Why didn’t Voldemort just stomp on Harry’s head with a pair of cleats?

>no I don’t want my fathers name!!! I want to be called something cool and evil like Voldemort!!!!1
>called the “Dark Lord”

Attached: 8685AD8D-AA51-47D0-9235-F6CDD653AE81.jpg (849x560, 40K)

>Love works as a shield against killing curse
>doesn’t work as a shield against even the smallest caliber bullets
Muggle Chads win again, stay on those reservations luddite scum

Dial 8

Why didn’t he just take a knoife and shag that Potter baby?

because the kid wasn't Warwick Davies

No loicense m8.

no license

propper foken cunt those coppers are innit lads

>fighting Voldemort
>”yeah, no”
>wip out pistol with free hand
>blast the fucker with 8 rounds while he’s distracted and his wand is preoccupied
Is Rowling a hack? Anyone could have easily killed Voldemort

Attached: 0D3A305B-1486-48B5-AD00-1614B621FDD1.jpg (600x400, 21K)

>muh evil powerful wizard is defeated by the power of LOVE
How could I read something so gay back then

Why didn't Dumbledore just let Tom have a teaching position at Hogwarts so he couldn't go full evil?

why havent the wizards a propper army of sorts to fight off against things like that

Voldemort would have reported the child grooming to the ministry

>tfw that lightning scar could have been cleat spike scars instead

kek

He was severely injured when his spell backfired

Wait a minute is this for real? Give me the quick run down on Harry Potter please. Saw the first movie as a kid and thought it was meh didn't see the second (with the snake?) until I was an adult and it felt cheesy. Who is voledmort I know he's the bad guy and killed his parents or whatever but he is really defeated by love? Or could just be shot in the head by a gun?

Attached: 1558492395602.jpg (746x407, 67K)

I guess killing him with magic was Voldemort showing he could defy prophecy and all that and ironically it's what made the prophecy true.

So 3deep.

Also begs the question why the Minister for Magic never asked for an SAS raid after an airstrike on Malfoy Manor when the bad goys were there.

He was already evil at that point (he'd murdered Myrtle, his father, his father's entire family and his grandfather before he even left Hogwarts), he just wanted a way to more easily recruit people to his cause

>but he is really defeated by love

Yes, it's never actually explained but some ancient magic was inadvertently cast by Harry's Mother and this caused Voldemort to be nearly killed in the process. The only reason he didn't die was because he split his soul into several pieces and put them in very obscure but personally significant objects (His pet snake, the house artifacts at hogwarts, a family ring)

you just know she would make some bullshit magic to stop guns
like an entire army could go against a wizard and the guy would just wave his wand and poof all the weapons stop working even tho they cant even get a wand out of a childs hand

The better question is, why didn't the Queen just end social services to prevent the creation of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1485638790859.jpg (1565x2823, 558K)

I think I'm ok with not seeing these movies or reading these books.

Why doesn't Hogwarts have a class on demonic possessions and exorcisms? Why are there no classes on chaos magic or summoning?

Apparently Moldyshort (unknowingly) made a "pact" of sorts when Harry's mum offered her life for Harry's. V zapped her, and since apparently it's Ancient Magic, that gave Harry a Get Out Of Getting Zapped card. Zapcurse rebounded and blew up the house and Trolldeport.

The simple, yet complicated act of changing your form to that of an animal is a crime to do just because you didn't tell the Ministry of Magic or your nation's equivalent and register. What you posted would be forever illegal

OI M8 U GOT A LOISENSE FER THAT TRANSFIGURASHUN?!

>turn into an animal
>life in azkaban, no parole

such is life in great britain mate

Attached: dNe7p8q.jpg (704x672, 173K)

Based no poster. Now I can leave this thread.

Its literally plot armor

Because Avada Kedavara had a 100% success rate beforehand, takes two seconds to do and kills the target instantaneously and cleanly. Voldemort knew nothing to suggest that he should do something else.

He was a lich and used the little shit as a D&D tier phylactery (or whatever the name is).

Decapitation has a 100% success rate and can’t be blocked by power of love bs

Why didn't the ginger faggot have hot sexes with Hermione? They could have made something lewd in the last movie.

Don't logic this. There's no point. Truth be told after WWII the Wizarding world is was completely overshadowed by what science can accomplish. Magic is good for party tricks. Science is good for amageddon on a global scale.

Too messy. Avada Kedavra leaves no physical damage, and again Voldemort had no reason to assume that Avada Kedavra wouldn’t work. Obviously you are too much of a brainlet to understand sophisticated literature.