Who will play him in the biopic?

Chris Farley

This. He is hyperbolic as fuck and conflates things, but the effort to unperson him should at least set off alarm bells in people's minds.

Alex Jones is a giant piece of shit and fuck all of you who actually think he's "based"

>t. Deep State shill

Attached: 1518442135548.png (500x312, 83K)

>WAAAAAAAA THAT CRAZZY MAN WEIRD SAYS MEAN THINGS INDONT LIKE WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>M-M-MOMMY! THE MEAN MAN SAID A BAD THING ON THE INTERNET WAAAAAAAAA

people who don't understand irony have ruined the internet. you'd have to be seriously brain damaged to take Jones seriously.

cringe

>AJ explains on Joe Rogan that there's a coordinated attempt to unperson him so that libel can be easily spread
>AJ is immediately banned from every platform
>Headlines like "AJ is a pedo white supremacist" abound in a matter of months

go prosecute Hillary Clinton already

Fuck off, the media absolutely hates him and slanders him and is constantly trying to sue the fuck out of him. You are basing you opinions off of hitpieces on him created by corporate media who are directly being outcompeted by him. Its so ignorant. They just make up any old bullshit and retract it, like him sending child porn to sandy hook families the other day. 100% false, he was actually the victim. You wont ever see corporate media treat him fairly: he is anti-establishment and a direct competitor to them.

why doesn't trump? remember when alex endorsed him and roger stone, yet here we are 3 years later and they're standard warhawk neocons just like bush. really activates my dmt receptors

Why would i take him any less seriously than CNN or Buzzfeed or Fox? At least hes open about his biases, he has legit sources and is entertaining as fuck. Judt dont take everything he says literally. Also the fact he was essentially banned from tbe internet makes him even more interesting.

Get off the internet. Your wife needs to send pussy shots to Tyrone.

>and they're standard warhawk neocons just like bush
No they arent. Trump is sort kf neocon, but nowhere near as neocon as bush you fucking retard. The actual neocons like mccain and romney hated him, the repubs almost didnt let him get the nomination. Hes destroyed neocon trade deals and has pulled troops from syria and advocates for pulling more from the middle east, against the will of his advisors. You're clueless.

Now do this guy

Attached: C73A8348-4ABD-45B3-B1BD-955DFFC1ABF5.jpg (400x400, 17K)

>why doesn't trump?
What more could he do? The FBI already decided she was guilty but they wouldnt charge her, Trump isnt a dictator, he cant just do anything he wants. People like clinton are too powerful to ever really be charged.

the feds can't meme

>against the will of his advisors
why are those his advisors than? seems like his only saving ability is to be so retarded he can't get anything done. really incredible stuff

if your argument is that even the president of the country can't do anything to hillary than what the fuck are you complaining to me about? you think I have more power than the president you dumb faggot?

I think mainstream journalists truly believe that they have a right to guide the narratives people are exposed to. And after Trump's election, despite all their best efforts, they realized that they had lost the ability to shape public opinion in this way. New media on the internet had taken over and was changing the political discourse in ways that the establishment didn't like. Now they're scrambling with mass-censorship, deplatformings and hate-speech laws to make sure that things don't get out of hand again.

Alex Jones is a dummy. But even presenting the idea that government can act maliciousy (as Alex Jones often did) is enough to get normies thinking and asking the wrong questions when exposed to mainstream narratives.

Maybe Pete Townsend since they both seem to like looking at “research”

the president doesn't arrest or prosecute people, shill. He isn't the dictator you leftist shitbags pretend.

0/10 back to the shareblue discord

Idris Elba

I thought the /pol/ approved opinion was to dislike Alex Jones because
>hes a deep state shill
>he doesnt name the jew
>his ex wife and his kids are jews
Really does me a big think

Attached: 1508799281319.png (651x503, 293K)

You're on Yea Forums, soibrain.

He obviously isnt a deep state shill. He exposes the deep state. /pol/ despises AJ, but its mainly because /pol/tards are easily brainwashed and theres been anti AJ shills on there for ever. The only valid criticism of AJ is that he doesnt name the jew. Well that and he hires plagarizing morons like Paul Josef Watson.

Whatever happened to the "[board] is /pol/" /pol/-approved memepinion? Also I've probably got higher test than you considering I work a skilled trade for a living and you probably sit in an "open office" programming gay tranny hookup apps in between powerpoints from HR about sexual harassment

Seesh, have sex already

Have testosterone

that vid, lmao. nice dude.

>being proud of your shitty manual labor job
do americans really do this?

I immediately stop reading someone's comment when they fuck up something as simple as
>npc's

>skilled trade
>shitty manual labor
Choose one, estrogent. No matter how many "commits" you have in your LGBThub you still dont know how to do anything in the real world.

Alex Jones jerks it to trannies m8

>/pol/ approved opinion

This elitist attitude is why Trump won the election. Think about it.

>stolen from Super Deluxe

Will Sasso wins the oscar 2024 for
His portrayal of AJ in the biopic
"ENDGAME" the Alex Jones Story

Jason Momoa

Attached: Alex Hulk Out.jpg (404x600, 32K)

I never said i'm pro or anti Alex Jones. Plesse have sex.

Yeah, they exist. You can't disagree with those approved opinions or else you're a soiboi Hasbara JIDF deep state DSA antifa chapotraphouse reddit shill

As opposed to the "heh stupid flyover dumbasses, just get a college education" elitism that was supposed to win Hillary the election? I'd like to see you low test office eunuch types try and do lineman work on 25KV service lines while dangling from a helicopter harness
>inb4 you reply with more elitism "b-but it's ok when we do it you rural suburban blue collar retard!"

Saying an entire town faked a shooting and faked the deaths of kids based on no evidence and that it was an entire government ploy to take guns away, is dangerously close to libel...

So I think you're just retarded.

>"he's not a neocon"
>attacks Syria
>false flags an attack by the "definitely Iranians" then tweets about Iran a dozen times at 3am in the morning that we should invade the country

Attached: 1557797277855.png (687x446, 374K)

>The FBI already decided she was guilty but they wouldnt charge her
Except the opposite of that happened.

>People like clinton are too powerful
I like how in your bizzaro world, a billionaire from WallStreet with international banker buds who happens to also be the fucking President, is somehow at the mercy of a hack politician who's main claim to fame was being Secretary of State of Bill's wife.

*and Bill's wife

If you dont think something fishy went down in newtown then you arent paying attention. Why did only 1 ambulance respond? The only thing Alex did wrong is suggest that the kids didnt die. He knows god damn well our government has no problem killing kids to achieve a goal.

first of all, he'd been saying that shit about Sandy Hook for years and there were no calls to deplatform him. That was just the bullshit pretext they used when they started this mass censorship campaign. Secondly, remember the 'mobile weapons labs' and 'yellow cake' from Niger? Various media institutions peddled that info knowing that it was complete bullshit. Millions of people have died, trillions of dollars have been wasted. Has any mainstream media institution been deplatformed for literally facilitating a war crime? Why not?

I didn't say you liked or disliked him, you're using lgbt as an insult and he has been caught watching tranny porn

Maybe if you /x/-tier retards produced ANY shred of decent evidence to arouse doubt, I'd be inclined to believe you. But since only the severely mentally ill still push the Sandy Hook conspiracy, it's safe to say that you're just wrong and Occam's Razor is a litmus test to weed you people out of real discourse.

Do you even know the logistics of an entire fucking town faking a whole class of kids? The actors, the actor fees, the sheer size of a coverup of that magnitude...or you know, the shooting happened like shootings do in the worst first world country with the highest school shooting rates per capita?

>ignore Alex as any old conspiracy nut, still find his clips entertaining and like the guy
>watch the JRE return episode
>actually start listening to his infowar episodes and watch his old movies
>mfw he keeps being right

Attached: 45363456.png (1173x676, 686K)

He literally got shit on by democrats for not attacking and wanting to pull troops out faggot

>he'd been saying that shit about Sandy Hook for years
Not true, it was the last few years. Then he tried to scrub the videos when he got sued. It didn't work.
>mass censorship campaign
KEK okay faggot, they waited 30 years to do that? Why didn't they pull his plug during the 9/11 truther movement?

You know he still has his website, right? They did a great job deplatforming him, huh?

That's a very strange whatabout at the end, schizo.

False, it's exactly what happened. Comey flat out stated she committed wrong doing and that others were prosecuted for doing the same, *but that no one was willing to prosecute her*.

What a shill this poster is, i hope nobody replies to this retard anymore.

How does that change what I said? I'm not personally the entire Democratic Party, faggot. I don't speak for them.

Actually its a legitimate double standard he's pointing out. Take your redditard lingo elsewhere.

user, why did the "deep state" or whoever, wait for over 3 decades to deplatform him if he was dispersing those truth bombs all over the place? Why wait until an actual libel case?

Use your brain, it's almost like Youtube pulled his content so as to not be involved in a legal case with Jones.

>Actually its a legitimate double standard he's pointing out.
It's not though.

You got nothing and have restored to ad hominem you lose
Gee he only started talking about Sandy hook after it happened and not before huh?
He is only getting deplatformed before the next election, after you left wing shills found out he motivates trump supporters huh?
You're dumb as fuck and starting to become contradictory to your own logic.

>look, see? not Bill Hicks
Now I'm left with even more questions.

Youtube as a monopolistic platform that captures 95% of eye balls on the internet because of the way google ranking works did not exist 30 years ago.

To my fellow anons, I apologize for taking the bait and stating the obvious to this blatant concern troll and eliciting whatever retarded misdirection he will come up with next. Hopefully he will just stop shitting up this thread and go away.

>You got nothing
much like your conspiracy theory that is laughed at.
>He is only getting deplatformed before the next election, after you left wing shills found out he motivates trump supporters huh?
kek, what in the absolute shit are you on about? Then why didn't he get deplatformed in 2016? Or during the midterms? Why now...a year before the next election? Do you honestly believe that Jones getting pulled from Youtube is a liberal conspiracy?

You realize you've been getting mocked since this thread began, right?

Imagine being an unironic Jonesfaggot who thinks Youtube pulling his content is indicative of a major conspiracy.

Again, here is more your speed

Because you shareblue shitheads started data mining who trump voters liked. Every single one has been attacked to silence them. Stop acting dumb, it's not hard to put together.
0/10 you shills are better off not even trying to defend this

>this is the spokesperson for modern conservatives
wew

So the deep state waiting for technology 30 years later, to allow for the internet, to THEN pull Jones from a single platform in an effort to "censor" him?

0/10 back to the shareblue discord, commie

I'm not that other guy, but I'll put you on the right track: read about internet activity at Sandy Hook Elementary.

explain how

>muh shareblue data mining conspiracy
haha shareblue now? You're fucking with me, you're getting for (you)s now.

0/10

AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH

Attached: alex jones going super saiyan.webm (494x360, 963K)

>let me put you on the right track with some infographic talking points backed by nothing
Why don't you source me something, faggot? It's almost like your conspiracy theory doesn't hold up to basic scrutiny or something?

because the media being wrong about "mobile weapons labs" does not mean Alex Jones is then correct. You're just whatabouting hard.

I didn't realize super deluxe shitcanned all his videos, wonder what he did to piss them off.
youtube.com/watch?v=RAplLNvvAVk

I can't but that doesn't mean I'm wrong incel, have sex lol

This isn't me
this is me

ARRRRRHHHGGGGG I CAN'T ARGUE!!!

Nicolas Cage.

Is anyone going to post that ebin Sandy Hook conspiracy #CONFIRMED info to btfo all the shareblue, tranny, resetera libtards in this thread?

>literally did not happen
Maybe you get your news from InfoWars like the retard you are.

Still waiting for that epic Sandy Hook conspiracy proof, it must be out there!

No you can't argue, and this is the last response you get from me, shill. Your posts are obvious in every thread and the agitation and demoralization attempts fail.

Attached: 1488812454670.png (601x600, 184K)

>using a meme from 2016
I'm still waiting for you to source literally anything in that dissonant fucking head of yours, that Sandy Hook was an elaborate false flag. I know that being unable to prove a set of beliefs is like physical pain to the unintelligent but can you give me ANYTHING?

any day now...

Kind of hate myself for loving this song so much. There are some legit moments in there where I can pretend it's not a parody and it's actually some self aware indie artist railing against the clown world

web.archive.org/web/*/https://newtown.k12.ct.us/~sh

Go watch his disposition on Sandy Hook and then come back and talk

The guy is a shameless hack who appeals to nutjobs to sell shitty merchandise

I don't speak /x/nigger, can you explain how this is an argument? Use small words, I'm not as smart as you.

Nobody understands what this argument is...that the web traffic at the school, somehow is a smoking gun that proves they faked killing all those kids? What? You've been asked to explain how using the WayBackMachine somehow changes or provides anything.

For some reason, the school website had zero activity between 2008-2012.

Attached: Sandy Hook Internet Activity.png (1719x532, 72K)

user, that graph isn't "absolutely no internet activity", it's "activity based on key word searches", of what you search. You're baiting me right? This is all you got?

>Nobody understands what this argument is...
I'm just saying it's strange that the school website's activity completely freezes for 4 years and then there's a mass shooting. Some time passes, and then the website starts displaying normal activity again.

Let's assume there was no internet activity. How does that correlate to "massive, government-run conspiracy to fake a school shooting"?

You must see how that's a jump, right?

Okay, then explain the gap from 2008-2012. Why is there a gap?

Where there's smoke, there's fire. Has your school's website ever had a 4 year dormant period?

9/11?

But it's not "no internet activity", so not sure why you keep making that claim. the WayBackMachine doesn't measure lack-of activity, it measures keyword search history over time.

Why would they turn the internet off for 4 years? I don't get you fucking logic, kids still have Ipads and computers there. Are you saying they turned off the wifi, to plan a fake shooting over 4 years?

Literally so what? If we start censoring people of the internet for being self-interested we are all going to be gone tomorrow. Before you know it the only interests that will remain are those that align with the corporations that own the platforms which dominate the net. How is that better than you having to exercise your critical thinking skills for a couple minutes to judge the content you are presented with on its own merits and decide if you want to consume it or not?

I was talking about the elitist attitude of the user I was replying to.

The only source you have that the internet was "turned off" for 4 years, is the WayBackMachine that doesn't even register complete lack of activity in their algorithm it only measures keyword searches.

So again, you really have no proof? Do you have any statements made by teachers that lead to a testimony of the internet being turned off for a long period of time? Do you have the actual wifi data from the fucking school? Do you have ANYTHING?

You're not explaining the gap. Explain the gap, faggot.

I explained your bad premise here: And there are at least a thousand better examples to explain why they have limited to no internet activity, BEFORE you reach "elaborate government false flag to pretend kids were shot". Are you on the spectrum?

>it only measures keyword searches
4 years of fucking nothing. Explain it.

>And there are at least a thousand better examples to explain why they have limited to no internet activity
Such as?

4 years of fucking nothing...of that specific data entry and parameter. Are you actually retarded? It doesn't measure "no activity", it measures keyword searches over time. The WayBackMachine has no way of telling or computing the complete lack of any/all keyword searches between that time.

You don't even know what its algorithm fucking does, Jesus Christ I'm talking to morons. You're truly a moron. I hope you kill yourself and rid the gene pool.

LITERALLY ANYTHING AT ALL.

*should have said, rid US of your genes in the gene pool

Name 1 thing if you think you're so smart, faggot.

>The WayBackMachine has no way of telling or computing the complete lack of any/all keyword searches between that time.
Why was there a lack of keyword searches in the first place, you fucking imbecile?

bad wifi coverage to make longitudinal assessment hard for a decade's old algorithm to compute activity over time?

No, you're right...it's logical to just jump to a faked school shooting. What am I thinking? It doesn't even matter that the time of the lack of activity, wasn't even when the shooting happened. But they are related user, because my feefees tell me so.

Why was there a lack of keyword searches in bumblefuck nowhere in the early 2000s at an elementary school that probably couldn't afford a lot of computers? Gee, retardo.

Imagine calling anyone else an imbecile, you're certifiably insane.

>longitudinal assessment
lmao you don't know what you're talking about

orange man bad

Attached: 1234.jpg (750x1000, 87K)

merriam-webster.com/dictionary/longitudinal
This would be what you would call a graph made by the WayBackMachine, my schizoid friend; since it's keyword search rates over time.

>early 2000s
Come on man, this is web 2.0 era. You really think teachers didn't have smartphones in 2010? 2011? 2012?

Just call it a fucking bar graph like a normal person

>smartphones in an elementary school, in 2008
It's far more logical to assume that they had poor reception where the school was located and therefore hard data for the WayBackMachine is inconclusive or incomplete. I'm sorry you're a hair away from a schizoid panic and jump to elaborate conspiracies but this can be easily handwaved as "bad wifi for longterm data". Even if you were correct, how are you linking it to the shooting? In what feasible way does that correlate?

Do you have anything else? Next?

>It's far more logical to assume that they had poor reception
What makes it illogical to think teachers has smartphones in 2008? 2009? 2010? 2011? 2012? Seriously, I want you to tell me I'm insane for suggesting teachers at the school might have had smartphones during this timeframe.

>What makes it illogical to think teachers has smartphones in 2008? 2009? 2010? 2011? 2012?
That's not what is being criticized as illogical and you know this. But jumping to "there is intentional internet blackout years before an elaborate false flag, ON PURPOSE" is completely illogical to the point of certifiably mentally ill. So then your argument is that an elementary school in the middle of nowhere, has the budget (in early 2008, when the "blackout" began) to afford smartphones for the what...ten teachers who worked there? Or the students? Is it for their computer classes?
> I want you to tell me I'm insane for suggesting teachers at the school might have had smartphones during this timeframe.
No, you're insane for thinking that using a fucking WayBackMachine is somehow hard evidence of a false flag shooting.

Zoomers dont remember early smartphones. I remember the first time i saw an iphone in person because it was such a game changing device. But zoomers have just always had them around.

Kevin Spacey

>has the budget (in early 2008, when the "blackout" began) to afford smartphones
You you seriously think schools pay for teachers' smartphones? How old are you?

You aren't addressing the largest points. How is this indicative of a conspiracy? HOW? Tell me HOW?

Okay, if you're at least willing to admit that teachers might have had smartphones during that timeframe, then don't you think it's strange how there isn't a single keyword search on the Wayback Machine between 2008-2012? Not a single one.

>Alex Jones was in A Scanner Darkly
>he was taken away by the government
>predictive programing

youtube.com/watch?v=EN_VBc98dzg

Kevin Spacey.

Again, that's not what the WayBackMachine measures, it measures parameters of single keyword searches. I'll say again; why can't you entertain that the algorithm used for the WayBackMachine, is unable to accurately fill gaps for every bumblefuck wifi connection especially in the early 2000s? And again again; how would any internet blackout years before the shooting, somehow correlate to the conspiracy of the false flag being true?

This is tiresome, you don't have any facts or real information for me. You know this.

Christian Bale

Attached: 1536948179719.jpg (820x430, 59K)

>early 2000s
You keep saying that when you're objectively wrong. There's a huge fucking difference between the Internet in 2001 and 2009.

2008 is early 2000s, you aren't addressing anything I said. Which is typical of you fucking retards.

Alex Jones is a conman trying to sell snakeoil to impressionable social outcasts. Also he should be in prison for inciting harassment towards the parents of sandy hook victims

>2008 is early 2000s
lmao and you're calling ME insane.

Attached: 5983765839.png (645x729, 91K)

i unironically love that song. Just me ?

Attached: 7L8UCjX.png (423x710, 420K)

>alternative news source
Oh, yes, right - You mean he's a total liar.

Attached: man-jacking-off.jpg (176x225, 10K)

Why are you inciting harassment towards someone online?

Life must be very frustrating for you

kino

youtube.com/watch?v=x-CrNlilZho

Attached: 1530197291905.jpg (1824x1368, 497K)

You aren't addressing anything.

Every major news outlet actively and knowingly lying about Iraq having W.O.M.D and killing millions in the process is infinitely worse yet they all got away with it fine with a slap on the wrist without even apologising.
A.J got bad Intel on a suspicious situation and later retracted and apologised yet he gets feed through the meat grinder. Really makes me think

I'm just pointing out how everyone reading this can see you're a retard who thinks 2008 is somehow part of the early 2000s.

>MUH WHATABOUT
Alex has literally never retracted his statements on Sandy Hook. Try again.

JUST

Christian Bale

Israel and Mossad gave us the falsified info about the WMDs, by the way. So much for "our greatest ally."

Well, it is. But you still haven't answered anything. Really rattles my brain balls that you can't actually argue anything, in good faith.

Just stop, user. You don't have anything.

So basically we have reached the point where you pretty much admit you don't have any evidence to back up that Sandy Hook was a false flag, so you're obsessing over semantic points to deflect?

Gotcha, typical /x/nigger behavior I guess. You'll disappear from the thread with the closing statement of "look into it yourself bruh".

>Well, it is
How can anyone believe anything that you say when you can't logically deduce that 2008 is not part of the early 2000s? That's literally the dumbest thing I've ever heard. There's the early 2000s, the mid 2000s, and the late 2000s.

What brought you to the conclusion that 2008 was part of the early 2000s? Was it Occam's Razor? Was it your superior logic and reasoning? Is it your hubris and inability to admit when you make a mistake?

Police officers have been murdered and millions of dollars of damage to public property has been done by blacks after news outlets deliberately misreported incidents where blacks got shot by police and categorized them as racially motivated executions. Blacks rioted and people died as a result. You don't perceive any double standard there?

Explain the gap if you're so smart.

Yes ye has. He has literally said dozens of times that was wrong about Sandy Hook

It's frustrating that you're either extremely ill or baiting to the point where you're just deflecting now and not answering literally anything I said.

You don't have any hard evidence that Sandy Hook is a false flag. You haven't fucking produced ANYTHING. I want you to understand this, the next time you leave /x/ and get btfo again, as you often do.

>You haven't fucking produced ANYTHING
I have and you're just too stupid to see it

Are there seriously people posting here who unironically get mad at Alex Jones? Lmao what the fuck

Attached: 1553721082297.jpg (944x944, 589K)

You posted keysearch results from the WayBackMachine and then explained absolutely nothing. You didn't explain how a possible "internet blackout" years before the shooting even occurred, somehow supports the belief that it was a false flag.

Fucking Christ, has this all been for (you)s? Or are you mentally ill?

>You didn't explain how a possible "internet blackout" years before the shooting even occurred
And during the shooting. And after the shooting. It's a government website, friendo.

we are seeing the rise of fanatical mainstreamists who advocate for censorship and violence against anyone who diverges from the prescribed government/corporate narratives.

AKA the NPC

Attached: 153964934892.png (636x773, 8K)

TheWayBackMachine is not a government website. Look, this is a really easy question. Explain to me how there being a blackout years before the shooting, somehow proves there was a false flag operation?

Is this all you even have?

i do too user

Attached: 1455048347456.png (210x229, 4K)

The Sandy Hook website is a government website, retard.

>the town's official website is a .gov
So is literally every city/town/hamlet's official page you fucking retard. How does that change anything?

>He doesn't know

why you gotta lie
youtube.com/watch?v=-5yh2HcIlkU the first 5 min

Every city in the fucking country has an official .gov page. I'm not even sure what you think your argument is anymore. It's beyond autismo logic at this point.

And Alex Jones pointed out it was a lie and cited the 1999 CIA and UN reports stating there were no wmds in Iraq.

Do you know what the General Services Administration is?

>fake apologizes
>basically backtracks his entire "apology" by defending his positions later on in the podcast that he was justified in thinking Sandy Hook was a false flag
This doesn't count as an open apology, user. Why doesn't he go on television and say it?

Alex Jones should have been banned years ago for his fucking shilling of snake oil and absolutely ridiculous conflict of interest in criticizing modern medicine and vaccines then shilling his own bullshit.

I hate alex jones.

But if you dont realize that the reason they are doing this to him now is because of the US election and his sway in that then you're probably a fucking idiot.

Do you? Look, I'm about to tap out. Are you going to actually link any of these fucking threads of yours or just string me along on this wild autistic goose chase of bread crumbs like that episode of Always Sunny with Charlie in the mailroom?

Yes.

FUCKING EXACTLY

FUCKING 100% EXACTLY

REMEMBER THESE PEOPLE WHO WANT ALEX JONES SHUT DOWN ARE THE SAME FAGGOTS WHO PROMOTE NEWS NETWORKS THAT OUTRIGHT LIED ABOUT COPS, OUTRIGHT LIED ABOUT ZIMMERMAN. THEY FUCKING CAUSE MILLIONS IN DAMAGES, BLACKS RUNNING DOWN THE STREETS BURNING DOWN STORES AND LOOKING FOR WHITES TO KILL, MONTHS OF FOOTAGE OF BLACKS SCREAMING AT COPS EVERY SINGLE NIGHT THAT THEY WOULD RAPE THEIR FAMILIES WHILE NEWS MEDIA REPORTED "peaceful protests".

They don't give a fuck about consequences when it's the other side. All they care about is their activism.

>wild autistic goose chase of bread crumbs
That's what life is. It's why religion exists.

>ZIMMERMAN
youtube.com/watch?v=CTicK_LTCEE
good times, good times

That's great and all...it's still a whatabout and not the topic of discussion.

>does thing
>later says thing was wrong
>defends why he thought thing was fake at that time
>still said he was wrong

>not the topic of discussion
Yes it is, but you're too stupid to see the parallels. You hide behind the shield of "it's still a whatabout" instead of recognizing the similarities.

Is this the schizo general?

Attached: chemtrail[1].png (300x300, 165K)

Or you know, it is a whatabout? Keep seething now, Alex Jones is still retarded and wrong about everything he says.

>murder is bad
>I have the principle that murderers should be arrested
>this particular murderer should be arrested
>these serial killers other there? Oh no, they're fine. No problem there. But this guy, he is a menace and for the public good we need to arrest him.
>Stop with your whataboutism by bringing-up those serial killers!!!!!!
excuse me if I don't believe that you are arguing in good faith regarding the principles that you state that you believe in

>whatabout
Have you ever heard of something called precedent?

What does any of this have to do with the fact that Sandy Hook isn't a false flag?

Moving the goalposts

Have you? Better yet, have you ever heard of the word "deflection" schizoid bugman?

Thats real retarded, sir..

I don't think you know how words work, that's what YOU are doing. Holy shit, what is going on with you? The ENTIRE point has been Sandy Hook.

who cares. newsmedia distorting and outright lying, causing deaths in the process, is much more objectionable and important than the opinions of one man. get over it

Have you ever heard of the word "projection" schizoid bugman?

Cool...but how does that prove Sandy Hook is a false flag?

>The ENTIRE point has been Sandy Hook.
No, it's been about honesty in the media and deplatforming people and censorship

Maybe if you were able to formulate a coherent argument instead of deflecting any criticism of Jones as
>WELL UHH DA MEDIA LIES AND PEOPLE DIE MAN YOU KNOW? LIKE, IRAQ AND STUFF
like a literal fucking faggot, then I'd take you seriously.

Attached: 457483536.jpg (400x400, 91K)

get over it leftist faggot

So it's okay if Alex Jones is dishonest and spreading disinfo because other media outlets do it too? That's the hill you want to die on? Also and I'll repeat this since you probably are in the midst of getting your pills from your handler; being removed from a private website is not "censorship". Remember when you basically tried to say that the nefarious "they" out to get him, were waiting for 30 years for the technology to catch up?

>everyone is gangstalking me
Calm down psycho

Alex Jones is a pedophile

The voices in my head tell me to do stuff, should I listen to them?

>only leftists think Sandy Hook wasn't a conspiracy

youtube.com/watch?v=LSGZ4Hkdyg4

absolute kino

before he went full israel shill

why does /x/ and /pol/ love to post this literal propagandist and spy?

>So it's okay if Alex Jones is dishonest and spreading disinfo because other media outlets do it too?
it's not "okay." it's just nowhere near as outrageous as the latter. which you would understand, were you a seriously concerned person

they're the only ones who think it matters if people do think it was, yeah

which is still a whatabout. Why can't you talk about Alex by himself without deflecting? Is that possible for you and your drug-addled frontal lobe?

>being removed from a private website is not "censorship"
It is when they aren't held accountable for the content published on their platform

Holy fuck you got called out.

Nice attempt to recover though. Its going very well.

You don't honestly believe that, right?

>Holy fuck you got called out
No? I feel like you fundamentally don't understand what a whatabout is.

because alex jones doesn't matter. he's a clown, propped up by establishment media as a bogeyman for the public to hate instead of them

>It is when they aren't held accountable for the content published on their platform
Except they are? Again, I don't know why this is difficult logic; you aren't owed the services or labor of a private company you AGREE to the terms and conditions of the platforms they offer. They can refuse to host you for any reason. It's not the legal definition of censorship, which is government censorship.

Can this thread please be moved to /x/ for shit's sake? This is annoying.

>everyone who replies to you is the same person
Take your meds.

Next you will start making up insane hullicinations about how blacks are murdered by police for no reason and judges let these cops off because of a white supremacist conspiracy...

We're in an Alex Jones thread you stupid tard.

Are you implying that our government has a nice relationship with minorities and that there are no instances of blacks being discriminated against by law enforcement or wrongfully murdered?

>Except they are?
Jesus Christ, you type like a fucking woman.

cnbc.com/2019/06/19/reactions-to-sen-hawleys-bill-that-would-overturn-section-230-of-cca.html

>“This bill forces platforms to make an impossible choice: either host reprehensible, but First Amendment protected speech, or lose legal protections that allow them to moderate illegal content like human trafficking and violent extremism,” said Michael Beckerman, president and CEO of the Internet Association, in a statement. “That shouldn’t be a tradeoff.”

WOAH. Here he goes!

HAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHA

Holy shit.

yikes. You're mushy brain is all over the place tonight.

Are you implying that no black has ever been wrongfully murdered by police...in America?

Still doesn't change the fact that you aren't owed the platform of a private company. That part really seems to make you upset, I'm not sure why. It's to protect small and large businesses from unlawful control.

Where do these white people meet to conspire about these murders?

What are they putting in the jet fuel streams to manipulate our minds?

the only people who care about sandy hook conspiracy belief are those who can't bear the idea of anyone not accepting the mainstream narrative, and seeing it as a plot to infringe on civil liberties. said people tend to be leftists who support the mainstream narrative because it is used to further their antigun agenda. normal people don't care

Go back you stupid mutt /pol/tard.

Since the civil rights movement, the whole "it is a private company" argument goes out the window.

You cant choose your race. You cant choose your beliefs. Its a civil right to not be discriminated against.

>muh private company
You sound like an Ayn Rand-tier libertarian. Did you even read the article?

and? go hit the media's pinata some more

>Where do these white people meet to conspire about these murders?
Nobody said that, but are you honest to Christ saying that blacks have never been unlawfully targeted by law enforcement, in the United States?

"my feefees were hurt because you didn't like my politics" isn't grounds for a protected class, user.

and here comes the nigger crybaby bullshit. right on cue

Are the white people putting subliminal messages into our television to control you?
Do you some times hear white peoole voices in your head telling you to do things?

>Are the Jews putting subliminal messages into our television to control you?
Yes. The answer is yes.

How are the white people putting the chemtrails in such a formulaic pattern? Are the aliens helping them to murder blacks?
Can we confirm the reptillians are not involved?

they have. just as whites, hispanics and every other group has

Funny how not a single major gun reform bill was introduced after Sandy Hook. Look, you sound actually mentally ill. Normal people accept that the shooting happened, they don't go through these mental gymnastics of "REEE E YOU JUST SUPPORT DA MAINSTREAM NARRATIVE" because there is no evidence that it was a conspiracy or plot. It's sad that you have to shit on the victims in this way, real people who were ripped apart by tragedy.
>REEE WHO CARES, THEY WERE ALL CRISIS ACTORS YOU LEFTIST WITH THE ANTIGUN AGENDA REE REE REEE
these aren't the musings of the intelligent, user.

youtube.com/watch?v=LCEDaLMb6pY

Post more Jones kino

youtube.com/watch?v=2L_Aw1YW2p4

Attached: 1543848802053.jpg (2181x2989, 3.45M)

nor are "people i am distantly related to who died centuries ago were used as slaves" or "normal people don't approve of my sex life," yet niggers and faggots are both untouchable

>WAHHH MUH SLAVERY
>MUH OPPRESSION
>I CANT FIND BANDAGES THE SAME COLOR AS MY SKIN WHITEY FIX THIS
>IMMA GO RAPE A BITCH
wow. The plight of the negro is heartbreaking.

What a proud and majestic creature.

Actually 2 major bills were introduced after sandy hook. They both failed to pass. Why do you lie so much?

what is fucking wrong with you?

They barely had any traction, and it was only one that was considered, and failed. Quite a victory for the deep state there, huh? All that elaborate planning to fake the deaths of children who apparently don't exist, and they can't get a bill to pass?

you are psychotic. i never said i supported the conspiracy belief. i said it doesn't matter that some people do. nor did i ever "shit on the victims," or even mention them. you are such a blatantly dishonest piece of shit, but that's par for the course with leftists

Why does /pol/ only care about shit when it affects them personally? They're all about deregulation and letting corporations do whatever the fuck they want until someone gets banned from twitter for saying that minorities should be rounded up and gassed then all of a sudden they want to nationalize all social media sites.

race, sex and gender orientation are protected classes, bud. Why does it bother you that you can't deny someone service based on these basic principles?

not an argument

>you now remember that he was caught with shemale porn open on his phone on his own broadcast, with his own phone, on his own platform

Attached: 195.jpg (3380x3780, 1.02M)

So you admit you did know. Why did you outright lie then and said no bills were introduced? Why are you a liar? You just admitted to lying.

>you are psychotic
The fucking glorious irony. I'm going to bed, go cry some more about blacks, and the deep state and the ebul leftist media or whatever.

>They're all about deregulation and letting corporations do whatever the fuck they want
Nice strawman, faggot. /pol/ is NatSoc and encourages government regulation so long as it benefits white people.

Why does the deep state need to go through the proper channels to get a bill to pass but goes to great lengths to fake a school shooting?

Why do you rely on crazy conspiracy theoried about all white people conspiring together to murder innocent blacks?

>race, sex and gender orientation* are protected classes, bud
*with the exception of white males

Answer my question you fucking liar.

There was literally no immediate bill introduced to the floor after Sandy Hook, one was considered. It died before a vote even happened. So that's correct, no major gun legislation was ever introduced. Which is what he said.

enjoy your peaceful rest. it's provided to you by men with guns

I missed that memo where white males had their rights taken away. I'm sorry user, are you restricted from voting now? Can you not marry other whites?

>no major gun legislation was ever introduced
And never will be. SHALL. NOT. BE. INFRINGED.

Thanks, zoomer /x/nigger.

So then faking a school shooting was pointless?

Was it kino? Might give it a watch after work.

Why do you think everyone who argues with you is "muh leftists"? It makes you look weak and easily troubled.

whites are the only group legally allowed to be discriminated against. there is no protection for whites, as anything that benefits or protects whites is "racist" and "white supremacist," and is therefore evil and not allowed

I had to sit at the back of the bus yesterday and i literally burst down into tears.

Then i went to work and wanted to use the bathroom and water fountain but realized that the fountain i had to use was an extra meter away. Again, i just fell down into a ball and burst into tears because of how oppressed and violated i felt.

This is true suffering unknown by any other group of people.

>I believe in property rights when it advances my interests (banning wrongthinkers off youtube)
>I believe in the violation of property rights when it advances my interests (forcing people to hire and do business with people they do not wish to associate with)
always the same. You people believe in nothing but fucking over whites. That's the only core principle that you will consistently stick to. Everything else is up malleable according to the circumstances

The kikes can try their best, but they'll never take our guns

because leftists generally oppose everything i believe in

thealexjonesprisonplanet.bandcamp.com/album/super-heavy-galactic-stuff

Attached: prisonplanet.jpg (1200x1200, 613K)

master/slave morality

>whites are the only group legally allowed to be discriminated against
fucking kek, sure thing retard. I'm out.

Attached: 1558220592694.jpg (560x564, 59K)

concession accepted

user, I don't think race/gender/sex/religious affiliation and gender are grounds to deny anyone service and participation in the economy. I think there are very legitimate reasons outside of that to deny someone a service/labor. For instance, if I host a platform and I don't like your content, I am within my rights to deplatform you. Your political opinions are not a protected class. As long as I'm not denying you service because of those very simple guidelines, I'm free to discriminate. Youtube can ban leftwing and rightwing youtube faggots, I wouldn't care. That doesn't make you a protected class. "Having an opinion on something" isn't recognized by the government.

>Your political opinions are not a protected class
they literally are. it's called the 1st amendment

>if I beat you into a ridiculous submission by being as autistic as possible, I win
The whole thread can see you.

No...the First Amendment says the government can not stop you from your freeze peach, or jail you for opinions or censor you. That doesn't mean you have a protected class because of your political opinions. You're retarded. Youtube deplatforming you isn't a breach of your 1st Amendment and no SC would ever rule that way.

no, i win because you have no argument and gave up. you can go now

Why do so many /pol/cucks have no idea what our Amendments even say?

feel free to prove him wrong faggot

>t. underage

>there is no protection for whites and you can legally discriminate against whites abloo abloo
>this is a fact, this is actually happening in the US

You have no idea what you are talking about. I love Alex Jones and I think he was unfairly targeted. But youtube has every right to de platform him.

AJ has the right under the first amendment to speak. And he does speak. He has 3 websites that he pays for so that he can speak. If the government were to take those websites from him, then it would be a first amendment issue. But he was a client to youtube. And a business is allowed to discriminate against thwir clients unless they fall under a protected class outlined in the civil rights act or one of the 3 amendments to it. This has nothing to do with the bill of rights and actually stems from congress' very broad right to regulate commerce between the states.

He doesn't care, user. This is the new calling card of /pol/niggers the "muh censorship" card.

Actually as somebody who works EMS in CT the ambulance thing is complete bullshit. I know several people who responded that day and were part of the triage there. We actually talked about it in class as part of our training on the SMARTriage system.
The fishy thing was that only pistols were used. He didn't even touch the rifles in the trunk.

all the research and all the infrastructure that makes youtube possible was publicly funded. And given that youtube is a natural monopoly, it can be considered a public space. Fuck your bullshit, bad-faith 'muh private property' arguments. When politically incorrect people build their own platforms, you fudge-packers immediately run to government trying to get them shut down.

Attached: you-didnt-build-that.jpg (640x360, 34K)

>it can be considered a public space
That's your own fault for believing that, since it isn't. Fucking idiot.
>you fudge-packers immediately run to government trying to get them shut down.
I personally don't. Alex Jones still has a website, friendo. Nothing has changed. I'm sorry you're some poorfag who can't just spend 10 dollars a month making your own stormnig blogs or some shit.

see go suck corporate cock some more

if I own a business, why can't I discriminate based on race? Because it hurts their fee-fees? Just because you simply adore Jamal, doesn't mean that I should be legally obligated to act the same way.

Ok commie.

Youtube isn't a public space though, no amount of crying will change that very real and concrete fact that it is a private platform. You know what is a public space? Libraries on State/Federal property, public areas...you know, places where freeze peach is literally never shut down in?

>it isn't
it is
suck (((ayn rand's))) cock in hell

Because a black traveling salesman was denied a hotel room in georgia in the 1950s. Read a fucking book moron. Its called the civil rights act.

I guess jannies banning you for shitposting is a violation of the first amendment. SEE YOU IN THE SUPREME COURT JANNIES

>why can't I discriminate based on race?
Because how is that fair grounds for participation in an economy and equal access to opportunity? The government decided on a very short list of reasons why you can't deny someone service. If you somehow still sperg over the immense liberal control you have over your private business, than you're the problem.

user, Youtube is quite literally not a public space.

Nicolas Cage with Tom Cruise Tropic Thunder tier prosthetics. You know this would work.

Because your race you don't choose, your sex you don't choose, your religious affiliation you shouldn't have to pit against shop owners and neither should you have to battle for access to a service because of your gender.

so it's unacceptable for a private business to refuse a person due to their race, but acceptable for another to refuse millions due to their political views. got it

>neither should you have to battle for access to a service because of your gender
why?

Because having a political opinion, is not recognized by the government as grounds for a protected class. You can't choose your race, user.

I dont agree with the civil rights act. I beleive that congresa has fully perverted the interstate commerce clause and rhe civil rights act is in the top 10 of those perversions. But you asked why you cant deny niggers commerce. And that is the answer.

Because how is that equal opportunity under the law?

yet it functions as one and is used as one by billions

>refuse millions due to their political views
funny how that's not fucking happening you literal baby.

>You can't choose your race, user
not an argument

then it's time for you tranny homos to stop misusing the term gender.

How is it not? Why should you get to deny someone service based on factors they can't change? That's not equal opportunity for success under the law.

user, I don't give a shit how it "functions" it isn't a public space. Seethe more, retard.

>You can't choose your race, user.
Not according to leftists

I'm neither a tranny nor a homo, but you /pol/types literally don't know the textbook definitions between biological sex and gender orientation.

people are not entitled to anything because of their gender or race. if i don't want niggers in my business, they should go elsewhere

black people exist and didn't choose to be black therefore the government has a right to force me to hire them or provide goods/services to them? Doesn't really follow.

It is

>leftists leftists leftists leftists
Will you give it a fucking rest already?

Equal access to service is not ENTITLEMENT to service you fucking tardling.

Back to the raid discord you faggot

What are you even talking about?

>"force" to hire
Must be hard, to get paid subsidies by the government to hire blacks...sure is tough, getting free money.

0/10 tranny

Why is it called civil rights act? Shouldn't it be animal rights act, seeing as niggers aren't people?

if it is guaranteed and enforced by the state, it is an entitlement

Concepts of transrace and that race is actually culture and not biology

>I fundamentally don't understand what "private company" is or means
user, go to sleep.

doesn't address my point. Why must I be forced to associate with blacks if I do not wish to? You said because they were born black and didn't choose to be black. I don't see how that justifies the government violating my right of voluntary association

That's not what entitlement is, holy shit what happened to your fucking head? It's entitlement if ONLY a select demographic have ACCESS to services and goods. So if ONLY women, blacks and gays were allowed to shop or buy groceries, sure. That's an entitlement, an entitlement is something that a select group is offered either outside or above a basic majority.

You have no clue what you are fucking talking about and its sad.

To all the shills;

Alex jones and Yea Forums created the zeitgeist that got Trump elected. These platforms didn't ban him because of hateful language. They got rid of him because they don't want a repeat of 2016.

These platforms control the internet, they are oligopolies. Censoring free political action is dangerous.

Once they're done with him we're next.

Then move to some Islamic State or kill yourself? I don't know what to tell you. Free societies are going to have people you don't like also existing in them. Put on some big boy pants and cope. Are you going to not associate with anyone even remotely black genetically?

I can't wait for the FOIA showing feds using slurs left and right on Yea Forums

>Alex jones and Yea Forums created the zeitgeist that got Trump elected
Imagine thinking this.

>doesn't understand it's operating basis

This was a such a bizarre thing to say and made it clear how little respect Obama had for smaller communities, smaller business, and that he only truly valued cities and mega-corps.

an entitlement is something open to everyone, like welfare or in some countries healthcare

Youtube is still owned by a private company and is therefore not a public space, keep coping retard.

them I guess shareblue can leave

oh dear! OK, user. You fought like an angry racoon. Well done.

Attached: mJGfv.jpg (352x473, 55K)

>Years of being ignored and forgotten by the fed had nothing to do with it
>It was all Alex and fucking Yea Forums

>an entitlement is something open to everyone
that's not what entitlement means...

>you fudge-packers immediately run to government trying to get them shut down
Examples please?

Lol youtube and google are getting regulated by the govt and you can't stop it

Attached: 1557126322434.png (634x153, 37K)

stop being disingenuous in the use of the word., switching between literary use vs govt program use

Christian bakers

that's exactly what it means in the civic sense

How where they shut down?

By getting fined into bankruptcy you dolt

Maybe they should have formed a union then

Why? Is he dead?