Decent show?

>Maher
>left
He's a right wing liberal who fucking dated ann coulter.

Well how could he not with all the evidence?

Orange Man Bad!

Of course Russia meddles in foreign countries elections, just like the US does.
It's naive to think otherwise.

>that they tampered in the last election?
>Buying a few hundred memes on Facebook is "election tampering"

No the op was talking about the "Trump colluded with Putin, he's a russian agent, PUTIN owns him!!!!"
The one that died with the mueller report.

Attached: russia election interference.png (640x346, 126K)

>The absolute level of cope from trumpsters is unreal
Na it's not coping it's fact. Mueller disproved the meme.
>Yes, your conman in chief coordinated his campaign with russian state sources through his idiot kids in Trump Tower.
No he really didn't. But keep trying rewrite Muellers findings.
>He most certainly WILL be impeached within the end of his term.
You better tell nancy that.

>died with the mueller report
Didn't the Mueller report point to it being very likely?

Na it's not. Mueller already proved that wrong.

yikes, dilate tranny

I haven't read it but I doubt that or he would be impeached by now.

Maher is the very definition of a pseudo-intellectual. He happened to have the right people around him that he could parrot their views and leech of their intelligence. But whenever he's not parroting someone he's in literal retard tier. On the rare occasion where he shows his own original views, he has shown to be an anti-vaxxer and a germ theory denialist. Politically, he just made low-bar bush jokes and now he makes low-bar trump jumps. His entire rise as a comedian was based on low-bar religion jokes. Anyone who thinks this guy is worth anything intellectually speaking must be as retarded as he is.

>or he would be impeached by now.
no, because the Democrats are corrupt and only in it for personal gain. they can gain more by playing their games and waiting to toss around shit around election time.

just because Repulicans suck doesn't mean that Democrats are good.

>a germ theory denialist
proven false, he never said that

>Na it's not. Mueller already proved that wrong
what? no he didn't. the report shows it to be likely

Democrats are in it for personal gain so they are not impeaching the republican president?

i like when comedians are on. don't care for the regular panel guests he has on almost every fucking week tho.

>anti-vaxxer and a germ theory denialist
you're stupid

It's pretty shit. He's not smart enough to give insightful or interesting political analysis and he's not funny enough to make entertaining comedy and he's too much of a arrogant, pseudo intellectual pussy to be a likeable host. Whole show is just a waste of time.

Yes. Both serve the same donors for the most part (or perhaps it would better to say that their donors have very similar interests save for a few key points.)

>Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation did not find evidence of criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign
>Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation did not find evidence of criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign
>Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation did not find evidence of criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign

Because impeaching, while the right thing to do and their fucking job, won't actually result in anything politically advantageous for them because the Republicans will shut down any further progress.

They're playing it like they did the Kavenough shit. They sit on it until it's politically advantageous, by waiting until the last possible second instead of doing the right thing.

>Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation did not find evidence of criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign
>Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation did not find evidence of criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign

No It did not.

based truth teller

So why would they spend every day of the last 3 years spamming 'collusion'. Fact is they want him gone but negotiation with other countries is not illegal at all or even close to what Obama did

if you keep copy+pasting that over and over again, obviously it negates that the Mueller report points to it being very likely

No the dems are stupid. there is nothing criminal in the report it's why both Nadler and Pelosi are just playing the political game now.

Mueller shot down their chances of getting trump.

>Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation did not find evidence of criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign
>Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation did not find evidence of criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign

>just because Republicans suck
They literally don't tho

it literally says it in the report you idiot

>So why would they spend every day of the last 3 years spamming 'collusion'.
Because it plays well with their voters and has a very flexible meaning. This is pretty basic political shit.

>Mueller shot down their chances of getting trump.
read the fucking report, you idiot

oh, you're the dumbass who keeps copy and pasting what you want to believe, nm

They can't impeach him because there is nothing to impeach him on. That's the whole point It's why they are just using this whole thing for political purposes and it's failing because the American people don't buy int anymore.

>17 intel agencies

What are you, retarded?

>they couldn't even prove collusion to tweet
Heh. What a waste of time.

Two things holding them back
>impeachment would probably fly past the house of representatives, but the Republican-controlled senate would kill it first chance they got
>it would most likely make trump more popular among centrists since he can paint himself as a victim of a witch hunt, which is what happened with bill clinton when republicans did similar shit to him in the nineties

Bill Maher should be picked apart by buzzards live. Maybe then his life could provide some semblance of constructive entertainment.

I only like the new rules segment. The opening is okay, the interview is sometimes interesting, and the panelists are meh. It's okay if you like politics I guess

Read it and it says Mueller couldn't find any evidence of collusion

>republicans live in a bubble!
>audience gives a standing ovation

>Because impeaching, while the right thing
Why? As it's been stated over and over again but you soi brain keeps ignoring there is nothing impeachable that the President has done. You people are literally mentally ill still pursing your dead lie.
>They're playing it like they did the Kavenough shit.
So lying about it and making utter fools of themselves and turning everyone off around them? Yeah that stounds about right.
>They sit on it until it's politically advantageous,
They aren't sitting on anything they are dragging out this nonsense for as long as they can but it's already dying on the vine as the Mueller report killed their chances.
>instead of doing the right thing.
Like moving on and not continuing their lie?

Mueller report was very clear. The first part dealt with collusion with Russia and it very clearly absolved him of any wrongdoing in that sense. In the second part, where Mueller declined to say he was innocent, dealt with his post election possible obstruction of justice. It's pretty silly that he would potentially violate the law to stop people from investigating a crime he didn't commit, but that's what happened. There was no collusion and that's not even a right vs left opinion divide at this point. It's an informed vs ignorant division.

The report says that there was no conspiracy or collusion.

You Russian hoaxers are the idiots.

>not having an argument in good faith
k

What is there to impeach? Trump hasn't done any impeachable crimes. Pelosi is way smarter than you thank God

>the Mueller report points to it being very likely
But it doesn't. Thats the whole point.
Read the report you stupid idiot. Your narrative died.

Person only has to read the report to see that you're lying, brah

>The report says that there was no conspiracy or collusion.
Based Mueller making incel discord trannies seethe

>he says this while 17 intel agencies proved collusion beyond a doubt back in 2017

Not one of them said there was collusion you stupid fucker.

the lie you are messing up was that 17 said there was Russian interference. The reason thats a lie was that only 3 said that but only 1 made the statement that they "influenced" and the other 2 cited the data from the first.

Goddamn you are so stupid.

Exactly, and then you add in that people are now admitting that Obama did far worse. The fact some of you are staying this is a masterplan are retarded. They already spammed all their plays hoping something would work, they have nothing left expect importing more niggers and spices

>What is there to impeach?
At a minimum, obstruction, which the report 100% points to likely criminal activity of doing such.
Republicans went after Bill Clinton for less. Democrats are afraid of a repeat of the Clinton thing backfiring on them, even if it's the right thing to do.

>The report says that there was no conspiracy or collusion.
The problem is that this is what people genuinely think. They ignore all the findings of the entire report and what it says, and just listen to the soundbite from Trump straight up lying about the report.

>ignorant division.
That's pretty much what they are willing doing at this point.

It's just a political play they are making.
Pelosi and Nadler know there is nothing to impeach on but they are using this whole situation for the theatrics.

Not even that, the intel agencies said the Russians tried but failed to interfere kek

>there is nothing to impeach on
why you repeating lies?

>The problem is that this is what people genuinely think. They ignore all the findings of the entire report and what it says
There are no findings that show that there was anything criminal that the Trump campaign did with Russia. Full Stop
Nothing not one single bit of evidence shows that a crime was committed.

Even the normies aren't talking about the mueller report anymore. It's just a bunch of seething lefties trying to make a mountain out of a molehill. People stopped giving a shit when it said there was no collusion.

Read again. OBSTRUCTION, I didn't say collusion. The report absolutely talks of obstruction, you can't even pretend otherwise on that one.
Reading is tough.

It's not lies.
It's literally what the findings of the Mueller report said.

>There are no findings that show that there was anything criminal that the Trump campaign did with Russia. Full Stop
>Nothing not one single bit of evidence shows that a crime was committed.

Oh, so that's why it got 34 people indicted?

1. No crime to obstruct
2. Trump runs the DOJ and is protected by the constitution
3. It there was obstruction Mueller would have recommended to impeach but he didn't because he had nothing
4. eat shit and die

see
nice try

transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0512/15/lkl.01.html
that's just one of his many rants on vaccines
From the janet reno, dave foley panel -
>that's another theory that I think is flawed, that we go by the Louis Pasteur theory, even though Louis Pasteur renounced it on his own deathbed and said that Beauchamp was right

guy's a nutjob and you two are retarded

>No crime to obstruct
That's not how American laws work, in case you're not American. Obstruction to an official federal investigation is absolutely a crime.

> It there was obstruction Mueller would have recommended to impeach
That's not his job. His job is to present evidence. And he said if there was no evidence of criminal wrongdoing, he would have said so.

>OBSTRUCTION,
What about?
The Report also said there was no evidence that obstruction was committed. Either way if we go by you claim that he "obstructed" when the special counsel makes it clear there is no evidence showing he did. How exactly do you think congress would investigate that considering the party involved on the receiving end of alleged obstruction couldn't be clear?

As said before move the fuck on. You lost this fight as we all knew you would and screaming about impeachment only makes you look like a lunatic since Both Pelosi and Nadler have backed away.

>The Report also said there was no evidence that obstruction was committed.
Okay, now that is a complete 100% lie right here. Not even being subtle anymore.

because they made false statements.
Have you actually seen what they were charged with. The most severe were for manafort and it was akin to tax fraud.

I don't know what you mean by "moving on." I'm not in any official position to do anything, I'm just discussing what was in the report, and what Mueller said.

lol keep chasing phantoms

>which the report 100% points to likely criminal activity of doing such.
No it doesn't It makes it clear there was no evidence.

I did see it and it's nonsense again you are trying to make the mueller report say what you want it to say but it doesn't.

So, earlier, you were implying obstruction/perjury and tax fraud weren't crimes?

>impeachment would probably fly past the house of representatives,
No it wouldn't many moderate dems have said they wouldn't vote to impeach. They literally don't have the votes for it probably because there is nothing impeachable.

Just pointing out you lying is all. Even Americans who like Trump know about the obstruction part of the Mueller Report, you're obviously not from here.

It's weird when he starts ranting and all the guests are like, "I'm just going to sit here and smile now."

False it does not.

>That's not his job
It literally is. He was suppose to find crimes and then recommend to the DOJ and congress to impeach. That's what happened to Clinton, a sitting US president. Special Counsel Kenneth starr found he committed perjury under oath and recommend to impeach. Nixon had articles of impeachment being written before he resigned.

who's chasing? I'm not in a position to do jack shit, any more than you. I'm talking here, that's all.

This isn't a football match, stop playing for teams and actually pay attention to what's going on, no matter who you support.

Oh, you're a troll. Carry on then

>faith
I don't need to
I have the backing of the mueller report and what it found or should I saw what I didn't find to back me up.

It does

>no retort
Thank you for your concession, non-American
Played your hand by pretending about the "no obstruction" thing

Yea, when you're a teenager. Then you grow up and realize that leftism is childish.

Maybe you should read it. You don't seem to know whats is in it.

keep fighting to good fight!

There was no obstruction thats why Trump is still sitting in the white house

>The first part dealt with collusion with Russia and it very clearly absolved him of any wrongdoing in that sense.

It did not.
In fact, it went out of its way *not* to absolve him.
The report states that russian interference in the US election DID happen, and Trump's campaign organization DID accept help from the Russians.
The question is whether or not Trump himself was culpable, and that's impossible to prove with the tools and resources available at Muller's disposal, but Muller notes that, given what we know and what Muller was able to ascertain, his actions are not those of an innocent man.
To get what is needed to definitively prove or absolve Trump of collusion, they'd need to invoke impeachment.

>this entire thread
Level with me you faggots, who here actually read it?

Attached: 1443279366704.jpg (383x472, 130K)

talking is fighting?

>At a minimum, obstruction, which the report 100% points to likely criminal activity of doing such.
No it literally says there is no evidence to support the claim either way. You're once again wrong.

>Yea, when you're a teenager. Then you grow up and realize that leftism is childish.

Attached: pol irl underage3.jpg (1130x1325, 181K)

>In fact, it went out of its way *not* to absolve him.
Prosecutors do not absolve you absolute moron. They either charge you with a crime or don't. That's it.

case in point

The same number as all of Congress

apparently, only this guy right here has actually read it in this entire thread:

there are exactly two posts actually about real time

>Obstruction to an official federal investigation is absolutely a crime.
and Mueller already said there is no evidence of obstruction.

Just "questionable incidents".
>That's not his job.
It is his job. He can make the recommendation of charges.
>His job is to present evidence.
Which he did not find.
>And he said if there was no evidence of criminal wrongdoing, he would have said so.
You're also leaving out the part where he said he had not evidence of criminal wrong doing.

Muller wasn't prosecuting.

you ever look at a kid and just know he's gonna grow up to be gay, and probably a trap?

Attached: vrZI6t1.gif (105x70, 292K)

>Okay, now that is a complete 100% lie right here.
No it's literally in the report.
There is not evidence to prove an obstruction charge.

He's a queen, but I've always liked a lot of real time. Haven't kept up with it for a bit, finna check it out on youtube right now.

>Prosecutors do not absolve you absolute moron. They either charge you with a crime or don't. That's it.
What the fuck are you talking about? What do you think Mueller was?

No one in the Trump administration was charged with collusion.

>I'm just discussing what was in the report, and what Mueller said.
Might want to read it again, you've been wrong on many points about it.

This faggot right here is the only one who actually read the damn report, you faggots
Why does Yea Forums insist on talking about politics when 99% don't know what the fuck they're talking about?

This

>The report states that russian interference in the US election DID happen, and Trump's campaign organization DID accept help from the Russians.
Your problem for your side is, this is not illegal. If it were, then every single politician would be guilty of committing a crime. This was always going to be your problem. You set up an investigation into a non-crime.

>The Special Counsel investigation was an investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections and suspicious links between Trump associates and Russian officials, conducted by special prosecutor Robert Mueller from May 2017 to March 2019.
> by special prosecutor Robert Mueller from May 2017 to March 2019.
>special prosecutor Robert Mueller
>special prosecutor Robert Mueller
>prosecutor
fucking morons

Well the obstruction of justice thing is a weird wrench. First you have to settle if there is obstruction when no crime has been commited (it absolutely is, but political figures get special treatment and at least one judge has already stated that no crime means Trump is innocent.) Secondly, he never actually obstructed justice. Every time he tried, he was speaking to smarter people who refused to follow his orders. I highly doubt he could be impeached for attempted obstruction. It's like attempting to plan a bank heist but never starting cause no one wants to team up with you.
Lastly, this just seems very vindictive for far lefties. They're just looking for something to get him out of office and they don't care if it's the now debunked claims of collusion that bring him down or if he gets caught stealing a candy bar at a gas station. I've heard a few major political networks/figures like TYT and Sam Harris say that they should just put him on the stand to get him to perjure himself and then impeach him on that, which is pretty fucked up. A lot of people here are trying to claim the moral high ground by claiming impeachment is the right thing to do but given the facts they just sound like really sore losers.

you responded to the wrong post
doesn't make sense in context to what you're responding to

>Just pointing out you lying is all.
But he's not he's 100% spot on.
Its you who are lying. You keep saying thinks like
>Even Americans who like Trump know about the obstruction part of the Mueller Report
Claiming there is any evidence of so-called obstruction when the report makes it clear there is neither.

Yea Forums is mostly underage. They never know what they are talking about.

Oh so this year. Ok we’re all waiting kek. Get a grip dummy, 2020 is going to break you faggots.

Then why are you lying about the contents of the report and leading a narrative based on half truths?

Culturally conservative and economically leftist is the chad ideology.
If your a poorfag and believes in capitalism you are literally cattle.

>lying
nice projection

Does not. Read it again.

I didn't. Politics is boring.
Niggers typing dozens of words thinking anyone is going to read it kjeke

>Played your hand by pretending about the "no obstruction" thing
What are you on about. You're the one make false claims of "obstruction" when the report makes it clear there is zero evidence to back up your claim.

You dead wrong and you won't admit it.

>Trump's campaign organization DID accept help from the Russians.
Too bad no one in the Trump's campaign organization was charged with collusion kek

That's not at all what the post you responded to is addressing, user

why is he spouting lies then?

Mueller had nothing give it up tranny and dilate

>lowqualitybait.jpg

"Collusion" is a meaningless word.
A political campaign accepting aid from foreign entities *IS* very much a crime, and a lot of people both directly and indirectly associated with the campaign *DID* go to jail, so

>the sky is blue
>ha, I told you this apple is a fruit!
k

please tell me how you got to that conclusion. The ONLY damning part of the Mueller report about collusion was about "contact" with russians on 100 occasions. But it very clearly stated that neither trump nor anyone related to him actually colluded with Russians. Attorney General Barr even stated in the press conference about the report that there was no collusion. Please, stop talking about things you didn't actually read.

>Culturally conservative and economically leftist
Literal autism alignment.

>trolling
you're not doing it right

I'm glad the US coast guard was able to verify the facts surrounded this.

>In fact, it went out of its way *not* to absolve him.
Wrong you idiot. It very directly said that no criminal conspiracy existed when it came to collusion.
>The report states that russian interference in the US election DID happen
in the form of ads on Facebook. Not "hacking the election" like many of you Russia hoaxers pushed.
>Trump's campaign organization DID accept help from the Russians.
It benefited indirectly from the email hacks. The report made it clear AGAIN since you seem to keep ignoring this part. That there was no organized criminal conspiracy with Russia or the trump campaign.
>The question is whether or not Trump himself was culpable,
No that's not a quesiton either. He isn't the report made that clear as day.
>his actions are not those of an innocent man.
Thats your editorial and it's reaching.
>To get what is needed to definitively prove or absolve Trump of collusion, they'd need to invoke impeachment.
Nowhere does he say that and that line of thinking is foolish.

You might want to reread the report and not get your talking points from Rachel Maddow.

>*DID* go to jail
For tax evasion nothing to do with Russians, nice try tranny.

>This faggot right here is the only one who actually read the damn report, you faggots
No it's clear he didn't and is just repeating talking points.
The report makes it clear that the collusion question is done with and the only "questionable" thing lacks any evidence.

>this level of cope

But he was asked to make report with a recommendation.

>forming a proper rebuttal
you're not doing it right

>This faggot right here is the only one who actually read the damn report, you faggots
>Why does Yea Forums insist on talking about politics when 99% don't know what the fuck they're talking about?
Because a lot of redditors are here now, plus the typical trolls

>99% don't know what the fuck they're talking about?
Like you and the faggot your quoted? Because the mueller report doesn't say what he claims it did.

imagine how mad all these trumpfaggots would be if Obama did anything close to this shit

Most redditards are lefties shilling this russian collusion shit.

Is this the current incel containment thread for redditors who don't watch movies or shows but still have spent their entire adult lives on this board and only pretend to care about politics because of reddit memes and actually aren't even registered to vote?

there's idiots acting like there's some here who don't think Foxx is corrupt regarding the Smullett thing, and talking like people here. There's a pretty big influx of trolls right now just taking adverserial positions, even for blatantly unpopular sides on Yea Forums that gives it away

I'm not the Mueller report backs up my view of things nicely as does the law.

No he was a prosecutor with prosecutorial powers, who can subpoena, call on the grand jury, indict and take evidence to trial.

2016 trumper reddit migration hurt this place

And they stayed there and made it even more of a lefty hugbox when this entire site became a haven for /rthedonald

So then he didn't because Mueller specially said that there was no criminal conspiracy.

The mueller report ended the debate on if the Trump campaign acted criminally with russia and that was that they didn't.

>t. didn't read the report, and didn't listen to Mueller talk

>The mueller report ended the debate on if the Trump campaign acted criminally with russia and that was that they didn't.
read it again

Why didn't Mueller indict or recommend to impeach? It's because he had nothing

/pol/ created the Donald. Either way that one sub creates so much asspain for that lefty site it's comical at this point.

So how bout that Bill Maher show

No one's reading your posts faggots.

What shit is that?
Trump was proven to not ahve done any "shit"
But Obama did actually commit a crime by directing agencies to spy on the Trump campaign. That is where the real crime is and that is the next show that is going to drop.

Attached: 23ADF38E-FBC9-4E64-BD75-AB24377C253C.gif (332x332, 1.68M)

Either someone in this thread has shit reading ability or the report is some ambiguous mess that means nothing

Havent read it since im not american and do t care but for fuck sake will one of you at least post a quote to back up if it did or disnt say there was criminality

Attached: 20190625_215056.png (606x372, 185K)

I did read the report. It seem you didn't.

You brainlets are ignoring the real thing people need to focus on about the Mueller Report.

Attached: Capture.png (1016x204, 31K)

Obama bombed Libya and turned it into a terrorist haven failed state with modern slavery. He was awful even a lot of progressive admit this.

>Na it's not coping it's fact. Mueller disproved the meme.
You sound so confused.

>the report is some ambiguous mess that means nothing

Because he didn't have the same power a prosecutor would be allowed in discovery for a trial, so he left "muh roadmap". I know it gets tiresome hearing the same shit about it, but that doesn't make it untrue.

not really.
I read the Mueller report.

Doesn't change the fact that this site has been infested with magareddit ever since.

You don't need to read it. Mueller didn't indict anyone, he didn't recommend to impeach. Nothing after 3 years of investigations and spending tens of millions of dollars. It was a dud.

>it'ss daddy Trump who is the real victim here!

Attached: 1359252021065.jpg (257x253, 14K)

>It very directly said that no criminal conspiracy existed when it came to collusion.
"While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him"

>He isn't the report made that clear as day.
"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state."

"the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred"

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state."

>Nowhere does he say that and that line of thinking is foolish.
"The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the president's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law."

>he didn't have the same power a prosecutor
He literally does. Special consul can recommend to impeach. Kenneth Starr did it against Bill Clinton for perjury. You are probably a zoomer and have no idea what I'm talking about though.

>You don't need to read it.
/thread

Attached: ziXo7p4AT.jpg (640x480, 23K)

He's an old school liberal.
He was super based in the early 2000s but now I feel that, much like with Howard Stern, he is a relic of an ancient time.
He literally didn't know that "cuck" was a common political insult until a few weeks ago. Given his support of MUH RUSSIA and Clinton, it's hardly surprising.

lmgtfy.com/?q=what is trial discovery?

>He literally didn't know that "cuck" was a common political insult until a few weeks ago
...only internet social media, which I highly doubt he plays a big part in
I'd hardly call that politically relevant

Are you just so full of talking points and empty of critical thinking that you think that somehow rebuts anything I said or are you replying to the wrong guy? We were talking about collusion, your entire post is about obstruction of justice.
try to keep up

which is what exactly?

He has discovery power you lying tranny

washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/mueller-says-discovery-materials-in-case-against-russian-firm-were-used-in-a-cyber-disinformation-campaign/2019/01/30/9fd60218-24c9-11e9-81fd-b7b05d5bed90_story.html?utm_term=.e5261d785396

Imagine being a leftist still OBSESSED wih the mueller report
Ahahahahahahah

Attached: image.png (565x600, 217K)

>He was super based in the early 2000
Was he though? In what way?

no that would be the lefty pol redditards that come here acting like they have always been here.

cuck isn't a common political insult though. It's for incels that are obsessed with not being able to keep a woman and their shithead representatives adopted it

He did lol that's half the reason they dropped it.

Only in your mind.
The real problem are the trannies and real redditards who came here. You know the ones who cry about /pol/ despite the fact that Yea Forums is and has been /pol/ since forever.

He called the US military cowards for using missiles on enemies that had no way of countering them. It was extremely based and is to date the most politically incorrect thing the MSM has ever aired.

Funny the only people who seem to understand it are the people who belong to the party in that picture you posted.

4chin was always lefty, sorry dude

Attached: 151074676977.jpg (1280x856, 205K)

>I still can't cope with the Mueller report killing my Talking point for the past three years so I'l make some starwman up.

>You know the ones who cry about /pol/ despite the fact that Yea Forums is and has been /pol/ since forever.
Yea Forums has always been racist, yes. However it wasn't a hangout for white nationalist activists (or really activists of any kind) until moot left and gookmoot let you and yours migrate from reddit.

Attached: pol 4chan45.jpg (1214x403, 88K)

Only people who call other people Incels are Incels and Cucks.

Also the left can't meme you've proven that yet again.

nice revisionism.

why do you keep posting that picture like it helps you? All those "Events" had a large amount of news sites and blogs right stories about Yea Forums. It's also around the time we started getting more trannies and other mentally ill left chuds.

the right can't read and you've proven that yet again

D R O P P E D
R
O
P
P
E
D

Attached: bill-maher.png (290x606, 216K)

it literally helps him, though

The problem is, "Collusion" isn't and never was a crime, and the Muller investigation wasn't looking for that. "Collusion" is a red herring that Trump's administration intentionally threw out there to muddy the waters and make discourse more difficult.
Today, it's used as a stand-in for "Literally any crime of any kind whatsoever", the line of thought being "He's not guilty of collusion (the thing we made up), therefore, there's no point in investigating any other crime!"

The Muller report set out to answer three questions: Was there Russian involvement in the trump campaign, Is the Trump campaign guilty of a crime, and is Trump himself guilty of a crime?
And the answer to those questions is, in order
Yes
Yes
Maybe, worth investigating further, in the only formal way of investigating a sitting president directly

nice seething

But it doesn't. It shows that lefties became more aware of Yea Forums and that's why we have to deal with all these reddit tourists now.

I feel like the trannies were always here though.

very true on the superficial Church bashing
youtube.com/watch?v=kJQjpG-lGY4
he's retarded

>Trump's administration intentionally threw out there to muddy the waters a
Nonsense, it was the talking point from the left from day one. Either way collusion isn't a crime but conspiracy is and mueller made it clear that didn't occur.

>Is the Trump campaign guilty of a crime
>Trump himself guilty of a crime?
>And the answer to those questions is, in order
>Yes, Maybe
Actually the report makes it clear that they are both No and Probably No.

youtube.com/watch?v=1_2v7tTadFM
>stop reproducing
>America should be a Jewish utopia
Wow, every single time.

Attached: 1538395856613.jpg (1012x789, 132K)

Read the report again, it clearly states The campaign did NOT commit a crime and there also isn't any evidence that President Trump commit one either.

Also nice revisionism about the collusion nonsense, The resist crowd started that before he was even sworn in.

what about this is wrong? There are too many people on the road and people have kids without being able to take care of them

How did you get that he committed a crime based on those statements that there is no evidence that he committed one? In the eyes of the law he is innocent.

>if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state.

"Innocent until proven guilty" does not mean "Emphatically innocent", user.

But thus far there is zero evidence of even a crime existing much less the President Committing one and after 3 years of investigations there still isn't.

At this point it really is time to just maybe admit that reality.

Like fifteen of Trump's retinue are in jail for crimes directly related to Trump's estate, two of them are Russian, and Trump himself seems awfully jumpy and alarmed for being the most powerful man in the world who has no reason to fear reprisal

Attached: MW-HH884_downlo_20190418115301_NS.jpg (1200x726, 250K)

I like all the posts about the Mueller report in this thread by you faggots who think that in the 1 and half years left in trump 1st or last term that anything will happen. Everyone literally has said nobody is going to do anything. It's just boomers on twitter that still care about this crap.

>He's no different than all the other lefties on TV

He's literally the opposite of all the other lefties on TV. Name another late nite liberal host who openly hates muslims, zoomers, SJWs and thinks trannies are mentally retarded.

Ask the proper question. If this entire country read the document would anything change? Probably not, so why bother? Adulthood is knowing what politics to pay attention to and what is dog-and-pony show. Unfortunately for most Americans there is an increasing amount of shit that was taken seriously being stuffed into the dog-and-pony show. We can't manage to roll back endless war at this point, why bother worrying about this or that minor legal infraction.

Nice picture, what does that have to do with anything especially given the lack of evidence found?

So we're gonna just ignore the fact that there isn't anything showing a criminal act and just lock him up anyway because of what want to think is true?

>He's a right wing liberal who fucking dated ann coulter.
wrong.

The left started the word "collusion", but it wasn't even about Trump, it was about the hacked DNC emails and whether or not Trump Jr and Paul Manafort accepted them from Russian hackers. It wasn't even about Trump directly.

Trump co-opted and miscontextualized the phrase shortly after the Obstruction thing started, because it was quick and snappy and, again, a misdirection.

Attached: 4F52DDEB00000578-0-image-a-1_1535012517526.jpg (634x266, 26K)

>This negro isn't as bad as all the other negros, he doesn't steal, rob or kill. He even has a job. We need more like him.

>people have kids without being able to take care of them
Right, those people are definitely watching Real Time.

>There are too many people on the road
Right, as he said it's because of the Jews. Regardless driverless cars will be around soon enough then L.A. traffic will be a breeze.

>what about this is wrong?
It's Jewish power subverting/corrupting/eliminating American gentiles. More than half of American political news hosts are Jewish so it can be said that he's socially conditioning Americans as part of the Jewish political agenda. This is part of the larger social engineering program that pervades mass media owned by the Chosen People.
youtube.com/watch?v=qx_g88kQek8

What, exactly, do you think "Impeachment" actually means?

>wrong

Yeah, they didn't date. They're fuck buddies.

Nice revision, but thats not true. The entire time it was about "Trump collusion with russia" it was a few months ago when they started trying to push the obstruction nonsense. But even now that doesn't look like it's gonna stick.

Says who?

how exactly would another investigation into an investigation prove obstruction when the first investigation could prove that?

Do you even watch the show?

>40 Posters
>225 Posts

Literally, have fucking Sex.

Dilate

youtube.com/watch?v=pllcTlN-7dQ

my all time fav youtube shit

I actually have sex with real women. Probably something you Yea Forums nazis have never done.

That one thing that I like that he does is call out Muslim apologist and at least hold them to some form of logic. He is a sniveling leftist on most topics but at least he calls them out on their "Islamophobia" bullshit and says there is credible reasons to distrust them.

>Islamophobia
how did we go from watching the worst terrorist attacks in human history to letting them play the victim?

When the US killed hundreds of thousands of them and then sponsored ISIS to kill even more. Oh yeah and now they are killing muzzies back home in the anglosphere too. So yeah there's a lot of victimization going on here and one side is doing most of it.

Attached: saudi arabia isis.jpg (600x330, 39K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics

Attached: 13380AC7-DBA7-4043-BFE0-26462AA90125.png (547x626, 18K)

>Dugin

Attached: dugin1.jpg (872x536, 97K)

>The one that died with the mueller report.

wrong

Attached: trump scrabble.jpg (1024x1014, 145K)

Even after attack after attack we didn't put them in camps nor write laws to restrict their freedoms despite the stats saying that even a conservative estimate of 10% of their billion adherents support terrorist activities and jihad we do nothing to limit their freedom. Somehow we are the bad guys for being apprehensive getting on a plane with them.

>CP

Attached: smug09485603499.jpg (674x678, 198K)

"good act does not wash out the bad, nor a bad the good"

Attached: 1549165168867.jpg (976x1024, 142K)

aww shit /int/ is on.

>demonizes legal refugees
lol haha.

No you're the bad guys for invading a bunch of unrelated countries (such as Iraq), sponsoring ISIS, and slaughtering millions of muslims in the middle east over the past two decades.

Attached: trump candidate vs president.jpg (500x391, 57K)

Why is literally every meme the left has a poorly worded copied version of one they have stolen?

>Even after attack after attack we didn't put them in camps nor write laws to restrict their freedoms despite the stats saying that even a conservative estimate of 10% of their billion adherents support terrorist activities and jihad we do nothing to limit their freedom. Somehow we are the bad guys for being apprehensive getting on a plane with them.

Attached: amerimut says.png (534x363, 91K)

watch this instead : vimeo.com/242297095

>Pardoned Terrorists
What the fuck is that even mean?
>Demonizes Legal refugees
They actually aren't legal "Refugees" thats the whole point, thank god he does.
>Call for religious discrimination
Good, Islam is the greatest threat to the west.
>Picks fights with Us allies
Good they deserve it
>Central Park 5
You mean those nigs who raped a woman?
>Encourages Police assault civilians
Aww some negro get what was coming to him again?
>Wall is impractical
Tell that to Israel or Hungary.

The rest are just sad talking points.

4 more years =)

>sponsoring ISIS,
Imagine being this retarded.
>slaughtering millions of Muslims in the middle east over the past two decades.
That would be Muslims doing that. Most of the people we killed were terrorists and those who weren't supposed to get killed were put their by those terrorists.

Yeah what he said was pretty much spot on. Its comical the muzzies try and claim they are victims. They terrorize the world for decades and now they got their feeling hurt.

obstruction that MAY have happened
that's not even "we can prove you were there when the murder happened" but "we can prove you may have been there when the murder happened"

There isn't any

>even if it's the right thing to do.
The child murderers who literally have to import shitskin foreigners into the country because they're too busy mass-murdering their own kids and discriminating against the white working class are worried about what is RIGHT? What cringe. The Democrats lost the argument objectively because they were WRONG.

Busted up lips, stumped on ribs, broken orbital bones, and some dead fucking kids.

>HUU HUUU HUUUUUUU HE COMMITTED COLLUSION SO WE RAN AN INVESTIGATION FOR TWO YEARS BUT FOUND NOTHING

>HUU HUUU HUUUUUUUU WE FOUND NOTHING SO NOW HE'S GUILTY OF OBSTRUCTING OUR INVESTIGATION THAT FOUND NOTHING

Imagine if someone lied to you to accuse you of a crime you didn't commit, and then when you told them to fuck off and stop, they accused you of obstructing their investigation of the crime you didn't commit.

Then when you deny that you obstructed the investigation of the crime you didn't commit, they start babbling about how THAT is a crime too.

And this is why every Mexican who dies squealing like a pig in a cage deserves it. Because those rat-faced hacienda trash are just Democrats from the future.

Attached: 0b640f24cf6aea9eff4ba8a4ee69b2487235e373f96b122741bd30696ee6e991.jpg (209x294, 25K)

I'm always tremendously pleased when white liberal filth die screaming for their mommies, tortured to death by foreigners. The best instance of it was Molly Tibbets, though those two 60 IQ Norwegian whores who were beheaded on camera in Morocco pleased me as well.

Watching them realize that hating their fathers didn't make their throats immune to the knives of angry Arabs. The way that one race traitor squealed "mommy!" in her disgusting language as he rolled her over to saw through the front of her neck was particularly sweet.

Attached: tomi.jpg (1052x1220, 245K)

My first clue that Maher was a clueless hack was when he kept urging Dem voters in 2016 to just accept any Democrat regardless, even though voting along party lines is just a way to keep people divided and ignorant.

My second clue was when Bill predicted that Trump would make himself dictator for life.

My final clue is when Maher handwaved the no collusion conclusion by saying "I know he's a bad guy, I have a TV". Showing the whole world that this supposed intellectual gets his beliefs from CNN.

Trump's greatest gift was shitting all over everything and exposing how stupid everyone is.