What was his problem? did he get shot at the end when the officer reached his hand through?

what was his problem? did he get shot at the end when the officer reached his hand through?

Attached: that jack that house built.jpg (675x1000, 80K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/Ypgq0qdgVZA
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

2 based 2 live

No he didn't get shot, he literally found the entrance to hell that was opened by the power of his house

Is the truly uncut version available now?

so sick of getting shilled typical incel core movies like this.

I understand you're fond of shopping at Carlson's supermarket

Incelcore should be a new music genre

are women that fucking stupid?

MUH INCEL

Attached: 1562096948062.jpg (605x658, 83K)

She folded as soon as it was about getting some money from the husband's pension

I found this film incredibly disturbing
not because of the killings
but because of how i somehow ended up on his side at the climax
most of the film i was thinking how horrible what he was doing was
but at the end, when he's racing back to the hideout to shoot them
I ended up feeling panicked, like in a normal thriller
except normally it would be the protagonist racing to save a bunch of people
instead I was tense hoping he gets there and can kill them in time

What does this mean?

>guau
dumb spic

hot take. based

Attached: rudeness.png (814x817, 948K)

his problem was that he was clearly and engineer.

Attached: 1562114892646.jpg (654x818, 433K)

It has been for some time but all it adds was more footage of him cutting the tits off and a laughably bad CGI shot of the kid's head getting blown off. Unironically glad that part got cut, ruined the entire scene for me. I've seen better gore in flash games

DUM
DAMDUM
DADUM

Attached: 46795697.jpg (480x360, 13K)

The ending is literally the highest stakes imaginable.
>resign yourself to an eternity in hell
OR
>risk falling into the deepest pit of hell for the slight chance of cheating yourself into eternal bliss
Fascinating in it's implications of the human psyche, how anybody could justify either option.

Attached: spooky.jpg (2234x2747, 364K)

he was always going to the deepest pit I think, that's why Virgil took him there and presented him the stairway upwards, he knew he wouldn't make it but that he would also try for it, and that the kind of person that he was who could think he could escape all the evil he did with no repercussions belonged in the deepest circle

youtu.be/Ypgq0qdgVZA

Attached: 1532654260252.gif (500x375, 498K)

This movie was so fucking kino that my whore ExGF dumped me right after we watched it

Still love this little flick

I think you're right but I think an alternate ending where he actually succeeds would have fit the theme of the film better, as most of the story is about him escaping any sort of judgement for his crimes. I like how they kept the end of his life very ambiguous.

Matt was born for this role. Anybody got that gif of him nodding from the trailer?

Attached: The-House-That-Jack-Built.jpg (780x519, 41K)

The part where he makes the cop check for any signs of the elderly woman he just killed was the funniest shit I've seen in a long time.

Attached: 1559415514727.jpg (762x768, 63K)

The shakey cam was kinda annoying desu

RIPPEN

It's 100% based

It's true; I emphasized with Jack's frustration over other's failings.

All Euro Versions are uncut

do you find that disturbing though or are you edgy?
I think part of Lar's aim in this was to demonstrate to audiences how powerful storytelling and perspective is and make us ashamed for our own feelings about his film.

He does the same thing (though in a far more powerful way) in Breaking the Waves, where watching it, i started to think very badly of the main character, as did everyone else in the film, and then after her death, realized how good she was (as did everyone else in the film) and felt ashamed.

I think part of the reason The House that Jack Built got criticized so heavily is that most people do not like feeling ashamed or being made to think about their own weaknesses.

Because also a lot of people were repulsed by a film where the protagonist and perspective is such an evil man doing evil things.
But why is that?
I think it's because we're conditioned so heavily and naturally inclined to empathize with the protagonist in a story.
And it's not that they cannot empathize with him and so the story does not work, but that they are threatened by the idea that they might empathize with him and the degree of culpability for his actions that brings.

On the other hand, many edgy people here seem to outright embrace empathizing with him and see no issue with it, which is equally as morally problematic. But maybe not more so?