Why didn't he just wish the universe was twice as big?
Why didn't he just wish the universe was twice as big?
He was a dumbass leftist
this
>snaps away 13% of the universe
>all crime disappears
Why didn't he just get rid of the 1.7%
Why didn't he just halve the metabolic requirements of all life?
cause he was a tard
*violent crime
Another hook nosed 2% account for all the white collar crime
>Everybody starts taking up the extra universe defeating the purpose of expanding said universe
It was not just about food, but all resources.
Why didn't he just implement socialism so everybody could eat?
ok, get this
wish for a FOUR times bigger universe
Because it wouldn't have help. Even if you wish the universe twice as big with twice as many resources in a few generations the population growth will catch up with it and you'll be back in the same boat.
And you just snap again its not hard user
Why didn't he just make infinite resources?
And then you do it again. In Endgame he wanted to wipe out the universe and create a new, so his power is clearly not limited to just halving the universe.
But earths population is predicted to stagnate in 2100, if he just snapped everybody to be atheistic developed western nations populations would decline if anything
>one snap almost kills Thanos
just do it again lmao
Why didn't he just build additional pylons?
>duhhhhlll why go big when you can go small?
Doubling the total mass of the universe will completely change its composition and fuck every thing up.
How hard is this to understand?
Why didn't he educate people on birth control?
Because it’s a dumbass kids movie
god damn it shut up. We need an ecological terrorist that is worse than Hitler. Just saying he has a hard on for a she-God of Death isn't enough to sell his character.
Killmonger is still a better villian since he actually has something to be mad about, like Magneito
Because he knows that the population grows to the limit of its resources within 50 years and that that really wouldn't solve anything.
wait
DAMNIT
Would Thanos have been able to basically copy paste our everything, then take half of the population from the original and place it in the duplicate. So you get only half the population strain but apart from losing people you know, maybe family or friends, everyone can live on mostly as usual. At least nobody would have to be dusted then, right?
Honestly this is probably the only situation where socialism would work. He's the perfect antihero
(aside from Dr. Dire)
...
Wasn't that what everyone originally believed he did?
where are you leading me?
Maybe that is what happened. I have not watched Endgame, yet. HD Rip without moonrune subtitles when?
>snaps 2%
>The world enjoys peace, end of poverty and cures for all illness for rest of time
Did anyone else think this was the lamest fucking villain ever?
Seriously is only motive is that hes sad his homeland died so he wants to kill half of all life because he thinks it will make him a saviour.
he didnt even care about earth and respected the avengers... what is compelling about this at all?
it leads to a "have sex" post.
They can't have the literal personification of death as a character because it would upset the chinese audience, so instead we get a purple space gorilla with a shitty understanding of economics
What dont the chinese like about death and also how could it be the chinese fault, thanos and his dumbass has been built up to since the first movies of marvel
*dumbass stones
>Even if you wish half the life in all the universe was gone in a few generations the population growth will catch up with it and you'll be back in the same boat.
thanos was a based retard, but only because they changed his motivation for the movies. in reality he was just trying to impress Death.
fertility rates plummet below replacement as women are educated and gain rights - why didnt he just snap for women's lib?
>put twice as much wood into the fire to control it
He had the right idea, but it wasn’t permanent. He should’ve created a culling mechanism that activates whenever a species reaches a certain point in the evolutionary scale. It’s funny that people talk about there having to be limits to animal populations and how it’s good that hunters keep the balance, but never reflect that question to humans themselves.