Boy oh boy, we have new toy...
vice.com
Boy oh boy, we have new toy
Other urls found in this thread:
>$50
When will someone put a stop to incels innovating new technologies?
>we
>direct linking vice
Kill yourself
not till we get full functioning sex robots
fuck off retard
roasties value falling by the day
where's the apk
It has free version for pc deepnude.com
And in fact it just an idea, you can train network like this for yourself, and make it free.
>"This is absolutely terrifying," Katelyn Bowden, founder and CEO of revenge porn activism organization Badass, told Motherboard. "Now anyone could find themselves a victim of revenge porn, without ever having taken a nude photo. This tech should not be available to the public."
Why can't the women just organize and fuck all these incel programmers and that could solve the problem once and for all. It's really a low price to pay. And you know, this is really all their fault anyway if you think about it.
well, are there any examples I can actually look at? it probably looks like shit and these cunts are just stirring up clickbait
you know the incels wouldn't suddenly be okay, they'd get super clingy or stalkerish or get mad that they had their "only experience".
from what I can observe, it looks like shit
but the photos aren't real...
Does it only work on tits or can you get the pusy too? How will it know what kinda pusy to produce? Is there a full bush option?
have sex incels
Just from that fucking thumbnail I can tell it's dogshit. Post some examples for me to observe and critique.
So who is going to take the plunge for the team?
Big if true
How accurate is it?
>This Horrifying App Undresses a Photo of Any Woman with a Single Click
OK, VICE, I'm going to go ahead and stop you right there:
No it doesn't.
Such a feat is physically and technologically impossible. You can't "undress" someone in a photo. The visual information necessary for that isn't contained in the original photo. Visual information can't come from nothing.
At best, what it can theoretically do (yet to see proof) is take a given photo and use an algorithm to ROUGHLY GUESS a matching nude-photo for it from a selection of available stock-images, and roughly Photoshop them together, complete with the prerequisite noticeable visual anomalies, seams, color-errors and perspective-errors that inevitably come with the territory of an AI being assigned to alter images without further input.
The woman that wrote this article is an idiot that doesn't understand technology. And for that matter so are most women.
> Who needs to be done first?
Discuss.
what happens when someone puts an actress like moner into this app?
nice try pedos
Someone please do moner
Ah, Katelyn "Bailed out by the Dutch Cops" Bowden. This is the woman whose idea of fighting back against revenge porn was to recruit an army of white knights. The end effect was to annoy user-ib users for a few hours at a time with Shrekspam, though it was only the Dutch National Police that actually was able to take user-ib off the web. (Women's bodies shouldn't be objectified, except when you pay them and we can tax you for it!)
>Also I find this most recent statement HILARIOUS. She wants to criminalize fantasy. She literally wants to enshrine the commandment "thou shall not covet thy neighbor's wife" into law.
>CEO of revenge porn activism organization Badass
Nude shooping is about as old as cave drawings. Fake drama over nothing new.
Looks like it is
Please don’t uncover that one
If I use a picture of myself will it give me beautiful breasts
thank you captain obvious
wow you're right this destroys the entire article.
You are a retard who is over analizing not only a stupid article, but an article written by a woman
any mirrors to download?
that actually looks terrible.
why do sluts do not like that men discover what they did