Literature>Film>TV. Change my mind

Literature>Film>TV. Change my mind

Attached: download.jpg (1000x750, 73K)

correct

In terms of quality? I can’t

Music >

pornography>anime>video games>literature>theater>film>tv

TV is often ruined by fandom (Stranger Things) and other things like budget constraints and actors' personal lives (Lost). Literature doesnt have that problem, and that is why it will always be the best storytelling device.

Attached: books are trash.png (236x214, 37K)

Real life > all media

Attached: You.gif (728x426, 128K)

worst post of 2019

Is what book nerds have because they need literally everything laid out to them.

Real life is a product of media. Prove me wrong.

vidya BTFOs all three

Attached: best-video-games-2018-1545927666.jpg (480x240, 34K)

Film is unironically the highest form of art.
It contains all the other art forms in all the filmmaking elements, from fashion, architecture, design to music, photography, the writing and performances.
With film, you can express your idea in just one single frame through framing and composition, the performance, production design, sound
etc, while with literature you have to use multiple sentences just to set up the scene and for the reader to grasp what's happening. Reading words linearly is not ideal, film is just much more efficient. Also with film you get an exact fixed artistic expression that can’t be changed, while with literature it's entirely different with every single person because they all self impose their own pacing while reading, some read a book in a day some in a month, with films you get the exact experience the artist intended. Not to mention the fact that readers rarely read the direct expression of the artist, more than often just a translated reinterpretation.

Now that doesn't mean everyone uses the medium of film to it's maximum potential ofcourse, but it has a far greater potential than any other art form out there.

>cowboy simulator
>bing bing wahoo
>greek mythology but edgy xd
>celeste? who?
Talk to me once video games look better than the first toy story movie

>t. low IQ brainlet

>everything laid out to them
Oh so every movie made past 2007?

Television is part of the medium of film, it just has a different production format. You got the hierarchy right though, theatrical features are better than tv serials.

No one cares about you and your shit OP, go find attention somewhere else.

That said is an even bigger faggot. Overall, a mediocre bait thread, share the (you)

Attached: 1560170897047.jpg (494x468, 45K)

Have you seen The Embrace of the Serpent? The White Ribbon? Under The Skin? Hard to be a God? Leviathan?

You know, it sounds nice and classy to say literature>all but not really.
It takes 2 pages in which the author tries to describe some scene or mood or character which takes a motion picture 1 second.
The character voices in the books are all in your head, they never truly come to life. Whereas on the screen, they do.
Something like:
"OP is a faggot" I said, spitting in his general direction.
Will never compare to actually seeing the 2 second clip of it.
You can include soundtrack, effects, performances here. All absent in a book.
I'd even argue that vidya done right is the top art form because it includes all the above and you're completely immersed and invested since you're interacting with the world.
So yeah, literature is great but movies are usually better.
The reason movie adaptations usually suck except for a few notable exceptions, is because they dumb down the book very much for run time, and of course, it never lives up to it if you read about a character for 10-20 hours, and then see it on a screen for 2 hours.

Right that's why incels have been seething about TLJ "not making any sense" for nearly two years straight..

Says the guy who thinks having literally everything explained to him makes him superior all because he partakes in an outdated form of media for entertainment.

>greek mythology but edgy
Greek mythology invented edgy, mate. Everything in the God of War series has happened at some point in some fucked up fable/tragedy the greeks dreamed up.

Based

Absolutely this. All of you losers use TV as an escapism.
I can’t prove you wrong because you’re already wrong. Media is a subset of our culture which stems from society. Fucking retard.

Fuck off little boy.

How is all that different from TV?

The primary focus in TV shows is on the written narrative and nothing else, the repetitive structure, countless establishing shots and shots of a car entering a location, countless "let's go to a bar for a beer" like exposition dialogues, every episode has to end with a cliffhanger, every episode has one big moment which is executed well while the rest is mostly filler, countless twists and turns etc
All the other filmmaking elements like cinematography, editing, sound design don't matter at all in the long run, the only thing you are left with is the characters and nothing else. Just a big collection of plot points.

Most of the time you don't even have to look at the screen, the back to back camerawork in dialogues get's so overused that you can basically just listen to the conversation without even watching the screen and grasp all the information you need because the written narrative is the main thing here, while in film it's the visual narrative.
(Actual) Films are made by directors, while tv shows are made mainly by producers. And in film, every single second of runtime is there for a reason and there isn't a single frame of "filler" in them, while in the vast majority of TV shows there are entire scenes or even episodes that are simply unnecesary and not of much artistic value, but you still sit through it just to see what happens with "the characters" at the end because nothing else really doesn’t even matter.

It's simple, TV shows are primarily a producers medium, while film is a directors medium.