What is The Beatles of films?

What is The Beatles of films?

Attached: the beatles.jpg (960x540, 104K)

Other urls found in this thread:

counter-currents.com/2016/02/the-enjoyment-of-vulgarity/
youtube.com/watch?v=HtUH9z_Oey8
youtube.com/watch?v=QDYfEBY9NM4
youtube.com/watch?v=4Vm7lQ3EheY
youtube.com/watch?v=2Q_ZzBGPdqE
youtube.com/watch?v=fQ5sMUzf2bo
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

A Hard Day's Night

Star Wars
Because it all goes to shit without George

Imagine being Ringo

Literally being in the GOAT band of all time and you are still a laughing stock and considered a failure

Tarantino

The Beatles were a manufactured boy band who started guerilla marketing by paying girls to go to record stores and scream and cry over them. They were basically the NSync of the 1960s.

Evola on the Beatles

counter-currents.com/2016/02/the-enjoyment-of-vulgarity/

He’s the least attractive one, too.

Admittedly good that gets credited for inventing conventions that were already done before and overly praised by boomers and lewronggeneration? Citizen Kane.

looks>everything else for normies. if he did the exact same things but he was good looking or average nobody would make fun of him

Only professional drummers can appreciate the nuance of Ringo Starr. Normalfags are still in the mindset of “hurr iz he no play like budy rich iz a shit playa hurrr”.

Attached: 3C876336-1F32-4816-B3A7-09DCCD2FA8DD.gif (325x203, 936K)

He was also the least talented, the dude only wrote one number one song

Yes.
Their music was stupid uninspired shit.
All of it.
Every bit of it.

A Hard Day's Night and Help!

Attached: The Beatles & Richard Lester.jpg (720x405, 71K)

People actually think this.

My dads a drummer and he still thinks hes trash

Ok retard.

Best Beatles song incoming

youtube.com/watch?v=HtUH9z_Oey8

Attached: strawberry fields forever.jpg (1280x720, 74K)

He looks much better than Paul now though. Honestly, he looks better than later George and John too.

This, but why stop here?
>anime - Studio Ghibli
>books - 1984
What else?

Holy fuck, Evola was a fucking pleb

>Paul and Ringo are both 77 and 78 respectively
>Within 10 years all the Beatles will be gone

>Not Let it Be
youtube.com/watch?v=QDYfEBY9NM4

Rubber Soul and everything past it was the tits.

It's true, though. Go look at the try-out articles and interviews. No one denies it.

Kubrick

Your dad's a fucking useless retard and a nobody

just like Ringo

This nigga gets it

Only correct answer. /thread

My favorite

youtube.com/watch?v=4Vm7lQ3EheY

Where the fuck is the Scaruffi pasta?

Citizen Kane

>A Hard Day's Night
>The Knack and How To Get It
>Help!
>A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Forum
>Petulia
>The Three Musketeers
>The Four Musketeers
>Robin and Marian
>Superman II
>Superman III
How could one man give us so much kino?

Attached: Richard Lester.jpg (482x612, 32K)

youtube.com/watch?v=2Q_ZzBGPdqE
>Ringo in the back doing nothing

Stop Undermining The Beatles by comparing them to mediocre Boybands.

He has a net worth of like 350 millions. Sure Mccartney is a billionaire, but I remember reading Ringo is still in the top 10 of richest rockstars.

Ya it must suck having a comfy drummer position in the band where all the focus is paul and john.

Yeah but he didnt really earn it, he just happened to be in a band with 3 of the greatest musicians the world has ever seen

Don’t ever browse Yea Forums. Stick to being uncultured on Yea Forums.
ok

>Superman III
LMAO, you're kidding right? His Superman movie turned Superman into a shitty comedy and resulted in Superman never getting another good film again and put a stain on superhero films for decades until Tim Burton.

Explain retard

He was an absolutely solid drummer, just not a talented songwriter. Also while nowadays he might be regarded a bit of a joke (not sure if that is even true), back then he was absolutely an integral part of the Beatles' public appeal with tons of fangirls having a crush on him.

>drummer in the most popular and successful band in history
>considered a failure

Attached: 1557432543585.jpg (630x418, 40K)

He unironically is

>Superman III bad
No
youtube.com/watch?v=fQ5sMUzf2bo
The only bad parts were some of Richard Pryor's scenes, the rest of the movie was fine
>resulted in Superman never getting another good film again
How the hell is it his fault that Superman IV was garbage? He had nothing to do with that movie
>put a stain on superhero films for decades until Tim Burton.
>decades
literally came out 6 years after Superman III

If you are not a boomer and you listen to the beatles, congrats, you are a victim of marketing

They made amazing music shut the fuck up