HARRY

DIDJA PUTYER DICK IN MAH GOBLITTAFIAR

Attached: SILEEEEENCE.png (616x531, 500K)

Richard Harris would never have delivered it that way.

dumbledore said calmly

>harry potter
>shit series that gets big budget movies
>Discworld
>amazing series that gets literally nothing
Fuck Harry Potter.

>The champion for Hogwarts is: Dean Thomas!
What did he mean by this?

>amazing series
Disc is awful. Death is the one who actually carries that world on his shoulders.

I THINK HARRY POTTER SUCKS MY SAGGY OLD MAN BALLS

Attached: 1544181616083.png (469x431, 585K)

to be fair, the discworld movies are pretty comfy

>and your other wand

Wow, what an absolutely amazing and earth shattering statement. No one would’ve guessed.

I'd consign my appendage to the flames too if it meant not watching the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1480194209347.jpg (1565x2823, 2.76M)

based

No one ever puts Catch 22 in the god-tier for this pasta

ALL FIRST YEAR GIRLS TO MY OFFICE NOW

Attached: 1480846795673.jpg (1564x800, 246K)

>Harry, I want to put my """""""name"""""" in your """"""""goblet of fire""""""""" if you know what I mean ;)

Attached: d.png (1305x667, 1.32M)

>ALL FIRST YEAR BOYS TO MY OFFICE NOW
*ftfy

Attached: f972c431-9832-4144-8b17-7c3b9c28a51f_169.jpg (360x203, 16K)

What movies?

There are live action and animated adaptations by the BBC.
There is not "literally" nothing.

I watched the Hogfather one. It was nice.
But Discworld has no big budget anything like Harry Shithead got.

They usually have straight to TV movies on over Christmas in England.

Because it's shit