His best?

Attached: DFE8d9IWAAAQ-YV.jpg (1200x1074, 131K)

Lyndon

Barry Lyndon

Attached: barry1st-dual.png (450x253, 82K)

Paths of Glory

Napoleon

B A R R Y
A
R
R
Y

it's 2001 though; don't fall for the pseuds

The man of culture's choice

A Clockwork Orange

For me? Either Barry Lyndon or 2001

Well its Fear and Desire of course!

Attached: 67EF1115-9808-4A54-8B36-9B11B8585945.jpg (235x283, 8K)

2001: A Shining Orange

Apollo 11

For me? It's Eyes Wide Shut without a single shred of doubt in my mind. That movie is mesmerizing.

The fake moon landings

Attached: C3DB1270-A975-4F71-A262-8DC53BD0403E.gif (320x240, 672K)

I really hate the Wikipedia article on him. It has no info box and picture of him that so young it doesn't even look like him. The first time I went to look for his article I saw it and hit back thinking I had picked the wrong one and was on some no name nobody's page because "surely someone as important as Kubrick would have a fully fleshed out Wikipedia page". It was only after I went back and read the talk page I realized the page was locked down by a bunch of autists who had an artistic autistic (or art-istic as I like to call it) vision of what the page should be. Like, yes I know wikipedia doesn't have any defined "you must do it like this" standards, but there is a basic assumption of quality and standardization that comes from being the defacto encyclopedia on the internet.

This but unironically

that's pure contrarianism

The Killing

Attached: image.png (1200x720, 709K)

spaced and redpilled

Paths of Glory is the only true kino he made. Everything else is pretentious drivel.

>Full Metal Jacket
>"pretentious"

Attached: 4tard.jpg (2272x1704, 558K)

based and pilled

>picture of him that so young it doesn't even look like him.
You're the pleb here for not recognizing that picture

2001
Dr Strangelove
Eyes Wide Shut

Can’t have just one fav. I can watch any of the above any time.

for me it's EWS

I love all of them really

Attached: 1532396611701.jpg (1000x420, 57K)

Somehow it seems fitting. If Kubrick was in charge of his own Wikipedia page he probably would've rewritten it 400 times before he deemed it acceptable.

I watched 2001 and it was trash.

It has awful pacing and it’s only claim was that it was a technical marvel.

It’s just boring dribble.

Attached: 1C37794C-3ED5-4F3A-8148-83253B27BE44.jpg (648x806, 102K)

he's not special though, the fact that it was shut down to autists """""""""""""""""into film"""""""""""""""" is hilarious

came here to post this

Kubrick is so based that he made the best sci-fi movie ever made just as a front for the moon landings.
its a pity that NASA pulled the funding once they had their moon shots and wouldnt let Kubrick have the ending to 2001 he wanted.

>shits on 2001
>posts moetrash
kys

>dribble
yeah you got that right

Attached: Driblet.png (403x448, 53K)

Napoleon & Aryan Papers

"Barry Lyndon is Kubrick's best" is the clearest pseud-marker in existence. His fumbling imitation of a painterly style and period-piece aesthetics, mastered by Griffith half a century earlier, is as dull as it is derivative.
Shooting on 'le special NASA stem lens' is always brought up as if it were some empirical evidence of genius. It isn't unique. David Lean had a lens specially made just for one shot in Lawrence. Hitchcock had to do extensive modifications to create the Vertigo effect without having a zoom lens. Welles was one of the first to utilize 18mm in Touch of Evil. Jacques Tourneur did amazing things with filters and Technicolor to mimic watercolor vistas in Way of a Gaucho. To say nothing of what Griffith accomplished with 1910s technology.

Attached: 1544312505660.png (546x706, 497K)

Attached: barry4.jpg (1568x940, 563K)

Attached: stale pasta.jpg (4000x2248, 2.53M)

CITIZEN KANE

This is true and only psuedointellectuals will disagree.

i aint watching that faggy shit. i watched all kubriks films but this just looks boring and efeminint. 2001 is pure kino but anything with pantoloons is dumb.

Dr. Strangelove

Attached: MV5BOGY0Mjk4OWYtMTRhZi00NmU2LWI3OWYtZWFiNGNmYWVmNjUxXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNjkxMjM5Nzc@._V1_-960x540.jpg (960x540, 73K)

based and redpilled
kubrick's best films are
>Paths of Glory
>Barry Lyndon
>A Clockwork Orange
Honorary mention for Spartacus

Attached: hitler-was-right.jpg (334x450, 72K)

that’s a really low hairline. he looks like he’d never go bald. when did this guy start losing his hair?

That means nothing. I had a super low hairline and it started receding very rapidly when i was 26.

A Clockwork Orange.
Come at me, Barrycels

why didn’t you get transplants? baldness is a thing of the past these days. my best friend’s dad went from JK Simmons-mode to having a long flowing mane with just hair transplants and biotin. granted he’s a wealthy entrepreneur who had the money but no man really has to go bald anymore if they don’t want to. fuck just look at Elton John

>muh cult following
Literally his shittiest movie

Because i don't care and i just shave my head. I can't see how its a big deal at all and think people that try to cover it up with transplants and shit like that are cringe as fuck.

come on user you can’t possibly be that autistic. just because you came to terms with and don’t mind losing your hair doesn’t mean it isn’t understandable for many men not to want to lose theirs. modern transplants aren’t even “covering it up” they’re literally repairing the hairline. alopecia is a disease and it can be treated now

Barry Lyndon. After that, Dr. Strangelove

It's not a disease and covering up a natural part of what you are because you are embarrassed is cringe. It's like wearing lifts if you're short.

thats not Eyes Wide Shut

holy shit have sex please

fiction set in the renaissance is based as fuck.

>renaissance
please tell me you're joking

>cult following
ACO is amongst his most popular movies though.

His magnum opus

Attached: ews.jpg (950x713, 98K)

one good scene

The correct answer