What role should media play in raising kids...

>They don't see people but money bags
honesty would be nice but more annoying than ever is the virtue signaling bullshit masquerading they do with this fucking nonsense. Its so fucking narcissistic, just brings home what a sociopathic, solipsistic fucking culture the 2010s are.

Makeup

“Rueben in Midsommar is a very important character. He’s important more as a symbol, as an idea, than he is even as a character. There are politics woven into the film and Reuben is about as close as we get to that being articulated explicitly, what is happening. And then if you also consider Swedish history, it is a very closed society and what does that really mean? There are things happening in Sweden right now that are echos of things that happened in the second World War. So I’m sort of loathe to expound openly about these things because I’m not making a polemic, but Rebuen, he’s like the full articulation of whatever the film is saying politically."

I don’t care about a Disney Princess because I’m not a little girl.

Don't gingers usually have green eyes?

you are a cuck though, unaware of whats going on, taking it up the ass?

>we're not against you

Attached: gutierrez.jpg (600x377, 74K)

It's so transparent and fake that it makes me feel like people just jump through hoops to defend their god Disney. It's like their entire identity is based around Disney, and applying it to their everyday life. These aren't even people, just flesh puppets for Disney

>mfw i realized the american refugee crisis is going to be worse then the one from the middle east
stay on your continent, mutts

Attached: 1551694968081.png (296x249, 23K)

>the gringo
>gringo
Ha, funny story behind the word "gringo"

>The land they stole from Native Americans wasn't enough
>US Army Men invade Mexico
>Take part of Mexicos land and cleverly re name it "New Mexico"
>Mexicans see Green Army Men and say yell out "Green (as in Green US Army Men) Go!" As in Go away and stop rapping our woman and shooting everyone GREEN-GO
They still call white people "gringo" to this very day, and most Mexicans don't even know why.

>like a Joe Rogan or something, and say, "Look, we know it's difficult that things are changing for whites, but we're not against you, and let's work together for a better future."
This would make things much worse. We already know (((they))) are against us, so that strategy is waaaaay too late. This strategy needed to be employed about 10 years ago and even then it wouldn't have worked.

The thing is, you're asking people to give up everything in exchange for nothing. Why should any white person want to accept this deal? You're asking people to give in to their inferiors.

>They could even make it an Afro-Caribbean story. Call it the Caribbean Mermaid Tale. Don't name her Ariel, a European name.
The thing is, Disney is almost 100% reliant on brand recognition at this point. Everybody already knows The Little Mermaid, and that's what Disney is really banking on. Nobody cares about "Caribbean Mermaid Tale". It would completely bomb.

This is what it's really come down to in the minds of corporate. White people will buy it based on brand recognition and black people will watch it based on black people. And Disney is 100% right about this, as sad as that is.

The sad thing is, redditors will actually believe this.

Yeah, I don't think redheads with blue eyes really exist, other than blondes who have dyed to red.

>dat forehead
holy fuck, she has scales already

Attached: 1123.png (640x480, 400K)

None

are you implying that the media isn't white? how about you just cool it with the antisemitic remarks

Nope, Americans yelled "green go", Mexicans heard it and star called them "green~go" - gringos.

Not even niggers, sandniggers and chinks are breeding lmao, we're taking our home back lads!!

Based.

Now we can just now each others lawns

That's a myth. Conservative white families are breeding comfortably at replacement levels and ot even being paid to do it. For all I know the same was happening in Europe. Which is why leftists want endless swarms invading. Its ballot stuffing.

ariel is an established white ginger, nigger

There are some
Most of gingers have brown eyes, second green and the last blue

Attached: 5632372102_3b0eb63bf0_z.jpg (480x640, 63K)

I see a lot of fake red heads these days. It's pretty annoying. You can always tell when someone isn't natty red, and it never ends up looking good, unless they're blonde/blue eyes and have fair skin already.

Tan -to- brown skin tones + red hair is fucking abhorrent.

Orange hair bad

is she going to turn white in her human form

and it explains why Orlando is gaining the most diversity out of any other place in the US in 2019..

Jewish people aren't white

Why not just genetically engineer a fish woman? Disney has the money for this simple task.

I'd like to see this old faggot try and kill anyone.

What in the flying fuck. Either someone copy pasta'd my little speech from yesterday or I've been posting in a fugue state again. Whoa.

Well.. no use in posting my thoughts again then.

Attached: Arielvoice.jpg (480x341, 34K)

leaked little mermaid live action

Attached: 1562762387976.jpg (960x448, 55K)

Kek what was the name of that cartoon?

Why hasn't the University of Texas fired him?

Attached: payload.jpg (450x450, 31K)

Dude, my gf is a redhead with blue eyes. What the fuck are you talking about?

>It would be nice if someone in the media just directly talk to white people, like a Joe Rogan or something, and say, "Look, we know it's difficult that things are changing for whites,
That'd be great but, it won't happen because most white people would just reject it. Also, only negative white identity is allowed

I think that's house of mouse, last time I ever saw mickey cartoons on TV that I can recall was that show. Disney is so fucked now.

WHAT A FUCKING HYPOCRITE AHAHAHAHA EVERYONE POINT AND LAUGH AT THIS BRAINLET RETARD HAHAHHAHAHHAHA

I don't understand this. Just make new original characters and pander to whoever the fuck you want to with those. Whoever is at the helm of this equality and diversity shit is pants on head retarded.

I'm redhead with blue eyes.
Go fuck yourself.

yikes if that how she looks then eric is gonna shit his pants when he awakens on the beach

A black guy who thinks hes smart with 70 IQ.. and hes calling people retards. Go figure - 2019 for you..

Jewish people that are ashkenazi have Eastern European and Central European ancestry. Its like calling Salvadoreans non latino just because they are subhuman

Racist, but a good point. Kangaroos are Australian. Just because you're a moron doesn't mean geography is wrong.

>giving this much of a fuck about these shit Disney remakes

Smells like virginity in here.

>Racist
Irrelevant.

Because he's targeting white men, who have been deemed socially acceptable to hate.

It is relevant. I don't like you, but I agree with your point. It's important to bring attention to this because retards on both sides don't think this exists.

You say it like racism is somehow bad.
Also not that guy.

Come on man. Don't make me put you down.

Attached: gotem.jpg (463x430, 29K)

If racism is bad then EVERYONE is bad.
Because EVERYONE is racist.

Im sure you like white people going extinct you fucking cuck

I am not. I love niggers.

Do you support affirmative action? Do you support diversity hires?
If yes, you are racist.

They are dying out because they keep race mixing - with other whites.

I mean if your pure white genes are so rare that mixing with other whites will wipe them out, maybe it's a genetic variant humans don't need any more.

We wuz mermaid and sheeit

Yea Forums we don't care at all, movie sure will bomb

it just means people have fucked everything up and made everyone mutts for decades now.. All you will see is mutts running around in the future. Yay diversity

Great, a moron. Why can't I meet any smart 4channers that see something like "I am not racist I love niggers" and go well this guy is clearly joking and is trying to end this stupid ass shitposting attempt. Where are those guys? Instead I get this fucking idiot with his head buried so far up his own ass he doesn't even remember what the sun looks like. I am gonna go jerk off, this bummed me out.

>White people are resistant to change, and resistance to change causes suffering.
Shut the fuck up. God, this is all so tiring.

Absolutely seething.

Lol you're all going to end up shoahed, it's too late for apologies

Relevant

Attached: 1551289115792.jpg (640x823, 361K)

>Hell. They could even make it an Afro-Caribbean story. Call it the Caribbean Mermaid Tale.
>Disney should celebrate their culture instead of just placing black people in European fairy tales.
Look, the answer to both of these suggestions, are simply that Blacks have largely adopted white culture. I mean, that's the natural process of being a part of a society. you tend to meld with the people you live with, sharing ideas and stories, making them a part of your life. And this happens on a worldwide scale, when you have Disney levels of reach across the globe.

If we counted the origin of the little mermaid, then fact is the majority of the world doesn't own the story. It's a Danish story. However, the story reached new lands due to wider publishing. And then eventually Disney adapted the story, and it reached the globe. Now everyone knows about the little Mermaid. Can we just pretend like blacks and asians and hispanics and arabs and the British and Germans and the French all don't know about the little mermaid? Can we only hire Danish actors to fill the role?

Do you know what story black American children never read? "Mufaros Beautiful Daughters." That isn't black American culture. But the Little Mermaid is. Because that's what black Americans grew up with.

Fact of the matter is, there's nothing about the little Mermaid that sets it apart. Even if you call it the "Caribbean Mermaid Tale", what significantly changed about the story? Just the superficial stuff like names and locations. A Danish man created a fantasy tale, where the race of the characters are unimportant.

Attached: Kiernan Ariel.jpg (1600x720, 105K)

I grew up without a tv, I was made fun of for it in primary school but past the age of 10 no one cared, I was active on the internet early though and fund Yea Forums at 12.

If the races are unimportant why change it?

even if the la raza larpers got their way the result would be a caste system with hispanized whites on top like the rest of latin america

It is transparent and fake, and yet Disney wins by technicality. Arguing That a black Mermaid shouldn't be, won't do any good. Because you can't prove it. You can only prove that the move is calculated. But you can't prove it's flawed artistically.

ok, let me be clear, ARTISTICALLY, the race of the character doesn't matter. You can argue aesthetics, sure. But I mean the narrative, the character, the motives, the plot, none of it is contingent on the race of the character.

But of course the race change matters on a meta level. That's different.

Everyone will become extinct.

So literally why change the race if it doesn't matter?

I don't know. Free outrage marketing. Progressive agenda. Trying to stay fashionable. Take your pick.

Normalfags eat these shitty ass remakes up like nothing else user even if you never hear anynone talk about these fucking movies
Dumbo and Mary Poppins where the only one that flopped/didn't do that well.
Aladdin did almost a billion so i doubt this'll do too horrible.

Maybe if you niggers actually had two functioning parents raising you would understand what it means to not be raised by the media.

exactly.
see

That's exactly my point. There's no reason narrative-wise to change it. They only change it for political reasons.

They'll go extinct in a couple of decades. Same thing with blonde people with blue or green eyes. Thank god.

Your point is dumb. There's no reason to keep it the same either. You act as if the skin and hair color matter. I checked the original book the other day out of curiosity. didn't read the whole thing. Just did a few searches. And the little mermaid's hair color is never mentioned. Don't you think that's interesting? Almost as if it didn't matter to the author. Or perhaps it was intentionally ambiguous, in order to allow girls to project themselves into the role of the protagonist.

>There's no reason to keep it the same either
Yes there is. Because that's what people loved in the original.

So things should remain the same, for the simple fact that they were that way in the past?

Yes.

Senseless.

Yet you advocate for changing it just because you can.

>ARI EL
>Hebrew
>European name
>(((white))) shill detected

Attached: the sam.jpg (1024x1024, 162K)

I don't advocate to change Ariel's appearance. Only that there's no reason to keep it the same. You're stuck in this either/or logic.

Also, if you think things should remain the same, then why should Disney remake the movie in the first place? Why live action instead of animation? Why do they hire actors that aren't Danish?

Let’s really put this into perspective. A live action remake involves REAL humans and REAL animals. A mermaid is a FICTICIOUS, MYTHICAL, SEA-CREATURE meaning FAKE! Therefore, Ariel is NOT supposed to be white with red hair because that would imply that she’s a human, when she’s not. She’s “human-like”, not human. Her human-like features consists of the structure and build of her body, meaning she’s built like a woman and has titties. Disney did exactly what they needed to do...... they casted a woman to play the part of Ariel. All of you racists hiding behind “I wanted it to be authentic to the cartoon”....... it is authentic!

Attached: 1531376776837.jpg (960x960, 61K)

It's not really senseless, if you actually understood his position better.

Adaptations are translating a thing from one medium to another -- or, in this case, animated to live-action. There isn't any reason to make changes in translation to what is shown, especially with regards to major things like the skin color.

You might as well add underwater guns and other things since it clearly doesn't matter to you.

>Only that there's no reason to keep it the same
Except there IS a reason to keep it the same.
Because you've already established how the character looks in an earlier work.
The Little Mermaid cartoon already made her a white redhead. Making the live action version by the same company a white redhead makes the most sense.
Doing the opposite is a bad decision that will cost them money.

Then why didn't they cast a human woman?

Checkmate.

Kek.

Yikes.

Attached: 1562784545009~01.png (285x160, 72K)

But Disney's animated film was an adaptation of a book, and they changed all kinds of things.

>Making the live action version by the same company a white redhead makes the most sense.
What difference does it make if it's the same company working on the production or not? If anything, the fact that Disney is remaking their own work, gives them a GREATER license to change whatever they want. But even if they were adapting someone else's work, which they were with their animated film, then they'd still have a license to chance what they want.

Here's a page that compiles a lot of the differences between the book and the animation.
thatwasnotinthebook.com/diff/the-little-mermaid

Imagine having disney this far up your ass.

>the book
The book is literally irrelevant.
The version 99% of the world is familiar with is the cartoon made by Disney. That is the version they are used to seeing.
Changing that will alienate the original audience.
My evidence is the very obvious shitstorm that's been going since the announcement.

I don't. I think they made a bad choice in casting. But I'm not going to justify my opinion by saying that Ariel should be a redhead, because she was a redhead before. And neither should you.

>The book is literally irrelevant.
What? You guys said that you should be faithful to the material you're adapting. And now you're saying the source material is irrelevant? Just because Disney managed to make a more popular version? That doesn't sound very logical.

Between this statement, and your previous statement about what will make the most money, I'm starting to think that you actually don't care about the artistic integrity of the film. You're just trying to appeal to the majority, in order to push your own bias.

True OP

True

>You guys said that you should be faithful to the material you're adapting
Yes. The material they are adapting is the cartoon they made.
Not bothering to read the rest of your post.

Gingers and paddyniggers are subhuman and not white

>Not bothering to read the rest of your post.
d'aww, baby is getting gwumpy.

What should I read the entire post of someone THAT stupid?

>race mixing with the same race

It's not stupid, you just can't think of a valid reason to get around the conundrum I've put you in. So you've decided to fold your arms and pout.

I already refuted it when I said they are adapting the cartoon, not the book.

no one would give a shit about this movie if there wasn't a controversy. it would've ended up like dumbo. now everyone is talking about it.

>t. swarthoid

>now everyone is talking about it
Literally meaningless if no one goes to see it.

But you never explained the difference between adapting the book and the cartoon. You say cartoon adaptation should be faithful, but the book adaptation is no matter? What's the difference?

I support affirmative action in favor of niggers, yes.

The difference is one is a book that no one cares about, and the other is a cartoon that everyone in the world has seen.

they will though

Even the spics have bought in on our mastermind (((replacement))) plan. You don't got a friend in the world, wh*tey.

Black people won't see it because black people don't like water movies.
White people won't see it because they changed Ariel's race.
Asians hate ugly niggers.
So who is left to see it?

That doesn't make sense. Why would popularity matter? This kind of thinking ignores the artistic aspects entirely.
This is like when Carlos Mencia stole jokes. But audiences excused it, because "he told it better". It's still a stolen joke. No matter how well you tell it, or how popular it becomes, it's still based on the material that someone made before you.

Come on now. If gingers were the same race as whites, why does mixing with whites eliminate all their defining traits?

I don't have any stake in all this race war but I do always wonder - why do redhead characters always get snubbed in live-action adaptations?

MJ from Spider-Man, Heimdall from Thor, Wally West Flash from the CW Flash show, and now Ariel.

It doesn't. Red hair and blue eyes are recessive genes.

The Jews, it's always the Jews.

Well they are currently getting a taste of their own medicine with rioting Ethiopians tearing up Israel's streets.

Redheads are the most attractive of hair colors and we're going to be worse off with umbriel there instead of a gorgeous redhead

Exactly. To be ginger, you need at least both parents to have the ginger gene. If even one doesn't have a copy, there's no chance of ever becoming a ginger.

Test tube designer babies are their only hope since so few whites carry the ginger genes now. They breeded it out themselves.

>If even one doesn't have a copy, there's no chance of ever becoming a ginger
That's not true.
As long as there is a ginger anywhere in your family tree, you or any of your descendants can be ginger.

BASED SPIC

I was wondering this too. Maybe there's some kind of subconscious level meme going around? No, not the ginger/nigger thing. But like maybe people subconsciously think of both ginger and blacks as a lower class? I mean, redheads certainly do get treated as lower. So there may be a connection there.

Or maybe it's because redheads are always considered the "odd" one. They're typically the side character. Nover the frontman. So maybe people feel safer using their side character as a means to get more "representation".

Or, this is an off the wall idea, but maybe there's some kind of class or guide within the industry, that outlines safe practices. Maybe multiple studios consult this internal guide, and it demonstrated redheads getting replaced by blacks.

Poor original Ariel. This isn't funny anymore you guys. Disney is literally rapping Ariel.

Attached: 1396723446642k.gif (500x278, 377K)

isnt there already a fucking nigger princess?

You mean the frog?

Attached: 1492677015159.jpg (2356x1972, 706K)

huh. the actress they cast as Ariel would have been perfect for her. she even has the ayylmao eyes.

Recessive genes don't work that way unless literally all white people cease to exist

Most northern euro whites are also pale and any white person can have freckles. And can have red beards and light eye colors. They're literally white european.

They can have any color but green is common yes.

That's not how genetics work. Red and blonde hair aren't going away unless all of northern and western Europe race mixes for several generations. Even then the recessive genes are still there.

but they've got it backwards in cases like ghostbusters and starwars. they're sacrificing a larger market for a much much smaller one.

That's not how fucking recessive genes and genetics work you retard. They're recessive and anyone can carry the genes. You think every redhead and blonde has to fuck each other for recessive genes to move on?

Res hair is naturally the Germanic race too, brainlet. Every white tribe has red hair genes and its not even most common in Ireland. It's most common in areas of Scotland with heavy Viking history.

The real problem here is that all of these live-action Disney remakes are pointless and look like shit. Stop fucking making them. Where's my fucking sequel to Drive?

The same number of whites have the recessive gene. The gene can't die out. It's passed on constantly.

Why do blacks get up in arms with "white washing" then? Explain the double standards and why they exist then you faggot

I want to go to ireland to find myself an attractive redhead but i'm afraid she'll be a lefty roastie so i cant marry her.

are there any pure girls there? or do i have to date a japanese for that?

why are you such a cuck? Look at yourself and see how pathetic you are

what's with her forehead are those barnacles?

Maybe if you're lucky. Probably better off finding a wholesome small town American redhead girl but who knows how many of those still exist. Plenty of redheads in the white areas of the US.

why do you have to do that? Because you're a self hating asshole?

blacks lack the intelligence and creativity to invent anything of worth, so "blackwashing" things is the only chance they have at making any cultural achievements

hes a piece of shit just like you.

I don't know, but black people need to let their fucking hair be natural. The hair in the op looks disgusting and I'd pay her to let me give her a buzz cut.

That's beautiful mermaid hair you racist

most people are white it's easier to get white people they're literally making it more difficult for themselves in the name of progressivism

It actually happened in places like india. It really depends on the ethnic makeup of the immigrant population

I work with an a Mexican dude who lives here illegally, who clearly has far less European admixture than this guy does, and he's cool as hell. Maybe that pasty spic has a point about gringo genes or whatever the hell he's trying to say.

nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger

I'll take niggers over ginger subhumans any day.

Attached: coppercab.png (619x386, 565K)

Uhhhhh.... what? I don't really know what this has to do with anything. But ok.
Basically, when you have 1 black character out of 10, then subtracting that 1 black character makes 0 black characters.
But when you have 9 white characters out of 10, then subtracting 1 white character, leaves you with 8 white characters.

Oh sure, it sucks that the character you loved changed, but "you" as a race, hasn't been removed.

t. Nigger. That kid is literally an actor who made that vid for publicity. Worked too he was in some Kino

Yep blacks can do no wrong. Of course that is your fucking answer you dumb libtard piece of shit

So keep the character the same, because white people would rather watch a white character on screen?
That's not an invalid reason. But it's not an artistic one either. It's just as cold and calculating as making the character black to appease progressives.

And what can we derive from this, about the creator's motivations?

I don't know how you came to that conclusion.
Do you disagree with my math? Did I forget to carry the 1?

I don't know, the same thing we could derive from the creator's motivations from the very beginning? that they're shrew, calculating businessmen, trying to appease as many people as they can, all the while attempting to maintain the image of the good guys?

Kids these days are conditionned to celebrate difference. They teach kids in kindergarden it's ok to be queer as soon as they can understand it.

>as soon as they can understand it
Most times BEFORE they can understand it.

Attached: 1562282199664.jpg (499x499, 41K)

You just recognized in the last post that if that's what they were doing they'd have cast a white woman. They're obviously not doing this for shrew, calculating businessmen-reasons, and I'm not sure why you try so hard to pretend otherwise. The actual reason is plainly what you frame as "attempting to maintain the image of [being] the good guys". Though that's not how I'd frame it...

>they made her black to be artistic

lol

holy fucking leftard

Nah

>You just recognized in the last post that if that's what they were doing they'd have cast a white woman.
No I didn't. I said that it's a valid reason. But I don't necessarily think that Disney thinks casting a white Ariel is the most lucrative decision. I mean, when you're making decisions, you could have reasons to do any number of things. You weigh each option, and then make the best decision you can. So sure, the fact that most consumers will likely be white.(excluding China), That doesn't necessarily mean it's the best business decision. Especially if a controversial casting gets more people talking about the movie. You could net more consumers from strong word of mouth. Rather than just playing it safe and having people wave it off as just another Disney live action remake.

Attached: AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.png (379x403, 407K)

This, redheads are fucking mutants

when are you going to admit that you're getting brainwashed by right-wing propaganda funded by billionaire conservative CPAC faggots to manufacture outrage about shit like this?

Attached: literally obsessed.png (788x1084, 733K)

>brainwashed by right-wing propaganda

Attached: girls-getty_1376498i.jpg (446x400, 45K)

Yes? I know you're a zoomer, but nobody even watches liberal news in the same throngs as conservative news outlets.

Where does this meme even come from? Because moobies aren't explicitly social conservative? You're brainwashed. You always have been. I bet you think you're a "minority" too.

>right-wing President who almost exclusively endorses a conservative "news" company to the point where he hires writers, produces and pundits from Fox
>wins every level of government with a sizable majority
>"we aren't brainwashing you bro, we're the underdogs. Us and the other CPAC billionaires who fund Shapiro, Carlson (who's parents are old money fucking royalty) and other such "mavericks" at Wallstreet and Goldman Sachs
The delusion is real with some of you, Jesus.

Attached: 1557629527302.jpg (250x240, 11K)

As opposed to every single branch of media being LARGELY left wing, brainwashing the masses for decades.
>I know you're a zoomer
Born 1980. Sorry to burst your bubble.

>literally control the government with a demagogue idiot who routinely lies through the white house
>Sinclair is one of the biggest media corporations
>pushed the overton window so hard that "functioning healthcare" is a left wing position in the US

Yes. You are brainwashed.

Attached: IMG_20190625_003156.jpg (800x450, 34K)

I’m coming to Italy Luigi, I’m going to get an Italian foot mommy thanks to my dual citizenship through my first generation parents. There’s nothing you can do to stop it. At least I’m not black or God forbid Sicilian

>MUH MEDIA IS LEFT WING AHHHH
Your'e a dumb faggot. The largest American media companies aren't even left-leaning and are explicitly part of lobbyist groups with money tied to CPAC and investment bankers.
>da left wing media are "brainwashing the masses" for decades
lol because movies have blacks in them? Fox is unironically the closest thing we have ever gotten to state sponsored media and you're retarded enough to post shit like this? You're brain-damaged, mate. Nobody even watches shit like CNN.
>I was born in 1980
You weren't, otherwise you'd see the trends.

Ever heard of Sinclair?
youtu.be/_fHfgU8oMSo

kek I almost forgot the Sinclair corporation, it dwarfs any "left wing" media outlet by a thousand miles. And guess who they donate to?

>literally kills the /pol/tard

HAR HAR WELL CNN ONCE HAD A CAMERA ANGLE ON A CROWD THAT WAS DISINGENUOUS!!

If you're so weak a bunch of powdered wig wearing tea sipping sissys can enslave you and make your entire continent their bitch then maybe niggers don't need to keep on living, they don't have neanderthal genes anyway so they're not even completely human.

I am going to watch Hercules with my kids because that is what I watched as a kid and I can genuinely say that it made me into a better person.

Attached: Herc_Title_card.jpg (700x534, 39K)

OBVIOUSLY BROWN PEOPLE WITH BROWN EYES ARE GOING EXTINCT AND A MINORITY WHICH IS WHY THERE ARE 5 BILLION OF THEM AND LESS THAN A BILLION WHITE PEOPLE

Blue pilled af. This person doesn't know that Mr. Noseberg is behind everything and that including blacks is just part of his agenda. user, stop reading dumblr.

(((They))) don't care about being left or right-wing, they just play with you to accomplish their political interests, especially Disney. They will create controversy and violate any iconic character turning them into whatever they want to mock people who are against their ideologies.

You can even rest the antagonist marketing concept that has been mentioned from the equation, this is just fucking hilarious: (((they))) laugh of greatest classics written by people from countries that oppose Mr. Noseberg. Danish and many other European countries that are sick of immigrants starting violence and bringing poverty to their countries. What does Mr. Noseberg do about it? Attack them through media, changing sex, gender, races, and dreams of characters of pop culture. It's proved that people who don't live in those countries take the bait and then argue those countries are 'racists', when that was never the point.

Mr. Noseberg is not making anyone a favor but to himself and his agenda. If you believe in any wing you're not thinking like people who rule the world think.

Yup, it's a fucking shit show.

>pushed the overton window so hard that "functioning healthcare" is a left wing position in the US

yeah because if its not free its not functioning right berniebro?

Attached: large.jpg (319x319, 16K)

Based.
I love Hercules.

>da jooos
Again, the largest media group is something like Sinclair, and CPAC and how they lobby exclusively for the GOP. I didn't read anything else you word vomited at me, since it was probably wrong on a factual level, since you're an insane person who somehow was memed into thinking that conservative parties are dindu underdogs.

Healthcare in the United States fucking sucks, not even fucking shill Republicans try to argue against that fact anymore. We die earlier because of it.

Imagine fighting tooth and nail so that your tax money doesn't go towards bettering your country, but instead blowing up brown people for Israel. Fucking Trumpcucks

this isn't /x/...

Have you ever considered that maybe, you use Jews as a boogeyman? Just asking.

literally haven't come across a single piece of "right-wing" media in probably 20 years, outside of the occasional fox news "who is 4 chan"-tier mockery of them

meanwhile, literally daily, 24/7, every single moment where I'm exposed to any kind of media, it's a nonstop barrage of insipid left-wing madness. I'm watching a fucking twitch stream of the mtg:arena early release and it's interrupted by an ad admonishing me to be ashamed of my white privilege. if there's right-wing propaganda anywhere outside of the living-rooms of 60 year old american conservitards then it's outnumbered 100k:1 by the left-wing garbage

>"Look, we know it's difficult that things are changing for whites, but we're not against you, and let's work together for a better future."

If you want to "diversify" White countries you are against White people, you are their enemy and they should rightly regard you as such. They should hate you utterly and for eternity. Whites are entitled to their nations, their countries, their neighbourhoods, their cultures.

Yeah because whenever I turn on the media whether it's movies, television or journalism all I see is nonstop right-wing propaganda!

Attached: 81rdDH6axsL._RI_SX380_.jpg (380x285, 20K)

>Jewish people that are ashkenazi have Eastern European and Central European ancestry.

They see themselves as distinct and undermine all White countries where they can be found. Jews are poison to White countries.

I like how you're brain is so fucked, that you forgot that the Sinclair Group was mentioned.

>GINGER=NIGGER
GET OVER IT!

You feel they favor you so you just ignore the facts.

What I said doesn't even belong to /x/, you dipshit. Anyone who reads a bit about philosophy or gets an interest in the principles people who own big companies and are part of the most powerful families knows this. It's logic, but seems like some people either don't like to question anything or need more digits to ride.

as if any channels supporting the uniparty differ meaningfully

>literally haven't come across a single piece of "right-wing" media in probably 20 years
I highly doubt that.
>meanwhile, literally daily, 24/7, every single moment where I'm exposed to any kind of media, it's a nonstop barrage of insipid left-wing madness.
I know you really want to believe this is true, but what you're referring to is just the basic ideological stance of Western ideology, which usually doesn't 1:1 vibe with whatever schizoid social conservative beliefs you hold because your Daddy taught them to you. Even so, I'll repeat if you're retarded; the largest media groups in the entire fucking country, aren't liberal.
>it's interrupted by an ad admonishing me to be ashamed of my white privilege
got a source?
>if there's right-wing propaganda anywhere outside of the living-rooms of 60 year old american conservitards then it's outnumbered 100k:1 by the left-wing garbage
right-wing media is literally the mouth piece of the Executive branch of government and funded his campaign.

Why do zoomers just forget the last 50 fucking years of American history for?

So pick your lane I guess? Is there a "uniparty" and it doesn't matter who's conservative, are you a majority or a minority voice in politics?

You can't have it all.

>you just ignore the facts
What fucking facts are you even going to cite? It's all just crying on your part "AAHHH JEWS ARE THE REASON I SUCK AHHH AHHH AHH LIBERALS AHH AHH", at least in the 40s, they were subtle with their anti-liberal agenda. Christ.

We wuz mermaid and sheit fool

Guy I don't care about your boogeyman. Name 5 recent films or television shows that have overtly rightwing themes. Here's 5 lefty ones

>Moonlight
>BlacKKKlansman
>Roma
>Bohemian Rhapsody
>The Last Jedi

If the media is so rightwing it shouldn't be hard for you to give me 5 titles.

Attached: 1528669154327.jpg (2200x1500, 389K)

Why do you people forget that the richest and most successful families, are literally conservative and CPAC members?

how is this post an argument? That picture was made by a /pol/nigger.

Whoah!
The amount of people who like Disney's dick in their eyes is amusing!
The little nigger is nothing but leftist propaganda or are you gonna tell me that Andersen was into niggers when he wrote the story? lmao
Poor guy is having a stroke in the afterlife.

>The Last Jedi is some "overtly leftie" film
you are a member of a cult, of insane and hyper-political teenagers.

The same that keep the left and right concepts to divide and conquer. They promote opposite ideas to manipulate everyone.

We do exist.

However I never had any idea that I was one of the rarest humans on Earth.
It's actually giving me an existential crisis.

Now I know how the last Mohican, Unicorn and Dragon Sean Connery felt.

Attached: tmp_23507-340f8f33-9265-40e1-8bce-c9bfd3ab698a629585323.jpg (1180x842, 121K)

Actually the wealthiest districts in the country vote Democrat:

forbes.com/sites/andrewdepietro/2018/11/08/democrats-wealth-inequality-congressional-districts/#4e1cc346c9b3

okay again, no. The single MOST SUCCESSFUL groups in American media, are literally conservative. Why do you pretend this reality doesn't exist?

Absolutely delusional, flyboy.

Attached: Admiral Gender Studies.jpg (408x421, 109K)

Who the fuck cares if they're making Ariel black? Ariel's a ditzy teenage whore obsessed with humans who falls in love with the first human she meets and rebels against her father by selling her soul and then gets enslaved. That's ALL Ariel does in the movie. And that's the character they choose to make black?
If anyone should be upset it's the sjw's, especially if they keep Eric white. So now the colonial white Eric finds a naked 16 year old black girl on the beach, who can't speak and thinks a fork is a hairbrush and in general is amazed by human white civilization. Sounds a bit problematic if you ask me.

They have been trolling mankind for 6 trillions years

>districts
Funny how that goalpost changed.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair_Broadcast_Group

What's the next deflection, that the Sinclair Group is secretly run by dogwhistling Jews or something? I know this type of cognitive dissonance makes facts hard for you. But pull the band-aid off now.

Oh they do. A friend of mine is marrying one.

Mr. Rogers

>last jedi
>not a far left film

Why don't you tell me in your very cogent words, how a fucking Star Wars film for babies is some sort of "leftie" calling card? I'll wait.

>The Last Jedi is a far left film
are you actually trolling or "pretending" to be a retard or something? It's not.

You're a fucking stupid person.

People have been saying thise since the 1800 and nothing happened

The "basic ideological stance of Western ideology" is anti-free speech and anti-science now? That's very different from the ideology I grew up with.

>got a source?
youtube.com/watch?v=seXojVr-lcM

>White Woman Red Hair
>Black Woman Black Hair

Authenticity must have a different meaning where you're from

>strong womyn protag
>diverse team of PoCs agains white male empire
>the force is female

etc...

Still waiting on those 5 rightwing titles.

>The only forms of media and propaganda are movies and tv!

Contrary to what you may believe, most people do not get their politics from fucking fictional entertainment

Also:

>Moonlight, Bohemian Rhapsody, and Roma are "lefty ones"

Looks like the propaganda got to you, fucking schizo.

Attached: IMG_20190705_214405.jpg (1122x1106, 176K)

>The "basic ideological stance of Western ideology" is anti-free speech and anti-science now
CPAC literally and again, LITERALLY (as in a literal sense), pools money to spread disinfo about climate change and evolution...

At this point, you really are on a "wrong" side. I'm sorry, I'm going to say that. As someone who is fiscally conservative and socially a progressive. You're a brainwashed person.

How is a "strong woman protagonist" a far-left trait? Are you retarded?

You're the type of person who believes what TIME magazine says about the so-called most rich families in the world lmao
Go read Kissinger, and then come back.

H O L D O

Attached: 46712065_2478054762220967_6751695233626406912_n.jpg (381x452, 43K)

Uniparty represents the 20%, fooling the remaining 80% to vote for them due to their media duopoly artificially removing all alternatives from the pool of candidates, whether by denying them exposure or simply by excluding them if they play the game as they've been forced to to get access to that exposure, as with Bernie. Ironically creating a situation where the majority have no political voice.

I'm going to say this for a third time since I keep getting ignored, why do you keep hand-waving the Sinclair Group?

You're not fucking clever or correct.
>doing thing to cater to the left is actually SECRETLY doing thing to serve the ancient evils of white supremacy but you DUPES just can't see it
Stfu

why you lying bro you getting paid or something?

Other than her hair being purple, she did fucking nothing "explicitly" leftist.

Are you retarded? Niggers are unironically the original people. The only reason whites have neanderthal DNA is because they migrated from Africa and crossbred with them.

You ever think that you're just wrong about a dumb movie that you allowed retards to politicize FOR you?

THE HOLOCAUST DIDN'T HAPPEN

What kind of low-effort whataboutism is this? So you're just admitting I'm right but who cares because some other people way over there (who I have nothing to do with) are ALSO wrong the same way you are? What kind of response is that?

You broken fucking robot.

>FOR you
you're a big guy (sneed) (nuke Israel)

youtu.be/mYWB43XpEUI
Literally nothing wrong with it. You probably got that link directly from /pol/ (TOTALLY not a wing of the establishment)

lol

>oy vey goy bow down to our androgenous and childless shriveled-ovaries dyke
No thanks jews.

All Africans need to be relocated in Africa. At least the ones in Europe.

bot test

Yes, I know you think there's literally nothing wrong with it, that's not the point. The point is that this is the only propaganda anybody's ever exposed to.

That isn't a whataboutism. You initially tried to do that with the usual and automated response of "AHHHH ANYONE LIBERAL IS BAD AND OUT TO GET/CENSOR/DESTROY ME", meanwhile, the Sinclair Group is the largest media conglomerate in the fucking West, they fund GOP members, they stack other subsidiaries with dick sucking talking heads, and pave the way for conservative media outlets to basically control the narrative all the way to the White House and you have no problem with this.

But you'll cry some sort of victim card when Alex Jones gets banned from a private company's website...you're a useful fucking pawn that doesn't even see how in the entire history of the US, we have never been this dangerously close to state media. Now we are, but you don't notice it because it's "your guys" doing it.

Kill yourself.

>wrong the "same way you are"
Remind me again which mainstream party is in the pocket of Big Oil and spends literal billions to discredit climate science?

Dude, you're literally sitting there having a conversation with yourself that you've done absolutely nothing to connect to anything I've said. I said I've literally never seen any of this alleged Sinclair Group voodoo you keep conjuring up to. You say it exists. Whatever. I don't care. I don't see it. I don't know about it. It doesn't affect me. I'm not being "propagandized" to by them. To reiterate, the only people ever propagandizing to me are the far-left, and they do so constantly.

Maybe you should go campaign in the american mid-west on the dangers of the sinclair group or whatever, but nobody on the internet knows about that shit. You're fighting against shadows.

you're not disagreeing

>Sinclair Group voodoo
see It's like you're uneducated or something?

stfu spic.

buddy, there literally is no '"far left" mainstream party in the United States.

Again, still has nothing to do with anything I've posted. I don't know about that, no, because I don't fucking watch local american news channels. This shouldn't be hard to understand.

>I don't care
That's the problem, since it quite literally proves the exact fucking opposite of your meme concerns: that there is a concerted effort by a right-wing political machine to produce propaganda.

Identity politics for feminists are nearly exclusively far left

>democratic debate
>how about universal healthcare for illegal immigrants?
>every single candidate raise their hands in support
>no "far left" mainstream party in the united states

Attached: 11453634564356435.jpg (499x481, 28K)

But their plan is to eradicate white people. I mean I don't think there's anyone out there who actually believes the "we want racial harmony we are all one" bullshit. It's explicitly about avenging perceived historical injustices perpetrated by whites. Seriously all this shit is just hating on us cause they ain't us

>oooooooooHHHhhh the Sinclair group
fucking kek

Someone at Disney: Why don't we make a The Princess and the Frog live-action to give blacks representation?

Disney: Let's better give them a nigger mermaid because they have migrated to so many different places it's fair to say they discovered the exact location Atlantis. Now they're race mixed with Atlantians at this point too!

Well it's not very effective then, is it? Considering I've never even heard of it until now?

Is it an issue of you not understanding what "far left" means/is? I'm confused. Universal healthcare isn't even far left as a concept. Are you just a dumb person?

It's a billion dollar corporation that produces more American news than any "libruh" outlet you complain about.

If they push left wing identity politics they are consjdered far left. The same goes fkr their right wing counterparts.

universal healthcare for illegal immigrants isn't a far left concept? bro I'm a fucking norwegian. that's far left even by our standards.

>feminism is far left
I sometimes honestly forget that I'm debating children or the mentally ill.

>Universal healthcare isn't even far left as a concept
For illegal immigrants it is. There is no arguing this, which is why you left out the word ILLEGAL.

>universal healthcare for illegal immigrants isn't a far left concept?
no...that isn't "far" left.

Nope. You are shifting the framework. IDENTITY politics for feminists is nearly exclusively far left. Honestly go back to r3ddit, you absolute pussy.

>no you see if you read my five commie textbooks you'll see they define far left as something totally different
They're crazy authoritarian commies that's far enough left my guy

>feminism isn't far left
Conservatives did all that stuff, huh?

>anything left is far left
>anything right is far right
You are all retards.

>IDENTITY politics for feminists
What does this even mean in your retarded head of yours? What is an "identity" politic that feminists engage in that you consider "far" left? It's like you heard words on a stromnigger blog and don't know what they mean.

Yes it is. Its radical. Just like rounding up nonwhites and expelling them is radical.

You are so far to the "left" that the idea of no borders and free shit for all is a non-radical idea. You are such a fucking moron.

please explain to me how third wave feminism is "far" leftist? Do you just have a big bowl labeled "everything left of Hitler is FAR left and I don't like it"?

No. Anything identity politics is far left/right (radical).

>You are so far to the "left" that the idea of no borders and free shit for all is a non-radical idea.
I don't support either of those, Mr. Strawman. Neither do the majority of liberal Americans.

One day shit will hit thefan and I can't wait for that day. All our problems will suddenly be possible to solve without punishment.

It is. They claim "literally" everything js sexist and racist and we must fix it with government. This is far to the left.

but what even constitutes (to you), identity politics? Seems like it's everything.

>the majority of liberal Americans
Who would surely be considered center left or just left wing, unlike yourself.

Okay, let me do away with the rhetorical posts. It's the kind of idea you'd only come up with if you were a complete full-on ideological demagogue. Literally just think for five seconds about the consequences of this, like healthcare tourism. No sane person would come up with this. That's EXTREMELY far-left. And I guarantee you, nobody in america would've agreed with that 10 years ago (when, incidentally, the dems were for building that evil wall of Trump's), and I expect even today only a tiny minority of said brain-addled ideologues would.

If you can't recognize that as far-left then I don't know what to say other than that you're wildly out of touch.

Attached: 20180922_USC938_0.png (608x967, 104K)

>They claim "literally" everything js sexist and racist and we must fix it with government.
No, they don't. You have a juvenile understanding of ideas you disagree with.

Can I guess your age? 17.

>Seems like it's everything
Because you lack the understanding. This is common among young leftists often it seems

>unlike yourself
Again, I literally never supported open borders...

It's almost like it's easier for you to pretend I'm a strawman so your brain doesn't work overtime to debate me?

>durr it's not far left unless they use the hammer and sickle and blow statues of Mao
>abolishing the nation's borders and planning mass transfers of wealth to institute "racial justice" for the "victims" of "institutional racism" isn't far-left because nobody's built a gulag or murdered their neighbor for going to church yet
Daily reminder that the left are a bloodthirsty monsters who see nothing short of the total annihilation of mankind as "far" when it comes to promoting their disease.

>universal healthcare is "far left"
>despite every other successful Western nation that is far more conservative than the US, having universal healthcare
>some whatabout with Trump's autistic wall
lol okay, retard.

One day this will end in war. I cant wait for that day. Mexicans are a plague.

>>abolishing the nation's borders and planning mass transfers of wealth to institute "racial justice" for the "victims" of "institutional racism"
You're brainwashed, mate. This is why I called you brainwashed before.

It is very obvious how ridiculously you ignore the tight restrictions imposed on many european borders, unlike the US.

>u just like, dum dum and stuff
FACTS and LOGIC!

>and planning mass transfers of wealth to institute "racial justice" for the "victims" of "institutional racism
And remember, it totally isnt revamped Marxism, goy.

That's way too fucking long a post for this thread man. But the essence is that they constantly lie to justify their narrative, they sell themselves as solutions to problems that don't exist but people think exist because feminists have lied about them, they engage in political activism for insane, legitimately evil (and sexist, which I grew up thinking feminists were opposed to) policies, they engage in organized harassment campaigns against wrongthinkers, they exploit their academic privileges to churn out deranged activists who spend their time on social media making posts like yours (for free), they're vehemently anti-science, they actively promote mental illness in people; the list just goes ever on. Like I said, it would be way too long a post for this thread.

Attached: intersectional feminist glaciology.png (557x546, 125K)

I know you're either disingenuous, brainwashed or uninformed, but the US has some of the strictest border security of any first world nation. It's why we have had a statistical net decrease in both illegal crossings for the last decade and in proper legal crossings.

Im sorry you get called dumb a lot. Maybe if you heeded the words you mocked it would stop.

>muh Marxism is happening and not a boogeywoogey

Yeah, I get it. You're ignoring the key part of the "universal healthcare FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS" that makes it radical far left madness, because you realize that's what it is and that you can't defend it. It's alright man. I understand.

>I don't get called dumb a lot
>is a bonkers social conservative faggot who posts on /pol/

He's talking in on-paper ideological larp terms. In the real world (as we know it) the right and the left are much different than whatever end goal utopia these incel philosophers dreamed up in their writings. This guy reads those writings so there you go, takes it as gospel. I mean it's fucking dumb considering majority of the worlds population don't read or care about any that shit. So these people end up in a position of having to tell people to read their holy scripture, THEN they will understand. These kids are like the Westboro Baptist Church but instead of the bible they're holding das kapital or some jung faggotry

>but the US has some of the strictest border security of any first world nation
Despite letting in hundeds of thousands of illegal immigrants in every year, america has some of the "m-most strictest border security ever mkay?"
Youre an absolute retard. Go fuck yourself.

You sound like a legitimately insane person. Are you diagnosed with something? By a professional?

Who's the ignorant retard? (Put up your hand)

Vaffanculo non ti vogliamo siamo pieni. Mangia pizza all'ananas, maledetti americani.
t. fellow dual citizen

Sure. My therapist's a 55 year old feminist. She agrees with me.

Incidentally, what's your diagnosis? You do have one right? Mine's autism. I expect yours is a different flavour. More unstable.

>You're ignoring the key part of the "universal healthcare FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS"
Yes, by extension..."universal" would mean everyone. I don't think access to medical care is exclusive to Americans, hence why anywhere in the EU, you can access the same quality care regardless of status. I don't think your health should be privatized. My sentiment is shared with a lot of actual capitalists too, which by the way, I am. Your ability in a free market should not be tethered by your inability to afford healthcare.

>le passive agresive libtard pants shitting
Epin

Do you uninronically use terms like "cultural marxism" and not get why it sounds stupid?

>semi-literate retard finally realizes the EU is far left globohomo nonsense
Party time, i got the kush cuz its legal in my state.

How am I shitting my pants?

>the assblasted retard flounders desperately
You have no argument, which is why you passively divert with questions. Fuck yourself faggot.

>I have a therapist and I am autistic
LOL of course you are.

"muh marxism" is literal naziboo propaganda that has origins from Goebbels pamphlets.

That's now retarded you are.

universal healthcare is quite literally not "far left" as a concept. Why do you keep peddling this lie for? Even Republicans were for it 30 years ago.

>Despite letting in hundeds of thousands of illegal immigrants in every year
That's not actually happening. Stop reading clickbait articles.
>REEE REE REEE NOOO
Again I'll repeat if you're an actual stupid person: of all the first world nations, the US spends the most on border security, especially post-9/11. I'm not sure how you dispute that, the last administration deported more illegal immigrants than most nations do in a decade.

You fell for protectionist propaganda and memes.

>likes the smell of his own shit so much "she" cant realize "shes" sitting in it
Epic

No, it wouldn't. Countries with "universal healthcare" only offer emergency services to illegal occupants, which I'm pretty sure they already do in the US. Then they deport them. They also have to pay for it in full, unlike citizens. Unless, I expect, they're under 18. Children have all sorts of special protections.

>cucked retard thinks neomarxism is merely a nazi conspiracy
Youre such a subservient little retard.

(((The Media))) should play the role of fuel in ovens

Attached: 1537882606202.gif (501x585, 212K)

That's not an argument so I'll just accept your concession then.

>universal healthcare is quite literally not "far left" as a concept
Nobody is disagreeing on this you fucking moron. Keep ignoring the point.>That's not actually happening. Stop reading clickbait articles.
Ok,

None of this is even true. illegal status immigrants can access almost the same levels of healthcare and healthcare response as native citizens, in almost every EU nation.

Were you the one larping as a Norwegian?

big yawn @this post desu

interestingly, correct. universal healthcare only works under conservative governments, for the benefit of the insular in-group. one of many ideas the left hijacks because it sounds nice, without actually thinking about what it would mean to implement, if it even could be in a community without a sense of community.

>wah why wont you argue with me
Poor little baby

Attached: 1558668491807.jpg (900x1200, 172K)

It literally is a conspiracy peddled by Nazis, does that bother you? There is no vast cultural marxist conspiracy, there never has been.

I bet you think the Frankfurt School was some sort of secret klub of marxist Jews trying to undermine Germany too.

>healthcare for open borders migrants isnt far left

Attached: nu.jpg (301x321, 29K)

>lolberts and berniebros arguing about muh healthcare
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST KILL YOURSELVES NPC RETARD GOLEMS

Attached: 1540749875921.jpg (498x272, 44K)

>if you support a universal healthcare system
>you support open borders
you're entire political ideology has been cucked to shit by base fears.

>everything i dont agree with is a nazi conspiracy theory
Youre a good little subserviant retard

Attached: wphyde.jpg (1080x608, 78K)

Yes. Giving healthcare to anyone js far left. You are a fucking blind retard.
>youre

"cultural marxism" is literally a phrase devised by actual Nazis to discredit intellectuals they disagreed with in the 30s, are you retarded?

>universal access to healthcare as a right, is "far left"
Again, I'll remind you that this was a conservative talking point 30 years ago, zoomer.

access to healthcare should be a right since your fucking well being shouldn't be a product to profit off of. It prevents you from participating in the free market. Why is this hard?

Sounds like a conspiracy theory.

straight from the health directory
>persons over 18, without legal occupancy have right to immediate help and healthcare that's completely necessary and can't wait. you must pay for the healthcare.
>right to healthcare applies fully only for persons who reside legally within the kingdom and
then a bunch of qualifiers

basically, you only have the right to emergency aid

It's not, it's actual history:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Bolshevism

>as a right
Its really sad that you thought you could slip that in there. Nobody denies a right to healthcare. Getting taxpayer funded shit aint a right, faggot.

conservatives in the US wanted to give free healthcare to illegal immigrants? wow, they were pretty progressive

what are you quoting?

Competiton ie human life "denies" your right to taxpayer funded shit. Grow up, baby.

taxes pay for public utilities all the time. Do you cry about those? I'm baffled that the idea that "the government foots most of the bill for access to healthcare" has become a subject of controversy, ONLY in the US.

>bolshevism
Irrelevant

the health directory
helsenorge.no/helsehjelp/helsehjelp-til-personer-uten-lovlig-opphold#Voksnes-rett-til-helsetjenester

I don't know

So you honestly believe that a person should compete to the fucking death in a first world society? You don't think that health should be something you have a right to preserve, so that you can participate in a free market system unmolested by disease? Are you the type of faggot who defended hiking the price of life-saving medicine by 200 percent?

>taxes pay for public utilities all the time.
For LEGAL CITIZENS you absolute fucking retard. Thats the whole point.

Are you a fucking retard...?

>So you honestly believe that a person should compete to the fucking death in a first world society?
Not if theyre a legal citizen, you idiot.

You are pathetically trying to deny a fact by diverting to conspiracy theories.

Do you and I agree that there are humanitarian rights for illegal and legal persons in all UN member countries or not? Because we aren't talking about access to federal assistance programs, foodstamps or welfare for illegals here...we are talking about equal access to healthcare regardless of status.

Youre such a fucking glorious retard.

bolshevism is their term for cultural marxism, they were synonyms you ahistorical fucking faggot. Hitler targeted "marxists" in Austria and Germany whom he deemed were against the pure German workers unions; intellectuals, teachers, professors, doctors. People who he scapegoated as "socialist" Russian-sympathizers, due to the increased socialist and communist interest in Germany/Austria. It was to divide them up, knock them down while also make a big show of sweeping through the German classes. One of the most common cries of the Nazi party were against the "cultural" Marxists who they believed infiltrated the Weimar Republic with Jews to destroy Germany's sense of national cohesion.

Again, are you an actual retard?

Are you trying to argue that the Nazis scapegoating boogeymen was a "conspiracy" theory?

That's not an argument, at all. I asked you a specific question.

Thats nice, but the marxism im referring to originated decades after that. One could be forgiven for assuming you had the slightest clue of what most people would know im referring to.

>So you honestly believe that a person should compete to the fucking death in a first world society?
The older I get, the more I genuinely do. With no mechanism to weed out destructive elements within our societies, and many set up to enable them, our societies are plainly "unsistainable" to use the buzzword du jour.

I guess those of us who can should milk the current situation for all that it's worth though.

Attached: dysgenics iq.jpg (1238x777, 206K)

Right, so basically you're just doubling down on a literal boogeyman that doesn't exist in the real world? Sure, retard. Go back to /pol/ you poorly informed fag.

>originated decades after that
Except it didn't, you brainwashed /pol/nigger. The term is exclusively one used by Nazis and neo-Naziboos of the last decade to scapegoat (again) anyone they dislike as some sort of nefarious Frankfurt/Marxist conspirator. You're referring to a dead propaganda meme that is so painfully obvious that it's bullshit, that I question your IQ.

>you had the slightest clue of what most people would know im referring to
Which is what? Blacks being in capeshit and Disney flicks?

there's a lot of jewish nazis in the US these days, uhu?

Attached: wash your dick.jpg (540x960, 146K)

>jewish nazis in the US
wut?

oh sorry. neo-marxism is a real thing? I can't tell all these different flavours of marxism apart.

>neo-marxism is a real thing
You realize that you're just repackaging Nazi arguments?

so they are jewish nazis?

Again, I'm not sure what you are trying to say. Are you autistic?

there's a lot of jews saying things you say only nazis say. ergo, they must be nazis

there's a lot of jews saying things you say only nazis say
or you know, that's not true at all? Unless we are talking about zionists? What even is your fucking argument?

just making an observation user

there were pro-nazi jews in germany y'know. all dead now of course.

>there were pro-nazi jews in germany
What is your point though? I don't speak /pol/faggot...are you saying they deserved it? What on this planet fucking earth is your argument?

no argument, just observations

and I don't browse /pol/, couple of times I glanced over there it was pretty boring. even during that last happening in new zealand

Pro-nazi jews weren't executed. They died of old age.

What does it matter to mention the statistically insignificant number of German Jews who were pro-Nazi in the late 20s and 30s...? Does that somehow vindicate the actions taken by Hitler? What the fuck are you on?

>Pro-nazi jews weren't executed
This is next level delusion.

it's just a funny observation user. you didn't chuckle?

The holocaust didn't even happen user.
Most jewish deaths were from disease.

weak bait. Thread is about to archive.

and you couldn't even leave it up as the final and thus most board-representative word. sad.

Good argument.
Facts are, there wasn't enough time or resources to kill 6m jews.

Well that puts paid to the reboot of The Lion King. They didn't use real animals!

>facts
>holohoaxer shit
lol sure thing.

>most board-representative word
almost this entire site thinks you /pol/niggers are laughably retarded and wrong about virtually everything. Why do you need the last word? To feel vindicated?

pretty humorless, ain't ya