Post bad CGI

youtube.com/watch?v=z-zy2m_7FeQ

Attached: xorigins-newclaws.gif (375x211, 744K)

Attached: deepfake.webm (1422x600, 2.94M)

1080P and 4K really ruin some movies. Especially with stunt doubles.

it's like they didn't even try

BP is objectively better technologically looking than Titanic, but the Titanic clip is far more forgivable as it's application makes way more sense.

kek, head like a brainlet wojak meme

wtf is this? 90s deepfake?

MOTHERFUCKER ARE YA OUTTA YO DAMN MIND

Attached: blade deacon frost CGI.webm (1076x605, 2.96M)

except BP was made 20 years after Titanic

Damn, some mother fuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill

Pretty sure it's not from the actual movie, I would have fucking noticed.

this was before post, r-right?

>deepfake.webm

lmao

Attached: 1543172218384.webm (1280x532, 2.8M)

youtu.be/5yThg2JWtqM?t=124

Titanic is better, BP messed up shadows. Rhino's shadow is short, meaning the light is up above it, then there is some scrap of metal with very long shadow, so it's like light went down a lot. Titanic, despite poorly made humans, still keeps consistent shadows. Check small ladder on the left.

Attached: DDB62BF85E854F4EB37F874288DD34C2.jpg (500x533, 35K)

there were a lot of movies released in 2005 that were never intended to be seen in HD

Attached: 44sincity.jpg (2124x3000, 1.3M)

mouse cope

Oh god. How come I didn't see that on big screen ?

This doesn't look so bad, the one where he jumps from the car is far worse

Attached: doomsday amazing cgi.webm (940x390, 2.89M)

better blood and it would look awesome tho

why do this? How is this better than getting a dubbed lookalike or just using makeup?

Attached: 1529870049581.jpg (399x400, 13K)

Agent 47 looks old

What the fuck is Disney's problem?

kino

200lb guy has enough inertia and weight to offset the balance of like a 1000lb rhino?

Yes, better cgi would made this bad cgi look better

CGI is bad but the idea of a half scorpion half man monster was really stupid and silly

How the hell would that stop the ship from sinking? It would've already taken on too much water when it was split and it wouldn't magically stick together when brought back.

Are his claws electrified?

Every fuck'r thinks they are an art'st cause they go into finished movies and lower the visual data quality as much as they can.
They even have the balls to claim they are editors.

Attached: cua0a9t1zrdwifrg12p3.jpg (672x403, 26K)

They're greedy af.

no, just really really sharp

What was the purpose of this? We already know she did her own "stunts" on that movie and was constantly in the water. She couldn't run down a hallway for one shot?

carnage

The composition and lighting of the things in frame are actually pretty good; the problem here is Hack Snyder and his fucking eyesore interpretation of how to represent these DBZ - style fights where a heavy blow sends the combatants flying a hundred feet.
Man of Steel has the exact same fucking problem.

All movies are played in big movie theaters and in 2005 most projectors were still film.
No excuses.

Attached: 1551755928048.jpg (700x467, 67K)

Why can't they do weight in any of these movies? Everybody is always weightless, it would be so much more convincing if they just added some mass to this stuff

Thor and Loki weigh 3 times more than they “look” also he’s a class 100+.

I'M NOT GONNA SAY IT, BUT I'M THINKING IT

>bad cgi
>posts absolute kino

Attached: ke747.gif (640x360, 1.19M)

You guys got to remember, it was a different time.

Is this Killer Croc?

I fail to see the problem here, what am I supposed to notice ?

not forgetting the rhino already swiped him and he bounced off but then swung on the horn and halted the rhino in its tracts

It may be the fact that all that water spraying down the hallway makes it more dangerous than just lingering in cold water while a heated towel waits for you on the shore - there's a point where their insurer steps in and says "no, we won't cover that" so they have to use doubles.

>Post bad CGI

Two Words: Babylon 5

To be fair though, the show was on a miniscule budget and for the cost of an Amiga 2000, genlock and a lot of CPU time, it came out pretty good considering.

>that "choir"
much worse than the CGI

Well that's strange. When it first came out I thought it looked like ass because it was trying to do blood effects, but now blood effects have come so fucking far that to me it no longer looks anything like other realistic blood effects and instead looks like it's taken straight form a stylised comic or cartoon, which suddenly makes it way better because it's a comic book movie. It's way better than the CGI fight where Blade's bouncing around, at least.

legitimately looks like a video game
I'm not even one of those "hurr looks like a vidya" faggots, that genuinely looks like fallout 4 or something

Manchild retards will still pay for it, so why bother? Reminder that Black Panther was nominated for best CGI.

This is fucking kino, go fuckyourself tard

>a 1000lb rhino
That would be a baby, this one is around 3 tons imo.

>camera reflected in his sunglasses

Attached: holeesit.png (389x323, 179K)

babylon 5 is one of the best shows existing if you like science fiction but yes the CGI on this 30 year old show looks bad today.

Attached: nasa-fake-earth.jpg (678x678, 97K)

based retard

it was alright for a first attempt in 2006

still love this moment

>Every marvel movie.
Exaggeration of course. Most Marvel movies have pretty damn good CGI, Black Panther looked pretty shitty though.

Attached: shit to live for.webm (1920x800, 2.98M)

My thoughts exactly, Blade.

This webm is based as fuck

That's a REALLY dangerous shot. As in not only would it risk either of them slipping and just banging their face, thus costing the production potentially millions in extra shooting costs while their broken nose is fixed, but would actually risk them DYING. All it would take is them falling behind and losing their footing when all that water comes rushing in, banging their head on those killer metal handrails, either braining them there and then or causing them to inhale a lungful of water and drown. It'd be especially dangerous to run on that dress and giant overcoat, I imagine, potentially tripping you or snagging anywhere.

Only Tom Cruise gets away with shooting such potentially lethal scenes by himself.

they are pretty bad, the most annoying are backgrounds, they look so off

that webm is cropped real close to the people, the actual shot is pulled way back so you arent focusing just on the people

The CGI there is terrible.

>Every Marvel movie
>implying the CGI in Iron Man and The Incredible Hulk was bad

Attached: versus-iron-man-vs-the-incredible-hulk.jpg (430x274, 51K)

>the cloud patterns are duplicated
But none of those cloud patterns are the same?

Attached: 1533566812745.webm (700x416, 1013K)

They are literally shiny things that he holds between his fingers. What's the point of animating that?

what the fuck

for every weak shot there's a dozen more you aren't noticing because they're well done

Are you guys serious? These are not from some video game?

Attached: 1498421828515.webm (1200x504, 2.85M)

youtube.com/watch?v=CvAXidAPTRM
0:09 to 0:15
impressive how it's the only case of bad cgi in the first LotR movie

Attached: snapshot(4).jpg (1920x1080, 341K)

>XXX: James Bond can't infiltrate the extreme sports-loving anarchist terrorists, so they get an extreme sport guy to do it, and he just barely saves the day because he's not trained for espionage
>XXX 2: the secret spy crew gets compromised and taken out by someone on the inside, so they need an outside man
>XXX 3: extreme sports people are simply superheroes who have been recruited into elite spy agencies for decades because their various skills AKA superpowers make them all superspy killing machines
Did Vin even remember what the original movie was about?

Iron Man 1 was fine, somewhere after Avengers 1 they just stopped giving a fuck

Attached: who framed james howlett.webm (1280x720, 713K)

Are you retarded?

He remembered he did stunts and was the cool hero.

>Iron Man 1 was fine
lol, this meme. The MCU has always been bad.

Attached: 1510009571659.gif (500x281, 1.81M)

Infinity War or Endgame are infinitely better in effects than Avengers 1 or AOU. Yes we've seen the Bruce Banner shot. It doesn't invalidate the 1500 good ones.

That's a legit deep fake effect

Attached: Air Force Fun.webm (1262x520, 2.23M)

absolutely terrible

looks like peter postwaithe

Attached: 1537940563122.webm (1920x800, 2.98M)

What's interesting about this is the blood looks terrible but there's more going on than the blood and it's surprisingly good

Attached: 1540101478612.webm (1920x1080, 2.93M)

He'd actually make a decent Professor X. Marvel should get him for when the X-Men show up in the MCU

Attached: totally there.webm (638x360, 669K)

No seriously aside the shit quality of the webm it's hard to notice anything "bad".

No, it was in one of the trailers.

Attached: 1537906519506.webm (1280x720, 2.78M)

>but there's more going on than the blood
You mean like the obvious stunt double at the beginning?

Oh I know, I'm just saying the effect in the movie for this is a legit deep fake, it's funny because people who make deepfakes for fun could do a better job than a multimillion dollar movie like this

why does leo look like he's taking a huge dump

I mean his body being split in two, idiot

Everything aside from the jump cuts looks pretty great desu, well choreographed.

Attached: 1556644290707.jpg (540x720, 33K)

bad greenscreen isn't bad cgi you fucking goobers.

It's all awful. All of it. I think your brain is mush at this point. You need a break from Disney, my friend. For your own sake.

That doesn't look particularly bad

Attached: 1403606568612.webm (1280x544, 2.15M)

Amazing show

Attached: Jax Teller Death Scene - Sons of Anarchy Ending - Full HD.webm (1280x720, 2.53M)

Attached: 1533942833914.jpg (1583x1323, 246K)

also the rubbery bad CG stunt doubles

ahhahahah oh what the fuck?

Why did Vin Diesel want Dwayne Johnson to be CGI'd so small? Was it part of his contract?

Stop whining.

Yeah sorry I meant this one

You wouldn't be able to spot 90% of the CG in one of those films. You've just got it in your head that you have to hate everything Marvel.

deep fakes are better

Attached: cage.webm (1280x720, 1.32M)

would be perfect if they removed some of the brighter reflections and toned it down a bit

>that's the last shot of your whole show

Winter Soldier is still my favorite Marvel movie and you know what? Minimal CGI. It was mostly used in the Hellicarier scenes but that's about it.

lel

Attached: sh1.webm (720x404, 287K)

Agreed. Makes it even more pathetic was my point. And that when CG was more basic, it was used in sparing and smarter ways.

T1000 for example is 25ish years old and is still top 10 best uses.

Attached: 1537846735277.webm (1280x532, 2.72M)

user... I have bad news

That's part of the fun

what do peope even see here

this stuff

Attached: soprano.gif (400x231, 465K)

Attached: snakes 3 enter the snake.webm (640x480, 527K)

That's just what they want you to think, user. You think the only CG that exists is the obvious bits you can see.

>that fucking neck

Attached: 1454491426871.jpg (544x841, 159K)

aerisfuneralfmv.webm

Attached: twilight babby.jpg (600x350, 26K)

Iconic kinography.

what the actual fuck?

The bad CGI is exposed due to the camera movement.

I have no recollection of this in the movie. Anybody got a link to the scene on YT?

Attached: 1369089264034.gif (302x329, 2.97M)

actress died
cgi proposed this as a solution, saying it'd look just fine
it didn't

Something I noticed just now, why the fuck did Blade not see Deacon recombining when he spun around?

>impressive how it's the only case of bad cgi in the first LotR movie
there are a few

Attached: lotr2.webm (1728x720, 1.77M)

who is this semen sommelier?

Oblivion physics

youtu.be/dRkXjAhaUk0?t=57

bitch ain't even 8 and she hates life, seems accurate

Post the horse scene from the Two Towers. You know what I'm talking about

>he’s a class 100+
capeshit was a mistake

Attached: GI Joe.gif (480x270, 3.47M)

Retard

You can't possibly make this character look not stupid.

this looks stylish tho

virgin detected

Is this Ghost Adventures?

is it possivle?

lmao people paid real money to watch this

Attached: lostsub.gif (358x202, 3.48M)

probably only time i got disgusted by CGI so much in a movie
even LotR has better CGI and it's older

Attached: the_hobbit_battle_of_five_armies_still_3.jpg (1296x730, 176K)

Attached: legolas.webm (1280x580, 2.65M)

Attached: 1422143299433.webm (720x304, 2.95M)

Attached: capeshit.webm (640x272, 2.2M)

t. nasa shill

kino

Attached: 1418863437183.webm (1920x800, 1.52M)

the Rock is a bit further behind because they are not face-to-face but side-by-side

I remember in the commentary, Jackson talking about how one day they would probably change Fellowship Gollum to Twin towers Gollum, I am glad they didn't because I still like the way it looks in each movie, but there are a couple of scenes here and there that I wish they touched up, like that one and when showing the Orcs armies around the end of RoK

>the best reviewed film of all time
-Rotten Tomatoes

Attached: 200.gif (461x200, 1.21M)

why is CGI getting worse?

what the fuck

Attached: 1494882994505.webm (694x376, 2.89M)

Attached: johnny derp.jpg (1087x744, 91K)

Attached: 1411566499074.webm (1920x800, 2.89M)

Attached: obi-wan-mace-windu-e-yoda-star-wars.jpg (1916x808, 185K)

To be fair, elves are weightless.

I know you don't like looking at people's faces due to your autism, but you really have to do it in this case.

I don't have a webm of them but any of the CG stunt doubles from the Prequels were terrible even on release. I'm thinking the random backflips from Dooku or Sidious or others. Pointless and look awful.

this would have been great if not for the bad cgi
still good

Attached: 1522951793178.webm (1280x544, 1.6M)

That is fucking atrocious.

why is that lil nigga on a go-kart

He said more recently he doubts they will as he's gone off the idea of tinkering with finished films years later.

Nigga wat, that's really good considering back then the standard was Toy Story graphics.

Attached: 839Xsiqh.jpg (1003x542, 76K)

The guy flying the plane is also the rent guy from Spiderman 2.

It isn't.

fun fact
this scene was entirely CGI
none of the actors were there, i wish i was fucking joking, the pre-rendered version was posted here some days ago

This isn't supposed to be toy story graphics though?

Anor Londo is looking great

Attached: Equilibrium+when+the+party+over+but+you+in+another+demesions_c4ff3b_6020734.jpg (900x393, 75K)

Attached: clip.webm (1920x1080, 1.97M)

Why did they have a Stunman for that sword spin?

Then I guess they might wait until he is dead.

resident evil did it first

Shouldn't his body be stiff as a board after being dead for so long? And what.. Krpytonians don't decompose?

don't shit on this. this is the only franchise still making soulful movies

>we're flying too high!
>high, what's high? can I spend it?

I don't know, I feel like the shitty CG was intentional.

Post anakin's face morphing

>Why did they have a Stunman for that sword spin?
They just did

Attached: snipes eyes.gif (300x297, 300K)

Honestly if the fantastic 4 leans more toward a comedy then maybe it could work. theres creative stuff you could do with it.

Missiles run out of fuel pretty quickly, so they glide to their target for the most part, but are moving at mach 3 usually. Makes them darn hard to see too visually.

>Yo Nigga Get Me Outta Dis Wack Ass Crystal Prison

I swear, the only thing missing from this are little Dragon's Lair command prompts.

lmao nigger
tokyo drift and 2fast2furious are the only entries
the others are cringe fest and the franchise have lost sight of what it originated from

Being stretchy males you faster than bullets?

>MKII fatality snes.webm

get fucked

this is zoomed in

cunt

That unironically looks like an old playstation game. Not even memeing

My entire theatre legitimatelly clapped at this. Though it was also mixed with a hysterical laughter. Everyone just appreciating the sheer, unbridled balls of this scene.

Jesus, why not just make a damn set out of particleboard and cover it with vinyl? That CGI is worse than Property Brothers makeover proposals.

fun fact
you're completely wrong about your retarded fun fact. See here:
>the pre-rendered version was posted here some days ago
you don't even understand the words you're using, that sentence makes no sense. "Pre-rendered?" What would that even mean in a film context? You mean pre-vis. Pre-vis can be used for planning scenes that have no CGI in them whatsoever. It doesn't mean they're fully CGI, but it is typically used for scenes with some degree of CGI, yes.

Don't think you're so smart as to make assumptions and then state them as fact, it's really dumb.

Attached: 1426078867342.webm (1280x720, 1.08M)

The room isn't actually cgi, it's a miniature. They green screen the actors on to it.

who is this scrotum licker?

Just off screen is Ornstein and Smough

The machine straight up clips through her at the end. She should be dead.

it wouldn't change the fact that it looks like a theme park ride

which?

Attached: 1479441180771.jpg (620x433, 87K)

Making it crappy looking and at home in the thread.

i was waiting for it. didn't have it saved otherwise i would have posted myself

dude, watch the stairs clipping during the pan. it's atrocious cgi

Based as FUCK

>Krpytonians don't decompose?
Yes but not on earth.

YOU SHOULD SEE THE ORIGINAL ENDING IF YOU THINK THIS CG LOOKS BAD. GOOGLE IT.

>it's ok when tarantino does it

I never understood this. Lost came out in 2004, so it should have been for the GameCube.

Because it doesn't look like a Gamecube game, it looks like an N64 game.

Dis case. Deez keeds. Sallacan thankabow

>Samurai sword fight
>No blood

The blood tornado?
youtube.com/watch?v=fnzen9QCmrs

>why is CGI getting worse?
Shooting schedules, rising costs, and over-use to pad out bad scripts.

He was doing the anime swordsman duel stance after the killing blow

took a bit but here it is. christ these movies look like shit. anyone have the webm of the elves leaping over the shield wall and just melting into the earth?

Looks ok at first glance...

Attached: mj.jpg (1500x1500, 234K)

I was watching this with my gf, who is kind of an airhead, and even she was like wtf?

Why even bother using real people anymore?

until you see the full version

Attached: Michael-Jackson-HIStory-Past-Present-and-Future-Book-I-Cover-michael-jackson-31568920-1726-1707.jpg (1726x1707, 968K)

Stop bullying guys, I do CG and it's hard. Especially under tight deadlines.

Deh, what's up doc?

Why did producers think this was acceptable?

>Property Brothers makeover proposals.
Uh what? What is so particular about that show?

Attached: 1483402496965.webm (1920x816, 2.34M)

It isn't. It's actually made massive strides in the last few years. The best CG looks pretty much like real life at this stage. What is happening is every blockbuster uses massive amounts of it and there are only so many effects houses and so much time, so a lot of CG is rushed or multiple companies of different skill levels work on the same movie. One company might be working on 10 films a year. They only have so many animators and hours of work.
If you took Black Panther and gave it an extra entire year of the final cut of the film with the effects teams doing nothing else, all the CG would be flawless. That crummy final fight that everyone points out is bad? That was a reshoot, and was shot in October, the effects house got it in December and the film came out in February. That's why it looks rushed and sloppy, because it was.
Some shit CG is from lower budget, or more often poor direction that doesn't use it right, but generally all of it would look fine if it had the time and resources, but they don't.

Literally some shaky camera and moving him around in the green screen would have made this look more than fine

>cgi
>the hallway is a Looney tunes painting on the wall

He never did it.

Attached: 1457567672806.webm (698x362, 2.49M)

just get more computers 4head

On that note, the Hobbit films look shit often for instance, because of overuse and overreliance with too little time. Notice how much worse the second and especially third film looks, because they were shot and expanded hastily to accommodate the sudden change to three films instead of four.

>Be super advanced civilisation
>society is organised into a couple of tribes and sends rhinos into battle

>>Property Brothers makeover proposals.
>Uh what? What is so particular about that show?
They did CGI room makeover proposals, which were cheap desktop computer animations. Sadly, they looked better than many of these movie clips.

it didn't.

what did stop the ship from sinking was iron man showing up with like 40 of his robots pushing on the ship from each side, welding it back together, and carrying it to safety

>watch the stairs clipping
You'll have to elaborate for me, user. I see nothing that could be construed as clipping there. Looks like there might be some barely noticeable wonkiness in the tracking of the background plate to the foreground plate (the foreground ending at the stairs) That's a compositing issue, nothing to do with CGI objects intersecting.

Discussions of CGI have far too many retards throwing around words they'll hope make them sound smarter than they are. Half the time it's not even CGI being discussed. If you want a catch-all term, go with VFX you idiots.

I don't see it getting any less rushed and CG houses are practically sweatshops.

RULES OF NATURE

they should have been naked

Is that the same wheelchair-bound black guy from The Shield? I haven't watched SoA

when you haven't seen the film you should stop asking dumb questions like this

Because he wouldn't open his damn eyes

Maybe the standards weren't so high yet because that's just where the technology was at, but I don't remember thinking there was anything wrong with this when I saw it as a kid.

It's not in the movie, it's the last mission of GoldenEye 007

By the time they got to Blade 3 Wesley was such a constantly stoned asshole that the director told him he was totally willing to finish the film without him and just use his double.

How the fuck that got an Oscar nom for VFX over Aquaman I will never understand. But considering how dependent Aquaman was on CGI, what was there was pretty good.

That's bad but it's the best kind of bad

i agree that the franchise now is different than what it originated from, but that doesn't mean that they suck. how many original movies can you make in one franchise? they shifted gears (lol) and revved it up (lmao).

the newer movies are just what they are supposed to be. summer fun movies, and that's it. nothing wrong with over the top fun, kid.

lot better than SMASH CRASH **WHOOOMMMPP** KREEEEENNNNNGG SMASH SMASH CRASH fucking Transformers shit. learn to enjoy life user, you'll get litty

Attached: get litty.png (268x318, 217K)

Oh no, it's only going to get worse as films require more and more CG per year and the effects houses get more and more strained, and the increase in use of reshoots without changing the release date is even worse. The best CG out there will still get better and better but the majority won't be as good as it should be. They have to pick and choose which parts get the most attention. It's how Avengers has Thanos as phenomenal work, and also CW level greenscreen for Bruce Banner in that one shot, in the same film.

come on, Wesley, grow up

Honestly the CGI is good, you can't tell me the visual effects studio did a bad job. There's just so much of it that your brain doesn't even attempt to perceive it as real.

Ah fuck, Too Old To Die Young spoiler alert

Patrick Stewart doesn't even look that much different than 20 years ago.

How about cgi so great you dont even realize it was cg?

Attached: 1.jpg (1274x500, 88K)

You should because that came out the same year as Starship Troopers, which still holds up as looking great. That airplane scene was mocked as terrible on release.

Attached: Enchantress.webm (854x480, 2.94M)

Can I get a sauce on this high cinema?

Attached: Enchantress A.webm (854x480, 2.93M)

SOULESS

youtube.com/watch?v=yRhRZB-nqOU

in fairness, the entire film was a shit show, having shit cgi just added to the comedy

Attached: Enchantress B.webm (854x480, 2.91M)

Attached: 1435451536828.webm (660x272, 1.46M)

>johnny depp did the jump
>director says it doesn't look right
>depp tries a few more takes
>nope.jpg
>director decides to bring in some athlete and explains what he wants
>athlete gives it a few tries and nails it
>mann just adds depp's face using computers
was it autism?

an example of that?

this one is offensively bad

It didn't?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy_Award_for_Best_Visual_Effects#2010s

Black Panther wasn't nominated for Best Visual Effects at all.

look at the three slags, its clearly charlies angels

you're way ahead of me in the cgi terminology department, user. but I suppose in this case, the stairs and the floor seem fucked up. is that better?

vin is only 5'5 or something
dwayne is 6'4

but vin Always wants to apear like he's huge in his movies.
he even stands on his toes during some photo's of the cast at the red carpet

Attached: crooked man.gif (394x237, 1.97M)

Blade 1 & 2 are fuckin kino.

youtube.com/watch?v=vrEN5Bl2ncI

>the newer movies are just what they are supposed to be. summer fun movies
Yep. I love em. So goddamn dumb and fun and they're not ashamed of it either.

Striptease 2

Attached: DP Mystique.png (979x605, 580K)

I'd say it's just a fucking hop, get over it Mann.

How the fuck did I never notice that.

Attached: mediocre.webm (1920x1080, 913K)

Guess it was just because I was a kid then. Probably just didn't care since I liked the movie anyway.

Do you have his random somersault?

Dwayne Johnson is supposedly about 6 feet tall according to people who have met him. Every celebrity lies about their height, even the short ones.

this, people really underestimate how much force that much rushing water has

Attached: blade runner cgi.webm (1252x720, 859K)

Attached: Spooder does Playstation flip.webm (1264x526, 759K)

Starship Troopers had a lot of practical effects, though

>True detective dream sequence

Viggo nearly got drowned doing that floating in the river shot, and that was just a straight river not crazy rapids

and high quality CG for the timee that holds up well

>this
>bad CGI
Neck yourselves, stupid zoomers.

people might shit on phantom menace. but attack of the clones is 100 times worse.
the cgi was terrible and it was noticable even then.

Attached: mirror.gif (400x270, 1013K)

where's the bad CG?

Attached: 1511871608454.webm (1280x718, 2.74M)

Yeah, if it wasn't shit, it wouldn't be shit.

James Cameron almost drowned Ed Harris in the shooting of The Abyss too.

>this actually aired
it was a different time
a more innocent time

Attached: 1435468053098.gif (320x180, 1.47M)

That appears to be a matte painting in the background, as they did in the old trilogy as well

Attached: rocklette.jpg (480x360, 42K)

oh fuck off those shows embrace their corniness.

Literally nothing wrong with this, you guys are blinded by your prejudices

This is a thread about CGI, so you can assume user is talking about the CGI in Starship Troopers, which was really good for its time.

Attached: 1423143575191_starship_troopers.webm (1280x688, 1.9M)

Even if I like Marvel movies, at times is very hard not to be cynic, seeing things, scenes that feel made for some kind of function instead of the art, the photography, the aesthetic, the plot, it feels like something that was not even watched by the director or whoever handled photography, just "give me a scene where X happens and I don't care how it looks", in the age of 4K-8K, people will notice these things.

should have used a miniature.

compare to knowing that Charles Barkley is listed as 6'6"

Attached: 1462063668597.webm (830x466, 1.22M)

briethreadposters.webm

vin is still a manlet though. he RDJ tier in height.

Attached: look at those fucking fast & furious shits.jpg (467x413, 40K)

Cameron almost drowned himself too, his thing malfunctioned while he was at the bottom of the tank.

Why are (You) sitting like this? Yes, I'm talking to (You).

looks well ahead of its time

that's not CG, it's a fade transition

same with arnold. he Always claimed to be 185cm. but other people said he is actualy more around 180cm.

Attached: best stories.jpg (650x716, 52K)

Even my tech-illiterate boomer parents laughed out loud at how awful this was. It came out in fucking 2009 too so it really wasn't THAT long ago.

There's only one course of action

Attached: 1423142531046_starship_troopers.webm (533x300, 2.66M)

Which is equally rarted

>they do it for free

Every single time this Terminator clip is posted I have to show these fucking retards how fucking retarded they are (4:32)

youtu.be/c31w-qYPv-c?t=273

you know the fucking rules

Attached: 1560860266429.jpg (610x495, 40K)

>Lost came out in 2004

Attached: _76683862_76682936.jpg (640x360, 32K)

Holy shit please tell me this is the only scene Chiklis is in.

Attached: thecommish.jpg (480x360, 9K)

Shit, for a second I though the obvious special effect in that was Seagal's hairline.

based

Attached: WEHAVETOGOBACK.png (300x499, 233K)

On a scale of 1 to 10, how lazy of a cunt is JLaw, and why is she an 11?

>>Lost came out in 2004
jesus

Attached: we have to go back.jpg (283x397, 16K)

this

99% of these are "it's not perfect so it's bad"

Typical entitled mindset of today's consumer.

that's not CGI that's just forced perspective

I actually find this kind of poignant

The UHD Bluray is just gorgeous. It holds up very well

Attached: Starship.jpg (3840x2160, 2.21M)

>finishing a VN.webm

Ah! I was watching this on television and I didn't notice how shitty this looked.

Maybe your mind does that because you've already watched an hour already and it just doesn't notice those things.

oh no