Thoughts?

Better than the Official Version?

instagram.com/p/BzNSWotovcI/

Attached: 62084122_348157572548050_7450929677921123537_n.jpg (1080x607, 56K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=nbY_aP-alkw
youtube.com/watch?v=yUioIn8rPPM
youtube.com/watch?v=TXbHShUnwxY
youtube.com/watch?v=KxoeALWDPGE
m.youtube.com/watch?v=IPiyo332Gks
youtube.com/watch?v=QVJ6lzEIUmo
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Attached: 65321888_123020398666296_307553583032853344_n.jpg (607x341, 33K)

I hate these god damned remakes and I’m a Disney shill.

Fuck its even more disgusting now

This is the route they should of went since it's all CGI anyway.

Holy fuck no.

Jesus Christ talk about uncanny valley.

Did they do this scene?

Attached: sexynala.jpg (600x338, 22K)

yeah better

They should have had furries in full fursuits because that's the target audience anyway.

yes very cute
show his friends too

looks better but the uncanny valley effect is a lot worse. like yikes i cant even stand looking at it for more than a few seconds

>OFFICIAL THING BAD
>FAN THING GOOD

DISNEY, HIRE THIS MAN!!!!

Attached: giphy (3).gif (245x200, 1.85M)

No.
The official is dumb because talking animals shouldn't move like real animals, but they do look good. These are bad if you're going for real, and bad design if you're looking for non-realistic

Nah. That's deeper in the uncanny valley than the actual movie.

>remaking a perfect original film

Attached: 1537350580153.png (323x570, 214K)

No, they're just like 'Oh it's you!', touch noses and jump around laughing like retards laughing, it also happens during the day.

Why would they hire Wee Bey?

There is zero FUCKING WAY TO FIX THIS it just shouldn't exist.

You know Simba's I just can't wait to be King song sequence? Well, because animals don't actually stack on top of each other it's just him and some lions and other animals running around in circles. You know how Scar had a dark sense of humour and dry wit? It's all gone, Scar now comes off as a bitter jealous one note faggot and he also looks like a complete bitch in the film too. Jon Favreau needs to be stopped, he is completely artless, has no sense of direction or any way to instill a mood into any scene beyond pure observation. This is a truly soulless soulless movie stripped of any life any joy and fun any originality any art any heart and any merit. Everyone involved should hang their heads in shame.

still looks weird. lets just leave the original alone how about that. nothing beats hand-drawn animation

They didn't have to go that far. The thing is that most people don't know the limits of expressions for animals, so they could have gotten away with cheating a bit. Nobody is thrown off by Rocket Raccoon, even though his face does things no real raccoon could ever do.

I'll be honest. I absolutely hate that 90s hair with the part up the middle.

Lion King remake should have just been a 3D animated movie using Toy Story 4's tech.

No
It's eerie

Yes obviously, the one on the right actually has emotion in it's face the left one is just a fucken lion

>Jon Favreau needs to be stopped, he is completely artless
Only when it involves grilled cheese sandwiches.

Fuck no

That cheese scene unironically has more love and passion in it than this entire movie.

>Jon Favreau
>Favreau was born in Flushing, Queens, New York, the son of Madeleine, an elementary school teacher who died of leukemia in 1979, and Charles Favreau, a special education teacher.[1] His mother was Jewish (of Russian Jewish descent),[2][3][4]
every time.

Attached: jew.jpg (501x504, 72K)

The right one is fuckable, real lion isn't.
That's the only qualification that matters.
So it's better.

it would make the remake look even more unnecessary though
at least the remake is trying something "different" by making the animals look real

No, that looks fucking awful.

The issue is Lion King was a terrible idea for a 'live action' remake in the first place. Most of these Disney remakes are and they're just bait for nostalgic ideas who can only process something they're familiar with.

Can You Feel the Love Tonight takes place during the day.

NINTENDO

>When Matthew Broderick has more soul singing Hakuna Matata than nigger's lord and savior Donald Glover
youtube.com/watch?v=nbY_aP-alkw
youtube.com/watch?v=yUioIn8rPPM

Attached: image.png (1081x329, 542K)

(((Jon Favreau))) is also the director of Iron-Man 1+2

>because animals don't actually stack on top of each other
b...but...

Attached: kittystack.jpg (500x375, 30K)

But it's not different, this is like the 4th time they've done this. And as poor as it was, Dumbo at least tried to tell a different story. This is almost scene for scene the same film except they've removed all the art direction out of the original for this garbage.

And it's not like Disney don't know adaptations. The Lion King Musical is one of the best adaptations of it you can watch and further proof that photorealism adds nothing.

Because he gets the job done

Whatever he had then is gone now. He is so focused on VFX he cares about no other part of a film. I can't imagine how many sequences he canned because LiOnS dON't MovE Liek TIHS

Attached: 58408955_2052839684833046_7237308620884890547_n.jpg (1080x607, 61K)

thats uncanny as fuck

Why is he making them all sad, is this the only expression he knows?
Oh wait, he's a 3d artist in 2019.

Attached: 57558571_136828254108499_5795126833703192401_n.jpg (1080x607, 78K)

>hired as executive producer of the Lion King reshoot
>accidentally shoots a cop

These are happy

Attached: 56881498_1119651604903421_1481085012174957768_n.jpg (1080x607, 94K)

I don't get a super expensive CGI remake over just doing a re-release with some animation/art touch ups.

>mfw Disney fast tracks a Zootopia 2 to get back in the furry fandom's good graces

Attached: 12304128304891234.png (970x546, 662K)

this is dreamworks-tier holy shit

the boar would creep the shit out of kids.

Attached: aaxJkggW_700w_0.jpg (480x899, 46K)

>But it's not different
hence why I put "different" in quotes
not defending the movie, simply saying that look would make the movie even more unnecessary

The real question you fail to ask is why even remake it in the first place?

I hope they include gay characters this time, there are no straight furries, unless in denial.

Attached: 50070561_373822769831960_4343327645819716040_n.jpg (1080x1194, 90K)

Attached: 1562948175233.webm (480x480, 2.83M)

Holy shit that's so cute

holy shit you are retarded

this too

Attached: 49643366_117959652597739_6903347816145572248_n.jpg (1080x1194, 115K)

I bet everyone on this guy's page thinks this looks better than the original, right?

Wow that sucks

Whoever made these should be embarrassed

holy fuck those colors hurt the eyes, i fucking hate this palette

N O P E

Attached: 45672803_207331086835660_7530439527930090576_n.jpg (1080x1350, 161K)

I don't think any human with fully functioning brain wouldn't consider that rendition of Simba cute, it's unironically off the charts, how is he retarded?

Top just makes me think why the fuck is that lion not eating the pig. Shit half the time it looks like Simba is actively chasing them.

Why didn’t Disney simply make a Hamlet film and cast humans if they wanted to be realistic?

The lifelike textures don't do these edits any favors. I like what they were going for, but the end result is too awkward.

What film actually blends photorealism and cartoon elements together well?

this, all he did was just slap the animated eyes and mouths on them from the original rip-off.

New one is better

The same way you are.

You're memeing me

based

Attached: 1457839460081.gif (400x225, 1.94M)

Detective Pikachu

No, he's not. It does. Can you feel the love tonight is sung during the day. Nala also has her own song for now reason.

people always do this shit, but they don't understand that stills don't matter - all that matters is how it looks in motion. Like detective pikachu looked awful in stills, but looked great in motion.

is he better than bosslogic?

souless

Attached: 1476228802062.gif (295x221, 554K)

better than the remake sure, but it comes from a 2d movie and it has to be catoonish to work, they should do something more close to Madagascar or Ice Age instead of that shit

>original film
Uhhh Kimbo came first sweetie

Absolutely, maybe it could work with normal animal eyes too.

More than anything I don't understand why they used those washed up colors, in any documentary lions look colorful

this but unironically

>Orginal
Lol

The idiot wasting his time making this fails to realize the purpose of the live action is to make it fucking look real. There would be no point of the movie if it looks like the right

DISNEY HIRE THIS MAN

What's the point of making cartoons look realistic yet completely fake, again?
This just makes me think of their computers, not the characters

uh...

Attached: 1532426123473.png (480x310, 370K)

Me too. I am paid $200 a day to shill here and this has been a really tough week.

I had to pull a lot of strings to get the jannies to shut down and ban everyone that participated in the Toon Town Terror disneyland brawl thread 5 days ago. And now I got to shill this piece of shit soulless film. I'm ready to throw in the towel.

Any of you other paid shills in this thread also thinking what I'm thinking?

Where's the explicit sex scene, this is what Disney would've wanted.

so that's why i got that replying to offtopic garbage ban

To be honest at least 50% of the characters in Zootopia looked gay.

"No."

How bad do you have to fuck up to turn memes real?

Attached: 1537490757632.png (1452x762, 487K)

Detective Pikachu

Attached: 1561181508701.png (937x705, 290K)

cringe

In the business we have something called disney dollars. Its a form of incentive but also ethical disincentive. An ethical disincentive is considered saying something that is true but that someone doesn't want known. In this instance we have gender transition surgery records of one of this subforums community moderators, so we used those disney dollars to ask for the disney land quibble to be kept under wraps

I hate everything about the camera angle/panning. Could be because what we're looking at is ugly, though.

Just because you wanted to fuck them, that doesn't mean they'd fall for you.

It's artless, like the whole fucking film.

The reason many Disney animations are so acclaimed is because they synthesize creative design and attention to detail.

youtube.com/watch?v=TXbHShUnwxY

youtube.com/watch?v=KxoeALWDPGE

The end result is something that's both charming and immersive.

The photorealism in the new Lion King is impressive, but it's not nearly as engaging as the animation in the original.

I feel bad for the parents who are taking their kids to see it because they saw the original when they were young. Their children are getting a sub-par product.

that's not how uncanny valley works

Attached: Janguru-Taitei-1.jpg (841x1200, 262K)

retard. the souless meme is imitating the common souless phrase not the other way around.
fucking retard.

ohnonononono hahahahHAHAHAHA

on the left: either a jew or chinese direction that cannot be intuitive or aesthetic
on the right: a white vision

>live action
huh

It looked awful in motion too

>Tonight
>during the day
wat

Yea its uncanny or whatever but still looks better than their retarded "hyperrealistic" look where characters look absolutely nothing like their cartoon counterparts. Youre retarded if you wouldnt take it over what we actually got

No it's not you absolute dumbass. Kill yourself.

soul

souless

Why is the scale in nu-king so fucked. T and B look like ants.

point was to look real. Right looks like shit

Just Alita: Battle Angel my shit up

The mane is better but the eyes are still creepy.

And in today's '4channers live in a bubble' we take a look at how retards actually think they invented calling something soulless and in an exclusive interview we investigate how Yea Forums users think the world revolves around them.

>don't recast james earl jones because the voice is too iconic
>replace jeremy irons' scar with a literal who

That's it? That's the live action remake? That was just a bunch of cheap walk-cycles! What a rip! Disney BETRAYED US!!!

Attached: disneyexecutives.gif (360x270, 2.54M)

>Can You Feel The Love Today

The problem is, we tried this with the Jungle Book remake, and it didn't work then either.

The only solution is to stop making live-action remakes. They don't fucking work.

They shouldn't have gone THAT FAR into cartoon territory, but it would've been good if they made Scar just a little bit more visually distinct. Given him a darker mane or something.
In the new movie, he doesn't look like a villain, he looks depressed.

They don't work but they're still too shiny to ignore when I look at what's up in theaters, honestly I feel more inclined to watch a Disney film than any other thing there.
John Wick 3? Justice League? Some comedy or action or horror film that's doesn't even have brand name? My eyes kinda ignore them and I'd go straight for The Lion King.

Sucks but that's life. Critics can say al lthey want but Disney is too influential to our culture, I can't ignore them even if I know they're bad. Beast and the Beauty was kino though, I only had a problem with Dumbo. Aladdin looked sligtly dumb in the musical moments but Will Smith still got me good.

If you want it to look like a cartoon, just watch the fucking cartoon. How stupid are you. It was supposed to look real

I'm not trying to be racist or anything, but the lions all look kind of the same to me.

Honestly this.

Like, I think the remake is stupid and redundant, but at some point, you just gotta let what is be what be.
Just admit to yourself that the original was better and watch that. Don't try to force a square peg in a round hole

Of course it would. Realistic lighting would mean you wouldn't be able to see anything at night.

Disney will put out what ever shit they feel like putting out, while knowing full well that it's not what the majority of fans want, and you MUST consume it or be labeled a manbaby, a racist, a misogynistic pig, or a _______________fill in the blank.

Attached: kfc.jpg (1172x1790, 1.78M)

yeah...I hate the new movie as much as anyone, but this doesn't help, its like those people that do hyper realistic art of random characters like the simpsons or mario

Even though people are shitting on this, it was made by one person who was doing this because they wanted to. Also uncanny valley only applies to humans so that isn't really a good criticism either.

It's fine

Attached: 1535506639892.jpg (800x757, 102K)

>uncanny valley only applies to humans

This film is proving that false

Adam what is the final score?

Dot and the kangaroo. Horror kino.

t. npc

Both are equally as pointless as each other so it’s a no from me.

I've said it before and I'll say it again; Jon Favreau is a gross flabby no-talent micro dick energy perpetual wannabe.

This brings a whole new level to the soul/souless comparisons.

Attached: dd4nfmu-0ca479b4-e335-4ff5-ac23-fd8f1735c0c4.png (750x563, 365K)

Rodger Rabbit

only time ive ever seen jon favreau was when he acted like a bitch to chris moltisanti when he was making that shitty lesbian heist film, fucking asshole who thinks he's orson wells while making the worst plebbait shit

It wouldn't work because the original animations have white features.

Bosslogic is officially employed by the Mouse now. He was making Spider-Man and Avengers posters.

>I made this realistic film into an "hyper realistic" cartoon
>lol I fixed it guys!

Post some real lion kino

m.youtube.com/watch?v=IPiyo332Gks

>he compares john wick to justice league and off brand comedy horror films
you're fucking stupid bro.

>Make animals emote like 2d drawings

a

Pixar tried to use cartoony character designs with photorealistic environments in The Good Dinosaur and it looked awful. You'd need the environments to match well and at that point you're making a CGI animated movie instead of "live action". Disney needs to find the happy medium between these.

Attached: good-dino.jpg (960x448, 45K)

Well only the characters looked awful. The world looked goddamn incredible.

based vegeta-san

>make money
>doesnt work
It does work

ugh .he's doing Cons now. this one is equally talented and does capeshit too

Attached: 62024642_312535582965882_5550453427494834662_n.jpg (1080x607, 87K)

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Oh yeah, capitalistically, it works wonders!
Artistically not so much.

Is this thing going to make money even though it's a piece of shit like everything else modern Disney puts out?

>cartoon is a visual spectacle
>live action is just the characters walking

Is mange common for lions? Maybe that would have worked?

Imagine being disney and thinking you can't make characters emotive with photorealism

Attached: 1532520715109.webm (720x300, 2.93M)

This looks like shit.

Attached: pride2.jpg (1368x1026, 286K)

They're cartoon characters

Maybe, but like
Black maned lions exist. They could've used them

Attached: D3y8UzkWwAE8DPJ.jpg (588x401, 88K)

Pumba looks like a serial killer

that mother fucker would have been perfect

The difference is, Rango knows when to cling to photorealism and when to let go.

The character designs and animation aren't photorealistic in the slightest.
It's the physics, lighting, and shaders that do 99% of the heavy lifting, as far as making the characters look and behave realistically.
It's actually a solid 50/50 split between photorealism, and breaking from reality for the sake of action and emotion. It's actually kind of a master-class in knowing exactly where and when to do that.
Lion King buries the needle on the realism, acting be damned, and suffers for it.

Attached: 1bda9b2838f6f9cab59c706de5c5d042.jpg (682x1024, 101K)

>those expressionless faces all around
>muh realism
I sincerely cannot comprehend how anyone at the fucking studio thought "yep this is fine"

Based animation

literally soulless vs soul

fyi you can buy a pass to avoid being banned. Yea Forums doesn't like to annoy paying customers.

>Industry experts said it could be the highest grossing film of the year
TICK TOCK AVATURDS

Fuck off, no way.

literally soulless vs soul

>What is moonlight

I love Eternal Enemies. But if you want some sad news Mandebu and Ntwadumela were ousted by three rogue male lions about a year after it was filmed. They were pushed out of their territory and ended up going outside the borders of the national park and got shot by poachers. :(

It's because lions sleep at night and it would be too unrealistic to show them frolicking at night, heh, that's absurd!

It's so dense, every single imagine has so many things going on. Every single shot has a digital effect. It's Jon's way of making the best film possible.

Attached: Rick McCallum.gif (340x223, 1.83M)

thats stupid you dumb cunt; its exactly like the cartoon. why bother with a new movie if everything from looks and story is the same

Kind of uncanny with those cartoony eyes and that realistic fur

Nah, that's also too far into the cartoony style. They should have used the Narnia approach where they have decently realistic animals and very expressive facial animations

Attached: rpc.gif (160x200, 949K)

>nigga yo warthog is high on shrooms

Both look terrible

better

souless soul

>perfect
Top soi. It's a fucking average movie and retards can't see past their nostalgia

What an absolutely top-tier pun.

Maybe Jon Favreau
Learn something from this.

U N C A N N Y
V A L L E Y

Are you retarded? In Roger Rabbit the cartoon characters specifically do not blend in with the live action world. It's basically a plot point.

>original
>Simba is making the most of his freedom, swinging from vines, jumping into a river, goofting around with his friends, and generally being childish
>his movement is energetic and light, showing his youthful and carefree personality
>walk cycle uses high steps and shaking hips to show that he's hamming it up

>new version
>literally just walking
>nothing happens
>movement is heavy and plodding like he's elderly
>walk cycle is completely ordinary and realistic, shows absolutely no emotion

this is it folks, this is the crystallized essence of soul vs soulless

Holy mother of soulless

is this by shadman?

good god this is terrible

>Simba doesn't have anything even remotely resembling a facial expression
>Only jumps around a bit like he had too much caffeine instead of enjoying the pleasures of a literal jungle paradise
>Color palette ranges from dull green to dirt brown
I would really like to know which version a child would like better in this day and age.

Attached: 1560724845327.jpg (493x352, 60K)

>Given him a darker mane or something
That's racist though

First look at Scar in The Lion King (2019)

Attached: 1543012274019.jpg (236x303, 15K)

That's fucking retarded.

thats because they thought of the idea for the characters after they made the world like how they redid that Dinosaurs movie and added shitty voices to it instead of none like they originally planned

>CG rendering
>can't create incorrect light sources for artistic effect
what am I saying, they're outright refusing to do anything for artistic effect

soul vs soulless.... not in the aesthetic sense, but the right one looks like a literal uncanny valley demon.

youtube.com/watch?v=QVJ6lzEIUmo
Someone posted this in another thread earlier and it made me wonder. Could you do a photo-realistic CGI The Lion King with no dialog and only instrumental music if you had absolutely immaculate character design, animation, and cinematography? I know Disney would never do this because it would be far too experimental to be a plebhook cashgrab, but could it work and keep an audience entertained for ninety minutes?

Why are freelance artists the most despicable people on earth?

Check'd

He look like the downs syndrome tiger. You know the one.

Please be trolling.

Attached: 1496076730568.jpg (269x211, 8K)

Hercules could work well. i mean it's not like there isn't musicals. why didn't they just film the lion king musical in a fancy way?

You forgot to cross out "little" and put the word "black" in its place!

>perfect
>takes hamlets story and adds lions
>Shakespeare was already a hackfag who ripped off hamlet from history and various other stories
Have sex

No its worse somehow

Why is this movie a fucking thing at all?
What a terrible idea.

Attached: 1553780203595.jpg (508x508, 14K)

>I'm not trying to be racist or anything, but the lions all look kind of the same to me.
Das racis.

Attached: 1558301439021.jpg (1836x2448, 545K)

You're all wrong. That looks much better. Obviously if you were actually do it in a film you'd make it more subtle but at least trying to recreat their look would have been preferrable to generic CGI lions. Simba's look in the cartoon is iconic, simba's look in the live action just looks like any other lion.

Hercules is a Greek myth though. Not really the same as the Lion King.

>taking inspiration from the world around you is hackish

That's literally how you make it feel real. All great writers do this. Whatever the genre.

I dont care

ip protection.

No. Looks too close to the original.

CUTE

this.. why would they do that? this film is basically hey we have the tech lets do it this way cause there arent any humans

Looks too much like a muslim, you racist.

bullshit it was mostly the crappy ass music for children

Attached: didney.png (480x600, 736K)

>live action remake
>it's all CGI
what did they mean by this?

you guys are dumb I think the shot of them just walking in a straight line is much better

>tfw never seen a single Disney movie except that one time they wheeled out beauty and the beast on the school tv
feels kinda based

JESUS FUCK WHAT

>Genest Dies
That was like a year ago. Why is it showing there?

>Can you feel the love this early.
>Can you feel the love this morning.
>Can you feel the love this afternoon.

How do I cleanse myself and attain your powerlevel?

Only correct answer.

kek

After Ralph Ruins the Internet, I don't trust Disney with Zootopia 2. They are going to ruin it somehow.

Attached: 2925695690.png (775x703, 817K)

What emotion is the right conveying?

So now with every FX heavy movie we're going to get a bunch of freelance and amateur graphic design failures making bad photoshops in an attempt to get a job? Fuck Sonic for making this happen.

>It was supposed to look real
Why?

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1024x576, 29K)

>Can you feel the love tonight

They already made a live action Hercules, it was called Superman: The Movie

the new one would of worked if it was purely English actors with a brtish style docu feeling

I think thats is what they were going for and got confused and needed to add the original back in because they got scared then added diversity so it couldn't be criticized

like it was meant to be a super sober version but with a little theater class

the probably got spooked when the original idea might have been accused of racism

now its just garbage that will linger

Attached: pepe-the-frog.jpg (1020x574, 48K)

You're actually a brainlet.

Unironically sounds like kino

You're trying to hard.

The point of Scar is to be hot, they made him ugly in this movie, it's idiotic.

>~uguu

That's some great animation.

Rip zombie boy

Attached: 1444505719393.webm (1152x480, 2.82M)

walking simulators finally reached Yea Forums

retarded, looks too much like the original and completely out of place with the photorealistic approach. i'm tired of these fucking brainlets without an actual job in the industry thinking they can do better than a huge team of people all brainstorming ideas to come up with the best possible approach. they have no context of the whole picture, yet they have the audacity to think they know how shit should look

they would NEVER be able to make a decent movie themselves. EVER

>best possible approach

Attached: The-Lion-King-2019-Rotten-Tomatoes-Score.jpg (798x420, 24K)

>a huge team of people all brainstorming ideas to come up with the best possible approach.
Every blockbuster has this same approach and 99.9% are barely watchable at best. Doesn't matter how huge your team is if it's full of retards.

Maybe, just maybe, this should be interpreted as the time to move the fuck on from watching disney movies my dude. Criterion is thriving, good movies are still being made around the world, you shouldn't be this upset that Disney makes bad movies and yet, still consume disney and hollywood movies

Spotted the pajeet render farm monkey!

I've never seen Rango. Looks pretty fucking good.

I literally did a dry spittake just now. I was not expecting the critics to go wild on this movie. I was positive it would be 95% and nothing but mousedick sucking.

Attached: 3453563560.jpg (359x359, 25K)

Attached: 11453634564356435.jpg (499x481, 28K)

Based pseud contrarian retard

both are shit

He is right. The one on the right looks stupid

I wish I saw the re-release of Lion King when it was out. I've never seen it in a theater because when I was a kid, we almost never went to movies and only watched them on tape.

Now this piece of garbage is going to be clogging up theaters for a few weeks and there's nothing to look forward to for the rest of the year. There's a garbage Terminator sequel and a garbage Star Wars sequel. woo hoo.

Attached: 2459824569.jpg (570x425, 47K)

so he's wrong while incidentally being right about that one thing

Attached: 3A7D4EA1-3DD6-490B-A6DF-EF036F2D0A2A.png (782x1156, 565K)

I had a pretty visceral reaction to that webm. I really hope this movie flops but that's putting too much faith in the NPCs.

Attached: 2456925690.gif (300x136, 110K)

Rango is fucking great, go watch it

They had to remove the scene from the original where he tries to seduce Nala because her rejection of him wasn't convincing enough.

The literal definition of soul vs soulless

This is like saying Taurus is superior to Stairway to Heaven. Get over it. Disney did it better.

Attached: 1533734649764.jpg (373x331, 16K)

>Can You Feel The Love This Morning

>they're literally just walking

There is no fucking way this movie isn't an elaborate troll.

Attached: 1507600335134.jpg (672x728, 79K)

Meant for

>uncanny valley

Fucking reddit kys

I thought the critics hated the movie because the story says that if you let the weak masses rule things go to shit or something

genuinely feel sorry for you, 89-95 alone is enough to fill a childhood, let alone missing classics like Snow White

>not making the penis on the castle extra large.

ONE JOB!

Rango is amazing. 10/10 alternative to Disney / Pixar whether you are drunk or not.

Another film about police? In current year?

Attached: Nickface_27.png (289x402, 177K)

>i took the CGI lions, but added sad disney eyes

Attached: 1543762317023.jpg (706x634, 29K)

Based Jon Favreau wasting the mouse's money. Now if The Last Jedi 2 flops heads will roll.

Attached: 245925690.jpg (800x626, 53K)

>cartoony cgi
god no why

that skeleton tattoo guy is finally dead great

The Narnia movies are family-friendly kino. Aslan is proof that CG can still have soul, and Lion King completely misses the mark.

Attached: aslan vs simba.jpg (796x450, 262K)

I can guarantee you that someone at Disney is pissed about all the furries the original created. They throw all their money at art commissions instead of going to Disneyland.

Attached: 356935607.jpg (200x250, 15K)

Seriously, what the fuck. They set the movie in a fucking jungle and then they run everything through the fart lens instead of letting the colors pop off the screen.

Attached: Jungledreamstime_l_56902828.jpg (900x599, 950K)

Is there any difference between CG and live action if you are a computer?

Attached: 356923569.jpg (636x773, 32K)

I would be morbidly curious to see a bunch of fursuiters try and do a sincere production of the Lion King broadway musical.

Attached: 24582459.png (577x796, 59K)

>soul
>soulless

The entire thing is self-defeating. A live action remake of a cartoon that is practically entirely cgi is pointless. To add insult to injury they apparently treat it like actual life action though when it comes to the "realism" of the character movements etc.

So you have the worst of both worlds. A fake looking animated movie with none of the expressiveness that a cartoon can deliver.

They might make some changes for Zootopia 2 since red-haired characters are no longer relevant.

Attached: 265925690.png (486x719, 482K)

>live-action
Are you retarded?

Will there ever be good movies in theaters again?

I really like going to the cinema but there are never movies worth seeing. It's a sad affair.

You should make Flotsam and Jetsam a pair of white males.

That's just not true you’re either being insincere or you just can’t into film. What do you think is a good animated Disney movie?

none of them

It is entirely CGI. There is not a single photograph in the entire movie.

OK then scratch the words "practically"band "live action" from my post.

fuck, that looks scary as hell. Genuine nightmare fuel.

That’s what I thought too cool for the room faggot lmao. Your opinion doesn’t matter

honestly, left looks like one of those disproportionate stuffed animals. right looks like a real lion, which is a problem in a cartoon movie because most lions rook same and you want characters to be differentiated.

The autistic fixation of realism in modern filmmaking is a mistake and the industry deserves to crash and burn for it.

furry shit

Wow it's almost like Disney doesn't give a shit AT ALL, and dumb goyim will still flock to watch this abomination

terrible movie

I already know Disney Shills are going to try to justify this scene by claiming the LA remake is better because it conveys more "subtle" reactions, and is more "realistic" and that makes it the superior version. Fuck you, shills. You people are so easy to read and so goddamn predictable. Might as well talk to an AI.

>A lion with a wig
>better
Big yikes

Someone really needs to do a Lion King remake but with David Attenborough-style dubs over the dialogue.

soul

>there are people who defend this