Is Yea Forums allowed to discuss this show?

>Ava Duvernay
......so grannie goodness will absolutely be played by oprah right?

>Netflix most watched show before this was Lucifer

Attached: 2ankaviv9e131.jpg (314x246, 14K)

For the detectives yes for sure but for the Jury, possibly
Even after all the evidence that pretty much proved the boys weren't at the rape they still got convicted.
Wish I was on the jury just so I could argue because how the fuck did they reach a unanimous decision that they were guilty

YES BUT HOW THE FUCK IS THE FUCKING SHOW? HOW DOES IT WATCH? IS THE STORY WELL STRUCTURED? HOW IS THE PHOTOGRAPHY? HOW ARE THE ACTORS? IS THE SOUNDTRACK OKAY? I JUST WANT TO FUCKING KNOW IF IT'S WORTH WATCHING. FUCK YOU /POL/ THIS IS WHY EVERYONE HATES YOU. YOU MAKE ACTUAL DISCUSSION ON TV AND FILM FUCKING IMPOSSIBLE. IT'S ALL JEW NIGGER FAGGOT JEW AND NO ACTUAL SUBSTANCE. TELL ME WHAT YOU THOUGHT OF THE ACTUAL FUCKING TV SHOW.

yo or

Didn't even know people watched Lucifer

everything is fine once you realize it is in meme countries like the usa

I agree. It's totally one note. Everything is predictable. The characters are all the same. The story doesn't feel lived in. There's no nuance. It's difficult, because it's a true story, they can't insult the men now, they've been through enough. But in a fictional version, you'd make one of the kids a cunt. It would just work better.

But it is very competently made, and I do largely agree with the social message. I haven't seen beyond ep 1 and iunno if i will.

I haven't really gone over the facts either but i'm happy to take Ken Burn's opinion. I know he knows his shit.

The Night Of on HBO is the nuanced and actually interesting version of this story.

It looks good and it's competently directed but the story is very flat and predictable.
It's affecting, but as suffering porn. The melodramatic soundtrack is obnoxious.

I've only seen one ep, but I wouldn't recommend it.

Can anybody take niggers seriously when they dress and have hairstyles like this? It's like looking at clowns all day

41 milly in da bank
I got 41 milly in da bank!
^o^ ^o^ ^o^ ^o^ ^o^ ^o^ ^o^ ^o^ ^o^

When did Netflix start releasing viewership

if you're going to talk about it be sure to mention that the nigs they caught that night were attacking people while also robbing them.

The most popular shows always have been and always will be painfully mediocre drivel that appeals to the lowest common denominator. Same with movies. Same with music. Same with books.

Considering most of the population are tasteless retards we're lucky anything good ever gets produced at all anymore.

Attached: 1128380590338.jpg (400x462, 26K)

It's one of those points that, frankly, When They See Us doesn't capture very well but was definitely a major point of the actual incident. Again, go watch the documentary.

Long story short, NY was experiencing a major crime wave throughout the late 80s and huge inequality of wealth. The affluent white populace was very vocal about feeling like the city was unsafe due to black/brown criminals, and white woman being attacked in central park by a group of black males seemed to encapsulate everything that was wrong with the city, and it was very much a "I'll take the words of the boys in blue over those hoodlums" kinda things. What's more, DNA evidence was still a relatively new means of criminal and judicial investigation. Juries didn't understand/trust it the way we do now.

Attached: 1560777148446.webm (480x360, 835K)

because the boys freely admitted to doing a bunch of other fucking crimes
yeah we didnt do a rape but we were assaulting and robbing someone which is also a felony, welp guess you cant do anything you dumb jurors, probably laughing and smirking the whole time anyway, you know how these people are

They were robbers right? Does the show deny that? I guess good for them that they were just fondling girls not raping them.

Attached: 1560776072130.webm (1280x720, 1.67M)

baste

>how are the actors
It has based Joshua in it, so pretty good I suppose

they were on their way to night school after doing community work

>They were robbers right?

No, they weren't.

>Does the show deny that?

Yes, because that's not what happened. It does, however, openly acknowledge that the gang of boys in the park that night absolutely were heckling and in some cases even assaulting passersby in the park. All indications are, however, that none of boys in the Central Park 5 did.

13%...

Attached: 1560773900581.webm (1000x562, 1.94M)

I thought the most watched show was Friends? What is this bullshit about Lucifer. Where are the viewer numbers. Netflix never releases that unless they want to gloat.

if you look into it the police had a pretty good reason to arrest these niggers

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-06-17 at 6.01.57 PM.png (2368x850, 920K)

The problem is their stories regarding the rape were completely conflicting and the case in point wasn't about the other crimes, those people never came forward nor did they press charges and the ones that did come forward didn't identify those boys
We don't know how much of those tapes was admissible seeing as they were also heavily edited.

Yes, they were just there for school.

>all indications are
bullshit, you cant be part of a roving pack of criminals but play the dindu card, if you're with people who viciously assault someone you're also culpable

In the show yes but IRL they admitted to taking part.

Ignore this user, he literally sits in on every single one of these threads and argues with everyone that the nignogs were totally innocent. He's either a shill for the show or an assblasted monkey who can't stand hearing anything that doesn't acquit his fellow chimps of any and all crime ever, last thread he was saying Jim Crow was basically responsible for every crime ever committed by a nigger in the last 50 years

Attached: 1560779432390.jpg (2032x3528, 840K)

No one has ever denied that.

The problem was pinning a rape on them that had nothing to do with what the group of teenagers was actually doing, and not taking the time to find out who in the group was actually responsible for what. It was 30 kids, but not everyone was actually guilty of anything beyond simply being there.

>woman incompetent when not just following instructions
Shocker

from a moral perspective they created a state of disorder that facilitated the rape

>guilty by association

Not how that works, idiot.

This is the biggest surprise for me in all of this. I don't know a single person who has ever seen it.

Empowering

Is the webm guy gonna continue or not, its my only investment in these threads

Look at white haircuts in the 80s then come back kid.

niggers should go to prison, I literally don't care if they are innocent

user that's literally how that works.

>they created a state of disorder that facilitated the rape

That's retarded beyond reason. Especially since they weren't even in the same area of the park as the rape so it's not like they created some opportune distraction for the rapist.

Might as well throw "society" in jail for creating a state of disorder as well.

it literally is, google joint enterprise
otherwise i could just get 10 guys go around beating up anyone i wanted and just claim it wasn't be that did any of punching

>I'm racist and misogynist

>i'm on Yea Forums
what did you expect zoomer

Civilization is slipping. Soon all that is good and lasting will be torn asunder in a great orgy of barbarism.

i'll admit that police and prosecutors sometimes do underhanded or shady shit, and these kids likely didn't commit the rapes, but they were part of a mob of people beating and robbing passerby in central park. liberals always pick the strangest hills to die on; it's like how mike brown was shown to be in the wrong by an actual DoJ investigation under Obama, and yet people still include him with the BLM "RIP in peace" collections.

i'm willing to admit that blacks get the short end of the stick sometimes if they'll admit that sometimes their people do some really stupid shit and get put down for it

>IM NOT RACIST
come on are you the one man in america who doesn't feel anxious when a group of upstanding young black gentlemen are moving down the street toward him

So what's the best on-screen telling of the story? Netflix, HBO or Ken Burns?

>Especially since they weren't even in the same area of the park as the rape so it's not like they created some opportune distraction for the rapist.
Is this a brainlet take
>even though police are distracted in other parts of the park they aren't creating an opportune distraction for the rapist

>these kids likely didn't commit the rapes
Yeah someone else genuinely confessed to it and all evidence shows they didn't do it, they did commit the other crimes though

I understand that being present absolutely potentially makes someone culpable and opens the door to arguments of enabling the incident, but it's a matter for the court to decide the degree to which it is the case.

There is also absolutely cases of being in the wrong place at the wrong time or not being able to stop what was going on and shit like that.

Not him, but youre retarded if you think thats how it works.

being racist can save your life dumass

I say Ken Burns.

Or Trayvon, who literally jumped someone for staring at him too much.

lol why would some idiot hire a black nanny goddamn what fucking morons

They were guilty as fuck.

>meme countries like the usa
>usa
>meme country
Seething euroslime
Who put a man on the moon?

>not him but your a retard and stupid haha
why are you talking about the law when you know nothing about it? do you have any idea how many people are in prison right now for join enterprise cases?

YOU HAVE BEEN VISITED BY IDRIS BOYEGA SAY SOMETHING NICE ABOUT HIM

Attached: Idris Boyega.jpg (300x400, 21K)

>i'm willing to admit that blacks get the short end of the stick sometimes if they'll admit that sometimes their people do some really stupid shit and get put down for it

That's not how it works. If you admit "blacks sometimes get treated unfairly" you undermine your position of "blacks should be treated carefully"

>sometimes their people do some really stupid shit and get put down for it

but how do you seperate sometimes?

Attached: 1548364480157.png (1002x522, 372K)

>who is a laughing stock to the rest of the world
Try again Amerifat
No one has any respect for you or your "free" country

Retarded people shouldn't be allowed to comment.

You realize the police only came to the park because they were responding to the call that a gang of boys was assaulting people in the park, right? That it wasn't some ever-vigilant gang of cops regularly patrolling the park that suddenly all had to ignore the rest of their duties to devote their attention to these boys?

Hell, if anything, they increased the chances of the actual rapist being seen.

Do you?

They clearly did it. Outside of torture, “coerced confessions “ are a complete myth. The DNA evidence is not at all exonerating nor is the (jailhouse confession (lol, as if the word of an admitted rapist/murderer serving life means anything). They did it, probably with a couple other unnamed/unknowns that got away.

Don’t believe everything Hollywood tells you. This and the West Memphis 3 are great examples of hollywood bullshit pushed by you know who.

They were guilty of being part of the gang of several dozen kids who were assaulting people in central park. They were not guilty of the rape and attempted murder of the victim in question, and were eventually exonerated from that crime via DNA evidence.

Of something other than (and lesser) what they were charged with? Sure.

nonsense, our hombre decided to head over there to do his raping because he knew packs of ferals roam that area, thus making it a lawless place within which he can operate safely

There's a recent trend in production design among "diverse" shows that feature a heavily brown and black cast that consists of painting the sets of a vibrant/darker tone that they usually would in order to blend the darker skin tones better with the scenery and I hate it (like in Sorry To Bother You). The police station and many other buildings had this awful shade of blue snd everything looked like it was recently painted. Watch any of the early seasons of Law and Order and you'll see NY police stations looked nothing like this.

So 40 years ago some white people did this thing, therefore please don’t talk about black people relevant to this discussion? What’s wrong with you?

They all literally confessed to assisting the rape by holding the woman down AND various other crimes like assault and robbery.

>Who put a man on the moon?
German scientists

How many viewers, or rather, what percentage of Netflix's user base, do you think is required to make a show the "most watched" on its platform?

Listen femcel, reality is not a college textbook from shit eating 101

american teens do love their urban dramas

Confessed under duress and with conflicting statements
The only accurate part of their confessions were the other crimes. Not a single one of them had similar statements regarding the rape and they were even exonerated years later when new DNA evidence (and a confession from someone else) showed they didn't do it.

40% of the US is Germanic

So we all agree that white women are the literal devil right?

>no we're not going to release the actual viewer numbers, just trust us, black men are very popular and everyone cares about them and we're definitely not saying any of this for virtue signal points on social media.

>They were not guilty of the rape and attempted murder of the victim in question,
Bullshit.
There's literally no reason to believe this.

>im based and redpilled

The kid from the picture youre talking about is from 1989. Do society a favor and end your genetic line.

Because fuck niggers. Lock em all up just to be safe.

>do violent crimes
>admit to doing said crimes
>also they maybe did this rape since it happened at the same time in the same place
>Dey dindu nuffen!
>get big cash reward
>several decade's later be treated as some respectable innocent victim in a film
It's very tiring

LOL based sista doing praxis. Hopefully that baby will get some mild brain damage to lower his IQ a bit to even out his white male privilege

yea but we all live in the midwest, and let me tell you, nearly all midwesterners are fat and dumb as hell, second only to southerners.

>repeat after me THIS IS NOT ABOUT TRUMP'S LETTER THIS IS NOT POLITICAL
hmm yes very convenient timing, unfortunately they're too dumb to know that locking up niggers is why im voting for him

Huh except for the exoneration, conflicting statements and DNA evidence proving they didn't
kinda wild right

What duress?
They were talking about the rape before they even got brought in.

“duress” lol. So asking politely more than once is now duress? Please, DNA didn’t show shit

Yeah, it's like when Netflix said that the most watched Trek show was Voyager.

Amazing that all of the US is apparently so fat/dumb and yet curbstomping the rest of the world in money and power

>niggers dindu nuffins

Their statements conflicted in terms of who exactly in a group of 5+ people was the one to knock the woman down, tie her up, etc., but they were essentially the same.

Also, the DNA evidence didn't "show that they didn't do it", considering they always claimed to have ASSISTED the rape, so of course only the actual rapist's semen would be found. Literally the only reason they were exonerated was because the rapist met one of the 5 in jail and wanted to get some prison favours by claiming he acted alone.

>no DNA evidence tying the suspects to the crime
>no physical evidence tying the suspects to the crime
>no eyewitnesses tying the suspects to the crime
>"literally no reason to believe this"

Off yourself. Too stupid to live.

It boggles my mind the utter faggotry that is this country.

Attached: 1503021486252.gif (320x240, 933K)

how about the fact that the actual rapist came forward and they confirmed his story with DNA and other corroboratory evidence, you literal retard.

>exoneration
They weren't exonerated.
>conflicting statements
minor details are irrelevant due to the flaws inherent to human memory
>DNA evidence
DNA evidence doesn't prove they didn't rape her, it just proves that they didn't nut.

unz.com/jderbyshire/while-we-can-still-say-it-the-central-park-five-committed-a-gang-rape-and-linda-fairstein-proved-it-in-court/

>muh DNA
really getting sick of zoomers that think DNA is the ultimate evidence.

They're niggers. They will rape eventually.

the real question is how many crimes were prevented by locking up these 'kids', probably saved half a dozen black lives and prevented at least 10 rapes, but of course nobody wants to talk about that

>taking the unsolicited word of a convicted criminal
you liberals make me sick

>DNA evidence doesn't prove they didn't rape her, it just proves that they didn't nut.

Thankfully, that's not how "beyond a reasonable doubt" or the burden of proof work.

>when da weed too strong for playin' Madden all day

the fat and dumb are cattle, ruled over by the educated coastal elites :^)

You have no idea how the law works.
If you have knowledge of a crime you dont report, you are party to the crime

>unz.com
>Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Hate Group, Poor Sources
fucking. l. m. a. o.

They do this all the time. They literally keep underage lackeys that just get sent to "juvie" for a couple years to fall on the sword for the rest of the gang. He earns street cred and who knows what else for doing so.

>nigger apologists
wew

is this really how american law works? damn..

you're an incel. you'll go on an autistic shooting spree eventually. we should lock you up now.

>doesn't understand what DNA evidence is or how it applied to this case
based literal retard

>Thankfully, that's not how "beyond a reasonable doubt" or the burden of proof work.
That's exactly how reasonable doubt works.
All the confessions don't go away just because DNA wasn't found.

Do it. You're a waste of a human being.

Attached: 1555909105655.jpg (836x727, 105K)

You're welcome to try nigger lover.

go to a ghetto in a major city and see how long your fantasy world holds up

dude, the group of 5 literally said in their statements that they helped a hispanic looking guy rape her, and lo and behold, a hispanic guy's semen was found on her

>muh DNA
seriously fuck off zoomer

>If you have knowledge of a crime you dont report, you are party to the crime
failure to report isn't illegal in 48 states. in the other two it's a misdemeanor. in zero states does it make you an accessory to the crime. you're kind of a retard, aren't you, sport.

We've been through this already.

It's not that black and white. Knowledge of the crime is not the same as guilty of the crime - which is what people in this thread are saying these kids were just by being in the group - and it's up to the court to decide whether or not you had knowledge of the crime and the degree to which you were potentially party to it.

>no eyewitnesses tying the suspects to the crime
You mean other than each other you colossal faggot?

he was an unrelated party who was already serving a life sentence for a different crime, who only came forward because the statue of limitations was up on the rape. face it, incel, these 5 lil nigs didn't rape that woman, and you're basically a fucking retard yelling at clouds.

>and it's up to the court to decide whether or not you had knowledge of the crime
Yeah, and the court decided that they were guilty.

gee I wonder why white people tend to move away from brown neighborhoods

>implying this was a case of white privilege and not a case of Female Privilege (TM) which asserts power over every other form of privilege as all privilege/identity politics are on behalf of feminists and women and rape is somehow seen as worse than murder in modern society

why are americans so obsessed with blacks?

exactly, so he had nothing to lose in terms of sentencing and everything to gain in terms of prison favours

>an unrelated party
Except he was serving his sentence in the same prison as them, which means he's not actually an unrelated party.

I see you missed the part that was literally the entire case where the validity of their confessions was in question, and there was no one else to corroborate what they said.

>old man doesn't understand science; yells at clouds

>America is the only country
Thank god we don't have to deal with nogs here

>Yeah, and the court decided that they were guilty.
based on coerced confessions from a bunch of 14 year olds after a healthy round of psychological torture. courts also exonerated them later and decided they weren't guilty. why do you champion one verdict but not the other, hmm?

This shit is force-fed.
archive.is/JzysN
archive.is/ihHMJ

>no one else to corroborate what they said
You mean other than each other?
Bro even Muslims have better standards for prosecuting rape than you do, and they require four male witnesses of the penetration of prosecute the crime.

>be nignog
>peacefully redistribute some crackas money and brain matter
>see some spic going for some of them ol' seksual reparatuns
>help him
>confess
>get exonerated and 41 million cash because you are a nignog

clown world

Nobody fucking cares that you placed a mutt in a space rock and it probably didn't happen anyway

>muh science
Holy shit keep digging that hole zoomer.

placing them in a room and asking them questions is now "coercion", lmao

No, because one must first speak chimp in order to understand it.

Is it true that DNA testing wasn't very accurate at the time?

literally sums up the case

When They See Us (They bout to get rizzaped)

Why are you insisting on being retarded?

A fundamental point of the case was whether or not the testimony the boys gave against each other could be trusted because it was potentially coerced. As such, you would want some outside objective witness, but there was none.

How are you not getting this?

>You mean other than each other?
they didn't even corroborate each other's stories lmao. everything in common between their confessions was shit the cops beat into them on record during days-long interrogations that involved psychological torture, denial of sleep, literal beatings, etc. and those interrogations are some of the only things that ARE corroborated by both the cops records and the niglets.

>coerced
Where is the evidence?
>courts also exonerated them later and decided they weren't guilty. why do you champion one verdict but not the other, hmm?
No they did not, there was no "verdict" because there was no retrial. The DA simply vacated their convictions.

It's kind of indoctrinated now that schoolkids go through class after class shaming and lecturing their ancestors and the actions of a few. It's racism in another way, associating slavery/Jim Crow with the white majority whose parents were merely immigrants and poor themselves.

Kids take this one of two ways: internalizing deep guilt that influences their politics for decades to come, or hardening and refusing to accept a bit of it, potentially becoming more racist themselves.

based, nothing wrong with arbitrary punishment of criminals, if you dont like it stop doing crime

thanks for outing yourself as a literal retard who didn't read a single detail of the case. you lazy headline cucks are cancer and need to kill yourselves.

i was taught that white people went to africa with nets and caught niggers like trappers

>That bean DUI rate

Boy, they sure do love their tequila.

>A fundamental point of the case
No it isn't.
The system is not on trial here dumbass, they are. The fundamental point of the case is that a woman was brutally raped and they confessed to the crime.

>“(Meili) was in a coma,” said Reynolds. “If we’re railroading them, how do we know when she comes out of the coma what story she’s going to tell? If you are trying to pin it on someone, why would you risk that she would say something different?”

Is there ANY evidence of brutality besides their own testimony?

>Where is the evidence?
where is the evidence that they attacked or raped the woman?

>The DA simply vacated their convictions.
>simply
do you even understand what that means? it's literally an admission by the court that the evidence used to convict was false, and an overturning of said conviction.

this literally isn't a real thing that happens in any civilized area of the US. maybe it happens in the south and Texas, I dunno.

>The system is not on trial here dumbass, they are

Yes, it is. It literally ALWAYS is. Why do you think we have deliberations about whether evidence is admissible and whatnot? Because we are checking to see whether the investigation was performed within the rules of the system.

This is dumb. You're just arguing to argue at this point and clearly aren't smart enough to do so.

So with graphs like these, where does a criminal who's half black and half white go? With the kind of racial melting pot the US has become, it's not all so black and white (ha!)

gee, I dunno, user, maybe do some research and watch the hours upon hours of media coverage that happened during the crime, read the public reports on the arrests and interrogations and pretty much anything else you could hope for, instead of being a lazy brainless diaper baby who cries for spoonfeeding.

>where is the evidence that they attacked or raped the woman?
Their confessions.

>it's literally an admission by the court that the evidence used to convict was false, and an overturning of said conviction.
No, it's LITERALLY an act of political fiat, that usurps the entire judicial apparatus. What's even the point of having a trial, if one man can come along years later and undo the whole thing?

No bestiality on a blue board

>Yes, it is. It literally ALWAYS is.
Oh shut the fuck up you subversive faggot,
I'm really getting sick of leftist pieces of shit bending over backwards to defend the scum of society over normal people.
Civil rights?
WHAT ABOUT THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF ALL THE PEOPLE IN THAT PARK THAT GOT BEATEN? WHAT ABOUT THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF A WOMAN WHO GOT STOMPED OUT SO HARD HER EYE WAS KNOCKED OUT OF HER SOCKET?

Never mind her day in court and the jury trial!
A fucking POLITICIAN said they didn't do it!

Come at us then eurofag see what happens

>Their confessions.
you mean the ones that are on video being coerced from the children? the ones that don't even corroborate each other outside of the recorded police coercion? the ones that have long since been dismissed and overturned? those confessions? why are you incels continuing to argue against all this shit that was literally on video but you're too lazy and stupid to watch?

>innocent people should never be given the chance to have their false convictions overturned due to new and overwhelming evidence of their innocence
based komrade

What overwhelming evidence?
The word of a convicted serial rapist that he acted alone is not "overwhelming".

Awhat

Show me this video of coercion.

>literally dindu nuffin

wew lad user is turbo triggered.

he's right though. The police can't just start randomly kicking in doors and arresting people if and when they find something because our legal system protects against it. It wouldn't hold up in court, as it shouldn't. The system is fundamentally on trial at all times. It has to be.

The fact that the police can't randomly arrest people doesn't mean the system is on trial dumbass.

it's basically soccer mom shit to leave on while they do the dishes and fantasize about how they wish their husband was a rich sex crazed British man

So according to you, if the cops kick in your door for no other reason than they just wanted to see if they'd get lucky and they arrest you for, say, having pot on your coffee table, if it goes to court and the judge goes "WTF?! You can't just go kicking in doors looking for people to arrest! Case dismissed!!" that is NOT our executive branch being on trial in your book?

This in a nutshell.
>get paid $41 million because the crime you were accused of was rape and not assault and battery for literally beating up and robbing white people in the park

if cops do something illegal during an investigation or a trial, then there would be a second trial started with the cops as the defendants

>, if it goes to court and the judge goes "WTF?! You can't just go kicking in doors looking for people to arrest! Case dismissed!!" that is NOT our executive branch being on trial in your book?
Correct the court dismissing a case, does not mean the court is on fucking trial dumbass.
You realize the system is the court right? How does a trial put itself on trial?

A riveting piece of fiction. The Central Park Rapists are guilty irl

and then slaanesh

Even though they all admitted to attacking that specific woman and two of them could direct the investigators to the exact spot she was attacked?

>inb4 coerced confession
Almost all of them had adult relatives present when they confessed. There was no coercion, they were guilty

Bullshit, they never release the data, just promotion articles.

What do you mean? You never had american history classes waxing on about slavery and Jim Crow, or tons of literature/English about it? I'm in Ohio, pretty characteristic of the whole union.

And in college it gets 5x worse. At that point they're basically saying you personally owe reparations and shut up whenever a black person is speaking.

>You realize the system is the court right? How does a trial put itself on trial?

The "system" is the larger criminal-justice system, or even just our government as a whole, both of which the courts are merely a part of along with police, legislators, etc.

And it puts itself on trial by having a system of checks and balances built into itself so hold people accountable if and when it is not functioning as it was intended to. Such as, a suspect being able to secure legal representation from a lawyer, or a judge being able to dismiss a case if it was not investigated within the confines of the law. Very simple. The system has all kinds of ways in which it is constantly checking itself, including in an actual trial.

So yes, the system is fundamentally ALWAYS on trial.

Yeah, a lot of convenient omission of the fact that the slave TRADE involved black Africans selling their fellow black Africans and that the Barbary trade on part of the Muslims was far longer and bigger in scale. We get this impression that white people are uniquely insidious with a poor historical perspective.

How would "the black community" have handled Chernobyl?

BASED JURY

blacks can't even feel genuine empathy for their own children, let alone some russian engineers

>woman
>detective
Why is this allowed? Women are too retarded to be detectives.

Checks and balances do not equal a trial you colossal faggot.
The whole idea that the system is on trial undermines the very idea of the trial, as the trial itself is predicated on the idea that the system is legitimate.

If the system is illegitimate, what legitimacy can its trials have?

>Yo dis nigga straight wildin' take his ass to the docta, cuz.

>attacked 8 people
>confessed
>but didnt rape the woman, someone else did
>they din du nuffing
>pay reparations cracker

Lmao, fucking niggers man
Also Burgers and their white guilt never ceases to amaze

t. gooblyist and frentolist
disgusting bigot

I meant having them be the workers. It would be a great parody!

>GET THE WATER NIGGA!

>trial itself is predicated on the idea that the system is legitimate.

Where the fuck did you even come up with that nonsense? The system never claims to be infallible. That's literally why we have two sides to the argument in a trial and go to court in the first place. If the system was "legitimate" as you say, it would all end the moment the police (who are also a part of that system) arrested you. After all, why bother with trial? The police arrested you and they're part of the system and the system isn't wrong, right?

The trial is not predicated on the idea that the system is legitimate: it is predicated on the idea that truth is subjective and that it can't be taken for granted. Knowing that, the system is openly acknowledged as a noble attempt at gleaning truth, a best effort, but one that is imperfect and where mistakes are made, hence why there are also means to course correct (e.g. retrial). It is designed to check its own effectiveness as much as anything else.

>The system never claims to be infallible
Cute strawman. I didn't say infallible, I said legitimate.

>The trial is not predicated on the idea that the system is legitimate: it is predicated on the idea that truth is subjective and that it can't be taken for granted
What the fuck is this post-modern bullshit? Is this seriously what they're teaching kids these days?

>I didn't say infallible, I said legitimate.

And? The entire rest of the paragraph addresses that.

>What the fuck is this post-modern bullshit?
Man, it's really sad that such a simple, factual statement read as brainy intellectualism or whatever you.

>Who put a man on the moon?
Imagine actually believing that happened

>And? The entire rest of the paragraph addresses that.
No it doesn't, it addresses your strawman. I reiterate my statement, the system having check and balances into it does not mean the system is on trial.
> factual statement read as brainy intellectualism or whatever you.
There's nothing "brainy" about claiming the truth is subjective.

Mind you the real rapist went on to murder someone a year later. Also the police never actually found out he was the serial rapist in Central Park, he confessed to it to free the Central park 5.

>a rapist and murder showed more compassion to those kids than the police or NY legal system

Why the fuck are these big apes so cowardly to attack in groups. Even if they manage to beat the couple up, how can they feel proud? 'yeah, we ganged up on a single white boy and totally beat his ass fair and square.' fucking niggers, they make me sick

You are aware its illegal to integrate a minor without a lawyer present. The police held them for hours before even their parents were allowed to see them. Who knows what they did during this time.

>b...but the kids waved their rights to an attorney

A bunch of 13-16 year old kids who weren't aware of the legal system. The cops took advantage of them and anyone with common sense knows it.

Jesus Christ what the fuck is wrong with you people. How the fuck is THAT your take away?
>We should totally take the word of the felon that raped a woman in front of her children and gouged her eyes out, at face value. He was clearly motivated by compassion, and not by of jailhouse politics.
America is fucked.
We're all fucked.

>Who knows what they did during this time.
Speculation.
>A bunch of 13-16 year old kids who weren't aware of the legal system.
Bullshit. The basic mechanisms of the legal system is beat into everyone's heads through popular culture from the moment they're first exposed to tv.

He meant if blacks were in the same situation idiot

Why the fuck would he confess to the rape then?

He literally said he felt sorry that one of those kids was still in jail for something he did. No it doesn't make him a "good" person by any stretch of the imagination.

same for PA

>The basic mechanisms of the legal system is beat into everyone's heads through popular culture from the moment they're first exposed to tv.

If you believe this, you are a retard.

This is a long brainlet post

based unz review poster

Attached: 1508416505091.jpg (702x528, 67K)

>my nonsense is factual
>>>reddit.com

>put a man on the moon
>beaten every other step of the way by Communists with no regard for safety
>killed two dozen astronauts to beat them too it
And it wasn't even Kubrick's best work.

>Why the fuck would he confess to the rape then?
because one of the kids rose to become a major figure in the prison hierarchy, and he wanted to get in the good favor of that prison clique.
Do you seriously think violent sociopaths "feel sorry' for the people they fuck over?

Everyone who isn’t white is morally and spiritually superior to every white person
t. Reddit and American Democrats, unironically

So you're claiming entire generations of people weren't exposed to the concept of miranda rights due to police dramas on television?

I doubt most 14 year olds are aware they can't be interrogated by police without a lawyer present.

>having check and balances into it does not mean the system is on trial

The system has checks and balances because it has to vigilantly ask whether it's doing it's own job right. Testing/assessing it's own performance is synonymous with one of many definitions of a trial. If you wanna be all po-tay-to/po-tah-to about it, that's on you.

And you're in a thread with dozens of people arguing over what they believe the truth to be yet scoffing at the notion that there might be any subjectivity to it.

>a 16 year old kid rose to power in a federal prison

Doubt.jpeg

ebin react

>you have the right to remain silent
>anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law
>you have the right to an attorney
>if you cannot afford an attorney one will be provided to you
Literally said every time someone is arrested on television. Don't bullshit me and say those kids didn't know their rights.

why does this trigger white people so much?

Where does it say that we aren't allowed to question you without an Attorney if you are a minor?

Like I said, a kid would not get this.

>Testing/assessing it's own performance is synonymous with one of many definitions of a trial
Don't you fucking pilpul me faggot.

>And you're in a thread with dozens of people arguing over what they believe the truth to be yet scoffing at the notion that there might be any subjectivity to it.
Truth is by definition OBJECTIVE faggot. It doesn't shift according to your point of view.

because it's fucking irrelevant and based on the bullshit assumption that 14 year olds don't know they have the right not to self-incriminate.

based brainlet, broken windows actually create jobs for window fixers, just like nigger rapers make jobs for vagina fixers o_o

Why do you doubt that a sixteen year old could gain status in prison over the course of more than a decade?

selfhating faggot, move to New York if you don't like it

Actin like you wont get (You)'d.

STOP IT THERE ARE TOO MANY FAGGOTS HERE AS IT IS