Dude let's ruin a low-iq man life forever - yes, only low iq individuals would fall for their tricks and actually send dick picks - only because a sexual preference - that probably would fall under a psychological problem - without even try to help them. Lol, so funny!
Dude let's ruin a low-iq man life forever - yes...
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
wcsap.org
counseling.org
cdn.hansenvspredators.com
drive.google.com
youtube.com
reddit.com
twitter.com
HEY, im smart, not all of us are dumb!!!
pedo cope
Its funny because everyone universally hates pedos.
Wait for the army of incels coming in here telling you that anti-pedoism is some form of jewish brainwashing and that it's actually based and red-pilled to rape children.
dumb people still rape kids
but there is no victim in this scenario
what? are you retarded
What about children?
There was a doctor or two.
But there's plenty of dumbass MDs. Like the ones who prescribe antibiotics for colds.
But in this scenario, there is no child to be harmed
I mean let’s let chubby_cuttles1488 who cares that he came here with the full intention of raping a child, he said he wouldn’t do it again
alabama is right they need chemical castration
>Getting paid to pretend to be and underage girl on the Internet and have lewd chats with neckbeards to entrap them
I wonder who would want such a job.
No but it was their intent to sexually abuse a child. Had they not been caught they probably would've been successful in raping a child eventually. Intent is a crime.
Perverts.
Vincent only wanted to consensually cuddle.
A man who goes to a childs home to "cuddle" is planning on doing more than that. Fuck you for defending this sick sack of shit. I hope your mom smashes your face into computer screen and takes a shit in your mouth
but there wasn't a child that time
>he thinks TV execs give a fuck about anything except money
Here’s the kind of poster that probably cried at shoveldog
> pre-crime
Not all crimes need to have a victim. Criminal intent on itself is a crime.
From what she was writing to him she was willing. Yes, he was a retard for sending the dick pic and stuff like that, but in this program they actively try to ruin the lives of mentally unstable people.
That's immoral.
>not all crimes need to have a victim
why ?
Fun fact, 40% of males are actually attracted to minors (and struggle silently unfortunately) and still, they do not solicit pictures from minors. This is not a defense of child predators, this is just a measure of morality. The fact that unironically almost half of the plant wants to do something but only a fraction of the plant would be morally bankrupt enough to do it, because its not a question of IQ, its a question of whether or not that person understands its not ok to sexually harass minors, not a hard subject to grasp.
but there wasn't a child that time
Don't need a victim to commit a crime. Why do you think drug use is illegal? If you ask a cop for drugs, even if they don't have any you're still going to prison for solicitation
That's why the "predators" they catch are extremely dumb men, or men in extreme need of psychological help. Not of public humiliation and a ruined life.
In 20 years people will see this program as an atrocity.
ok but there could have been a child. if there was no cop, and by extension if there was no prison time, it would have been a child.
>meet guy on internet
>ask about his family
>talk to him about murdering him and his family
>spend weeks coercing guy into letting you kill him and his family
>tell him when you're planning to come murder him and his family
>spend copious amounts of time telling him how and why you're going to kill him and his family
>tell him when you're leaving to come to his house to kill him and his family
>lol but there's really nothing you can do about it till he murders that guy and his family, getting the police involved is entrapment because then he guy isn't actually talking to his intended victim but the police
This is what you child molester apologists sound like.
What? No way
>This is what you child molester apologists sound like.
but he didn't molest anyone
You can be a fucking idiot and know that you shouldn't be fucking eleven year old girls. Again, the fact that its wrong isn't a question of intelligence. I teach entire class rooms of retarded high schoolers and even they can understand that hurting people is bad.
but there was no one to hurt
There would have been someone if there was no undercover cop dumbass. Its only a victim-less crime if there are people there to stop the crime
but the undercover cop was only pretending to be a child
ok but you can understand that your only two options here are pedophile goes to prison and child gets raped. You can see how there is no question as to what should be done right.
like if those are your options you're going to have a hard time convincing me that it should be the former rather than the latter
but there wasn't a real child that existed. its all in your mind
kikes are the paedos though. Just look at how they refuse to cast big booby actresses and always cast flatchested cunts, or look at the horde of formerly innocent aryan actresses they've thoroughly defiled just to give them an audition.
>it's okay to try to shoot somebody if you were too retarded to remember to load the gun lol
but there was no "somebody" to shoot. it would be like being in your home and pointing a gun at the wall
ok let me put it in simple terms because obv you're too fucking stupid to understand the difference between entrapment and catching someone red handed.
If there was a lion, and that lion was loose in a puppy enclosure, and that lion was hungry, you get that at least one if not several of those puppies are getting eaten right? Therefore if you dressed a bomb in a puppy costume, you're preventing the lion from eating, not forcing the lion into suicide.
I don't understand your analogy, but there was no victim
I know, it's like people don't realise that pedophilla, like being gay is just a sexual attraction that you can't change, we need to help these people as much as possible not discriminated.
>how can laws be real if people aren't real
It doesn't matter if he didn't molest anyone, the point is that he was going to if not for intervention. If you remove the intervention, he would have raped a child. What are you suggesting exactly, that we wait for pedophiles to rape children before we arrest them? That we allow people to get hurt instead of acting preemptively? Like what would you do differently?
>If you remove the intervention, he would have raped a child
but there wasn't a child
Google mens rea and then kill yourself pedoshit.
I mean studies have shown that helping a pedophile instead of forcing them to keep it a secret is directly connected to that pedophile having less of a probability to act on their urges. The best way to ensure a pedophile rapes a child is by refusing to help them and rejecting it as a real thing that unironically almost half the people on the planet suffer from.
Can't wait until the social stigma is ended and I finally can go out in public with my little gf.
I think you're right to some degree, and I think Chris Hansen does it for the money, he's trying to get as much usable material as possible. The groups he's working with though, the ones who do all the work, they're doing good work. Most of the people who get caught are real scum, look at that one guy who was a Rabbi. He was supposed to serve his community as a spritual counselor, care for youths, and he wanted to meet underage boys and sent them dick pics online. Guys like that need to have their jobs ruined. Some other guys, like that handicapped dude or Vince Ambrosio, probably shouldn't be exposed like that though, they do need help
Formerly chuckville
The problem I see with this is that the people pretending to be kids in the show are actively trying to coerce the “predators” to do something bad, in such a way that real ones wouldn’t do. Like if you militantly persisted trying g to convince someone to try weed, even when they say no at first, and then you arrest them for it.
>Sniper who fires into crowds of civilians missed all his shots so why is he going to prison if he didn't kill anyone
>pedophiles
i might be wrong here but haven't they all been ephebs so far? youngest 'decoy' i remember was 13.
Yes, I agree that's not a matter of black and white, but that's for both sides. People get too emotional when talking about this.
but there is no one in the crowd
Pedophile is a buzzword used even for men that like already matured 16yo girls.
there is unironically a crowd of billions of children on the internet
I was shitposting if you couldn't tell, fucking kill yourself you pedo scum.
It's not about preventing child rape faggot, its about destroying people who're even lower than me so I can pretend to myself I'm not as much of a piece of shit compared to them
>CHILDEN DON'T REALLY EXIST BRO, THEY'RE ALL COPS PLAYING ENTRAPMENT
Nigga you dumb.
Get help.
>Eskimos
Haha. This loser had to stoop to having sex with kids that just hit puberty. What's wrong, can't hunt well enough to find a wife old enough to keep a fire going and handle home chores? Haha. Dork.
>Americans
FUCKING HANG HIM AND PULL HIS GUTS OUT!
People actually defending pedos.
HURR DURR NOT MY FAULT OFFICER AM RETARDED
Most of them drove from their house, so they are more capable than you think.
imagine doing a thing that results in more child rape but also calling people pedophiles for doing the thing that is directly connected to preventing child rape
>Haha. This loser had to stoop to having sex with kids that just hit puberty. What's wrong, can't hunt well enough to find a wife old enough to keep a fire going and handle home chores? Haha. Dork.
>caring what happens to stupid people
>he doesn't know about Eskimos and sex
> no crime but could have been a crime
gerontophile smarts
modern day sacrificial lamb.
the people who enjoy this show are more morally corrupt than those who get caught. holier than thou pornography.
castrate yourself you fucking scumbag, there's a reason you keep your predilection to yourself, because you know it's wrong and any normal person would kill or fuck you up seriously. do yourself a favour and kill yourself, so you cant hurt anyone, and put yourself out of you're own misery
>the people pretending to be kids in the show are actively trying to coerce the “predators”
Except they don't, because that would be entrapment. It's like you pedo white knights have never watched the show.
at least you're honest
man its almost as if doing something about the problem will make the problem not so much of a problem. I honestly never understood why there are so many people opposed to helping pedophiles especially with how much evidence exists to support the fact that it reduces child rape. I mean whats your recommendation? Kill 40% of the population of the planet?
My little gf and her family love me. Good for me that I don't live in the "land of the free" called America.
kikes push ugly and fat too.
Do you imply little girls are ugly?
>leading scientist claims
is there a leaderboard so i can keep track of who the leading scientists currently are
just because you can't change doesn't mean society should accept your perversion.
Enough of this shit, let's discuss our favourite predators.
imagine being this susceptible to relative cultural influence
you're just another dumb pitchfork lemming
Is it true that if a girl is underage where you live, you can't take her to the next town where the age of consent is higher to have sex? If so, why not?
reminder this is yet to be reasonably and rationally refuted
DUI is a crime even if no one got hurt.
i thought that had to be edited but it's a real place
until it's well established that pedophilia is the sexual attraction to prepubescents, a serious discussion about this topic will never be had.
when all you have is arbitrary numbers that vary depending on the girl's development etc you can play fast and loose with the truth/ morality
>citation needed
17 year old thots are minors but there's literally nothing wrong with wanting to fuck a 14-17 year old. only sick cunts go younger than that
Attempted sex with an imaginary child?
it's called engaging in criminal fucking conspiracy you daft cunt
who's kids are you going to fuck? your own, your pedo friends, or is it just cp you're into, and then when their grown up will you discard them, or will you hide your lust under the banner of love, I hope you die screaming.
LEFTIST KEKS BTFO
Yeah I'm sure the entirety of Yea Forums rapes kids daily. This isn't a retarded argument at all
I think it's hilarious how plebs argue amongst themselves whether a 14-15 year old is a child, all the while actual pedos and hebes consider 14-15 year olds grannies
In the USA the consent laws are by state and taking a person across state lines becomes a federal crime that fucks you even worse than the pedo shit alone
> my totally subjective age limit is better than yours
So what if a guy's intent is to have sex with a legal girl but in reality she's 15? Does intent matter then?
Why are Age of Consent laws different from state to state? Seems like something like that fucks over so many people.
"pedo" aka "I have no arguments"
correct
> let's make-up more "crimes" to subjugate the population better
>it's the same cherry picked opinion piece as yesterday
Get new material pussy.
Just having criminal intent is generally not a crime unless you actually commit the crime. It's not a crime to want to murder somebody.
kys, you fucking pedo. why don't you inform you friends and family what your sexual attraction is, you're a predator and a threat to the species, you should be treated as such.
>dude what's your argument for being attracted to a human who's ready to be pregnant according to nature
Truly no argument at all
ya seethe leftpedo?
>SEX BAD VIOLENCE GOOD
Cool
It's just one of those things were state can make their own laws like marijuana.
sexual predation is pretty damaging all on it's own m80, if you have trouble understanding why maybe you need to exit humanity.
You're sending mixed messages, is it about turning the children gay or trying to molest them? Decide what you're outraged about then try harder.
>opinion piece
it's sad how Yea Forums has fallen so far that there are people here who absolutely hate anonymity and consider argumentum ad populums genuine arguments
why are you even here? you're just another dime a dozen normalfag. you are an automaton created to carry along the lowest common denominator. do you genuinely think your words mean anything here?
trying too hard there pedo
why not both?
> fucking = hurting
>hollywood is rampant with child molestation
>no one ever goes after them
I wonder why this is so
No sub-80 iq virgin can resist the cunny, that lesson gets taught in "Of Mice and Men" class in every school in the world.
threads like this really illustrate how many normalfags are on Yea Forums now. this place is dead. filled with phoneposters and people who migrated from noramlfag social media sites when this place because sanitised enough
That's not both though.
Kek
sex with a child severely fuck's up a child's development and life and is tantamount to violence made worse against an innocent, you deserve nothing less and I'd gladly do it myself, so don't try and claim the moral high ground in defence of you base nature, you fucking subhuman scumbag.
Based retard and his retarded reading comprehension
>sex with a child severely fuck's up a child's development and life
Whoa there idiot, psychologist here and recent studies have not shown this at all. Stay in your fucking lane.
Chris Hansen is based just based on the sheer number of pedos who won't try and meet children due to the fear of being on television
finland used to have something like a 20% incest rate and everybody wasn't walking around "le traumatised" because it was just culturally normal
Only if it's a violent act.
Ruining low IQ people's lives is based though. We would unironically be better off if we ensured that low IQ people get limited chances to breed/succeed. If we were really serious about fixing the human race we would sterilize anyone with an IQ below 90.
IMPLYING BRAINLETS DESERVE SYMPATHY
LET ALONE PEDO BRAINLETS
YIKES LMAO
makes sense
except the only 20 percent bit
this is just an asian man
wcsap.org
CHILDREN AT DIFFERENT AGES EXPRESS THE IMPACTS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT EXPERIENCES DIFFERENTLY:
Older children overall tend to be more affected because they have greater cognitive awareness of what sexual assault means and how it might impact other aspects of their lives.
Younger children are primarily focused on their immediate safety and security.
Anxiety and posttraumatic stress in young children are often expressed by developmental regression, aggression, and distress at separation from a caregiver.
Older children are more likely to withdraw, avoid situations that are distressing, or shut down emotionally.
Adolescents who experience severe anxiety may have panic attacks, abuse substances, or engage in self-harming behaviors.
No matter what the developmental stage of a child, caregivers are the most important influence on children. Insuring that caregivers have accurate information, are supportive to their children, and manage their own emotional reactions in a constructive way is by far the most important factor in helping children. When working with children and caregivers we always need to consider the impact that culture has on the child and caregiver.
I hope you're outed ostraised from your community and then kill yourself, sincerely.
Incel pic
reminder that studies on child sexuality are essentially forbidden because the findings don't stack up with cultural idioms
WHERE ARE THE FUCKING MODS TONIGHT REEEEEEEE
WHO GIVES A SHIT
YOU SHOULDNT FUCK KIDS, SIMPLE AS
post unbiased sources
But intending to drive while drunk isn't. As long as your friends manage to stop you before you enter the driver's seat you're good to go.
11 and up is all good
that's when they're most horny too
Kill all pedos and pedo friendly faggots too
Yes, that's assault. Do you know the differences between assault and consensual sex? Sexual assault as well messes with the heads of adults. Or do you not know how to separate different acts within the same encounter because your brain is just that smooth? Let me break it down for you then, retard.
>Hitting, spitting, forcefulness
This will eventually lead to psychological issues in -most- cases. This is typical, but not assured, and in all ages.
>Consent and nothing but
Rarely does this end in any psychological trauma unless stigmas were placed (i.e. It's the adults that found out and ostracized the child's older lover that warped their social breakdown). On the other hand, what we've seen from adults that participate in the same effect, they find it okay until ostracized. You in a given situation would be more of a problem than a pedo/hebe.
>Child porn
The pictures or videos are never a problem. Again, separate acts. Remove the violence that they go through typically, since that isn't part of sex, that's part of the assault. Children who just had regular pictures taken of them posing don't find issues typically until, once again, social stigma takes place. We're even trying to get CP passed for patients that are interested in children RIGHT NOW because studies have shown, and these are all in different countries, that given the opportunity to actually view something or touch themselves to something with no repercussions, men who are into CP will have their interest dwindle or die out, and it has been lowering instances of actual sexual assault among children.
tl;dr You're the problem.
>remember when I was arguing against entire swaths of pedos about how pedophilia is wrong
>am now arguing for pedophilia because there's too many retarded normies who dont have a critical thought in their mind.
riling up normalfags on this topic is just too fun. mostly because it's the topic that truly exposes all flaws in normalfag thinking. like a distilled form of cognitive dissonance
Cope more you fucking pedo's
There are many forms of childhood sexual abuse. The sexual abuse can involve seduction by a beloved relative or it can be a violent act committed by a stranger. Sexual abuse can be hard to define because of the many different forms it can take on, the different levels of frequency, the variation of circumstances it can occur within, and the different relationships that it may be associated with. Maltz (2002) gives the following definition: “sexual abuse occurs whenever one person dominates and exploits another by means of sexual activity or suggestion” (Maltz, 2001a,as cited in Maltz, 2002, p. 321).Ratican (1992) defines childhood sexual abuse as:any sexual act, overt or covert, between a child and an adult (or older child, where the younger child’s participation is obtained through
Ideas and Research You Can Use: VISTAS 20112seduction or coercion). Irrespectiveof how childhood sexual abuse is defined it generally has significant negative and pervasive psychological impact on its victims.(p.33)
counseling.org
read here you fucking pedo
That's called a "power dynamic," brainlet. You're arguing against power dynamics and violence, not adolescent sex.
>abuse
Read here you fucking retard.
who's kids are you fucking?, do you think any parent would let you near there child
Thanks for finally submitting. We can all laugh at you now,
submitting, thinking that fucking kids is normal and healthy. as long as it's not violent.
I never said it was normal and healthy. Clearly you didn't read it all. I said we're using CP (and this is older pictures with permission from the victims if we can track them down) to dwindle the appetite in patients and are curbing sexual assault because of it. If I were for fucking kids, I wouldn't even bother with wanting to curb this want for them, I'd be out of the psychology business and elsewhere having an easier time, like graveyard nursing or being a school counselor. There's separation between acts and priorities to set in order to prevent assault/abuse here. You're not a bigger picture person, and it's a good thing you teach instead of make an attempt to perform any sort of assessment that requires critical thinking.
yikes
I know this is a troll thread but I can't resist
>Guy has notebook stating his plans
>Has already flown to NYC
>Text messages with multiple people in city to purchase materials
>Cops raid his motel room
>"B-but he didn't actually blow up Trump Tower yet so it's entrapment"
Holy hell, any defense attorney worth anything would immediately ask for the chat logs to try for an entrapment defense. The perverted justice people literally just go "lol I dunno" or "maybe, I'm scared" to every answer. It's the pedophiles who always lead and direct the chat in a sexual way.
im too old now but if you dont bang teen girls when you're still into your 20s your basically gay FACT
There is not a single pedophile in this show. The youngest decoy was 13.
> REEEE MODS PLZ HALP
> SILENCE THE GERONTOPHOBE NOW
fag reply
If your law makes it illegal to just have intent without committing the actual crime then your law is dumb.
If intent only matters then it should be okay for someone to fuck a 15 year old as long as he's convinced she's 18, too.
They do it because if they didn't, their normie patients would start reeeeeeeeeeing and complain about them to the higher ups. Easier to placate them by prescribing antibiotics to their Little Jimmy's virus-based diseases.
> Fun fact, 40% of males are actually attracted to minors
It's around 90% of males.
>muh morality
moralfaggotry is fine only when there is a strong reason for it. Like against murder that if allowed in the public space, the society degenerates into a chaotic shitfest. Or violence leading to the same result.
But in our case pushing responsability for your own children to someone else threads on the fucking snek.
All the arguments against pedophilia are WEAK. Nobody ever produces strong ones that aren't based in their own personal axioms. No, I'm not talking about fucking kids. I'm talking about wanting to fuck kids. Being pedosexual. There are no strong arguments against it. Just dumb traditionalist outrage. It's laughable.
this show was basically just pure entrapment, and then the fucker hansen doesn't pay his taxes lmao, what a fucking joke
> It's the pedophiles who always lead and direct the chat in a sexual way.
Damn now words are punishable offence. Murricaaa, land of the free and shit.
> often too tall
manlet detected
> pedosexual
another made-up imbecile word just like pedophilia itself
> Just dumb traditionalist outrage
> traditionalist
sureee it is.
Until the rise of liberalist FEMINSHIT kikery there were no ages of consent.
The cuckservatives are indoctrinated morons that think this libtard feminshit bullshit is tradition.
should put God on trial for making little girls so sexy
anti-pedoism is some form of jewish brainwashing and that it's actually based and red-pilled to rape children.
Anti-pedoism is bad when it reaches the point where a single father taking a photo of his daughter playing is seen as a potential child molester.
Virgin Mary was unironically like 14, God was all about that prime cunny.
anti pedoism is at it's core a roastie feminist movement. it's what happens to the female mind when they are neurotic about how attractive they are. it's legalised hysteria
Who doesn't indoctrinate kids? Religion is indoctrination, standing up for the flag is indoctrination, the culture we transfer to our kids is indoctrination. Very little is actually free well, independent of societal norms. Or are you implying that only leftist ideology is indoctrination?
C O P E
>this is the normalfag's idea of a valid point
>thinking it's ok to diddle with kids is a valid point
Diddling kids isn't OK. Assuming every single male who so much as looks in the direction of a kid is a kid diddler is equally not OK.
as long as they're fertile, yes, it is a valid point.
notice how you can't write a single sentence without bring up some cultural societal slur. you're not making a point. you're just using these charged terms and extreme example like "diddling kids" to make a point. however I doubt you can even tell me what these things mean to you. because you have no internal consistency. these aren't points because you can play fast and loose with these terms. they just mean whatever you want them to mean. for all I know you could consider having sex with a 16 year old "diddling kids"
I agree
tl;dr
Molesting a kid = diddling
Not all pedos or hebephiles are molesters. Most of them aren't.
I'm not a pedo for being attracted to young looking girls(16-18) while rejecting older women(27+).
so by kid you mean prepubescent?
sending dick pics may be low iq behavior but even a halfwit should know better than sending them to minors.
>This thread
First off, why are right wingers actual pedophiles while accusing the left of it?
Second, I could barely fuck sophomores when I was a senior in high school. they felt so young mentally, talking to them was fucking hell. Older girls had bigger tits, ass, and would let me finish in their between their asscheeks. Even two years in those devloping stages changes a person so much.
most molesters are actually just psychopaths who get stamped with the pedo badge after their crime. despite not really being pedos
lolicon here, we will have chris hanson himself in jail once cunny is legalized soon.
Yes
Pedo acceptance will be the straw that breaks the camels back. Parents will never support such degeneracy.
>why are right wingers actual pedophiles while accusing the left of it?
>why is there a few openly pedos on a free speech board
FTFY.
Mens reus isn't enough to get a conviction in court without actus reus though.
> pics are an offence
Also
> because I have a kid, everyone else has to do what I want on the internetz and protec my kid
fuck you and fuck your kid. I hope she dies.
It will never be legal.
Can't wait for you to slip up and for Tyrone to have his way with you in the shower btw.
pedo acceptance coming from the left is a right wing fantasy. the "pedo acceptance" shit that /pol/ keeps posting is not about straight males attracted to younger girls and it never will be. all it is is the same yaaaas queen trans shit.
if you think you that leftist hysterical roasties would ever be comfortable with straight men finding 12 year olds attractive you are out of your mind
It's called deflection. Right wingers are on thin ice and they know it. They've committed crimes and deviant acts for generations. So, any wrongdoing of theirs is deflected upon the left. This way, if they're caught red-handed, they can pull the school yard excuse, "Yeah, but he did it first!"
This is not to say that the left doesn't lie or break laws, etc., but the left is known for having the bleeding heart, running charities and caring about people that may not care about them. And everyone knows this. The left are typically viewed as the good guys, so the right has to deflect whenever they do something wrong because they already have a bad track record.
inb4 I get called a kike, nigger, tranny or some other crybaby bullshit
islamophobe
holy shit man that is some next level wit you've got going on. how'd you come up with that?
the problem is of course if you are shared on the internet
Holy fuck, maybe I am a leftist.
Why are pedophiles routinely freakish, ugly outcasts? Is there a link between wanted to fuck someone younger than 16 and being complete sperg?
Why are there so many of you freaks on Yea Forums?
There's a lovely place called South Armagh, you should check it out, I hear they are very tolerant of your kind.
>left
>good guys
this desu
The amount of pedos in this thread is surprising. I know this is commonly known as the pedo-board, but christ this is nasty. Off yourselves.
>Wait for the army of incels coming in here telling you that anti-pedoism is some form of jewish brainwashing and that it's actually based and red-pilled to rape children.
You mean the folks from resetera?
Is that you, Dr. Pizza? I thought they were holding you without bail.
Trump supporters are like this, user. Are you new here?
If your feelings are hurt, try reddit. there is an upvote system that filters out all those upsetting comments.
This shit will never be tolerated in Northern Ireland.
UK needs to up their fucking game.
>thinking about doing something is crime
>this shit will never be tolerated in northern ireland
right, i'm sure Northern Irish Catholic priests are very different from all the other ones
>if you think you that leftist hysterical roasties would ever be comfortable with straight men finding 12 year olds attractive you are out of your mind
and who said that roasties are intellectually consistent?
when girls become pubescent it's in their nature to seek an older male who they can then go on to develop a long term bond with. the tabboo of male/ female relationships that is never stated anymore is that to have a proper deep relationship that is destined to last a long time the girl must develop a kind of paternal/ surrogate father relationship with her future mate. this kind of relationship is what has been the norm for thousands of years.
it's my theory that when this urge is suppressed or brainwashed out of society that we get the mass level degeneracy we see in young women today. also funny how the "Daddy" fetish seems to be escalating. I think girl's are now acting out in extreme ways sexually because they secretly crave having someone to submit to and dedicate their lives to. but due to the way society is now structured all these impulses are never truly realised and both women and men either sleep around or are in horrible relationships. relationships where there's either an equal amount of control, or the male is the submissive one.
there have been about 20x the amount of child rape cases by public school teachers than by priests.
>walk up to president
>point a gun at his head
>pull trigger
>gun jams
>"Whoah buddy you could have gotten into some serious trouble!"
And most of them got what was coming to them.
The threat of kneecapping is real.
You're delusional.
Left pedo acceptance is all about pederastry. You have to be brainless to think otherwise while the interactions with wahmen become more and more regulated by the same left.
Right's is about re-acceptance of normalcy.
Because they're unable to engage consentually in sex with girls their own age, and so seek to manipulate easily impressionable under aged girls.
It's classic predatory behavior, they give it large on here because they can hide behind their anonymity. When in real life they scuttle around like gutter rats out of the public eye, knowing full well what would happen if their secret ever got out.
Arguments like these is how society lost its ability to act.
>oh we can’t lock up the violent robbers, that would be racist
I've had five girlfriends my own age. I just find girls 10-12 to be peak aesthetics
Kek. Imagine being this retarded. I bet you fell for the Trump meme, huh
And did they know you're a nonce?
If you somehow met a little girl online, complete with confirmation that is indeed a little girl. Would you meet with her in her house Yea Forums?
I know most of the /r9k/ pedos and wikieat tourists are in this thread
why do worship mass opinion? as if the lowest common denominator means something.
> point gun
> point picture of a gun
t. retard
Also, it is my plan to go to NK borrow some gook nukes, dig until I reach under Murrica and blow it all up. Thought crime.
anime rots the brain
What if they replaced the catfishing adults with AI chat bots. These bots would lure you the exact same way - except no one existed! Would (or should) these people still be prosecuted?
> kek, I can't argue, kek
t. brainless moron
depends how intelligent she was. and I would need more circumstantial information. and to trust her
yes, it's the same thing like how underage drawings are illegal so everyone has to say that they're 900 year old fox girls
why do adults always have this false idea that children are like these pure little untouched angels. do you even remember being a kid?
past 9-10 or so everyone's a fucking mischievous cunt
I am fine with 21 if she looks like that
can't wait for the seething reeeeeeees of normalfags when I mod my photorealistic VR games in 10- 15 years
Post more rare Ambrosios
warning contains dick pics
drive.google.com
> but the left is known for having the bleeding heart, running charities and caring about people that may not care about them
that's why conservatives donate more to charity than lefties? Also, conservatives tend to be less narcissistic, bitter and self centered than liberals, which makes having meaningful relationships with them much easier.
Your kind tend to overcompensate for your moral relativism and emptiness by wishing for generic/basic bitch beliefs like ''world peace'' or ''save the polar bears!'' while forgetting about those that are most close to you.
No but they knew you were a fucking faggot.
why are leftists not breeding?
>Here is the Left wing, an unnatractive fat dude in a weird outfit making a silly face
>Here is the Right wing, a literal stock photo
Does being conservative require you to become retarded, i cant think of a single good posistion or mindset they consistently hold
sorry to trigger you so early in the morning, sweatcheeks
what would you do in this situation?
Thanks my dude
>These bots would lure you the exact same way - except no one existed
no it wont be prosecuted, instigation is illegal but not entrapment, what the bot will be doing according to you is instigation
It isnt just intent, its action with intent.
>Dude I didnt actually assassinate the President wtf!!!!
I'm glad no matter how right or left society goes, your kind will always be hated.
realize that you have fucked up good.
What an embarrassing thread. No wonder you're all the outcasts of society.
Try to kill myself in any possible way. My life would be fucked forever anyway.
>you're
Is it a lot more? Not even the most conservative Bible loving people breed like Somalians or medieval families
joke's on you, because every game and game system that runs outside stadia-like broadcasting bullshit will be illegal. In VR, as a male you'll only be allowed to suck dicks,
>the average IQ of a pedophile
Be ready for:
- no job
- no friends
- no family
- police checking every week
why would I want to be normal?
Has there ever been an actual pedo caught by any of these stings?
lul wat. You're talking about the same conservatives that refuse to aid those in need? And only help wealthy whites? I live in the US. Don't know what country you're in, user, but in the US, everyone knows conservatives don't give a shit about anyone.
>b-b-but the left are the good guys
give your own aid bucko quit trying to grab my wallet so you can virtue signal
obviously not. pedos have no interest in girls over 10-11
>Not liking children
>Faggot
rather be a faggot than a nonce, least they're somewhat tolerated nowadays, people like you will have to live in the woodwork forever.
Because democrats love abortion
this has to be the dumbest post i've read on this board
I'd argue pedos aren't even interested in girls that old. In my experience, they are pretty developed and mature by that point.
post one single case of an attack on a catholic priest in NI
>NO NO NO! THIS IS ENTRAPMENT!!
Why would you want to kill a pedophile? I'm not saying I'm a pedophile because those guys are weird but why would you want to didn't kill the child they just used a little bit of his body for their own erogenous reasons I don't see anything wrong with that and I'm not trying to defend them but they're not that bad maybe you should talk to someone that is a pedophile maybe they should explain why they are the way they are it's this societal issue that you have placed on them and the challenge that they must not touch a child which is impossible I mean have you ever been to a kindergarten how could you not but hey I'm not a pedophile and I'm not supporting them sort of
>Not wanting to fuck kids is considered being a part of the lowest common denominator
Ah yes, because so many of those caught in stings look like real pillars of society.
Nah I'd just be her friend.
>This thread
The bait in the program is never a child.
Why don't you retards just go out and try to rally people behind your cause of changing the definition of a pedophile to something else or decrease the age of consent or some shit. Why complain about the man keeping you down and then do nothing about it
>the mental toddler itt who ascribes the most cartoonishly evil positions he can think of to right wingers and unironically believes his own bullshit
what's his story?
>We just hit it off.. friends...
Kek
>A bunch of trannies= The Left
Sure buddy. Keep getting triggered over mixed race couples or whatever. You are literally evil and history will remember you as such
>changing the definition of a pedophile
Don't need to change it. It means one thing and that is good. Pedophilia means attraction to pre-pubescent humans.
The age of consent is 16 or lower in the majority of the first world. That is low enough, premarital sex is immoral anyway.
kek this guy is literally mentally stunted
the people they catch are not pedophiles or people that have different opinions to that of mainstream society. they are simply desperate, mentally ill or disabled men who would go after any female giving them the smallest amount of attention.
genuine pedophiles have zero interest in the girls that age. the reason why the decoys are so old is because they know if they actually had decoys for pedophiles 7-8 year old children nobody would show up
because fucking is as bad as murder
> fuck normalcy because it is not accepted by the kike-indoctrinated society that programs me
t. NPC
why do men feel the need to virtue signal anonymously?
Fucking a kid? Yes, child diddler.
my theory is they vent their sexual confusion of being attracted to minors as directed violence towards pedos.
>"DA JOOS"
Pathetic.
They use actual pictures of children in the chat but the woman who greets the pedo at the house is over 18. There's a difference.
i feel like one for Yea Forums would be a lot higher on the far left
Tell us more about how you want your 13 year old daughter to be raw dogged by a 50 year old man with weeping sores and a crew cut.
Maybe your daughter could get gang-banged by all of these fine gentlemen?
>muh statistics
yawn
*smacks lips*
Bleeding heart libtards only think in the short term and their policies end up hurting more than they help. Not only that, they steal other people's money to pay for people who don't deserve or don't need help.
>Projection: the post
so are they saying they think 90+% of 14 year olds are attractive? what exactly are they measuring?
The bait is always a fictional pubescent female, thus perfectly natural for a man to have reproductive desires for. A child is a pre-pubescent human, "child" is a biological classification.
>look everyone Im using buzzwords i dont understand
Are you clinically retarded?
Now you're projecting your low IQ and lack of education, good job.
> the left are definitively the good guys
The bait is often 10 to 13, which is still pre-pubescent.
Yes what are they measuring?
The average age for a female to begin puberty is 11. The photos they use are always displaying secondary sexual characteristics and developed bone structure.
I know a prison warden who tells me stories of how pedos are treating on the wing.
You are gonna have it pretty rough if you slip up, why bother?
not him but it's really unclear what exactly is being measured here. it'll help your case if you just explain what exactly the chart says and how they came to the conclusion.
Ask a parent or guardian to help you read the words in the image.
>muh right side of history
> sex ?
> murder?
>SAME THING
% sexually attractive females...so what does that mean?
why does being asked to explain yourself upset you so much?
Why does being a retard upset you so much? Just learn basic English before using English forums and you won't have this problem.
>That curly glass dude who tried to torrent some CP under VPN
>pedos can't even explain their own charts
>antis literally can't read
why do nonces always lean back on biological arguments like that completely defines how we structure society?
if we're going by biology, there's nothing to stop some thunder chad taking your girl to live in his rape harem, smashing your shit up and clubbing you to death.
luckily for you we have rules and structure preventing base instinct, and not diddly kids is one of them.
welp, this is what i get for trying to have a normal conversation with pedos i guess.
nonces can't even explain their own charts
>welp, this is what i get for trying to have a normal conversation with pedos i guess.
Just finish your ESL classes and then come back.
>nonces
Maybe I've been off the internet for too long...what is that now ?
men were presented with images of girls without any age attached to them. they were asked to rate either sexually attractive or not. the measure is how many men found girls from whatever age bracket attractive
thanks
>if we're going by biology, there's nothing to stop some thunder chad taking your girl to live in his rape harem, smashing your shit up and clubbing you to death.
Apart from the other betas. Cave Chad can't live without their companionship and they'd still hurt/murder him back. We're apes, not bears. Interdependence and social needs define us just as much as "muh dick"
britbong slang for pedo i assume
how genuinely fucking retarded do you have to be not to understand that grade 3 chart?
>luckily for you we have rules and structure preventing base instinct, and not diddly kids is one of them.
That structure is called marriage, not age of consent.
Nobody is saying "durr they are menstruating so we fuck!" that is a straw man. I'm saying there is nothing biologically or morally wrong with a man courting a pubescent woman.
Tell us more why every member of society has to be responsible for your shit daughter, but not you or the stinking cunt?
Tell us more why do every male member of society has to be cucked by the state because you're a beta faggot that can't control your child?
Tell us more how is that your child can't consent, but you leave it roam free in the public space (including the interwebz).?
because harems never existed in natural human tribes. pubescent girls bonding with older males did
because you didn't mention this you dipshit child fucker
imagine getting your shitty ass fake news chart utterly dunked on by reddit
reddit.com
kek at the replies
You broke the moralfaggots! You broke the bloody moralfaggots!
You are confusing cause and effect. These people have zero role-models and are hated by the entirety of society. They are shown no path forward whatsoever. Many fall to into depression, suicidality and alcohol/drug abuse. Of course they're going to be messed up and dysfunctional, but saying that them being dysfunctional is what caused them to like kids/teens in the first place is dishonest.
incel boiling
@116476289
>linking r*ddit
>needs an explanation to understand an extremely rudimentary graph
>I'm the retard
Based on objective studies, rather than anecdotal evidence and adamant denial rants (which mean nothing), about 90% of men are attracted to preteen girls.
A peer-reviewed scientific journal study (Behavior Therapy 26, 681-694, 1995), conducted by Kent State University, 1995 (Lori L. Oliver, Gordon C. Nagayama, Richard Hirschman) was conducted on a sample of normal (adult attracted) male volunteers using the "penile plethysmograph".
The team carried out hundreds of tests exposing men to female adult and child images. 95% exhibited arousal to the female adult images.
A staggering 88.7% exhibited arousal to the female child (less than 12 years old) images.
Prior to the study, 80% of the participants claimed to have no attraction to children and all of them had no history of illegal or legal youth attracted behavior.
Based retard and his retarded reading comprehension
hag can't cope
the age of consent in the US was 10 not long ago.
>can't read a graph
>"y-you have retarded reading comprehension!"
retard seething
@16476702
Cope harder, incel.
It's always funny when /pol/fags talk about the degeneracy of modernity and "muh left wants tu push paedophilia! Immajun muh shok!" when in reality, in the "good old days" people were quite a bit more lenient on this than they are now. That they actually delude themselves to think that 40-something single-mom "where are all the good men?" feminist hags would ever allow grown men to fuck 14 year-olds is also incomprehensible to me.
and it was stupid too. Age of consent came with liberalism. Being more free in the "muh tyrannical" ancien regimes than in the "for freedumz" kike-owned system.
The only minimum age of breeding is puberty as it always was and everyone knew this without libtardism libsplaining their convoluted lying bullshit.
>self-esteem so low he wants to fuck 10 year olds
>calling anybody else an incel
Based retard afraid to get a reply from me because he is getting utterly BTFO
Without libtardism there is no problem, you dumb shit. Know why? Because you have absolute control over your own child.
@116476794
>sweaty illiterate incel still posting
>retarded pedo incel thinks I won't see his posts
kek I got ya so boiling you are literally literally taking the time to manual type in post numbers
@116476917
>manual type
lmao the incel is a phone poster in addition to being a newfag
yeah and most girls were married off at 12-13 because their fathers knew it was the best thing for them
>pedo NEET incel doesn't leave mommies basement
OH NO NO NONOOOOO IMAGINE THE SMELL
user, draw a swastika
does america give you live tracking of pedos?
>he just admit to being a phone poster
yes
>he just admitted to being a shut-in pedo
hebesexual*
based loyal pedosexuals
*is a pedophile with a dictionary
>bigots don't own dictionaries
last for sexy little girls
cool autstika
last for sexy little girlss
>sneedville
NO FUCKING WAY