>He continues, “And it’s very ‘Heart of Darkness.’ It’s sorta like, if you got ‘Apocalypse Now’ and ‘2001’ in a giant mash-up and you put a little [Joseph] Conrad in there and you hope its as good. But it’s probably not. I’m being silly. But those were the influences.”
Can everyone stop saying that Gray said this movie will be 2001 & Apocalypse Now?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
No, i will continue to claim that it's Apocalypse Now and 2001 in every thread.
>Brad Astra.jpg
Why would you add a little Joseph Conrad to a mixture that already has a lot of Joseph Conrad in it? Is Gray an idiot?
As you should because it quite obviously is
It turns out we have a brainlet in Gray.
muh conrad
if this shit isnt kino im going to drink bleach. scifi has been such a letdown over the years
Kys
No u.
Are 55 year olds allowed to be Astronauts?
Asking the real question here.
>Pitt as an astronaut
Is this a comedy?
Why? Pitt is pretty decent actor when he has a good director he can give a great performance.
If they pass physical requirements it doesn't matter.
Scott Kelly is 55 and retired this year
John Glenn was 77 in his last mission
I had no idea, very based
bullshit space isn't real.
it's proper proportions brainlet
two parts of conrad and one part of 2001
He's a pretty boy and below average actor.
Watch his stellar performances in 12 monkeys and the final scene of Seven
space based
Wait who's Conrad? I thought this was a Brad Pitt movie, is he a co-star?
Watching 12 Monkeys at this very moment. Weird movie, but interesting concept. Lots of 90s cringe.
Better buy a bottle now, mate.
The Conrad/AN influence was already big on Z. It's about the "it'll be good" comment. I've been following Gray for years and he's often insecure and self-deprecating. He's a typical kike, high opinion of himself but also suffers when he's not being validated. Really suffers from being unrecognized in the US and with the industry despite coming up as a prodigal kid and worshipped in European arthouse circles.
He was good in Killing Them Softly, Moneyball, The Tree of Life, Burn After Reading, Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford and Twelve Monkeys. He is also decent in some roles where he doesn't act that much like Fight Club, Ocean's Eleven. He can also be terrible like in Interview with the Vampire, 12 Years a Slave and World War Z. It really depends on the director, with a good director who can play on his strengths he is able to give a good performance. Gray is a good director, Pitt plays slightly autistic astronaut in the film so i think he will do a good job.
Gray is quite funny, his TIFF talk is pretty good.
where is everyone getting this info that Pitt plays an autist?
Script descriptions. Look at the other Ad Astra thread there are several links.
it's not gonna be, I can tell from the trailer. Sorry for your loss, I was excited too
>judging film by the trailer
>Apocalypse Now and 2001
it literally looks like a remake of Interstellar. saying that it's the only film i'm going to turn out for this year aside from the joker movie
Name a movie that was better than its trailer projected. Movies are either just as good as their trailers or worse.
Blade Runner 2049
kek
donnie darko
trailer makes it look like a cliché teen horror flick
youtube.com
Keeeno is back on the menu boys.
Donnie Cucko was a teen horror movie
There's already a little joseph conrad in it if it's already very Heart of Darkness
brad pitt stopped acting a long time ago.
he just collects checks now.
>Can everyone stop saying that Gray said this movie will be 2001 & Apocalypse Now?
Too late, BR 2049 was already the 2001/Apocalypse now of the decade
different sentence