Why do Mexicans love The Simpsons too much?

not even mexican, so predictable.

una sneeda....

The OP was about Mexicans so it wasn't at all strange for him to assume that some lame faggot crying about White people in the thread was a little manlet Mexican.

Also, SNEED.

>the Simpsons
*Los Simpson

>*Los Simpson
**Los Sneed

Much more culture in a mariachi song and a plate of enchiladas than in your entire mutt country.
t. neutral Swede

There is more culture in the average swede girls vagina then in all of south america.

It's a monkey thing, you wouldn't understand.

Go get shot mutt

Based and unironically this
Goblino culture is giving their daughters away to niggers and then shooting each other at work and school

you don't?

based deranged freak shitskin

I was posting info/answering question abotu precolumbian, ancient mexican civilizations in another thread, but sadly it 404'd before I finished, so i'm gonna finish answering that user's question here in hopes he sees it

In case anybody wants the context, see and it's reply chain

and now answering

>1) why did they never expand......able to do it?

Well, from an anthropological standpoint, "Central America" actually refers to the space below Mesoamerica but above South America, so most of Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama; with Mesoamerica being the bottom 2/3's of Mexico, all of Guatamala and Belize, and tiny bits of Honduras, and Nicaragua. Even formatting your question correctlyt, "why didn't Mesoamericans leave mesoamerica" is a categorically flawed question: They DID expand, with various groups from central mexico moving down into central america, which is why those bits of Hondouras and Nicaruaga is part of Mesoamerica.

But as far as why not beyond that: To the north of Mesoamerica is the hugeass deserts of northern mexico, New Mexico, and Texas. To the south is the dense jungles and swamps of central america. Both go on for ages and are awful terrain to deal with. There's also the matter that, again, no horses, so long distance travel, communication, and logistics was a lot more complicated.

Not sure what you mean by "Rival empires" here. "Mesoamerica" is a cultural sphere like the Middle East or SoutheastAsia, it's not a singular state. If you mean the Aztec Empire in particular, they controlled basically the entire middle third of mesoamerica, aside from a few enclaves they could not/had not yet conquered, most notable the Republic of Tlaxcala, the cities of Cholula and Huextozinco; and the Remanants of a former unified Mixtec empire operating out of the city-state of Tututepec

(posting a map for reference here, though I dislike how it doesn't show the different maya kingdoms and excludes a ton of cities)

1/?

Attached: Territorial_Organization_of_the_Aztec_Empire_1519.png (3613x2265, 3.23M)

The latin american dub of the simpsons is really good

>arriba arriba *sucks down a burrito and a gallon of tequila*
>*pops out 10 kids*
>8 are shot or beheaded in cartel wars
>2 escape to the USA by human traffickers to pick strawberries

Space travel.

Because fat guys with hot wives is a Mexican tradition.

here';s another map. In some ways it';s worse in it shows even less cities and no borders for non-aztec states, but it shows more cities and towns for the Aztec empire itself, though it';s still excluding stuff, even in the zoom in shot

cont:

The Aztec Empire couldn't expand westward because the Purepecha Empire was there, and was the largest state in the region after the Aztec and had utterfly BTFO a previous Aztec Invasion. As far as north, there's not much up there beyond what the Aztec Empire already controlled that the Purepecha Empire wasn't blocking that was worth conquerintg: Again, it's mostly deserts, and Northeast Mesoamerica is basically a bunch of nomadic tribes, not cities or towns like everywhere else, and the Aztec empire was primary concerned with economic extraction: They conquered you they could get you to pay them annual tribute and if you did they let you do your own thing. Conquering a bunch of tribes in the middle of the desert ain't gonna do shit.

Expanding further into the east into more Maya states was possible and probably would have happened had the Spanish not showed up

>2)re: beasts of burden i know alpacas ...at least knew of them

The Andes and it's civilizations like the Inca, chimu, moche, Wari, tiwanku, etc is 4000 miles away, as far as the British Isles are from the Middle East; and, again, there were no horses to aid in transportation and the terrain is prety much alll swamps and jungles in the land connectiong the two regions. There was some minor, indirect trade and cultural diffusion between andean civilizations and some central american tribes which traded to other tribes a bit north and then other ones a bit north to that and so on and then finally reached Mesoamerica civilizations in a point A to B, B to C, C to D sort of way, which is how metallurgy arrived in Mesoamerica; but What the fuck would the tribes want with alpacas, after all? They couldn't even really survive in that environment

2/3

Attached: aztec empire map stuff COMPRESSED MORE.jpg (2703x2061, 3.37M)

Ay sneedrumba!

cont:

>is there any truth to what that user on his keeps memeing about, that based on certain factors mesoamerican civs had greater civilizational potential than european ones.

Not really. It is true that in terms of certain milestones, Precolumbian civilizations got from one to the other faster, in terms of how long it took once people got their to start their neolithic revolution, start agrilcutre, then form civilizations, but as I explain in , you really can't judge "advancement" of Precolumbian civilizations vs Eurasian ones because they were developing in isolated places with differing geographic and cultural conditions which led to them not devloping slower or faster along the same paths, but rather on different paths entirely.

Yes, in many respects, the Mesoamericans and Andeans were more complex then the Mesopotamians were given the amount of time since civilization first popped up: Large Mesoamerican cities, for example, matched what was in contemprary europe, absolutely dwarfing the cities that popped up around 2000-2500 years after Sumer, Buit then in other respects, they are way behind: Their metallurgy for example, their lack of decent watercraft, etc. If I HAD to average everything out and make an assessment then yes, they were "progressing faster", but you really shouldn't be making that assessment to begin with: There's too many potential variables to explain why X or Y did or did not happen, and, again, Mesoamerican and Andean civilizations were not developing in the same way or along the same pathway eurasian ones did, so it's never gonna be perfectly comparable anyways.

Like, what does "civilizational potential" even fucking mean? How do you define what an "ideal" civilization is to judge how close or how far X or Y civilization is from achieving it or how fast they are getting there?

It's just a stupid premise of an idea.

3/3

>burrito and a gallon of tequila
south america

¡Ja ja ja!

A better question is why are Japan the one country that hates it?

I’m Mexican and most I know are fat guys with fat wives. My wife has a hot mom and I yet I always catch her husband ogling obese women

LA SNEEDCARACHA

Attached: 1559352052899.png (583x357, 312K)

Attached: 1463802450335.jpg (500x360, 34K)

not him those are very mexican things, even south americans consider it a mexican trait

that map is wrong lol the chichimecas where the center states of guanajuato, slp

They didn't have any other choice?

Attached: 238738.jpg (640x480, 78K)

Attached: 1463802857333.jpg (500x376, 55K)

Attached: 1463806194360.png (400x267, 195K)

Attached: 1550005032985.jpg (1223x684, 311K)