response if asked, "what's Fonzie like?"

Please consider suicide

>Smash Mouth even wrote a song about the Fonz a few years later after Pulp Fiction's release
Are you literally retarded. Smash Mouth wrote that song BECAUSE of the dialogue and scene with Yolanda and Jules in the movie. Do you remember how HUGE this fucking movie was? 10 year olds were buying Dick Dale CDs at the mall. Does this mean they knew who Dale was before PF?

Your better example should have been that Weezer's "Buddy Holly" video around this time recreated the set of "Happy Days" with a "cameo" by the Fonz. But that too was a huge leftfield cultural moment, supported by the fact Weezer was considered a super white geek-chic band. Rivers Cuomo would be able to answer Fonz trivia questions, Yolanda? Not so much. Jules doesn't mention Fonz to trip her up with trivia at the diner. He asks the question because it should get her to FOCUS. Like "1 + 1 = what?" This means Happy Days has mainstream social currency at the moment of the robbery.

Fatality. Please exit the ring. You've been knocked out cold like Bitch's opponent.

>stretching on when Vietnam occurred to keep Muh Timelessness afloat

"C'mon, man." Yes, "c'mon, man" is a substantive argument, here because that's how dumb you're being. Everyone watching the film has a sense of when Vietnam was at its height (from about 1965-1975), and with the set design, will make the obvious chronological jump: this happened about 20-30 years ago, and current events take place about 20-30 years later. That is, a generation later.

>still tripping over yourself and further confusing matters with the Jules/Yolanda stuff

I'm going to take the trouble since I'm bored, but it's a long way to go. Your language is so confused and self-contradictory on this point that it's going to deserve its own post, which I'll do separately.

WHAT YEAR DOES 'PULP FICTION' TAKE PLACE?

The 1990s? Incorrect.

One of the intricacies of the movie pulp fiction is that you are supposed to be unable to determine the year, even the decade, in which the movie takes place.

Well according to a couple of off the cuff references, you can find the movie is (most likely) based in the year 1982. The real range is anywhere from 1979-1983 but most likely 1982 for two reasons, General Mills monster-themed cereals and shitty 80's bands.

In the apartment scene where Jules and Vincent retrieve Marcellus' brief case, Jules mocks one of the kids in the apartment's hair, calling him "flock of seagulls". Well, the band Flock of Seagulls, which the haircut was named after, was not formed until 1979. However, they had their first hit single and their most commercially successful year in 1982. It would be unlikely Jules was an early fan of the underground band A Flock of Seagulls so most likely only new them after they became well known with their first 1982 hit.

So, although it is possible this could have occurred starting anytime after 1979, it is most likely it was at least after 1982.

The next clue comes from a scene with Lance, after Mia snorts Vincent's heroin and begins to OD, the scene switches to Lance eating cereal, specifically Fruit Brute cereal a General Mills monster-themed cereal that was discontinued by 1982.

So unless Lance was a hardcore aficionado of Fruit Brute and stored up on it before it was discontinued or liked eating very expired cereal, the maximum year these events could have taken place was 1983 (assuming it hadnt expired by then), but most likely 1982.

God damn it takes that much to get loaded?

based word filter

Attached: 1465844032154.png (350x277, 218K)

Explain the Fruit Brute cereal Lance eats then, bitch? It ceased to exist in 1982! Not 1992! The Eighties.

And nope. Fruit Brute was never reissued in the years between 1982-1992.

>Stoner in a messy, dishevelled house gets the munchies and eats expired cereal because there's nothing else in the house sweet to eat

>expired cereal
No one eats decade-old cereal. Ever. And the box is new, and the cereal is fresh. He's a drug dealer and making good money. Exit on your right.

>It's less likely someone would eat expired cereal than be set 20-30 years after the Vietnam War
Exit off a tall building

That’s the joke brainlet

Very good if your name is Daniel Plainview.

It's too bad those autists stopped arguing desu

I wouldn't know. Every milkshake I've had cost at least $6.

>he's actually arguing the cereal is old because the cereal isn't in circulation
Christ, this is what happens when you're fed movie trivia without the proper context. Yeah the next time I see a box of old school Count Chocula I'll just assume the movie is set 30 years later than it actually is.

Fucking imbecile.

I'll take two alcoholic shakes, hold the shake.

Count Chocula never left circulation. Fruit Brute seen in the film was never made again after 1982. Big diff.

Kek

>When I see a character that is 30 years after an event I'll be sure to check cereal boxes before I determine the timeline

Count Chocula also doesn't look like it did a mere decade ago, which is my fucking point.

I still say "thumbs up if you get the reference."

>paying attention to the boxes themselves and not the context in which they're presented
Moron.

In Canada it tastes like a cheap milkshake.

So what is the context of a character being a child around the Vietnam war and then 30 years old or so during the main story?

And Red Apple cigarettes never existed. It's almost as if movies aren't real life.

Eric Stoltz's drug dealer is dressed literally identically to the singer Harry Nilsson on his famous solo album cover, which came up in the 70s. Roseanna Arquette says "Farrrr out!" The motorcycle movie Butch falls asleep to in the hotel is from 70s. "Dead nigger storage" would never be said by white males in 1990s but in the 1970s and part of 1980s it wouldn't be that bad. Also Bonnie the black nurse is wearing a 70s nurse uniform in the film.

It's a nebulous time frame full of anachronistic items and imagery. I'm not expecting you to agree, but goddamn some people are too stubborn to admit simple facts of life.

Vietnam occurred in the world Pulp Fiction occurs in. But it was not set in the year of release. It's an alternative timeline in the groovy sense of "alternative" not the same as the revisionism in Man in the High Castle.

And it's set approximately 30 years after the Vietnam War with a character using a cellphone and another driving a 94 Acura NSX. It's a film set in the nineties filled with references to Tarantino's childhood because he's an overgrown child that never grew up.

This. Quentin Tarantino has confirmed it.

"don't be a square."

>But it was not set in the year of release
How do you figure? Colonel Coots gives a rundown of the watch and the Wars in which it featured and they all follow our own regular reality timeline.

Sonic's peanut butter milkshake is worth 5 fucking dollars.

It's a fucking Anachronism Setting. The year is never specified or hinted at in the movie. It's a magic fictional time.

Been making sure the thread stays up while I prepare the Yolanda stuff, give it a few minutes.

Yes but it's pretty simple to put two and two together. Do you need everything spelled out for you? Ultimately it doesn't matter to the story but it's inarguably 90s.

1/3

This series of three posts concerns the interaction between Jules and Yolanda at the end of Pulp Fiction, when the standoff begins and the words "Fonzie" and "cool" are used. For reference, see 2:00 - 3:00 here:

youtube.com/watch?v=mvy4YH9--Vw

Specifically, this post is a rebuttal to various confused statements concerning the scene (and its larger context) made in the posts and , which I reasonably assume are made by the same person, "B". Thus far I, "A", am the author of and . The also-antagonistic post may be by a third person "C", but it could be by "B" as well.

In , B writes: "Note Jules' Fonzie reference. The young robber girl (Yolanda-ed.) doesn't skip a beat. No young woman her age would know what Fonzie is like in the Kurt Cobain era." This statement is patently false in two ways: First, regardless of the reason why, Yolanda does "skip a beat". There are many reasons for her to do this, as B CONCEDES below in : "She delays because she's 1) stoned 2) stupid" etc. Second, assuming an early 90s setting as B does for discussion, he states that "no" young woman of the period would know "what Fonzie is like" (read: who the character is, what he's known for). Since B makes such an overarching claim, it can be strictly dismissed (of course there were young women in the 90s who knew who Fonzie is), but we can strengthen the point: Happy Days was a popular 1970s television program that ran from 1975-1984, and was later syndicated on TBS from 1989-1995 (taking wiki at face value). Even if Yolanda herself didn't know who Fonzie was, large numbers of young women of the period did in fact have a basic acquaintance with the character, even if they didn't watch the show-which is all that's relevant here. There were many young women of the 90s who knew who Fonzie was. I made these same points in less formal terms in , to which B then replied in .

2/3

In response, B replies that Yolanda "delays", conceding the above and abandoning the point. While B now provides reasonable possibilities for Yolanda's hesitation, it also ISN'T entirely true that Jules DOESN'T "guide her toward that answer." -the point just now being that B's assumption for discussion is also false. In the confusion as the standoff sets up, Jules (and Ringo) utter "cool" and "chill" multiple times, as Jules simultaneously assumes control and attempts to prevent escalation. Regardless of whether Yolanda knows Fonzie or not, this has a clear verbal priming effect in the context of the situation, so that she delivers the requested answer: Fonzie is (I, Yolanda, will be) cool (calm). Either (or both) because she knew the character, or because she heard the word "cool" multiple times, and understood what she was requested to do/say (be cool).

B's prose and thought process then become thoroughly confused in the final paragraph of . This confusion extends to the immediate points made (what Yolanda knew, could be expected to know and how, etc), and also to B's larger argument (Pulp Fiction is a postmodern film not explicitly "set" in the 1990s). To aid this rebuttal, I'll rephrase. "Yolanda knew what Fonzie was like without Jules telling her, therefore Yolanda had trivia about Fonzie's character stored in her memory. But since as I've said, it's unreasonable to suppose that a young woman in the early 90s would know the Fonzie character, the film must not be set in the early 90s."

is it really $3 more for flavored salt?

3/3

As another writer "D" helpfully corroborates , this last paragraph is TRIPLE-STUPID, maybe even QUADRUPLE-STUPID. To simply state the assertion is to see its stupidity, as the Australian user remarked. First, the possibility exists that Yolanda picked up on the "cool" word only from the heated exchange itself, as has been shown (yes, the individual may not have known the character-but many younger women did). The reason why this point is important (even though it involves the case of conceding that Yolanda really doesn't know the Fonzie character, which is not the larger point) is because it is one possible disruption to the above "reasoning" process, one of several ways to topple the house of cards. The other ways assume the other possibility, that Yolanda does know who Fonzie is. Second, it is (again) a ridiculous contortion to hold that young women of the early 90s, in general, didn't know who Fonzie was, as has already been shown. Third-where else is there to go, chronologically? Butch's aging puts us in the 1980s at the earliest, and nothing physically (temporally) prevents the olde-time taxicab, Vincent's ridiculous hair etc from all jostling together in the 1990s.

The central point is that B offers a deeply confused, incorrect and internally inconsistent mis-read of American popular culture as it relates to the Yolanda/Fonzie problem, displaying a thought process so poor that it undermines his thesis-that Pulp Fiction is not, in some strict sense, set in the 1990s. While B IS correct as to the intentionally confused, "timeless" postmodern quality of the film, with its anachronisms and SEEMING contradictions which ARTISTICALLY suggest that the film is set in no particular year, the preponderance of evidence nevertheless lead us to conclude that the film is set in the 1990s, the non-impossible anachronisms notwithstanding.

Does Mr Wolf have a cellphone? Can't remember.

>british caliphate citizen
>MFW Americans go out of their way to larp as bongs
Fuck are you doing you American larper? Also Eddie Rockets in Ireland is a pretty amazing milkshake place, can't thing of too many big name milkshake places in the UK But they absolutely exist.

Attached: 1561497701510.gif (400x300, 1.93M)

Vincent does but Wolfe takes both of his calls from landlines.

my man

I reckon the autist going off in this thread about how Pulp Fiction takes place outside of any known place and time is Roger Avery.

the drug dealer is watching a show from the 90's eat shit

there is more confirming it's set in the 90s then whatever pretentious bullshit you are talking about

it's the adderall admiral
writing holy mackeral

Fruit Brute cereal stopped being made in 1982. The box of Fruit Brute the heroin dealer eats from is new. He's definitely not going to be eating a 10-year-old expired box of cereal. And why would he just randomly open an ancient box of Fruit Brute that evening?

Tarantino purposely left the time period open-ended, and moreover this artistic license wasn't merely to be "hip," it adds a timelessness to the film's themes of karma, good, evil, and peace. As the name of the movie and its title design colorfully implies, Pulp Fiction is a pastiche of eras and a kinetic palette of low culture from multiple decades.

You have flip phones and an Acura from the 90s, you have retro tshirts like the Santa Cruz Banana Slugs t-shirt that Vega wears after cleaning up nigger brains, that aren't communicated to be retro at all, they are Jimmy's clothes.

No characters make any, not one, reference to 90s culture, whereas the show KungFu, Happy Days, even presumably Fox Force 5, are old. Fox Force 5 would be a traditional boob tube show in the 70s, as Mia describes, but it'd be very very odd in the 90s Tv landscape of Home Improvement, ER, and NYPD Blue.

Pulp Fiction, thus, is not set in any known year of reality as we know it. Tarantino is immersing us in his world, which as we know is filled with alt-history, from the death of Hitler to everything I've mentioned here. Mia Wallace saying unironically "Don't Be a Square" which no one said in the 90s, then drawing a magically appearing square in the air, semi-breaking the 4th wall, all is part of the Unknown Magic Year, which is the point of the movie:

Pulp Fiction has one foot in the past, the other in the present, and it dances back and forth across the lines, that's the riskiness and brilliance of this kino revelatory indie classic.

You are a Fruit and this has been one Brute defeat for you.

Such as what? A car? A phone? The dialogue, slang, pop culture references, the clothes of every character, the color palette, the furnishings and architecture, the music, "Smoking cigarettes and watching Captain Kangaroo (70s show)," the nickname Rocky Horror for a fucking gangster.

The movie overfloweth with 70s, but has a few 90s quirks, which don't mean it's set in the 90s. It means it's a postmodern pastiche that also feels 100% authentic to itself. It has the word Fiction in the title. Pulp refers to the dimestore low culture publications of the 60-70s. The title alone sums up the m.o.

Blue or orange Addies?

when were mobile cellphones a thing? I think the answer lies with that.

>t. shortbus son of a summerfag

Saw pulp fiction in the theaters when it came out, back then $5 for a shake was ridicules, everyone chuckled in the theater at that line. Also everyone was white so it was a quiet sensible chuckle that didn’t interfere with any other viewers experience

DRAINAGE!

Attached: 9E474BB0-C4DF-4FA8-9C2B-69CB95935091.jpg (460x259, 64K)

for you

I saw Pulp Fiction on home video. And I never even questioned a $5 milkshake. I told my mom "what's the big deal?" She said "well that's a lot of money, what's in it" and I said "No it's not. And it's looks good."

I like to imagine she then surprised me by making a shake then and there. And hiding $5 under the cup. But iirc she told me there's too much cursing in this movie so I said Fuck you dumb bitch, go to bed but in a nice, sincere way that a kid would back then. Now kids actually talk to their parent like that more because of Basketball American culture than Tarantino.

>"Dead nigger storage" would never be said by white males in 1990s
but it was

early gen x grew up watching Happy Days when there were 3-5 channels tops.

I honestly hope posters like you get cancer. Not being ironic, I literally hope you die slowly. You're beyond pathetic.

What is that haircut called?

based (formerly thumpq up)

In the script he literally tells her it's only tobacco when she asks him to roll her one.

the " I'm trying to revive my son by becoming a thetan overlord". It's great if you don't want to spend too much time in front of the mirror during summer.

Big dick big brain post

Pulp Fiction takes place in the 90s but Tarantino was slightly sloppy because he didn't give a shit and wanted to have certain details in the movie.

He just picks cool stuff and throws it in, like a jerri curl. Not like NOONE had them in 1992, they just werent in style.and the cereal is just something he liked as a kid, no doubt so it’s an Easter egg.
^I fully support this anyways, realism/naturalism is shit film making and a cancer on Hollywood.
See the impact Wes Anderson films have on you for more information.

Attached: 181B75D6-B61D-4D7A-BF45-A39C9CE1E542.jpg (600x400, 51K)

Evil Heroin Steven Seagal

Travolta was smoking the script after he rolled that joint. It was a cooler time to be alive. He smokes tons of 420. Scientologists have pot farms.

samefag alert

How old are you? Does Pulp Fiction remotely look like 2Pac and Biggie Smalls were going platinum in this movie? Do you hear grunge? Rodney King and the LA riots? Same location. Criminals used beepers in LA back then. I lived in an apartment near Watts. Blacks dressed like Ice Cube, not Don Cornelius on Soul Train like Sam Jackson. QT isn't sloppy. He's meticulous.

True Romance, that took place in the 90's. Natural Born Killers. Reservoir Dogs. From Dusk Til Dawn. Pulp Fiction is set in a singular pulp fictional time.

Uno Farto was a huge nerd is why all that shit is in the movie. The story takes place in circa 1992.

Because junkies spend all their money on drugs. He probably pissed and moaned at buying the cigarette papers for 99 cents

Kill yourself Disney fag

nsx was unveiled as a concept in 89 dude

were gimps a thing in the 70's? I really don't know

Peanut Butter all the way fags

Yes. Ever see Deliverance? William Friedkin's Cruising w Pacino? Based on a 70s book.

Vanilla.
Salted Caramel if I'm getting it with booze.

Are you a nigger? Because if not you should understand that some films are documentaries, some are period pieces like Zodiac, and others are not a reflection of the real world at all, like Pulp Fiction. Just because Acura showcased a car in '89 does not mean Pulp Fiction takes place in 1992 because said car appears.

Do you take all art literally? Or are you a taco who studies every car promotion in the 10 Fast & Furious shitfests? Every character in Pulp Fiction dresses like it's the 70s. Are you researching when the clothes hit runways and retail stores? The movie takes place in neither the 70s or 90s, it's a singular hazy hybrid of both.

>But it has electrolytes
Don't be that guy.

On The Late Show Monday, Samuel L. Jackson and host Stephen Colbert were chatting about the ’fro’s they used to rock back in the day, which lead to Jackson talking about how his trademark Jheri curl in Pulp Fiction was actually a happy accident.

“Well, Quentin is this huge fan of blaxploitation films,” explained Jackson. “So in his mind, Jules had this big Afro. And, unfortunately for him, he sent this young, white PA over to South Central to buy an Afro wig. And she bought a Jheri curl wig thinking it was an Afro wig.”

“She brought it back, you know,” Jackson continued. “Quentin kind of railed at her, went off, and I’m like, ‘No, no, no, it’s perfect,’ because NWA is starting to hit, you know, they were large, and all those guys had Jheri curls.”

The milkshake that tastes like it was blessed by Jesus.

Attached: chick-fil-a-shake.png (934x910, 292K)

absolutely everybody during the 90s knew who fonzie was

Reddit - the movie

Do they put something in their shakes that make them taste like garbage? No other place has shakes that give such an awful aftertaste as Chick Fil A's.

it'd be $25 today, amirite kids?

It would be $30 if you figure prices double every 10 years and it has been 25 years, or 2.5 doubles.

Attached: 41070F87-66AE-488E-A67C-675DA1914E00.gif (499x266, 770K)

It would taste a lot better if satan wasn't living inside you.

Underrated

what does a $5 milkshake feel like?

upvotes to the left

Five guys does a pretty alright milkshake, I don't really like milkshakes though

Not true, if you can still find one of the 5 wimpy's left in the country their shakes are awesome.

5$ is the minimum these days.

Attached: 1555598206904.jpg (500x395, 30K)

he was just talking shit. guy was a fixer for a gangster, he was loaded. when he pays for the heroin he pulls out a fat bankroll

that's not even a milkshake you fucking retard

Just take some milk and icecream and blend them

These are fucking shit. I went there one night for a shake and there ice cream machine wasn't working so they offered this instead. Terrible.

is it just me or vincent was a beta bitch?