OH NO

OH NO

Attached: file.png (756x349, 154K)

Other urls found in this thread:

rottentomatoes.com/m/the_lion_king_2019
youtu.be/yUioIn8rPPM
youtube.com/watch?v=xOz2cvHDDJc
youtube.com/watch?v=AshEWMaXFxY
youtube.com/watch?v=0UQV89DQTWo
youtube.com/watch?v=1kGEz1zDGgY
youtube.com/watch?v=kLQ6SRH90s4
youtu.be/Kp7eSUU9oy8
youtube.com/watch?v=dZjgk2J2vFw
youtube.com/watch?v=k-OOfW6wWyQ
youtube.com/watch?v=V7zAymon84Q
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

What’s the excuse now? Disney shilling suddenly not so real huh? I guess just for this just one no reviewers were influenced or paid off I guess they didn’t buy half the theatres out

Honestly if you believed any of that just because you couldn’t except people like shit then, well; you know who you are and you know you’re a fucking easily influenced brainlet.

Anyway, fuck this movie.

nigga you can’t even discern between accept and except, you must be one dumb dingus

It’s a live action movie about talking animals, there’s really no room for liberal politics. Therefore, critics have no reason or desire to defend it.

Did literally ANYONE enjoy this movie?

Attached: untitled.png (753x1069, 148K)

I PUSH MY FINGERS INTO MY

asshole

well the cast is all black, that's why some critic white lady gave it a good score claiming it has a "very human cast"

Why is Brandon Zachery's review counted twice?

Wtf, when did our guy Jeremy get verified by rotten tomatoes?

SOUL

Attached: 41NbQKPYPrL._SX355_.jpg (355x347, 18K)

brb buying a ticket so I can btfo Disney shills

SOULLESS

Attached: young-simba.jpg (1800x2666, 614K)

No fucking way that's real

where were you when disney got STUCKMANNIZED

NOBODY PANIC
Everyone just calm down, I'm sure there's an explanation for all this I KNOW, RUSSIAN HACKERS DID IT!

IT'S AT 56%

Attached: 1536536543464.gif (300x206, 922K)

Does this mean Armond has to give a good review now?

55%

Attached: 1524114649086.jpg (300x300, 10K)

>BUT DISNEY BUYS CRITICS

check must have bounced

The only ones that claim disney buy critics are shitskins from twitter

it's fake

It's at 55% now

Attached: pepe heart.gif (500x500, 1.56M)

lmao what the fuck, 3% in 20 minutes

Attached: thelionkino.png (1427x2130, 848K)

BASED GRACE

Attached: grace.png (358x230, 33K)

S O U L L E S S

*activates shill button*

>for some fans that may just be enough
The damage control

This literally happened with Beauty and the Beast live action before the shill button was pressed.

they flushed it down the fuckin toilet

HOLY FUCK THE CHECKS *DID NOT* CLEAR THIS TIME

Attached: 1283113012029.png (472x479, 20K)

Attached: 1523397490525.jpg (683x1024, 535K)

How much of a difference does one day make?

Attached: Screenshot_20190711-123631__01.jpg (1080x429, 135K)

jeremyjahns confirmed the WHITE cast characters steal the show, everyone else sucks

>"is it faithful to the original"
>"oh it's faithful alright"

why?

Disney inflation is only 15%. It can't save true pieces of shit.

Anyone remember /pol/ claiming that this movie would get praise only because the cast was black? Turns out critics aren’t as shilled as we thought.

SOULESS CINEMATIC UNIVERSE

Wow didn't think Grace was a nazi considering how much she loves race swapping

Disney always ensure glowing buzz from their embargo breaking early reviews.

Fly reviewers up to LA, put them in a Disney hotel (free park tickets of course), get them interviews with stars, get them a goodie bag of just under the standard disclosure amount...

>55%
>literally 30% after accounting for the disney (15%) and black cast (10%) bonus points

Attached: le pink man.jpg (352x351, 45K)

I feel bad for Jon Favreau, but really this looked atrocious to begin with.
Half the film was in the animation style. It doesn't work with "realistic" animation. It's the complete antithesis of the original intention.
What a huge misfire, along with the odd casting. I mean what are they trying to imply, that African-American's are animals?

post yfw Disney remakes will die in your lifetime

Attached: 1400885452735.jpg (413x395, 19K)

Attached: 947a587bc8cb55f8116b2702dad149ec891ef21fc6939675e23638075902c283.png (409x448, 324K)

The moment Jeremy Irons was ignored, I knew this was going to be a very bad movie. It's the definition or a cashgrab. Did they at least mention the lions being endangered due to poaching and shit in any way? I guess I read there was to be a subplot about poachers to add humans in the movie "not to actually shed some light on the problem, fucking assholes"

They don't need to shill it because it's a one-off movie. They need to shill Captain Marvel because she's going to be the next face of their decade-long franchise.

>remake is a blatant copy of the original

Lol no shit you dumb fat bitch

the little mermaid is going to be a huge success critically and financially

yeah and people were calling me a faggot when I was saying this about screenings of BvS

This shit probably deserves 25% or less, we all saw Captain Marvel and know the shilling is real

>movie looks like a soulless cashgrab
>it comes out and surprise, it's a soulless cashgrab
Wow who could've seen it coming oh no oh the humanities

I am still bummed for not using original Davros

Attached: 1551863809834.gif (484x305, 1.12M)

But /pol/ and Yea Forums told me that it would get high scores for the mainly black cast and paid-off critics.

I'd be willing to buy tickets just to make Adam cry honestly

Attached: Adam Johnston from YourMovieSucksDOTorg.jpg (325x290, 13K)

this, every single Disney movie gets an automatic 15-20% bonus on RT, all of their films should have considerably lower scores

>mfw Yea Forums start defending it now for the sake of being contrarian

Attached: 1522363495039.jpg (1079x1069, 476K)

How many left? Who will they cast in Tangled?

not really

youtu.be/yUioIn8rPPM

HOLY FUCK THE SOUNDTRACK IS BAD WHAT THE FUCK

>disneyshills denying the bought reviews LAW after TLJ and captain SJW
lmao give up my dudes

Why. is. there. so. many. spaces. between. the. words

Lion kangz

>Glover can sing perfectly
>uses autotune anyway
why does every singer do this

Attached: IMG_20190620_223309.jpg (1024x838, 104K)

>ecelebs are not credited critics on RT
Burn it to the ground.

>TFW Road to El Dorado Chads still have their perfect movie and its reputation wasn't tainted by Hollywood pedophiles
Feels good man.

Attached: raw.png (508x272, 71K)

>For some fans that may just be enough.
They still find a way to slurp that Big Brother Mouse cock huh
Don't wanna upset him

youtube.com/watch?v=xOz2cvHDDJc

WHY IS JOHN OLIVER IN THIS
WHY IS HE SINGING
AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>tangled
I wouldn't mind this being made before disneys downfall

Attached: 1469325380522.jpg (1920x1080, 269K)

Why are they avoiding the snow white remake? Is because the dwarfs?

I'd like you to compare this scene from the original:
youtube.com/watch?v=AshEWMaXFxY

With the same scene as it plays out in the remake:
youtube.com/watch?v=0UQV89DQTWo

Notice something? All the lively cuts and close-ups from the original have been erased in the remake. Everything is filmed from distance and flat angle. Also, the remake has exactly 0 facial expressions, something which the original relied heavily on in order to quickly convey a character's emotion to the viewer. There are no emotions in the remake. It almost looks like they filmed real animals and simply gci'd moving lips on them.

This is bad. It's so bad I can't believe someone greenlighted and pumped millions of dollars into this. What the fuck Disney.

Attached: 1478291297199.png (454x453, 53K)

What's the point of these remakes anyway beside the easy money?
Is there any plan behind that? Is it only nostalgia cash grabbing or are they trying to introduce old films to kids this way because 2d animation isn't in anymore?

I wonder if Disney is regretting killing the audience score, as I'm sure there would be people defending it already. Oh well, that clip from Kimmel was more than enough to tell me this was garbage.

probably a mild success

>youtube.com/watch?v=AshEWMaXFxY
>youtube.com/watch?v=0UQV89DQTWo
Holy shit it's the epitome of "soul vs. soulless"

Isn't it in part so they can keep the copyright licenses going?

did the jungle book remake look this off?

Because he probably couldn't sustain the highs. Disney tunes are demanding as fuck.

In beauty and the Beast, Watson's autotune was so extreme her voice turned into a dialtone. She couldn't even hold a flat note.

The Little Mermaid is going to be autotune heavy too.

is this the end of blackcinema bros?, will little seanigger be enough to save it?

...

I love how all the "early reviews" praised it.

Attached: 1562824952100.gif (275x151, 1.01M)

nah, the casting of the black actress has sealed the deal, people are going to love it. once they find out that the king is also black it will be an even larger success. they're already shilling for Mulan just because she's Chinese even though actual Chinese people hate it. this is literally how normies think these days

...

This thread is literally Yea Forums in a nutshell, a bunch of bitter people who hate anything new. Also since when do you guys listen to (((critics)))? Seeing this day one and going to enjoy it

>Because he probably couldn't sustain the highs.
This is from the same guy who recorded Redbone. He can definitely hit high notes but I guess his singing part was all in one take.

.50 shekels have been deposited into your cuckbuzz account

We'd be all over a new Disney animation.

I'm still fucking bitter Mulan is replacing Gigantic.

>Yea Forums - Television & Film
>Film

If (((crititcs))) hate something then it must be decent at least

I'n surprised Disney lifted the embargo for full reviews a week early

When a Disney movie is rotten you know things are bad

What's new about remaking an animated movie into CGI and removing or adding some minor shit to pander to current year? fuck off

wtf when did critics become so based?
Or maybe the movie did something that upsets liberals maybe that's why.

>lion king remake
>new

>who hate anything new
Lion King is 25 years old, sweety.

100% cgi = cartoon

they didn't kill the audience score, they made it more shill friendly

IT CANNOT BE

The Disney Renaissance Remakes are the polar opposite of new. They are shot-for-shot carpon copies of something old.

why is timon a lisping faggot

(You)

>disney shills aren't rea-

It's one thing singing falsetto, it's another singing normal then smoothly hitting a high.

Attached: F75B4724-89E4-429F-9905-E8CA793AAB6A.jpg (1800x1880, 1.14M)

>a theatrical film isn't Yea Forums because it didn't use an actual camera

Disney magic die here fellas

Attached: Even the ass did not even!.jpg (250x187, 5K)

нy чo бля, вce нaхyй пиздa диcнeю и мapвeл. cyчкa вcтaлa в пoзy, щac eбaть вceх мapвeлoблядeй бyдeм

No. But Jungle Book had the advantage of a multi-species cast where every character had a different physique. So even if Kaa or King Louie couldn't convey emotions through their faces anymore, they could still do it through their movement. They don't have that advantage in Lion King where everyone is a four-legged mammal.

>That Chel
Please I've fapped only 20 minutes ago.

Most of these quotes sum up exactly how I feel about all of the modern Disney movies. Hopefully people are finally waking up.

Grace love Wonder Woman
and cried with Endgame
she has no credibility with me

If only they added this scene:
youtube.com/watch?v=1kGEz1zDGgY

Lol it’s too easy

>This Lion King now has another political resonance that was absent from the 1990s version, one that Favreau, if he intended it at all, doesn’t stress too hard: The movie’s vision of a once-honorable empire being taken over by a corrupt and malevolent usurper will strike many Americans as having an undeniable ripped-from-the-headlines quality. When Scar consolidates his power by enlisting the protection of an army of hyena henchmen, it’s hard not to think of another luxuriously maned would-be dictator who relies on a pack of scavenging subordinates to carry out his vile commands

Attached: 1559502061724.jpg (708x800, 64K)

sauce?

Nilso's gay

ДИCHEЙ COCИ ХУЙ! MAPBEЛ ИДИ HA ХУЙ!

Wait, so does this mean we like it?

>Disney will die in your lifetime

Attached: 1538689973313.png (600x536, 376K)

omg klumpf is scar

oy vey

>mommy, 10 people called me an idiot on a tibeten spear fishing board today!
I guess that's an accomplishment of sorts.

>Glover can sing
kek

I think she bullshitting with that whole crying at Endgame.But yeah she's a hit or miss. Depending on how much boxes are ticked for the SJW column.

OH NO NO NO DISNEYBROS WE GOT TOO COCKY

H-haha! g-got you!

Attached: 1348764844816.png (244x226, 2K)

warwick davis

>Grace love Wonder Woman
>and cried with Endgame
BASED GRACE

youtube.com/watch?v=kLQ6SRH90s4

Attached: unimpressed villains.gif (320x240, 1.83M)

>All the normies in the comments eating it up
It's still going to be a success.

have sex

>falls for an obvious joke
>n-no you’re the idiot!!

It is not and twitter and insta influencers are not real life.
People are basically apathetic and will take their kids to see it because it's The Little Mermaid. The demo for these movies is 95% normal families who do not care about your identity politics, 3% your identity politics twitter enemies, and 2% pedophiles

*Disney live action remakes*
>Jungle Book
>Alice in Wonderland
>Maleficent
>Cinderella
>Alice though the looking glass
>Beauty and the Beast
>Christopher Robin
>Dumbo
>Aladdin
>Lion King
How many of these were actually good?

Well there it is, the stupidest thing I'll read today

the one with the nigga

what are you going to spend all of your (You)'s on?

I almost cry with Endgame too, I though it was never going to end

timon and pumbaa are gay now
haha get cucked alt righters XDDD CURRENT YEAR

>literally any movie exists
>one soi-infused reviewer HAS to cry about blurmpf

Attached: 1543484120345.jpg (483x600, 32K)

Prove the article wrong.

yikes

Attached: robbie collin.png (686x189, 47K)

real life...is just like...da moobie

Attached: soiwojak.png (647x740, 14K)

Maybe if it bombs but it wont

>are gay now
now

Attached: 1556039295338.jpg (645x773, 60K)

youtu.be/Kp7eSUU9oy8

RT scores sure matter

Attached: the_end_of_disney.jpg (739x585, 123K)

I...jungle book?

So many vistas

Attached: eohovgtgfa9y[1].png (1920x1080, 2.56M)

I'm sure the recent one with the casting of the she boon will great. I'm lying

wtf I love imperialism now

wtf is this shit?

My predictions

This film will still make a gazillion bucks because of nostalgic Peter Pan millennials desperate to jump back in time.

The Little Mermaid will flop because that had a Gen Xish audience who don't really give a shit, also Chinese don't like black Ariel.

Nobody in the West will see Mulan but everyone in China will so it will just about break even.

Attached: 1447173268020.jpg (254x270, 49K)

>They don't need to shill it because it's a one-off movie.
Dude, you're fucking retarded, the marketing for this was bigger than Aladdin's.

It's wrong, because it's pretending like the themes are anything new.

You missed out Pete's Dragon which is how the remakes should be done: they take a shitty film and turn it into a good one.

>character played by seth rogen steals the show
it's shit alright

don't forget she said Wonder Woman was Top 3 best movies of all time (of any genre) and Black Panther was the best film of 2018

>not liking the KINO original
>not liking the utterly based doctor terminus songs

The irony is that even though third world scum and chinks always seem to feed on Disney movies like their crack, putting them over or close to 1 billion. Those same movies will be forgotten. No one will care or cherish them like the originals.

What?

>please come to shill central we can't afford shills on two boards :(

>Y-You clearly fell for it! Now call me an idiot!

How is that any of importance to modern Disney tho? Look at their movie slate? They in it for the buck and my friend.

>all friends are gay
bruh

Disney Doesn't want people remembering these flicks. As long as they turn a profit they're happy

101 Dalmatians

>tfw you will never comfort Grace when she cries and wipe her tears away

hopefully this flops so I can finally afford some disney stock

too old

All of the phony outrage and shilling for a slate of movies no one will give a damn about. Further demonstrates how powerful the mouses PR/media arm is. Especially with third world scum and chinks

>all the reviews saying Timon and Pumbaa are the best part
>Listen to the soundtrack
>They're both literally the worst parts of all the songs they're in, Hakuna Matata being the worst

Attached: B5FCC0A0F14D4194BC4BD4F464903174.gif (222x400, 1.99M)

It isn't going to flop

You got that right.

Attached: Literally me.jpg (1080x602, 112K)

if they ride each other

>post yfw Disney remakes will die in your lifetime
>pic related

Attached: zed338.png (994x838, 842K)

so obama is scar (black) and the illegals are the hyenas? trump is simba

The well known remakes have all made bank. No matter how shitty Lion King remake is I expect it to make 1 billion

Talk about damning with faint praise lmao

Attached: wewlad.png (525x574, 239K)

NOOOOOO DEM RAYCIS CRACKAZ AIN'T LIKIN' OUR MOVIE MUHFUGGAAAAA

>tell that to Bob's snapped neck
>GET STUCKMANNIZED

This

be more specific

No one is asking for these shitty remakes

Out of the films you listed, only The Jungle Book was acceptable.

they should have at least one year inbetween

Kek is this edited or does it actually say that on top of the 57%?

Apparently something every reviewer is mentioning is that "Can You Feel the Love TONIGHT" is sung in the daytime.

Attached: 1282052943203.jpg (412x445, 16K)

Still gonna make 115 trillion dollars because who cares about quality when this film's title is the same as an older film I really liked.

Attached: e7a.jpg (1916x945, 205K)

>Cinderella
when?

So now they care about something being "remarkably faithful to the source material". Hmmm funny how that works

Attached: 1562398891116.png (567x1200, 1.19M)

>They draw parallels to Drumpf
>The original many drew parallels to Hitler
You don't think they did this same thing to Hitler, do you? Just repeating the "he's evil!" Sentiment for decades? Even with the whole Holocaust deal I don't get how he gets such a bad rap, eugenics was the hot meme at the time and he was just pushing it. The killing folks bit was extreme, but he at least strove for something to improve humanity.
Make you thonk big thonks, boys

imo, 2 years, in between star wars every christmas. But they were successful so of course the (((shareholders))) would force them all to come out as soon as possible.

Bravo Nolan

What happened, did the Disney checks bounce this time around? Did the buffet at the press screening run out of shrimp cocktails?

You will never have it.
i learned it the hard way

see

Donald Glover is box office poison. First Solo and now this. And people were saying Beyonce will get an Oscar for this.

Alice in Wonderland
1.025 Billion
>Maleficent
758 Million
>Cinderella
543 Million
>The Jungle Book
966 Million
>Through the Looking Glass
299 Million
>Beauty and the Beast
1.2 Billion
>Christopher Robin
197 Million
>Dumbo
352 Million
>Aladdin
925 Million

IT'S THE CIRCLE OF JUUUUUUUST

What the fuck
>The writers butchered yet partially retained the "I've got a better idea" and "who's the brains of this outfit" exchanges, but now they sound like shit
>All the new lines are worse
>Seth Rogen's voice does not look like it's coming out of that
>Timon is a lisping queer
>Their faces are soulless

Attached: 1483932145949.jpg (1200x900, 114K)

Aladin is still on theaters

>an Oscar
>for a voice over performance

Please tell me people actually thought that was possible.

I want remakeshit to end and a new age of Ridekino to rise.

Alot of critics are going to get a visit with the big guy wearing mickey mouse cuff links for rating this movie badly.

literally based

and dumbo was in theaters when Aladdin came out and got a huge boost

I didn't say otherwise. What was the point of your post?

Seriously, while Mulan looks like discount Zhang Yimou I think the fresh take going on here might be big with critics.

Is it even allowed? I guess if the actor does motion/facial capture it's elligible, but I'm not sure about voice acting alone

bewilderment

I don't know if it was for her performance or for a song. I only read the headline.

Dumbo was lower tier

You've been stuckmannized

>it's a one off movie
>disney has about 5 live action remakes in the pipeline

>people complain about Hollywood lacking originality
>then throw money at this shit

wtf he doesn't even have the same markings it's just a generic cat

Say what you want, but financially this cat's in the bag.

Attached: Daniel-Teper.jpg (215x289, 11K)

oh no no no no, delete those fake reviews. these russian trolls are meddling with the score again.

>making a literal downgrade movie
Good job disney

Attached: eosuZ9w.jpg (398x500, 34K)

>make it look like shit
>everyone is talking about it
>????
>free PR
brava disney

i just walked out halfway and went for a bathroom break it's not like I missed much

>It's as if every creative decision were subordinate to the film's misguided insistence on realism, on keeping the mannerisms and movements of these magically intelligent creatures "believable"

Excellent, sums up precisely why this movie was doomed to be bad.

Literally who

>"This film is soulless" - Chris Stuckmann
BASED

Attached: brehs.jpg (1080x1080, 84K)

>"your voice is the sound of an angel calling"
>BOM BOM BOM BOM BOM BOM BOM BOM BOM BOM BOM BOM

Attached: 1556220373567.jpg (2499x2208, 853K)

Good.
The original was a rip off of the white lion anyways.
Hopefully disney learns their lesson.

At least the music sounds good, even if it is almost exactly the same.
youtube.com/watch?v=dZjgk2J2vFw

>wojak cancer
You need to go back

Based stuck

The 2016 Jungle Book film was a remake, but it did it's own unique twist to the story. It wasn't just a blatant shot for shot remake like this one.

>there’s really no room for liberal politics
The villain is a wh*Te lion.

lolwut, are the libs really all invested in this movie?

>Their faces are soulless
This is it. You can clearly see the facial expressions of Timon and Pumbaa of the animated one and that's matches the dialogue as well. The new one, not only butchered the jokes by not considering the pauses, doesn't have the necessary facial expressions to go with the dialogue. The dialogue is never enough to create likeable characters. It definitely is soulless.

Rand Al'Thor will be next

>Bowling for Buzzards!

Funny.

>I'M GONNA GET ONE ONE OF THESE DAYS! I'M GONNA GET A VULTURE! IT'LL MAKE ME FEEL BETTER, I KNOW IT.

Not funny.

Attached: 1562436733378.jpg (629x476, 49K)

>Whedon reshoots

They look like fucking marionettes, their mouths move but nothing else on their face does. It's so distracting.

>Nathan Lane is a faggot jew but has a great voice and is a good singer for musicals
>Cast some lisping faggot jew for the remake that can't sing

WHY?

God, it almost sounds like it's
>THE SAME FUCKING MOVIE!!!
EEEEEAGGHHHHHHHEHEEHEAGGHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEE

Attached: catererreeeeee.jpg (848x1024, 73K)

it's called a de-make and it's totes chic

u wot, Nathan Lane is Irish Catholic

but muh beyonce

Attached: tenor.gif (498x372, 723K)

Easy money on a proven story with known characters while also keeping the franchises alive and known to children, and the live action element is a hollow way to market it as an "advancement" of the story because people implicitly see animated movies as less legitimate

What was their endgame with that line?

I wish I had a screen cap or something because I fucking knew this was going to be a complete disaster as far as a year ago.

BUT CGI IS ANIMATION REEEEEEEEEEE

Disney prolly didn't bother paying reviewers, knowing zoomers will naturally watch this shit no matter the consensus.

>besides the easy money
What else would they make them for? You think Disney still cares about anything other than money?

Why can't disney go back and fund more new scfi films now?
I just want something new with a decent budget.

They should have gone the Rango route.

Photo realistic animals with slighty altered features like larger eyes.

youtube.com/watch?v=k-OOfW6wWyQ

no one watched that poo

>SOULLESS
OH NO NO NO DISNEYBROS

Rango suffered a lot (financially) from people thinking it looked like animated taxidermy.

the pink panther

Attached: 5bd36ba84855679fc741acbd3165270c696831af792618c40632f03250919dfb.png (245x206, 6K)

who?

oh fuck this shit

youtube.com/watch?v=V7zAymon84Q
get Stuck in to this, mann

They don't need desire, just a Disney check. Which they apparently didn't get

OH NO NOT EVEN JEREMY JAHNS LIKED IT OH NO NO NO STUCKMAN SAVE US AHHHHH
(he didn't like it either)

OH NO NO NO NO NO NONONONONONON

Attached: 1560905646737m.jpg (1024x1017, 83K)

HAHHAHAHHAHAH IT MUST BE FUCKING HORRIBLE

critics eat disneyshit up. if a disney movie gets bad reviews, it must be truly horrible because even the ones that get good reviews are bad

>6,8k likes to 215 dislikes
Well It looks like people actually love it.

>Disney movie that pushes liberal propaganda
Receives high praise from critics
>Disney movie that doesn't push liberal propaganda
Receives no praise from critics

REALLY MAKES YOU THINK

And Every single one of these sell outs will sing the praises of live action Black Little Mermaid in 2021 for fear of being labeled a racist and losing their careers.

Attached: z lo_0289_Chloe-x-Halle_ur.jpg (769x950, 141K)

Basically Disney makes overrated shit that critics praise if it panders to their political sensibilities, but if it doesn't they give it an accurate (and negative) score.

Maybe we were wrong the whole time. Perhaps critics weren't just being bought out by Disney. Maybe they just give high scores to films that satisfy their agenda.

(I'm still surprised they panned Wrinkle in Time... it must've been TERRIBLE)

Pretty much all critics are just saying it's just like the original. Which is actually a detriment, because it's literally the same product they've seen, only CGI instead of hand drawn animation

I guess Disney was too scared to change up their classic.

>FIRST DISNEY RIPS OFF A JAPANESE CARTOON
>NOW DECADES LATER THEY HAVE RESORTED TO RIPPING THEMSELVES OFF

Attached: 1507360029170.jpg (377x364, 25K)

isn't it the same fucking movie as the original?

But that is not a good movie.

a lot of the time the people that see it early are at a party where they butter you up and influence the scores you wouldn't remember the bland parts if you feel a good buzz and ate some good food

No

no really who the fuck wanted to see this
never saw even twitter normies wanting to

>Giving your money to the most powerful entertainment company just to own some e-celebs
Bootlicker

based
post kimba

Attached: an actual ripoff.webm (1280x720, 2.99M)

I guess you get a hard on for being called an idiot...

more than 25 years of this faggotry

Original was also shit.

>Japan is making Disney pay for screwing over Alita, Detective Pikachu and Godzilla
Based

Dios mio...

The man knows about lacking a soul...

How long until the reviews are called racist?

Based Disney ripping so many parts off wholesale because they knew no one gives a shit about that crappy looking chink shit

I'm honestly amazed that didn't really happen to Aladdin.

no one thinks disney invented animal animation dumbass

Inarguable.

>no one gives a shit about that crappy looking chink shit
>immediately after getting cast, Matthew Broderick initially told people he was playing Kimba from the cartoon from when he was a kid

A shame. I actually quite liked it. Just goes to show how normies hate anything that is different.

front hole

It's Black Pander all over again. When did people become so afraid of jigaboos

I want to fuck her

based
fuck millennials and fuck furries

>Those same movies will be forgotten
That's the fucking point you dummy. Wth this in mind they can remake the same movies dozens of times.

2016 when Trump won and everything became identity politics thanks to the media

You have a bright and colorful cartoon turned into a bland brown CG remake where it's weird how they didn't want to make the animals emote more especially considering they're not real.

Holy fuck. You get this one, Chris.

Go fuck yourself, twerp. I was mainly pointing it out as to why everyone else can see it but the people they pander to.

So why did A Wrinkle in Time get poorly reviewed?

>Stuckman called it soulless
Unironically OUR GUY
We've been STUCKMANIZED

>butchered Be Prepared
Fuck that movie

Attached: expect one of us in the wreckage.jpg (480x360, 11K)

>we can't have them emote or have a stylized design because it has to be realistic
>turns out real lions don't sing

If critics don’t like it, it might actually be good. Might check it out now, honestly. I’ve always liked Favreau

Attached: D82B6E9A-8394-4085-8D43-39F33DB8398D.jpg (1125x1630, 327K)

I will not pay to see shits like this.