Will it at least be better than The Hateful Eight?

Will it at least be better than The Hateful Eight?

Attached: C6D5A63F-FB61-45AB-B3B8-14D1787B3839.png (640x640, 474K)

I don't know. I was older than 15 when Hateful Eight came out and therefore did not watch it.

I heard there's no violence until the last twenty minutes and when it happens its incredibly ridiculous and over the top. So its a 2 hour slog of Leo hamming it up in the front of the camera and then Quentin tries to shove in as many of his trademark Tarantino-isms as he possibly can before his producers say enough is enough and force him to trim down the runtime. So yeah, pretty much just like The Hateful Eight.

I don't like Tarantino, but his films are entertaining to watch. Still better than capeshit or most Hollywood blockbusters.

Hateful was the best movie hes made since Jackie brown. What the fuck is wrong with zoomers and they're obsession with hiveminds?

Tarantino peaked with pulp fiction.
Four rooms was the best film he took part in.

Tostinos film legacy:

>four rooms
complete dogshit and yes this counts no matter how bad he wants it not to

> Reservoir dogs
rip off of city on fire

>Pulp Fiction
decent only because of Roger Avary's contributions, but a B- at best

>jackie Brown
great film. funny how he can only tell a cohesive narrative without "muh disjointed chapters" when the material isnt his.

>kill bill 1
rip off of lady snowblood

>kill bill 2
trash

>death proof
the less said about this one the better

>inglorious bastards
decent. suffers from meme chapter directing. the shtick gets old

>Django
fucking horrible

>hateful 8
his second worst movie (next to DP). what a waste of good talented actors and 70mm film on what essentially is a boring as play.

tortallini is a meme director loved by first year film students who think he actually ever made anything worth a damn. suffice to say once upon a time will be more mastaborary nonsense

>can't even bother to photoshop Brad's elbow on Leo's shoulder
>expect me to bother with the movie
fucking dropped, 0/10

What's your obsession with being contrarian

Hateful Eight is one of Tarantino's best

I don't fucking understand why nobody likes it. It's really fucking good.

I just realized I've made a mistake, I meant to write Inglorious Basterds. Fucking hated Hateful Eight kek

Why are you dismissing movies as being ripoffs when his entire career is meant to be homages to other directors and genres? makes no sense

Unfortunately it stars Leo, so no it won't be

You aint fooling anyone with this bait buddy
Try to be a bit more subtle next time

Attached: 1537199298116xd.png (249x200, 20K)

the spoilers already leaked from cannes premiere

basically it's inglorious basterds 2.0....sharon tate lives and kicks charles manson ass using the techniques she learned from bruce lee (he helps them too). there's also big reveal that polanski hired manson to murder tate after he learned the child of sharon was not his, but in fact bruce lee...the movie ends with sharon and bruce lee getting married, showing that neither of them die and they live happily ever after. polanski is arrested.

as for pitt and leo they don't do much, they just witness the events and help defeat the manson girls. brad eats and leo yells at stuff. brad dies at the end.

>you will live to see both Brad and Leo go bald

the hateful 8 is good you plebthe first 2hrs at least

>Jackie brown
lmao

Reminder: Insider user informed Yea Forums that tracking is "through the floor" and Sony knows this is going to bomb in near historic fashion.

Opening U.S.: $18 million
Total U.S.: $80 million
Total W.W.: $280 million
Budget: $150 million
Marketing: $130 million

Tarantino's infatuation with self-aware meta "cool" has overpowered his scripts and films since Kill Bill, and reached a point of no return with Inglourious Basterds, where it seeped into revisionist history with a Weinstein-fostered Jewish liberal political bent, and was then whipped up into a yuk-yuk hijinks comedy.

Why it's become insufferable is that as he ages, his films oddly lose emotional depth and detach from resonant reality. An aspect ignored is that the characters in Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Jackie Brown and True Romance are all in the grip of money woes, be it greed (Drexel; Marsellus), desperation (Butch; Clarence), or the grind of work and time (Jackie; Hopper's cop; Jules). Money is a thing, like the pocket watch up the ass, it's a real force even when the films exude pop mysticism or genre fervor.

Starting with Kill Bill, cash money may as well have been made from recycled comic books. It has no weight on these worlds. Django Unchained should be about business and survival, money in the enforced labor of human chattel. Instead we get Candyland, a juvenile Batman villain plantation. The entire movie is ironically black/white tedium.

When Tarantino attempted to scale back with The Hateful 8, he compulsively had to widen out, literally with superfluous 70mm that didn't make sense for an overwrought stage play about cabin and jungle fever.

Now he says Once Upon a Time is his closest film to Pulp Fiction, but notice how he doesn't specify the qualities of PF that carry over, because he is now reduced to a superficial posturing of his earlier risk-taking, an ear to street grittiness amplified through a vintage haze of vinyl, crime novels and boob tube. It's literally a self-aware meta dramedy about A-list actors yukking it up as C-list actors in a bloated modern self-congratulatory Hollywood rendition of its earlier, purer self, which mirrors what Tarantino has become.

>Trashrantino

Bump. Nobody cares about this movie lol. Why