Why was it so hated?

Why was it so hated?

Its better than quite place

Attached: bird-box.w700.h700.jpg (700x700, 96K)

if twitter normies rave about it, it's automatically trash

Sandra bullock looks like an ugly old burns victim despite using foreskin face cream.

think about a bad adaptation
easy mode: Annihilation
this was worse

>netflix
Hide

The book is abysmal, I haven't seen the film but there's no chance it's any worse.

I still don't get it. Was it an allegory about depression or what?

Too many people thought it was a rip-off of A Quiet Place even though it's based on a book that came out before QP.

She looks like Michael Jackson

That fat girl Olympia. Who names a girl that? And the way she ran to kill herself was kinda funny. But the main thing that bothered me is that Sandra Bullock is way too old to bare children of her own without complications

>the protagonist,20 something years old, is now fifty
>no sense of passing time
>Tom (leader of the house) is now an ex-marine
>also love affair
>five years later: still healthy and groomed

hey guys how many of the people who saw the monster and became corrupted were black?

Flavor of the week shit

>Who names a girl that?
It's Alexander the Greats mom you little troglodyte

>Better than A Quiet Place
>No sense of pacing
>No character development
>No memorable setting
>Characters behave irrationally
>Enemy defeated by blindfold
>Nonsensical ending

one of my bigger grips was;
the main conflict with the movie besides simply surviving is her struggle to decide which kid she is gonna sacrifice when it comes to the rapids part of the river. in the end she just says fuck it none will look we'll be aight and everything worked out somehow they find some blind sanctuary or some shit? huh?
also if no one ever looked because you could never be sure when the creature is around yet the birds would start acting fucky when they are around? so why carry a bird if you always assume the thing is around anyway and it cant hurt you unless you look at it?

>my bigger grips

The monsters are literally invincible.

It wqs boring as fuck and the premise wasn't exciting.

Monster movies should be forced by law to have a disclaimer that says "warning: this movie will neither show the monster nor attempt to explain it" whereas it applies. This disclaimer should be at the start of the movie, on every trailer of the movie and written on the promotion poster with the same font size as the title. A person who pays to see the movie without being shown the disclaimer should be entitled to a full refund.

this. it is disliked because it stinks

pretty good BLACKED porn

fuck that. i love the implicit and hope it becomes a growing trend

I’ve seen a few netflix original movies now and one thing is always the same. They all suck at endings. It’s like in the middle of the movie they blew their budget so they decide to just end the movie.

Yeah, the rapids part was fucking stupid. The choice she's been agonizing over for the entire movie actually means nothing - she decides not to decide, and everything works out fine. Fucking yawn.

more like Alexander the Gay as far as I'm concerned

This might seem disproportionately harsh, but dullards like you are the reason movies suck now. You are the dunce that big studios pander to even while openly patronizing, because they know you won't have the presence of mind to question what you're watching. If your imagination isn't scarier than something you see on screen, I honestly pity you.

Meanwhile the nigger goes on to destroy bullocks already tired pussy. Man I'm so glad I don't watch movies anymore, only snarky movie reviews and Yea Forums browsing.