Why don't they make kino capeshit like this anymore?

It may be a bit memey but it was the greatest thing I had ever seen as a 12 year old. Can't imagine a 12 year old nowadays having the same reaction with endgame

Attached: IMG_1919.jpg (320x401, 66K)

Fuck off unde-
>2008 was 11 years ago
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Attached: apusa.jpg (750x546, 32K)

Attached: 1555381627877.png (635x625, 619K)

>Infinity War and Endgame were the best attempts to turn film into capeshit.
What does that even mean

10 times? You gotta be kidding...Or else you're a try hard marvel hater.

Stop. TDK was a Nolan attempt at trying to make a superhero movie not look like a superhero movie, but an elaborate contemporary view of what would be a hero like in our time.
But what it really did, is that TDK ended up having a real good vilain, and a completely ruined Batman character cause he was almost ready to give up.

this but unironically. why do pajeets shill boring shit like batman vs superman when this exists

I don’t understand the criticism of it, it is objectively good, clearly a lot of thought went into story, characters, dialogue, themes, etc is all very good. Getting rid of the semantics arguments, no one can refute the quality and care that went intonations TDK. Can Vengers Spendgame say the same?

AH-BLAH-BLAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

because people have been brainwashed by MCU and think its the new standard for filmmaking.

I really didn't like The Dark Knight. It's the one I liked the least of the 3 (although I'm not a big fan of the other two). It's just a slick Hollywood film in that worst kind of soulless way.

I enjoy Hellboy a lot though.

>It's just a slick Hollywood film in that worst kind of soulless way.
Explain.

should have said "comic books" instead of capeshit.

IW and EG have the pacing and characters hopping into the story then falling out and it's carrying all this lore from other books/movies into the "crossover story" and everything else. They're the closest that movies have gotten to accurately recreating what comic books are like, where every line pretty much is connected to something from some other story that happened earlier. Like when you read shit the No Man's Land story or Crisis on Infinite Earths or Infinity Gauntlet or any other big "crossover event" comic series, they're a lot like what IW and EG did. And IW and EG were the best executed and most successful attempts to pull that off.
>Stop.
Hammer time.
>TDK was a Nolan attempt at trying to make a superhero movie not look like a superhero movie
Yeah and he did that by "turning it into a film." It is the best executed attempt to tell a capeshit story using "the language of cinema" and screenwriting and editing concepts that were developed in the history of film. Montage editing and character beats and a clear underlying subtextual "argument" simmering underneath the narrative and shit are all film concepts. He tried to make a film using comic book characters, whereas IW tried to make a comic book using the film medium.
>But what it really did, is that TDK ended up having a real good vilain, and a completely ruined Batman character cause he was almost ready to give up.
Having "character drama" and dilemmas and the character being pushed to the breaking point and everything is good storytelling though. And he essentially does "give up" at the end of the movie. He accepts the burden of being blamed for Dent's death because he understands that Dent being seen as a martyred symbol for good was more important, and Batman being seen as a scary symbol for people to unite against was the best choice, even if it meant hanging up the bathelmet and shit.

I can understand not liking it, but how on earth can you call it soulless? So much effort was put into dialogue, neat nitpicks and details into the backgrounds, and money was spent on real cars and trucks to be blown up for the film, instead of lazy CGI. It’s the absolute antithesis of “souless”

>TDK is a slick Hollywood film in that worst kind of soulless way
>I enjoy Hellboy a lot though.

Attached: dont_know_if_trolling.png (552x414, 215K)

This. It's a dumb bigass blockbuster full of explosions and action scenes, but it's made with love and soul.

It looks like this
Superhero comics look like this

Attached: avengers vs thanos.jpg (1000x773, 577K)

It was that good, I fucking loved it to pieces. I rewatched my Blu-Ray over 30 times now.

There are like 5 explosions in The Dark Knight.
And 3 are just the Joker shooting an RPG at an armored car.
TDK is pretty light on action scenes- because it's confident enough in the actors delivering the dialogue to carry you through it.

TDK is a big blockbuster, but it's not dumb

>TDK is pretty light on action scenes
But the few action scenes it had were phenomenal, the tunnel chase scene is still the greatest action setpiece of the 21st century

Daily reminder TDKR is underrated

They're all effective scenes with tense stakes yeah.
Action scenes are like chocolate chips in a cookie. If there are too many you don't notice them anymore and the cookie falls apart.
I suppose Mad Max Fury Road is just a chocolate bar in that case
The Avengers movies are just tubs of that pillsbury frosting

for you

You're a big guy

it would be very painful

If I pull that off will you die?

You mean Batman Returns, incel

no

because giving full creative control of one of your biggest IPs to a filmmaker often doesn't work out in the studios favor. Dark Knight was one of the few times it did.

It didn't work for Superman Returns, it didn't work for Green Lanterm, it didn't work for Man Of Steel, and it sure as fuck didn't work for BVS.

The DCEU flicks were long after the fall of capeshit, good capeshit died circa 2011

You forget JOKER opens October 4th

And it's gonna fuking suck

Super yes

Kick Ass no