How hard are they going to bomb, Yea Forums?
How hard are they going to bomb, Yea Forums?
Avatar 2 will be a "disappointment," and force Disney to rethink the schedule of releasing a new movie every other year.
>doubting Jimbo, ever
just go back
I've only seen the first Avatar once and wasn't crazy about it, but I'm going to pay to see the sequel just for contribution's sake.
>Avatar 2
2.5 billion
>Avatar 3
2.9 billion
>Avatar 4
2.7 billion
>Avatar 5
3.4 billion
>How hard are they going to bomb, Yea Forums?
As much as the first one.
>can't bomb if they never come out
They’re making a movie about the TITANIC? Like the boat that sank? Well we already know the ending then, why would this be popular lol. It’s ginna bomb so hard
NEVER JN YOUR FUCKING LIFR DOUBT BIG JIMBO
as said
>watching a movie not because you're interested in it but because you have a crush on the director
Okay.
they're just waiting for the technology to beam movies directly into our brains to be invented before releasing the sequels.
If 2 bombs they all bomb.
>How hard are they going to bomb, Yea Forums?
3, 4 and 5 will be nowhere near the numbers of 1 and 2. the fact that they're being released so close together proves it,
>How hard are they going to bomb, Yea Forums?
Why would it bomb?
How disconnected from reality will the story be after 20 years in the oven
what a waste of a career baka
James Cameron's brain is going to be uploaded to a computer to direct the series in the future. Avatar 5 is going to be in 2200.
Yes, because it's James Cameron, I'm virtually guaranteed to be entertained.
>>watching a movie not because you're interested in it but because you have a crush on the director
Virtually everything James Cameron has done is amazing. At this point, I'd go see his movies just to see what innovations he brings to moviemaking.
Except for the last James Cameron movie what was called Avatar that you weren't crazily into.
What was Avatar's innovation apart from the 3d crap? This is a legit question. I'm interested
sexy blue monkeys with nice legs
>What was Avatar's innovation apart from the 3d crap?
The mocap and the real time camera in the cg landscape. Check the special features of the movie.
Additionally, Peter Jackson later used the same tech doing the hobbit trilogy.
>Peter Jackson later used the same tech doing the hobbit trilogy.
Which was ass.
Avatar sucked ass. Was basically pochahontes in space
>Which was ass.
Yet Cameron essentially invented the tech to make avatar which is now used by other movie makers.
You know those scuba masks that you can talk to others with while underwater? That came from The Abyss.
Guy advances filmmaking whenever he makes movies.
Ok, so I understand your claim is about technology and not the movies themselves
I guess I have to agree on that regard. Terminator 2 was revolutionary as fuck in terms of cg
I wasn't crazy about it, but it entertained me.
So he's an engineer and not a storyteller. I can respect that, but I'm not paying money to see the result of engineering when the first Avatar sucked ass. Why would I?
>but I'm not paying money to see the result of engineering when the first Avatar sucked ass.
You didn't see Avatar in Imax, did you?
>Why would I?
Just you wait for 3D without glasses. Or photo-realistic CGI. Or some other amazing tech that advances film-making.
why does he still think people give a shit
They're not going to bomb. The only legitimate criticism I've seen of Avatar is that the story is unoriginal (Not bad, but unoriginal), which is definitely true. Let's be honest, though- who gives a fuck about plots in movies?
why does avatar take shit for being a cliche story when every marvel movie is the same big bad against wee superhero man
No, I didn't see Avatar in Imax because I like movies for the story, not the graphics. You may as well stare at a seizure-inducing flashing screen of bright colours if you play money for spectacle over story. You have to be 18+ to post here, son.
>No, I didn't see Avatar in Imax
Then you don't know what you're talking about.
read a book nigger
I will watch every single one
based
Based Disney would never let them bomb
>doubting Cameron making a sequel
the man is the master of the sequel
(It's going to look like shit in ten years even on Imax and you're just chasing dragons like a junkie if you like visuals over narrative. Dog Day Afternoon is still watchable and that came out forty years ago. Terminator 2 is still watchable and that came out twenty years ago.)
You don't even have bad taste in movies, you have bad taste in what makes a movie good.
Cameron's a great director so he's held to a different standard. I didn't hate Avatar, it just wasn't as great as all the other stuff he's done.
>Terminator 2 is still watchable and that came out twenty years ago.
user, I...
They should all comfortably hit a billion and won't bomb, but they're unlikely to reach the heights of the original. The second one will probably do better than the others as it won't feel like it's being milked. If the water technology is as spectacular as the rumours suggest that'll give it another boost.
Oh God....
>Avatar 1 had the emergence of 3-D
what will be the new gimmicks?
3-d blue monkey girl toes and smellovision
Bombing capabilities unknown to mankind
> Cameron applied for American citizenship in 2004, but withdrew his application after George W. Bush won the presidential election.
> Cameron calls himself "Converted Agnostic", and says "I've sworn off agnosticism, which I now call cowardly atheism". As a child he described the Lord's Prayer as being a "tribal chant"
That's what butthurt haters actually believe
Cry more