What channels do you watch for news?

CNN

Attached: 69.jpg (700x416, 77K)

I can honestly say I don't give a fuck about "news" from any source. That shit rarely affects the one person I care about; me.

this honestly

You also have a million reddit points dont you? Admit it

same, but no TYT, Liberal bias is too strong.

I wish that faggot had blown his brains out on live tv. At least it would have been some real Network shit.

i have only ever gone to plebbit for porn. that was months ago.

Based lonewolf! Yeah!!

Reddit is down the hall and to the left.

Ring of Fire
The David Pakman Show
Secular Talk
Majority Report
Democracy Now

no user he's a rich vanderbelt but you will be blowing your own brains in the near future.

I mostly get my news from podcasts. I used to listen to more serious political shows to get different opinions and shit, but now I don't even care about that, so I just watch Night Shade with Michael Malice on Compound Media and call it good.

Attached: night shade episode 20.png (1366x768, 921K)

You wish you reddit libtard

>ironically watches the young turks in 2019
jesus fucking christ

TYT for liberal perspective
Morning Joe for conservative/centrist democrat perspective

Attached: 1523805934280.webm (640x800, 1.74M)

what's wrong with the young turks?

lol. I wish nothing. I live in reality. I don;t need to photoshop memes, the moron in chief does it all on his own. But people like you continue to vote while living in make believe land.

youtube and twitter
a lot of tim pools shit, anything i can listen to with gavin mcinnes, rebel media, daily wire

r/thedonald

TYT are far left not representative of your median democrat. Maybe a democrat in San Francisco, Portland Oregon or NYC.

>TYT
>far left

lmao, not even close. they're solidly center-left only.

>Reality
You live in a shoe shack and pay 2 grand a month for 700 square feet in an overpopulated supermetropolis?

>Progressive left
>Not far left
Try again dumbass.

Attached: Media-Bias-Chart_4.0_8_28_2018-min.jpg (6613x5106, 1.84M)

Attached: 1438146901626.gif (319x240, 434K)

got that right, its 50% scaremongering 50% spin

bruh, TYT gets attacked all the time by actual leftists for being too conservative.

Every time they do a segment on economics, Cenk has to clarify 10 times that he's a capitalist.

this but unironically

>Progressive gets attacked by communists
You really are stupid.

NPR is worse than MSNBC. DESU Try /pol/, Tucker, NY Times, Economist, New Yorker, Foreign Affairs, 60 Minutes, PBS Specials. At the very least try browsing POL to try and unspin your MSM feed. At Least POL will attract commentary from the other side of the iron/iranian curtain on middle east conflicts and other world events.

your thought fragments aren't even intelligible

Attached: 1537570098524.jpg (560x612, 42K)

>every conservative site is in "the bad zone"
>all the liberal sites that anyone's ever heard of are a-ok

If you believe Fox News is any more unfair or biased than CNN and MSNBC you are seriously deluded.

And putting Reason on the "skews right" side is a little bit of a stretch in my opinion.

well, for starters, they call themselves "the young turks"

google definition of "the young turks":

a young person eager for radical change to the established order.

David Pakman Show for politics/economics
youtube.com/user/MidweekPolitics

Thom Hartmann Program to watch Thom btfo his callers
youtube.com/user/thomhartmann

NPR for the headlines

Attached: 1510737155392.png (1000x1000, 63K)

>bruh, TYT gets attacked all the time by actual leftists for being too conservative.
other than the constant denial of the Armenian genocide, what fucking conservative views do the fucking young turks hold? c'mon! c'mon!

>Frontline.
based

>constant denial of the Armenian genocide

why do you keep spreading right wing fake news?

I believe Cenk's current position is, "Okay, fine, maybe it did happen."

kulinski and pakman are good, but seder comes off as kinda douchey to me. I'd be lying if I said I didn't want to see him debate crowder, though.

>channels

no, he acknowledges that it happened, 100%

and he has had that view for years. It's just a conservative smear at this point.

TYT puts out more content I think than any of the other progressive media, so that's what I find them really great for.

For better analysis, I prefer Pakman who is very logical and careful in his analysis.

Many find Kyle Kulinski more entertaining and relatable and I don't mind him but he does tend to make a lot of mistakes and weak arguments.

I would like to give props to my boy Farron Cousins with Ring of Fire though which I don't hear a lot about. He has a lot of segments you don't hear elsewhere, especially on consumer protection stuff.

>pakman makes another shameless video begging for money that sucks dick while claiming youtube censorship is a personal attack on his livelihood in front of his plagiarized set

does this guy have actual autism?

tim pool
the quartering

Nice to see all the PakChads in this thread

Attached: pktextmm.png (1080x607, 182K)

youtube.com/watch?v=fQEeNIl9Gm4
youtube.com/watch?v=iR9lc34boeg
youtube.com/watch?v=1JyScf_JSxs

Hatriot Mail is kino tho
youtube.com/watch?v=VMfkcXbci_c

he's just stealing the "reading mean tweets" bit from late night. I mean, he needs content that's fine but... I dunno, seems like he's pretty quick to put his hand out and has no problem just taking what he can. 100% jew though so maybe he can't help it.

Recent TYT video addressing common conspiracies that have propagated through Yea Forums and /pol/:

youtube.com/watch?v=4W_BFkr5ry4

Attached: 471145.jpg (800x600, 378K)

TYT is full of sociopaths with ego issues

>at least try POL
>lol Hitler did nothing wrong

Testing consistently places Fox News viewers at more uninformed that those that don't even watch news. It's empirically bad.

I unsubscribed to them back when Donald got elected because they kept uploading at least 5 videos a day about him. What’s funny is that at first they censored his face to not give him attention, then they ended up doing that spam upload spree every single day.

so your only problem with pakman seems to be that he asks for money

sauce me senpai

David Baseman

and that he steals ideas from people. that's actually more important and less defensible. odd that skipped right by it...

Imagine being an Armenian sucking a Turk's cock for a job.

Fyi Cenk isn't a leftist, he is a Turk nationalist here to destabilize US politics and destroy American exceptionalism and nationalism.

which ideas has he stolen? important ideas, not stuff like the set background

>that old meme again

Fox focuses on different topics certainly, so people who watch other networks will have certain areas that they know more about. But the idea that Fox is unique among media outlets in that it's ideologically driven is insane.

Attached: jay rolled eyes.png (456x497, 386K)

I like France 24. They have qts and the coverage is much more global orientated because France maintains her crypto-empire.
Foreign Policy can also be a laugh but it depends on the writer.

Reuters for actual news.

Remember that time they insisted a KFC advert in South Africa was racist because it implied black people love fried chicken? And then when South Africans pointed out that they don't have that stereotype they were called racist and TYT led a social media campaign that had the advert withdrawn from their country?

Attached: Catherine Nicholson.jpg (1024x576, 128K)

Well that would be retarded because Erdogan piggy backs off Trump almost as much as Netenyahu.

you tell me, David.

I dont watch jew controlled media

the one and only. fuck spiderman

Attached: F18E4D64-A9E6-4A42-AD40-C381247EC045.jpg (500x514, 32K)

>American exceptionalism

Attached: spandong.jpg (570x396, 16K)

>believing Trump is also a nationalist
Erdogan wants a bigger piece of Syria and his pipeline to Saudi Arabia, Trump is a sellout to the jews who want to kill Hezbollah and secure the Golan Heights, you do the math and see the intersecting points. There are no leftists or right wingers in upper level politics, merely motivations and ends to means.

>But the idea that Fox is unique among media outlets in that it's ideologically driven is insane.

It is though, Fox isn't news and gave up any pretence of trying to be.

It is actually unique for a number of reasons. It's not even technically a news network. They are more inaccurate and misleading. Their bias is far more extreme and obvious. Their connection with the GOP is well documented and far exceeds anything on the other side.

They are the worst of the boomer media.

cspan

>Their connection with the GOP is well documented and far exceeds anything on the other side.

Salon, The Daily Beast, etc etc.

It's no worse than CNN or MSNBC. You just agree with the nonsense on those channels.

I just follow Anime News Network on Twitter

trump calls in to fox and friends on the regular.
he gets advice from hannity and tucker carlson. hell, he brought tucker carlson to north korea instead of is national security advisor.
not to mention the snowflaking of fox so called news hosts saying they'll burn all their nike shit

Not really. None of use peddle CNC or MSNBC as great.

They aren't but Fox is in a league of it's own.

>implying having Bolton with him would have been the better option

Tucker is unironically less volatile

Demetria Obilor

Attached: Demetria-Obilor.jpg (1080x1080, 102K)

That's not the point.

Hannity and Ingraham even campaigned for him

yeah, look it up.

It wasn't a Fox News journalist who was giving debate questions to their preferred candidate. The very fact that you can't see how biased the corporate press is, is proof that you've been raised in the Cathedral. Fortunately, with the rise of the internet, the press is getting called on their bullshit regularly, and they're losing their power.

Actually it was dumbass and then some. Keep up with current events.

They're heavily opinionated political pundits, what did you expect? NPR was pro-Hillary 24/7.

infowars.com

>trump calls in to fox and friends on the regular.
I'm aware that the president calls into a news show sometimes. Especially a news show that is friendly to him.

>he gets advice from hannity and tucker carlson
Who the fuck cares? They follow the news for a living, it makes sense you'd be interested in hearing from them if they'll speak to you.

>not to mention the snowflaking of fox so called news hosts saying they'll burn all their nike shit
Holy shit, call the police.

newyorker.com/magazine/2019/03/11/the-making-of-the-fox-news-white-house

No channel was "pro Hillary" in the way that Fox is "pro Trump," though. She was just the blatantly superior choice to any rational, thinking human being, so obviously she was more likely to get favorable coverage than the dumbass reality tv star.

Since when did the left give two fucks about Nike, king of the sweatshops? All a capitalist has to do is be pro-feminism/gay/tranny/nigger/jew and all sins are forgiven lol.

I love the fact that she fucked that one fat guy that runs TYT for her job

I love that she was an absolute sloppy, dirty, daddy's dick-needing whore for him until her job was secure

I love how he probably fell for her and she was like "lol no way fag" and now fucks Tyrone and Habib in front of him while he cries and feels sorry for himself

I love how he's too pussy to fire her because to do so would ruin his life and career, since she now has FEMPOWAH clout, unlimited pussy pass and social media pull

I don't understand why I'm supposed to find it interesting that Trump likes appearing on the network that likes him instead of the ones that call him Hitler.

>No channel was "pro Hillary" in the way that Fox is "pro Trump," though. She was just the blatantly superior choice to any rational, thinking human being

1. kek
2. search Uranium One, Clinton Foundation, Russia
3. 2/10 you got a reply

>No channel was "pro Hillary" in the way that Fox is "pro Trump," though.
Your dick must be hard as fuck from all those blue pills.

You don't have to. You're obviously brainwashed so I don't expect you to put the reals > feels m8.

Back to

I didn't say he was a nationalist. I said he was good for Erdgoanists.

If you're trolling you had me up to here.

>search Uranium One, Clinton Foundation, Russia

wow, right wing conspiracy theories that have been disproven over and over again. sorry, not impressed.

>uranium one, clinton foundation
You might as well have added Trump-Russia collusion while you're at it. All that shit has been debunked.

>Tucker is unironically less volatile
i agree, but the point is that he really had no business being there. it's an embarrassment and shows that fox so called news is currently operating as state propaganda.
>They follow the news for a living, it makes sense you'd be interested in hearing from them
them over actual experts tho? regardless of political affiliation of the experts

Pim Tool

Attached: IDW liberal.png (596x498, 62K)

The top article is from the New York Times

nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

that shit has been debunked lol

Tucker might be keeping us out of war right now. You should be praising him.

>look up pizzagate bro

I want to post the green frog saying the n-word!

>The Uranium One controversy is a theory accusing Bill Clinton, The Clinton Foundation, Hillary Clinton, the Obama administration, high level officials in Russia, the State Department, Uranium One, and the FBI of allegedly compromising national-security interests, bribery, and suppressing evidence.[30][31][32][33] All parties denied the accusations, and no evidence of wrongdoing has been found after four years of allegations, an FBI investigation, a House Intelligence Committee inquiry, and the 2017 appointment of a Federal Attorney to evaluate the investigation.[30][31][32][34]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_One

All you have to do is literally read a wikipedia article, and you'll be smarter than any conservative, my dude.

>liberals unironically get their information from Wikipedia

Attached: woah.gif (392x392, 1.97M)

ITT: /pol/tards try to emigrate out of /pol/

lmao remember when conservatives got so mad about reality not aligning with their narrative, that they had to create conservapedia as a safe space from facts?

>2 sources are Vox, literal propaganda
>another is Bloomberg, which states "As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton was officially part of the approval loop, but so far investigations by FactCheck.org and other media organizations have failed to discern whether she was personally involved, and during the presidential campaign a spokesman said she "never intervened" on any CFIUS matter (which, if true, actually seems oddly lax). In any case, what has ruffled feathers here is that by taking over Uranium One, the Russians took control of a substantial portion of America's proven uranium reserves -- 20 percent, according to Rosatom's chief executive."
So Bloomberg's article only speculates, and even notes it is strange that Hillary would be disconnected as she states she was from the dealings.
>using wikipedia as a source

Fun fact: wikipedia is more accurate on average than encyclopedia Britannica.

>genetic fallacy

It's genuinely frightening the alternate reality in which the left lives. I'm optimistic though, because it's becoming harder and harder for the corporate press to maintain their power. 20 years ago, they would've gotten away with their lies about the Covington kids. We never would've seen the Antifa attack on Andy Ngo, but now we do. And the truth will eventually prevail.

Attached: stop making sense.gif (500x276, 470K)

Everything you quoted backs up what user was saying which is that there's no evidence of some conspiracy and all the facts actually don't implicate anything nefarious. In fact, all of the Uranium is required to stay within the US.

Wikipedia fails as a souce since, as I pointed out, it can summarize articles while missing their full content or utilize biased articles as credible, unbiased sources.

why are you pretending to care about andy?

youtu.be/1cPeZLCVWTw

imagine living in 2019 and unironically believing that antifa means fucking anything to anybody. 90% of Americans probably couldn't even tell you what antifa is, that's how little influence it has.

100% of domestic terrorist instances over the past few years have been from right-wing groups. Just last week you literally had the republican party of Oregon calling for the murder of cops.

Stay off the alt-right youtube sphere bro. That shit is mind poison.

Yeah but your context that you provided only backs up what everyone was trying to educate you on.

Pro Tip: Every article you read has a primary source. It's not just Wikipedia that isn't a primary source. Most of them are not.

try a politcal movement that commited genocide

I didn't know anything about him before the assault. I had heard his name but didn't know what his positions are. But I care about him now because I watched him get beaten up by a violent mob because he was standing on the sidewalk while disagreeing with them. And then I watched bluechecks on Twitter make excuses for it.

how about the New York Times then?

nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

TRS
Tucker Carlson
Daily Stormer
Infowars
Stefan Molyneux
/pol/

Attached: 26804986_1801024573265556_6361839971560450651_n.jpg (192x187, 3K)

What right wing groups?

>Just last week you literally had the republican party of Oregon calling for the murder of cops.
Sauce?

>Stay off the alt-right youtube sphere bro.
Everything I don't like is alt-right

>Styxhexbabds669
>Timpool
>Ryan dawson
>Ron paul
>David pakman
Do you guys know of any good liberal/progressive and conservative news sources?

You're all Part of the Problem.

Attached: dave smith.jpg (397x600, 32K)

the man

Attached: KLyK4cVD.jpg (1024x1024, 152K)

www.twitch.tv/destiny

Is that the white nationalist dude that actually isn't white and got blown the fuck out by Destiny in a 4 v. 1?

>quarter-mexican white nationalist

Attached: joey.png (750x750, 443K)

4channel

Isn't that the holocaust denier who eats his boogers and got btfo by that twitch streamer?

Cenk getting assblasted is always so fucking entertaining.

youtube.com/watch?v=oxhsSLos8hk

Attached: 1559827409315.jpg (273x185, 5K)

all me

Who else lets news settle for a week or two before digesting and commenting on it.

Thats olds not news

That's a good idea. Stops you from getting angry about anything that's proven untrue later.

The amount of ignorance and arrogance in this thread is staggering. You all think you're beholden to some secret truth, but you barely know how to wipe your own ass.

Fuck me you people are stupid.

Attached: 6789.jpg (1280x720, 84K)

This. Unfortunately any secondary news source is influenced by such nonsense.

Euro News feed is solid news channel, France24 is also good.

>Look, I made a chart showing that my favoured news orgs are good, and your favoured news orgs are bad. So it's official now: You're stupid. Oh and by the way, Trump has a 99% chance of losing, my favourite news org said so. And Michael Brown had his hands up and said "Don't Shoot". And here's a picture of Trayvon when he was 10. And here's Hillary paying Russians for dirt on Trump but we'll ignore that whilst we investigate whether Trump committed treason by talking to the Russians for dirt on Hillary
etc.
You're a moron if you think that chart means anything.

The Guardian posted a story not long ago alleging that data shows that married women are miserable. A week later it was debunked and the Guardian had to change the article. Shit like that never seems to effect the establishment media's score, though.

It's actually based on sampling reporting from the various news networks and fact checking them and observing the language used,...but y'know being smug is a good substitute for being correct.

>>It's actually based on sampling reporting from the various news networks and fact checking them

Person 1: Hey my argument is *this*
Person 2: Hey my argument is *that* which contradicts your argument
Person 1: Oh okay. Well I'm going to change my name now to "Independent Fact Checker" and we'll see who wins the argument.
Person 2: Wait, what?
Independent Fact Checker: Person 1 is correct and Person 2 is stupid.

Do you see how this works? Do you see how dumb you have to be to be duped by it?
>b-but they're independent!
Sure they are, kid. Sure they are.

I read BBC.

That's nice head canon.

How it actually works is this:

Article 1: assertion
Fact checker: let me see if this assertion is actually backed by anything or if there is information that debunks this claim
Fact checker: it looks like this assertion is not actually backed up by any facts nor does the author offer a source. In fact, I've been able to verify that the opposite is true.

Article 2: assertion
Fact Checker: Let me apply the same criteria

I understand why you would think this way, it comes from a misunderstanding of the difference between verifiable facts and opinions.

Attached: 1423303675063.jpg (500x376, 186K)

>the amount of arrogance in this thread
>goes on a rant about how everyone else is ignorant and stupid

No. You don't just get to label yourself a "fact-checker" and therefore claim to have no bias and to be infallible. You think the far-left and far-right couldn't do exactly the same thing and create their own fact-checkers to discredit the establishment media? You'd say their fact-checkers are wrong? But they can't be, they are fact checkers! And all they are doing is checking assertions which are verifiable as facts.
>b-but they are biased
And your own fact-checkers aren't?
>N-NO
So let me get this straight. You think an organisation supported through donations by big businesses which support the mainstream parties, which is tasked with fact-checking, and which comes to the conclusion that all the anti-establishment news orgs are wrong, and the pro-mainstream, pro-globalism news orgs are right; you think such an organisation has no bias because it calls itself a fact-checker?
>Y-Yes

Attached: naked news.jpg (323x256, 25K)

I get all my news on Yea Forums

>not bukkake news

I can smell your virginity

big black cock?

Attached: 1499543476525.webm (240x360, 463K)

Did you watch the same debate? He destroyed destiny.

truly deranged

Attached: 1561262612193.jpg (1024x1004, 60K)

>Buzzfeed in the green
>Politico in the green
>CNN in the yellow and almost neutral
>HuffPo only slightly in the orange
>all the leftist stuff in the red is some obscure shit

laughed really hard when he said antifa "need some kind of 'solution'"

also I remember he went on for 15 minutes about why people who hate jews have lots of good reasons to ("could the next, like, SIX federal reserve chairmen NOT be jews?") before his boilerplate rejection of identity politics.

also Dave introduced me to Scott Horton, who is the best voice on foreign policy.

Styx

No he didn't. He made really stupid arguments that were impossible to defend (women don't belong in the military) and that made it easy for a numale like destiny to btfo him. Like Spencer he's more interested in being edgy and causing chaos than convincing fence sitters. The Jared Taylor style is a much better way of going about it imo.

Actually naming the Jew is objectively the best way of doing anything.

I stopped watching news during the refugee crisis because it just seemed like Jewish teabagging.

I actively switch it off even when that's rude.

You just turned off 99% of undecided normies that will right you off as some loony conspirator. Race realism is the most robust argument the alt right has and smart people like Jared Taylor realize that.

>Why yes, I'm a fellow nicker myself, how did you know?

Attached: chad.png (1673x2160, 2.17M)

>brings up James Watson
>Destiny flips out and starts yelling really fast

only the one and only MUNDANE MATT

Attached: 1561585252434.jpg (480x360, 25K)

>if i see it written down a lot i´ll start believing it

yikes

Unironically Philip DeFranco. Huge leftist bias, though.

It amazes me how bad Cenk is at arguing anything. He’s been talking on camera for decades now and he still can barely string a sentence together. Worst is when he does the hurr durr voice and waves his hands around. He must legit have an iq of 90

Most major news outlets, random articles I stumble upon courtesy of Firefox pocket, /pol/ for a laugh but also unironically for something to challange mainstream narratives. Every now and then I also watch TYT to see their spin on things, but it's pretty boring since their biases have become too predictable.

I work for a media company and mainly use spike, ctowdtangle, various twitter feeds, and browse pretty much every website from The Gateway Pundit to NPR. If I didn’t work in media, I wouldn’t ever look at any news ever again

And by Various twitter feeds, I mean news-related ones. Even Breakin911 and BNOwire

No, they really aren't.
Up and down this thread, you see lefties asserting things without any evidence, or linking to far-left news sources/

Literally the left's infowars

Attached: 33228BDE-1CA6-4185-8CA3-D68759C4F8B7.png (480x466, 139K)

Nice

smart user its not worth it

i read the financial times

>Watching news

Attached: 1529015596510[1].png (380x349, 52K)

stop falling for obvious bait u niggers

Attached: 1558655918584.jpg (2591x3624, 2.32M)

Vox
Vice
HBO
Sky News

Conservative news is boring and dumb
It's always a creepy looking white dude reporting it
Or some airheaded blonde bitch for the "sex appeal"
I feel my braincells die everytime I try watch it

this

America First with Nicholas J Fuentes every weeknight at 7pm Central Standard Time

>somebody finally follows my advice on Malice

Your welcome.

4channel

I watch CNN. They're based *claps* and redpilled *dabs*

nickers rise up

>it's another episode of Dave criticizing the alt-right for not understanding how the state is the #1 cause of spreading degeneracy

With all the Christian jokes he's making, I wonder how long it will take before he's going to convert.

i was hoping this would be a thread about hot newsanchors and instead you fucking turbo-autists turn this into another left vs right culture war thread. i honestly wish /pol/tards could see just how autistic they look trying to seem smart and informed. walk into rush hour traffic, please!

The only watchable ones on the left are Tim pool and Jimmy dore. Everyone else is unhinged russiagate conspiracy peddlers and salt mines.

Green should literally just have C-Span.

But leftists news stations have stopped to hire beautiful anchors.

Tim Pool is a bald retard.

we can still post hot news anchors
nobody is stopping you

Attached: 1524898476291.webm (412x718, 744K)

/news/, /pol/, Yea Forums, and Fark.

Attached: Newsfromdomo.jpg (313x240, 16K)

He is but I enjoy watching his slide to the right.

>no Dawson

Armenian Genocide deniers and actively anti-Catholic scum

This looks like the kind of woman who goes to the gym and flirts with the guy at the front desk to get free stuff and when he refuses she makes it her mission to ruin his life and get him fired by claiming he sexually harassed her.

c-span and Yea Forums. I don't need some faggot telling me what to think

I would sexually harass her if you know what I mean

Attached: 1525648243803.webm (500x720, 1.29M)

Attached: 1561946390743.png (288x330, 71K)

>The Guardian in the green

This was made by a yank for sure. As a Brit, I can safely say the Guardian is the biggest load of wanky shit ever. They used to be fairly factual and non-biased but recently they've been taken over by some nutjob fixated on spreading bullshit science news and Sun tier newsposting. It's fucking awful.

Move the BBC out of neutral too, those fucking kiddy fiddlers. In fact, don't put a single British journalist in the green, aside from possibly the Independent

Attached: 175px-Joey_NLa.png (175x281, 54K)

lmao

Yes, it means you are not white.

You know the usual
Tim pool aljazeera tyt
Stephen colbert john stewart noah Trevor

No agenda podcast

bI deffinitely got taken over by leftists in the past half decade, even before trump got elected. Should be in skews left.

bloggers and yootoob politcal pundits are not journalists

Corporate cock shoved in his mouth, and government cock shoved into his ass, like a good little drone. I wonder if their tips touch somewhere in the middle.

Attached: kasparian.jpg (544x509, 55K)

Attached: tucker.gif (392x241, 1.48M)

Imagine working for the people who holocausted our countrymen and never even recognize they actually did it.

cringe

Attached: flatlivesmatter.jpg (1024x563, 66K)

>sexist app
Wasn't it an app designed to help combat sex trafficking? What did Democrat Anna Kasaparian mean when she tried to denigrate technology that would make it harder to sell children into sexual slavery?

Attached: biguthunk.gif (278x234, 46K)

>not exclusively reading your news from sources of all spectrums.

It's like you want to be a drone

Secular Talk and Pakman

That’s really it

I only like Sam Seder when he makes fun of Rave Dubin. TyT is only good for hate watching

Attached: DD58B696-3204-4ABF-AA88-B4D34CC48B5E.png (500x540, 116K)

Never vote again you commie scumfuck.

Attached: image.jpg (640x464, 184K)

hello ?
based department ?

I can't stand the current landscape of the news. The BBC seems the least shit out of the major news agencies.

youtu.be/VMfkcXbci_c

Also anyone else not like TyT because they’re too retarded when it comes to Guns and Identity Politics stuff? Makes me not want to listen to them when they’re that dumb/thoughtless on certain topics for that long. They’re still about muh assault weapon ban

Attached: 003A44B2-0F8E-4915-A325-6CEB22FE36F7.jpg (480x360, 16K)

It's a meme ya dip, Destiny fanboys are even more delusional than Sargonites

The mere fact the NPR is solely teetering in skews left and buzzfeed is considered news completely debunks the whole infographic

I don't seek out the news

This. Great paper as well

ContraPoints is my main source of news.

how sad

Gross fat goblin.

god damn women are so ugly

based retard

if I read the news it exacerbates my depression so I just acquiesce to the state of the world by ignoring it

Attached: kek.jpg (808x808, 76K)

Have you seen the questions on this survey?
They skewed left heavily.

I'd fuck that goblin

Attached: Demetria-Obilor.jpg (1080x1080, 147K)

Its a not a boards fault that modern news outlets dont even try to hide their bias and no one if stopping you from discussing anchors

>Channels

Gross. Literally entertainment "news". I use RealClearPolitics primarily.

Testing consistently places conservatives as more informed regarding the nation's laws and Constitution

None. I'm much happier now.

All of this except never seen Status Coup, also Jimmy Dore, Ron Placone, Graham Elwood, Lee Camp and for international NHK World is my comfy japan one, and I see bits from other english international ones some.

thehill.com/opinion/white-house/369013-clinton-campaign-deserves-a-full-investigation-just-like-trumpworld
>Bill Clinton was raking in millions from foreign sources with dealings with the State Department, including some of the world’s most shady figures.

>While the Russian deal was pending, he received $500,000 for a speech to a Kremlin-tied bank supporting the sale. During this period, nine Uranium One investors gave the Clinton Foundation some $145 million. The company’s chairman alone donated $2.35 million to the foundation during the pendency of the Uranium One deal. The Clinton Foundation failed to report some foreign contributions, despite an agreement to do so, as well as a pledge by Hillary Clinton in prior congressional testimony. The omitted payments reportedly included some money linked to Uranium One
Are you saying this is a conspiracy theory?
That this never happened?

>Just last week you literally had the republican party of Oregon calling for the murder of cops.
Source?

>thread about TV news channel viewers devolves in to Muh Trump Collusion/Clinton Foundation shitflinging

pottery

The Ring Of Fire
Secular Talk
The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder
The David Pakman Show
The Young Turks
The Thom Hartmann Show

Just like TV news channel do

>pottery
more like everyday shit for the last few years here
you new to this board?

Also some entertainment news shows like:

Klepper
Last Week Tonight w/ John Oliver
Patriot Act w/ Hasan Minahj
The Late Show w/ Seth Meyers
The Daily Show

That isn't an objective standard, it's a subjective one.
It's not like say
shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-donald-trumps-first-100-days/
Something like this
A harvard study which tracked the entire media coverage during the first 100 days, and tracked the positive or negative coverage of trump.
It would be easy to say that a news station that was 50% positive coverage of trump, 50% negative, would be balanced.
Yet, 93% of the coverage of NBC and CNN on Trump was negative.

>The Harvard team found that CBS coverage was 91 percent negative and 9 percent positive. New York Times coverage was 87 percent negative and 13 percent positive. Washington Post coverage was 83 percent negative and 17 percent positive.
It doesn't show any of these sites as being as left leaning, as the objective measure would reflect

Attached: 1553837626943.gif (640x347, 1.15M)

The Japanese news parodies where they get fucked is great

Oh my god Harvard is being run by Nazis!!

C-SPAN is based.

>Time, Bloomberg, and NYT hovering around Neutral

D I S R E G A R D E D

Leftists have a really, really, really, really hard time not acknowledging mainstream conservatism without considering it "Hard Right", just look at that gap between neutral and Hyper-Partisan Right. It's part of the games they play, if you aren't hard left or mainstream left you're a Nazi.

My countries public broadcaster.

It's pretty biased and propaganda laden, but they at least pretend to be a bit impartial I supposed.
It's more the "sneaky" kind of bias where they tend to keep the writing fairly impartial, but the actual articles they publish highlight liberal actions and shit. A lot of "female artist nobody has heard of before is doing a pointless art installation to highlight female sexuality" type nonsense.

realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/30/scarborough_mocks_media_coverage_of_trump_this_is_why_youre_all_going_out_of_business.html
businessinsider.com/joe-scarborough-new-york-times-donald-trump-2016-11
The "Morning Joe" anchor took aim at The Times for its Thursday-morning article titled "Democrats, Students and Foreign Allies Face the Reality of a Trump Presidency," which Scarborough suggested was too focused on the paper's left-leaning audience.

"This is staggering, it really is," Scarborough said. "This shows that the editors of The New York Times - I have the greatest respect for them - don't get it. This is a 'Saturday Night Live' sketch. You went to a cocktail party the night before and you decided to write this."

Scarborough and cohost Mika Brzezinski argued that large institutions like The Times and The Washington Post were too focused on the "elite cluster" to see Trump's path to electoral victory.

Though he acknowledged that he was equally removed from many Trump voters' reality, Scarborough placed himself in a coterie of skeptical reporters and analysts. They included FiveThirtyEight founder Nate Silver and Bloomberg's Mark Halperin, who Scarborough said was "mocked and ridiculed" by some members of the media for suggesting that Trump could win.

"You had a complete blind spot, and you wanted to keep it that way," Scarborough said. "It was much easier for you to stay in Manhattan and say that they are all racists and bigots."

>Frontline
why is it so comfy?

Attached: 1546008002677.jpg (615x615, 72K)

unironically, just Yea Forums. whenever something big ends up happening there are a dozen off topic threads posted about it here. i always end up finding out about just the moist important stuff.

>Sam Seder
Yikes.

>Jimmy dore
lol
>russiagate conspiracy
The trump campaign did communicate with agents from the russian government in an attempt to influence the election by getting information on an opponent. That's important. Whether anything came from those meetings is another matter.
Did Trump try to stop the investigations into him and his campaign? Yes: Gets pissed that Sessions recused himself, fires Comey, tells McGhan to fire Mueller, tells his officials to ignore subpeonas, etc

/pol/
Tim Pool
JF
Ryan Faulk

Money, Power, and Wall Street is a masterpiece.

kys faggots. don't ever reply to me again

>aside from possibly the Independent

Attached: independent islam.jpg (715x387, 64K)

So when are we going to do punish the president for colluding with Russians?
So when are we going to do that?
youtube.com/watch?v=xHmyKksPois
When are we going to indict Obama for colluding with the russians?
thehill.com/opinion/white-house/429292-the-case-for-russia-collusion-against-the-democrats
thehill.com/opinion/white-house/369013-clinton-campaign-deserves-a-full-investigation-just-like-trumpworld
>Bill Clinton was raking in millions from foreign sources with dealings with the State Department, including some of the world’s most shady figures.

>While the Russian deal was pending, he received $500,000 for a speech to a Kremlin-tied bank supporting the sale. During this period, nine Uranium One investors gave the Clinton Foundation some $145 million. The company’s chairman alone donated $2.35 million to the foundation during the pendency of the Uranium One deal. The Clinton Foundation failed to report some foreign contributions, despite an agreement to do so, as well as a pledge by Hillary Clinton in prior congressional testimony. The omitted payments reportedly included some money linked to Uranium One.
When are we going to indict Hillary for colluding with the russians, with the agents of a foreign nation to alter elections?
thehill.com/opinion/campaign/435029-as-russia-collusion-fades-ukrainian-plot-to-help-clinton-emerges
>Ukraine’s top prosecutor divulged in an interview aired Wednesday on Hill.TV that he has opened an investigation into whether his country’s law enforcement apparatus intentionally leaked financial records during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign about then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort in an effort to sway the election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

>No Michael brooks

Attached: 567456568.jpg (360x360, 20K)

>So when are we going to do punish the president for colluding with Russians?
his campaign is on the hook for their attempt. Manafort, Flynn, Gates, Papadappolous have already been convicted. The president should be impeach so that the investigation mueller started can be finished.
The rest of your post is whataboutism.

Reading hate mail didn't start with late nights shows and tweets, zoomer.

>U.S. interfering with other countries' elections and installing brutal dictators is ok (see almost every Latin American country)
>It's not ok when the Vodkabloods do it to us

I used to watch TYT, now I only watch The majority report with Sam Seder and sometimes Pakman.

The biggest problem with TYT is the guests host who have no fucking clue what they're talking about.

I guess if you want the most objective, Pakman would be the one. But he can be a bit boring sometime frankly.

Majority Report strike a nice balance of informing you and joking around.

i didn't say that. i also dont agree with that.

where can I find more Ana images like this

Fash the Nation

>try
We're here, we're queer and we're never gonna leave

Tim Pool and Styxhexenhammer666.
and occasionally Jimmy Dore and Kyle Kulinski, although I find myself agreeing with Kyle a lot less than I used to.
I like Tucker Carlson too, but I never watch tv so I just see clips that get posted.

no matter who I watch though, it still feels like pic related and there’s nothing that can really change that.

Attached: 24838FD5-3A9D-4C74-87E9-FC9EC3371B52.jpg (640x518, 53K)

>not representative of your median democrat

If you're median is an establishment democrat who loves corporate donors, sure.

you shouldn't be allowed to vote unless you have kids

people shouldn't be allowed to run if they don't have kids

there i just fixed a few problems

Attached: 1549637620132.png (894x773, 48K)

4channel.reddit

Attached: 1521549729225.webm (594x700, 524K)

/pol/
literally a happening IV drip. You can't get global news sooner than that.

maybe stop acting like a bunch of pearl clutching faux-empathetic bigots and he (and others) will feel better about having to refer to themselves as on the left.
I have to pretend to be on the right just to avoid being associated with you retards.

the left has become full globohomo
borders are unironically racist and genders are suddenly a thing apparently.

do you assume people are pretending because you know that it’s all that YOU are capable of so everyone must be like you?

How is it whataboutism?
We're talking about a president colluding with Russians and how he wasn't punished
youtube.com/watch?v=0mgQaFlo_p8
We have the footage.
>Obama meets with Dmitry Medvedev, says that he will have more freedom after the election, so if Putin holds up now, after Obama gets re-elected he will give them free reign
>Obama says chemical weapons is the red line in Syria, he will attack syria if they use them
>Assad uses chemical weapons
>Obama says he will attack Syria
>Russia tells him to back off
>He doesn't attack syria

Attached: 1562098367108.jpg (930x916, 71K)

>8 hours later
>still no sauce

I hate this smug faggot like you wouldn’t believe

You get Michael in the Majority report. Unless you mean unfiltered Michael.

then people will start having disposable kids just to be qualified. but they’ll neglect them and laugh all the way to the bank. maybe they’ll even force them to work as child slaves just to get rid of them.

there I just threw a monkey wrench in your fixing the problem.

What the fuck does whataboutism actually mean?
It seems to me like it is just used to say "stop pointing out our hypocrisy"

it’s one of those buzzwords that people throw out when they don’t want to address whatever you’re bringing up. like all the dumb “””logical fallacies””” it’s just “I can name what kind of argument you’re using, and that means it’s invalid and I win haha I’m so smart because I know what things are called haha!!”

CNN and Fox

Jump to 1:33, he's telling that any cop that comes to retrieve him for the senate session better be a bachelor and heavily armed.

youtu.be/zFm2u3fKvSE

>fox so called news is currently operating as state propaganda
And MSNBC and CNN both have ex CIA and FBI heads as paid talking heads to spew their vile shit.

> America First

Attached: 1561935332324.jpg (498x618, 51K)

good luck running when people probe your parenting

>Just last week you literally had the republican party of Oregon calling for the murder of cops
Uh
That doesn't seem to be what he's doing

>CNN
>bordering on neutral

LMFAO BRUH THIS DOOD

So.
Any replies?

An automatic way to tell if somebody is from reddit. It’s one of the many newspeak words the left likes to parrot along with “racist”, “problematic”, “fragility” ect.

what aboutisms as in you are trying to detract from trump campaign collusion by bringing up something else. Assuming what you put is correct, then yeah sure lets get some consequences going. However, you still brought this up as a distraction.
the hypocrisy, if there is any, is sometimes irrelevant to the original topic

Go off King

Attached: xweycacbie831.png (640x640, 284K)

did here:

>Sam Seder
Fucking kek nice one user
Remember that time Seder went on a huge rant about how Seinfeld wasn't a good comedian because he said that thing about not playing college campuses because of liberal faggots there? He even used his own '''''stand up credentials'''' to back up his point, as if they were ever in the same fucking universe career-wise.

> insecurity
imagen, covering your face with chemicals to make you look prettier. its like cleaning your engine oil leak with part wash every week but not resealing your crank seal

The topic was the president colluding with Russia.
I was talking about the same thing. Just a different president who faced no repercussions
If Obama wasn't punished why would trump be?

>If Obama wasn't punished why would trump be?
so because one person got away with a crime, so should anyone else after that? Is this really what you're trying to argue?

For me it's SPIDR and then clicking the most partisan articles from both sides of the political spectrum. Or sometimes I just stick to the AP or Reuters pieces.
I like Nick even if I don't necessarily agree with his social or political stances. It's nice to hear reactionary or radical right ideas from someone my age considering most of the people around me are progressives. Plus he makes an effort to be energetic an sincere but never too serious.
Also he's cute

Attached: 1561191708233.png (713x730, 161K)

channels - pic related
sites - Reuters, NYTimes, FP, Daily Beast, mostly

Attached: al-jazeera-logo.jpg (618x412, 37K)

No
I am saying the rich and powerful do get away with shit. Not that they should get away with shit.
sensenbrenner.house.gov/2018/3/james-clapper-not-charged-with-lying-to-congress

>Not that they should get away with shit.
so you agree that trump SHOULD face consequences (assuming obstruction of justice charges hold)