What the fuck?

>I made it pretty clear, the first one is a real dinosaur and the second one is CGI
Both are CGI

The adult T-Rex they cloned for the movie obviously died by now.
They can't make any more because it didn't listen to its trainer one day and decided to eat someone.

correct, the nighttime setting and rain was there to help blend the early 90's CGI. Since everything in the frame had a blue cast with dark shadows and bright highlights along the edges, it hid the imperfections while tying the whole shot together.

because there are retards who think its CGI, so why spend money on it

where are the feathers.

The first one is CGI too. It's when the T-Rex actually exits the enclosure. The close ups where you don't see the feet on the ground are the Stan Winston animatronic one.

blending practical and cgi > cgi alone

>real set with full practical t-rex
>full cgi trash

Holy fuck dude. He means real as in a living breathing animal.

If you've ever seen jurassic park in hd you know the dinosaurs look like shit

If you guys are wondering why the top looks better than the bottom despite both being CG dinosaurs

The top one is shot in a real set/environment. Therefore, the dinosaur had to be rendered and lit in a way that conforms to the set's lighting. Even though the dinosaur is clearly CG, we still acknowledge in the back of our minds that it's in a real, physical environment so it's more convincing in the end.

The bottom one has a "better" looking dinosaur with higher resolution textures and more up to date animation, but the entire environment in that scene is also CG, especially the volcanic explosions. When everything is CG, then it feels like a video game cinematic/cutscene and less like a movie shot in a studio or constructed set.

Carnosaur was all practical and the effects were garbage.

Hey retard, if you've never seen Jurassic Park or the Lost World in their 4K prints you don't know what the film really looks like

Yeah like Im gonna watch tv on a tiny ass screen, fuck off lmao

>Outsourcing

Jurassic Park shot in 4:3 so the dinosaurs would fill up more of the screen which would add to the sense of scale, they forgot about this for Jurassic World

They look great. Movements are sometimes a bit clunky as you can expect, but the shots are excellent and clever and the movie itself is infinitely better than anything that came after if you ask me. Steven made a masterpiece.

Back in the day, low budget practical effects in movies were mostly on B movies
Jurassic Park is AAA

It actually looks like the old one has a higher resolution texture.