>This is what classifies as a "reviw" on Rotten Tomatoes
This is what classifies as a "reviw" on Rotten Tomatoes
Other urls found in this thread:
seattletimes.com
youtube.com
seattletimes.com
twitter.com
monstershits BTFO
BTFO how? The reviewers are literally brain dead retards who are complaining that a Godzilla movie has too much Godzilla.
>biggest and baddest of all, Ghirdorah, the three-headed, fire-breathing flying dragon
>Ghidorah
>fire-breathing
Did this mouth breather watch the movie?
>but muh reddit quips and politics
Godzilla is a good movie, not great not bad. It's a solid 6/10 imo. Some really great moments, a passable human story which isn't too heavy handed, and titan battles which don't overstay their welcome. Each of the main titans creates a unique beautiful colour and the soundtrack suits the movie really well. I feel like anyone hating on the movie is trying too hard to be a sophisticated critic
Was he right?
Critics are just failed filmmakers with an axe to grind
how does it compare to Pacific Rim?
wut
No, that isn’t even a complete sentence what the fuck??
You know what I'm just going to quote Brie Larson and on this
>This film was not made for you
this is not the review, it's just an excerpt
try clicking "full review" you stupid pleb
Critics are right and users are wrong. We do the Oscars for a reason. So be good little anons and go pay to see Endgame again. If its not there in your local theater, go see Aladdin instead.
Wtf does that even mean? He's a film critic not Joyce or Nabokov. Jesus fucking christ. It was a blockbuster horror movie too lol.
right and based and redpilled
using long words doesnt make you smart
But that's based and correct
Endgame has an 8.3 average score on RT. Critics loved it....
I did, and the full review was a bunch of retarded nonsense.
seattletimes.com
Nothing is said about the qualtiy of the movie except that the reviewer didnt like the lighting. Thats it.
The reviewer also called Ghidorah "Fire-breathing" so i really genuinely question if they even saw the fucking movie. Ghidorah very clearly doesnt breath fire..
based Soren
*nasally virgin voice*
>Ghidorah very clearly doesnt breath fire..
>pic related
>this is the post credits scene: youtube.com
>they also said: earlier in the review
This person genuinely didnt see the movie, lmao holy shit. This is fucking priceless.
Holy fuck they ACTUALLY didnt see the movie.
I still haven't seen Pacific Rim but from the clips of it I've seen Godzilla manages to create a similar weight to the kaiju as with the Mechas in Pacific Rim. One specific part near the end we see Godzilla and Ghidorah clash but from ground level and there's a satisfying rumble as they connect. From what I have seen of Pacific Rim this movie shares a similar colour scheme with a lot of darkness and rain which makes eccentuates the light emitting from the titans making it seem large than life
Im pointing that out because Ghidorah very blatantly fires lightning out of his mouthes and you'd have to be either genuinely brain dead or DIDNT ACTUALLY SEE THE MOVIE.
Also they're supposed to be a movie reviewer, come on now bud.
I'm not even sure what this fuck is trying to say.
>critical effluent and influent
Effluent is wastewater or sewage.
>Rotten Tomatoes
Site’s a complete joke, only absolutely braindead mongs even look at it and even they can’t defend pic related
>how to disguise the fact that you’re unintelligent with verbosity
>Calling Godzilla boring
>4th best movie on the site is fucking Citizen Kane
Yeah okay.
its like you have to be virgin to see through the pleb filter and fully appreciate this work of art of a film piece
Lmao holy fuck that's bad
>that Citizen Cane there because if you're into movies you're supposed to name drop it
>how do I seem smart?
>uhhh oh I'll string long words together with no cohesion!
A movie that is universally seen as slight above mediocre would get 100% at rottentomatoes. You got to be a special type of retard to get mad at a system that clearly does not mean what you think it means
seattletimes.com
looking at his reviews he is just parroting the general consensus of the film, literally an NPC
What a retarded system.
reminder
>"reviw"
>Seattletimes
Seattle is proof that no matter how red the rest of the state is, a few liberal counties is enough to fuck of your reputation.
Whats the matter little fella? Incelzilla cant compete against Endgame and its hurting you inside?
?
Professional critics are lousy these days because the audiences are not really interested in (or can understand for that matter) critic centered around technique, aesthetics or cinematography. So, when a critic can´t analyze objective aspects of film they are limited to just writting down their thoughts and subjective opinions which are all biased. For the media criticism is just another form of advertising, they have to sell the film, for people in politics is all about using the film to discuss social issues and so on, for free agents in youtube it´s all about the views (though those are no longer pro critics, those are influencers). To make things worse people don´t give a shit about the criticism itself, they usually support the influencer or critic they usually agree with or the one they find more fun to watch.
Criticism and rattings are utterly pointless and mean nothing these days because everyone can get their opinion out there and people think every opinion weights the same. (which is true since professional analysis of technique and cinematography is not actually an opinion but an analysis. These words don´t mean the same no matter how much plebs want it)
They also have an option for average rating out of 10, which is more accurate. It's hidden because people would get offended that Wonder Woman is a 7.4 instead of a 99
I look at the average score. The percent rating system and lists are retarded, but if u click on Black Panther it has a 8.2/10 (which is still far too high I'd give it like a 6.5/10), but is at least lower than most Bergman or Welles films etc.
Agreed. I don't look at critic reviews for anything after 2000.
Kek, based Soren
The dude is douche, but you are a faggot, he's talking about the whole newspaper credits thing, which hints the Godzilla vs. Kong, fucking speed watchers
wow, crazy how most of the greatest films ever made happen to have been released within the past 4 years. truly we are in the golden age of cinema
For some reason the old Godzilla shit seems cool while the new ones seem like s o y redditcore autism
>"Is it a Disney movie? If yes, then it's good."
Summed up the average "critic" review.
>This is what classifies as a "reviw" on Rotten Tomatoes
This is what classifies as "spelling and grammar" on Yea Forums
Oh goodness gracious me oh my oh heavens lords to betsy my finger didnt press down hard enough when i slid over the E key.
The Tomatometer percentage is the number that gets advertised and seen by site visitors, you literally have to click a separate icon to even see the average score these days. There’s no damage controlling how braindead Rotten Tomatoes is as a metric of quality or how deleterious it is to the film industry at this point
its a cogent enough argument, though overwrought
i did have to look up monody though, and if im looking stuff up you've missed the general audience by a fucking mile
People seriously thought the Monsterverse was going to be a success, let alone good series of films. Gonna go watch the movie about the singing gay guy than watch some fat lizzard taking a dump on other reptiles
I mean it is a success though. Reviews on Rotten Tomatoes dont kill a franchise, retard. Its already wildly successful and the finale of the Monsterverse has already been filmed.
>LOOK MOM I HAVE A THESAURUS!
Still wont be able to convince Toho to resign that deal again by 2021 though. So GvK will be the last of the Monsterverse
Oh so you're fucking retarded.