Godzilla is just based on an old incorrect reconstruction of a T-Rex skeleton. You know this, and yet you call it Kino...

yeah but what was that before or after he lost his neck frill?

Attached: Ultraman-vs-Godzilla.webm (640x480, 2.84M)

And people dare to say 1998 is the worst Godzilla movie

You're wrong
Tyrannosaurus Rex's closes relatives, Daspletosaurus and gorgosaurus have been found with small scales and no feathers. Yutyrannus may have had feathers but it was a more distanrly related tyrannosauroid, not a Tyrannosaurid like trex

Actually Godzilla 54 was based on an old incorrect Iguanodon reconstruction. Godzilla even holds his arms like he had the Iguanodon thumbspike.

forgot pic

Attached: Ig.jpg (602x900, 181K)

>Also T-Rex had feathers

Not that you care, but no, it didn't. Some dinosaurs did, but not T-Rex.

Doesn't work that way, once some sort of covering is developed it just refuses get adapted out.
Birds have feathers 100 million years later, there are no bald birds. Likewise mammals - those fucks invented hair - and every single one of them is hairy, yes, even the whales have thin, short hair covering their bodies.
We had some skin impressions from the T. rex, but those are conveniently located in the areas where it's cousins were bald too.

He's clearly a bipedal stegosaurus

What the other guy said. Faggot. Find me a featherless bird

>bull fighting at the end
LMAO

Attached: 1558479561815.png (992x1102, 622K)

>Pyjamas with maskamas
>vs
>The Very Angry Lettuce

It's not, but it's bad because it wasn't Godzilla. A movie called Batman that's about a middle class kid who gets bitten by a radioactive bat and transforms into a bat monster to fight crime, can still be a better movie than say, Batman and Robin. But obviously people still wouldn't like it because what I just described is in no way shape or form the character everyone is familiar with.

That’s a pretty cool looking dino

Features may appear and disappear several times.

Feathers were developped and disappeared in different times by very different species.

Here's a pic that show where the skin was printed in mud.

There is more proof than lead to think tyrannosaurus didn't have feather than the opposite

Attached: trexskin.png (500x661, 507K)

So just like other user said, the bald patches are conveniently located where his feather ancestors and cousins were bald anyway.
It's a big fat nothing.

And as I said, feature may appear and disappear.
Thermal regulation for big animals is easier with a naked skin than with hair or feathers. That's why Rhino or Elephant are nude. And don't talk about Mammoth : they lived in very cold area, while Tyrannosaurus lived in warm ones.

And you should stop with the lies, the skin areas impression with feather present for Yutyrannus were shown scally for Tyrannosaurus ones

fuck your trips
my step-dad was a t-Rex
I am not any different

Attached: tillyfullhouse.jpg (510x382, 130K)

>featherfag
oh fuckin no no no non o

wtf this is some liveleak gore shit

Godzilla is based on a Superman cartoon from 1942
youtube.com/watch?v=D3a9dNqqq-E&list=PLhGipfv0juZWw5lM_NyhY1n32UXVSn37Q

I have no idea either. It baffles the mind. Then they go on and on about their "kaijukino" pretending some black and white film from the fucking 50s with a dude in a rubber suit actually holds some artistic value as a film and isn't just brainless monster mayhem of its time. I just don't understand it

LMAO Clark looks so gucking baked at 3:00

>i am 12 and think i'm smart because i read a wikipedia article - the post

The fuck outta here, this is embarrassing.

Attached: 1444429454647.png (497x278, 51K)

Based Fleischer Superman

Don't worry. You'll cope.
You're just fighting to preserve Nostalgia and your childhood.
If you look back and read up, there was the same sort of resistance when scientists had to cope with dinosaurs not being quadrupedal, ponderous lizards, as they originally believed. Then later when after nabbing some complete, "unscattered" skeletons in the sixties - had to cope with the fact that they weren't upright, exotherm reptiles, but rather warm-blooded, bird like creatures.
Nowadays, birds are only classified as aves instead of dinosauria, because it's too much work to re-classify 20000 species. And there's the same sort of resistance to feathers as there was to prior paradigm shifts before.

I'm still waiting for arguments buddy.
And birds are in the theropoda clad, meaning they are dinosaurs, you know that, right ?

You should pay more attention on what you are reading on the internet. It will avoid embrassing yourself again

Samefag here.
To be more specific, birds are in the sub order Theropoda, which is in the order Saurischia , which is in the clade Dinosauria

I like this T-Rex better. Remember that this used to be scientifically accurate, too, just like the new feather theory, which will probably fall out of favor later on.

>I will never understand
You could have left it at that. Sóyboys and women will never understand

I will call it niggersaurus.

Japan is literally a race made entirely of söy and literally no westerner who isn't a two digit IQ weeb or hipster gives a shit about godzilla.

Attached: 1558660782235.jpg (960x407, 16K)

Kong is gonna get btfo ;)

based