Why is this guy never in the conversation when talking about the greatest directors?
Why is this guy never in the conversation when talking about the greatest directors?
Because he's a filthy dago
too many overrated gangster movies
his other works from the 70s and 80s are much better
He's literally the first one listened if you google greatest directors
he's not jewish
Because he's mediocre at best. He still gets named by plebs though.
Because he's entry level and he made a lot more bad shit than good.
TOO EXCITABLE
LAY OFF THE ESPRESSOS MARTY
>you know what my wife is doing up there?
because hes not michael haneke
HOW THE HELL DID RAIMI GET AWAY WITH THIS SCENE
TRULY IT WAS A DIFFERENT TIME
he knows most brainlets won't understand his films so he does what he wants
IS HE REAL Yea Forums?
>Taxi Driver
>Raging Bull
>After Hours
>Goodfellas
>King of Comedy
>Wolf of Wall Street
>Mean Streets
>Aviator
yeah, i'm thinking he's the greatest living director
Wolf of Wall Street sucks, it's pleb shit that celebrates hedonism and celebrity. Completely different from King of Comedy and Taxi Driver, can't believe you'd enjoy both if you actually understand them.
only cameronfags would disagree
>Why is this guy never in the conversation when talking about the greatest directors?
>Scorsese was raised in a devoutly Catholic environment.
He'll always be based as fuck in my mind. I remember when he was making Wolf of Wallstreet, and a group of metrosexual ((current year)) studio execs didn't like how much smoking was in his movie, and he just said
>"People smoke."
and left it all in anyway, no fucks given
if you think wolf of wall street celebrates degeneracy you didn't get the point of the movie pleb
CAPE FEAR IS PEAK
THE SCORSESE/DENIRO THEATERVERSE
THE VIRGIN TRAVIS
THE CHAD MAX
he is. Top 10 but not top 5.
>Read Armond White poseur
thanks for proving me right
gangster films are boring
>no Silence
Shit list mate.
Go consume Roger Ebert like you consume other media
Ebert is the same kind of shit you read, fuck off.
>Roger Ebert
>Armond White
>same
>it’s ok for me to blindly follow a critics opinions because he’s a contrarian
People talked about him too much and thus his name lost flavour
Scorcese really does nothing significant to challenge the worldview put forward, taken almost verbatim from the book. Vague moralising doesn't change that.
contrarian is a word used to shut down any discussion outside of the mainstream, you're the consuming basedboy here
His contrarianism has nothing to do with it, dumbass. Your logic is that it's somehow less stupid to blindly consume someone's opinion because, in your own all-too-obvious logic and words, it's opinion that falls "outside of the mainstream". In reality, you're still mindlessly parroting opinions, regardless of how contrarian they may or may not be.
I LITERALLY LISTEN TO NO ONE AND HAVE NEVER PARROTED AN OPINION IN MY LIFE BUT ARMOND IS STILL AMUSING
he is. he's widely considered among the greatest living directors, and taxi driver, raging bull, and goodfellas are considered among the greatest films of all time and regularly make top 100 lists.
what's your point mouth breather