Name one book adaptation that is better than its source material.
Name one book adaptation that is better than its source material
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Jaws
factotum
Jurassic Park only the first one though
The shining, quite easily too
blade runner
The Godfather
The Shining
The Magnificent Ambersons
Jurassic Park
the list goes on
Lord of the Rings
Does anyone even know the Godfather as a book?
Fight Club.
Game of Thrones
The first season of GoT is unironicly better than the first book.
Change my mind.
Blow-Up, but I don't like either the film or the story very much, the film is just a better version of the story.
american psycho
Every change they made for the show was for the worse.
>Ned is 50
>Robb is 18
>Dany gets violently raped
>no Jeyne Pool
I guess “Baelor!” isn’t in the books and that’s the best part of season 1
I read it. It’s a pretty interesting read. The first chapter has an extremely graphic sex scene, and apparently when the book first came out people would go to the library or book store and just jump to those pages lol. There’s also an incredible subplot about Sonny’s enormous penis being the only one to fill his love interest’s cavernous vagina, so once he gets lit up at those tollbooths she’s suicidal until she meets a plastic surgeon who can surgically reduce her vagina size. I’m 100% serious btw
the books are boring as shit. The world that Tolkien created is undeniably great but it's not that controversial to say the movies are better
starship troopers
Literally anything post-Hollywood Kubrick.
The Lost World was better too, if only because the film was a dumpster fire
The books are one of the best written pieces of English literature of all time, fantasy or otherwise. You are simply an idiot.
That seems like the book would be straight horror/thriller
Fight Club
The Shining
>Legolas sliding down things firing arrows
>Gimli being comic relief
The movies are great, especially extended, but the books don't have these Hollywood shit moments
12 monkeys
Everyone likes to dump on the film, but The Shawshank Redemption novella is atrocious.
American Psycho was a chore to read. It is pretty much Bateman reciting the minutiae of his day, right down to what flavors of ice cream he has in the fridge, and then occasionally slipping in "also, I killed someone."
The movie itself isn't that far away, only change the tone a little bit and you have a decent stalker horror/thriller
>comparing films to literature and vice versa
You people are a disease on mankind. If you ever write a book, and I doubt you will, remember to write "do not adapt without explicit consent from the author" on the first page.
Books should never be compared with films. Stop doing this.
And pardon my replies.
agreed, books are for retards
>spam
>writing a paragraph and conveying nothing
Clearly an intellectual. While it is difficult to make explicit similarities, characteristics like depth and quality can be purposefully discussed if the people involved in the discussion have integrity and are willing to explore by themselves what the other people are trying to convey.
Forest Gump
Utter moron have sex with yourself
The Prestige.
Although they're different enough that I would recommend the book as well.
The most reddit post I've seen all day, spacing and all.
how are books still selling when vidya exists?
Fight Club. Not that the book is bad but the movie is kino.
Bret Easton Ellis stuff.
rules of attraction
American psycho
...
dune. I'm sorry. dune.
anything steven king, PKD, or Michael Crichton.
>dune
Drive
Blade Runner.
>anything steven king
lolwut. It's hard to name 5 movies based on king that are good.
as for the thread, Tarkovsky's solaris is better than book.
>dune
what
seethe harder pedoking faggot
>50 year old copy of Surgical Urology in her queue
A true autodidact and polymath
Lotr
The books are way too detailed and slow
Literature is an outdated and obsolete medium that wouldn't even exist if Hollywood jews didn't like stealing ideas from them.
Film is keeping your dead art form on life support, bookfag.
Game of Thrones
Harry Potter
fuck off
>Tom Bombadil
Most of Kubrick's stuff based on books.
Pull that thumb out of your arse
Superman III.
For those who don't know, William Kotzwinkle is awesome.
en.wikipedia.org
I want to breed her feet formerly check dubs
The Leftovers.
Starship Troopers.
Read the book this year. Its good but its too "american". The movie is more universal and has more action.
Ch
No Country For Old Men is the only correct answer to this question
The Edge of Tomorrow
fight club
american psycho
Holy autism
Annihilation
>using the word 'obsolete' to refer to art
Unironically kill yourself.
Even if that was a description that could ever apply to an art form, Ulysses could only be a book, In Search of Lost Time could only be a book, Borges' stories could only be short stories
Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory
The Wizard of Oz
Imagine taking the time to post such bullshit
Wrong, Dahl is top tier comfy
League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen
The thing
lol, you're the idiot. The books are considered middling by critics at best