kill it with fire edition
Webm Thread
Joshua Flores
Jonathan Sanders
Evan Richardson
Evan Nguyen
Sebastian Allen
God she lovely
Gavin Martin
is this some new zombie show?
that's not how a flame thrower works by the way
Nicholas Cruz
Are those diseased bodies they're burning?
Benjamin Reyes
No, it is Fortitude, which has been around since 2015.
And what wrong with the flamethrower?
William Rodriguez
flamethrowers shoot a stream of liquid fuel that would be visible until the end of the range of the flamethrower.
Aiden Morales
No, it is a woolly mammoth corpse that has wasps that are parasites to mammals
Joseph Lopez
>arctic Norway
>black guy
fuck off
Alexander Rogers
Not all flamethrowers use liquid fuel, that is clearly a propane one. I used one like that to clear land before.
Lucas Rodriguez
>A flamethrower is a mechanical incendiary device designed to project a long, controllable stream of fire.
Isaac Jackson
He a brit.
svalbard norway by international treaty can have brits, americans, russians, and so on.
Hell, Russia operated huge coal mines on the islands for decades.
Juan Morris
Jose Allen
>In California, unlicensed possession of a flame-throwing device—statutorily defined as "any non-stationary and transportable device designed or intended to emit or propel a burning stream of combustible or flammable liquid a distance of at least 10 feet"
James Morgan
Never used a propane one have you user?
Oliver Rogers
Ryan Rivera
that looks like it might barely be 10 feet, but it's not horizontal
it's not a flamethrower
Ethan Jones
"but commercial flamethrowers generally use high-pressure propane and gasoline; such mobile liquids and gases are safer in peacetime applications, because their flames dissipate faster and often are easier to extinguish when necessary,"
Ethan Cook
>commercial flamethrowers are safer because they aren't actually flamethrowers by the legal definition in the only state that bans them
Noah Green
No user, commerical flamethrowers use propane since you can actually buy propane or gasoline at any store and they are used for brush clearing.
But of course you will autisticly insist that its not a real flamethrower even if I use one for 10 years in mexico and another 4 in Louisiana
Christian Gomez
He might be arguing those are more like big torches than true flamethrowers, which were invented to shoot liquid fuel.
Samuel James
it is not a flamethrower. It's not legally, spiritually, politically, or sexually a flamethrower
Anthony Diaz
There are small propane torches too, but there are dozens of things that are sold and regulated as flamethrowers that use propane. Military ones are normally liquid.
But this is levels of austism that reminds me it is summer.
Oliver Walker
Colton Scott
user, not even the webm user but it is a flamethrower.
Legally it depends on the country. The US is not the end all and be all of legally.
Politically the proposal is to regulate them as "“any non-stationary or transportable device designed or intended to ignite and then emit or propel a burning stream of a combustible or flammable substance a distance of at least 6 feet.” in the US. Brits already ban such things to private ownership.
So fuck off
Austin Smith
David Jenkins
no, retarded legislatures failing to pass retarded laws doesn't count as an argument
Andrew Foster
Go get fucked kiddo
Jace Morales
>Go get fucked kiddo
Nolan Lee
Stop feeding trolls
Henry Evans
Landon Morales
Noah Brown
Carson Cooper
Dominic Perry
Joseph Cooper
>>commercial flamethrowers are safer because they aren't actually flamethrowers by the legal definition in the only state that bans them
Yes, since a British production in iceland is going to give a fuck about California laws.
What type of dumb fucks is going on.
>July 3rd
Ahh, summer.
Jacob Wright