Who was in the wrong here?
Who was in the wrong here?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Dobson, for trusting that lard gargling chuckle head to get anything done.
As a kid I always fought the fat guy sounded like a velociraptor when he laughed here
Why did Nedry even try to steal the embryos?
Malcom was a fucking hack whose objections to the Park were nothing more than pseudoscientific gibberish.
The whole "life finds a way" rant makes no fucking sense.
kek
Malcom was the voice of Michael Crichton who is an anti science, climate change denying hack so that's why the story favors his retarded attitude.
The actor who played Dodgson is a sex offender.
Lel, really?
Michael Criton for simply switching two letters in the word "nerdy" to name a character
It was the shaving cream can that made that sound
adds an extra layer to the whole 'WE GOT DODGSON HERE' bit
Crichton is a hack.
I HAVE HAD IT WITH THESE MOTHERFUCKING DINOSAURS IN THIS MOTHERFUCKING PARK
>Ladies and gentlemen, we got Dodgson here
>YOUR FEELINGS CHANGE LIKE THE WEATHER
What was the magic word?
Hilary lost.
How is that relevant at all?
Also, wtf was that whole nonsense about T-rex having movement based vision?
She hasn't been relevant for years yet you keep bringing her up. Stick to science denial at Trumpemberg rallies and leave the grown ups alone.
Take you climate change back to reddt, seething commie.
Seething
Niggers, you don't need to be a fucking democrat or a leftists in order to accept the reality of climate change. What the fuck is wrong with you?
Was it the can or Dennis that made the squeak noise? That's the real question.
Intelligent response. Trumpanzees are trained to act very human.
i have seen this movie a dozen times and i still don't know what the point of this character is.
Dobson, for tracing over pictures instead of drawing.
>i fucking love science
>97% agree
Yikes
It is not clear. But why did he put it on the pie? Such an odd scene.
Newman, for laughing like a velociraptor.
Why not. Costa Rican sea bass?
I see you are here just to shitpost.
He is a character from the books, from a competing company. He is prominently featured in the second book as an antagonist. He doesn't appear in any other movies than the first.
what bothered me more (even more so in the book) was tha malcolm was specifically hired to find any flaws or oversight in the park but whenever he brough up any flaws he never informed hammond or anyone what they were until waaaaaaaaay after the fact. he literally could have mitigated so much but he was too busy being an arrogant asshole to do his job.
How did the dilophosaur get into the car?
>Michael Crowley of The New Republic alleged that, in retaliation for his having written a negative review of Crichton's previous novel State of Fear, Crichton named a character with a small penis who rapes a baby after him. From page 227: "Alex Burnet was in the middle of the most difficult trial of her career, a rape case involving the sexual assault of a two-year-old boy in Malibu. The defendant, thirty-year-old Mick Crowley, was a Washington-based political columnist who was visiting his sister-in-law when he experienced an overwhelming urge to have anal sex with her young son, still in diapers." Both the real and the fictional Crowley are Washington-based political columnists who had graduated from Yale.
What an absolute Madlad.
How in the fuck did T-rex get over the giant concrete wall over which it pushed the car?
He was a fat entitled slob who was terrible with his money and retroactively wanted more money for a job he had already been hired and paid to do.
Typical American in other words.
That shit confused me for years
>science denial
>i read ignorant HuffPo articles on the topic that play chinese telephone with their sources to make claims not present i am educated
Actually read some climatology stuff some time, urban redneck.
Go pay your carbon tax to Al Gore.
how much was he paying? $750,000 down payment and "$50" (thousand I assume) for each sample? So maybe 10 dinos for 500k. Why not take the 750 and run?
Dodson, shouldve appeared in lost world, changing the Ingen cowboys for biosin poachers
diferent sides of the road
>Also, wtf was that whole nonsense about T-rex having movement based vision?
This is something they did for the movie to increase the tension of the T-rex escape scene.
In the book a character speculates that T-rex's vision could be based on movement and tries remaining still to go undetected but it ends up not being true, the Rex still sees him.
But the fence it broke was trough which the car was pushed.
>2003
>We'll all be underwater by 2015!
>2019
>Something is bound to happen!
Climate change huh? Didn't it used to be called global warming? Makes you think.
you are right, they probably didn't think that through, they just wanted to add tension
unless you want to buy this image
You must be americans if the notion that human industry pumping shitton of carbon dioxide into the air for the last several hundred years having an affect on our environment is somehow controversial to you.
Carbon tax etc bs is just nonsense the powers that be are trying to push in order to curb the plebs further into the dirt and are using climate change as an excuse to do it. Climate change itself is very real however and obviously humans can't do jack shit to stop it unless we are willing to either basically return ourselves back to the 17th century in terms of industry, or kill a couple billion of excess people.
Seeing how I live in the socialist utopia of Finland, I don't really give a shit about what happens to the poor fucks near the equator that will run out of arable land due to climate change. Let them all die for all I care.
But what broke the fence over there?
le climate change, not even 4000 years ago europe was a permafrost wasteland, Id like to know what factories were responsible for that change, cause I'm fucking sure mammoths didn't use carbon, so who did it?
He's had sex. You'll be amazed what you can do if you ever lose your virginity.
the car? I dont know, spielberg forgets the details sometimes, like not filming raptors entering the boat on the lost world
Because why have $750k when you can have $1.25 million
Wow, I haven't read that book in over 10 years, but I remember that part vividly. I thought he was randomly being edgy since it really didn't add to the story at all. The book was Next btw
Why did the movie reveal that Nedry was Hammond's son? Why would Hammond under pay his own son? Nedry would be his his heir, no?
Is the concept of change over long spans and short spans of time hard to grasp for you? The reason why the ongoing climate change is an issue is it's speed. Humans given our technological and cognitive proves will no doubt be able to survive this change, but the already struggling animal and plantlife might not be so fortunate. Animals let alone plants do not have the option of rapidly adapting to the ongoing changes as they are still bound more or less to evolutionary process, which means that when shit changes too fast, mass extinctions occur because life can't find the way fast enough.
What the fuck are you talking about?
Retard
Not an argument, but nice dubs. Heil.
fucking kek
Who was in the wrong here?
i'm almost certain someone added it in post. it's almost identical to the sound the raptors make
how did it get in the building at the end?
americans
>Spared no expense.
>except when it came to the IT department, fuck you Nedry.
How in the fuck did this old fuck get away with it?
Malcolm for misrepresenting the problems with the park. He framed it as "muh life breaking free" when the real problem was that the park hired that fat corrupt fuck for IT services.
This.
I find Crichton so frustrating for that reason. He seems like a smart guy and his books, while thematically stupid, frequently have extremely well-researched and thought out science. It's just his stupid ideological conclusions.
based
>I find Crichton so frustrating for that reason. He seems like a smart guy and his books, while thematically stupid, frequently have extremely well-researched and thought out science. It's just his stupid ideological conclusions.
Same.
I used to like his books when I was younger and didn't really notice his obvious political leanings due to my own utter cluelessness about politics, however as I grew older I found myself getting annoyed by how heavily his own political biases influenced his works. The most outrageous example is the book about climate change. It had a bunch of absolutely absurd scenes like a bunch of young african tribesmen trying to rape a bunch of captive american women etc.
>young african tribesmen trying to rape captive women
What context makes that absurd? Without any further explanation that sounds completely plausible.
>The absolute state of boomers
>Carbon tax etc bs is just nonsense the powers that be are trying to push
this is what it really comes down to. I am sure climate change is a thing but it would happen regardless if we were here or not considering thats how Earth has been for billions of years. Piling more taxes onto the common man does nothing to help or prevent climate change and the topic is just a dead horse politicians keep beating to death in order to secure votes.
It is like 15 years since I read that book, so quite honestly, I don't remember the context. I just remember that scene, mostly because the boys were like 13 or something, and the women fucking killed them by slitting their throats. It seemed like it was some fetish shit imo.
>The whole "life finds a way" rant makes no fucking sense.
did you not watch the rest of the movie lmao?
they used frog DNA to fill the gaps and the species of frogs they used can change gender
are you perhaps retarded?
still sounds plausible. i can already imagine a bunch of dumb white girls going to uganda/rawanda/africa in general as peace corp members only to get captured by child soldiers. because that has actually happened. not sure why you hate chrichton for something heavily based in reality.
It most certainly would not be happening at the speed it is now. Industrial revolution and the consequential expansion of human productivity and utilization of natural resources as well as production of emissions has obviously had a tremendous impact on our world. But like I said, there is no way to stop it, anyone trying to push some sort of sustainable development bs is selling snake oil. The only way to stop climate change would be either dismantling modern industrial civilization and returning to the mostly agrarian based lifestyles of 17th century, or killing basically all of Africa. Humanity is not willing to make either of those choices, thus climate change will continue and we will have to adapt.
if it were real and politicians were actually worried about it (AoC et al) there would be a huge push for clean nuclear energy
but because they all push for the gimmicky solar and wind shit I am suspect of their intentions
Thought he sounded like a dilophosaurus, myself.
That's not the reason I dislike his books (I don't hate him or his works, I just don't really like them), and like I said, that scene just stuck to my mind for some reason. Maybe because I was like 11 when I read it during my Michael Crichton fan phase.
>Seeing how I live in the socialist utopia of Finland, I don't really give a shit about what happens to the poor fucks near the equator that will run out of arable land due to climate change. Let them all die for all I care.
wow it's not like some of them will migrate to areas that aren't fucked
not him but the more I re-read the book and re-watch the films it feels more like an excuse for malcolm to not do his job.
As a kid I thought the shaving cream was whipped cream.
Son, is that you?
He felt he was being short-changed by Hammond over the work he was doing (part of a skeleton crew manning the entire network for a theme park). Hammond "sparing no expense" turns out to be a big fat lie when you realize just how much he cut corners everywhere to get the park up and running.
>Don't get cheap on me, Dodgson. That was Hammond's mistake.
>It most certainly would not be happening at the speed it is now
people act like we have been keeping track of climate change for a significant amount of time. climate change in this context is a recent phenomenon that all started back in the early '00s when some scientist discovered a hole in the ozone layer. back then we never really knew what that meant or how often it happened in the past since it was a recent discovery but politicians and the media took it and created a ton of BS out of it. You never hear about said hole in the Ozone because it disappeared on its own and no one ever knew what caused it or made it go away. We just keep piling on assumptions that global warming is a thing and taking that as fact.
>if it were real and politicians were actually worried about it (AoC et al) there would be a huge push for clean nuclear energy
That's not necessary the case. Young retarded ideologues like AoC might genuinely believe the official narrative about how we can still prevent climate change (redpill: we can't, unless we either dismantle industrial civilization, or kill about billion or two people), and thus push their retarded nonsense out of misplaced desire to improve the world. The other breed of politician, the cynical elitists that serve their financial masters with no questions asked, don't give jack shit about climate change, the appropriate methods of fighting it, or the consequences, because they, and their masters have their luxury bunkers in New Zealand etc ass ends of nowhere in case shit ever hits the fan. They won't be suffering the consequences anyways, thus the policies they push only seek to further enrich them and their friends.
Here is a real way to fight climate change:
>1st step, basically stop all global trade, by imposing MASSIVE tariffs on anything that comes to your nation via cargo tankers.
>2nd step is destroying modern consumer culture, and returning to the old way of having products that last 20 or so years if not more and are not made to cater to trends etc, but for specific purposes.
>3rd step, focus heavily on protein efficient foods like insects etc and shift away from traditional meat production as it is very carbon intensive.
>4th step, go balls deep into nuclear power, while developing better alternatives that have less toxic waste, like thorium power.
>5th step, adopt eugenics, only allow people who live environmentally consciously to reproduce, sterilize or cull segments of populations that are undesirable.
>6th step, get rid of liberalims and democracy, the cancer that has ruined Western civilization, and adopt the only based and redpilled ideology, which is ecofascism.
>7th step, race war.
based
And we can shoot them at the border.
Preventing the spread of competing populations into one's own territory is not only right, but entirely natural.
The hole in the ozone layer is an entirely different issue m8. It is not related to climate change, is is related to a bunch of chemicals used in many products during the last century reacting with ozone in the upper atmosphere and thus depleting the amount of ozone over there, which is bad, because ozone absorbs uv radiation from the sun to which most life is somewhat vulnerable. So when there is less ozone there, aka a "hole" in the layer, more uv radiation gets down to earth, causing shit like skin cancer in humans for example.
How did the raptor get into the electric shed?
imagine what that room smells like with all of them crammed in there
they learned how to open doors user
And everyone stood up and clapped.
Are you me?
But why did it wait there for her to turn on the lights and only attack then?
MUH MUH CLIMATE CHANGE, MUH MUH REAL SCIENCE GOYIM. Climate change is literally the biggest fraud in history. You realize they get rid of data that doesn't correspond with their climate models right? youtube.com
I just realized the character Wayne voiced in Toy Story 2 is a splitting image of Andrew Dobson.
If you recall in the book the Dino DNA was closer to avian DNA. So by using the Amphibian DNA (which is what they originally thought was closer when they first started the project) they didn't create as close of a copy of a true Dino like Wu was talking about. In the book they comment on how they believe the (amphibian) DNA they used caused they Dino to move faster than they may have moved when they were alive millions of years ago.
yeah sure dude let's see your Finnish govt allow that
The biggest party in our nation right now has a youth wing that is ruled by open ethnonationalists and the leaders of the main party openly speak about "great replacement" etc.
Funland is treading towards awakened ethnic nationalism faster than many other European nations.
That scene of fatty eating made me so hungry as a kid, such kino. I wanted to even eat the shaving cream after he put it on the pie.
I watch mukbangs constantly and only now do i know where the need to do so came from
>In the book they comment on how they believe the (amphibian) DNA they used caused they Dino to move faster than they may have moved when they were alive millions of years ago.
nah, the problem is that the dinos were TOO close to real life dinos which moved faster than 1990s americans thought they would since the whole "slow, lumbering beast" image of dinosaurs was still popular (the movie was what changed that). Wu was trying to convince Hammond to let him alter the dinos to match people's expectations more, but Hammond insisted that he wanted "real" dinosaurs even though because of all the gap-closing they could never get completely real dinosaurs.
Hello Newman...
Same. My family never used barbasol. I always thought it was a joke that no one would find i suspicious that the fat guy would have a can of whipped cream on him at all times.
I was always just disgusted by him.
>I always thought it was a joke that no one would find i suspicious that the fat guy would have a can of whipped cream on him at all times.
Top lel
After seeing this thread I had to re-watch that scene of him with the shaving foam and now am on a mukbang binge, no money but bought eggs and crisps and am eating along with mukbang videos
I should note I also have to be awake in 5 hours for work
Life is full of choices, but in the end it doesn't really matter what you choose fren, we are all gonna die anyway.
been proven that the rex smashed the ship up.
How did it end back in the cargo hold tho?
Proofs?