Arthouse

Thank you dear user, very based of you. Trying this in a few and I'll post the link

Where does one download the obscurest kinos?

Attached: 1558957942756.jpg (1636x1744, 1017K)

KG

you can find all of these on rutracker

Once I exhaust the list of films I want to see, maybe I'll actually get into arthouse. It would be nice to ascend to that level of patrician kinographer status.

>no Begotten
>no Satantango
wut?

>End of Evangelion
>Star Wars 2
>The Avengers

blow-up is entry level tbqh

What's the appeal of Satantango except being extremely long?

>took one international film course
>first flick is Blow-Up
>find out in 2016 that the flick was banned from the official curriculum

>invite only

Attached: 1541994457983.jpg (199x255, 32K)

Satantango is an unbelievably good film, when you watch it you’ll forget about the runtime.
Begotten is mediocre, though. You’ll get more out of watching gifs from it than you’ll get from watching the film itself.

Kek

>entry-level

those are memes

>Satantango is an unbelievably good film, when you watch it you’ll forget about the runtime.

the humour is extremely subtle

bump

why cant I stop watching japanese movies brehs they're like fucking crack

Attached: es-kirker1.jpg (356x400, 15K)

Tell me good ones

zatoichi series
lone wolf and cub series
(nearly) every godzilla film
all of kurosawa
all of mizoguchi
all of ozu
all of kobayashi
mishima a life in four chapters
battle royale

>No Imamura
>No Shinoda
>No Naruse
>No Suzuki

cry more faggot

Is Killing Auntie great? I've always wanted to watch it but it looks like its only avaliable on KG.

>No Suzuki
Suzuki isn't even that good, what are you on about

I have recently seen this kino. What are people's opinions about it?
It's great atmospheric film, quite funny also. Werckmeister Harmonies and The Turin Horse are amazing too.

Attached: cover_full.jpg (709x1002, 1.02M)

>mfw no Roy Andersson recommendation in the arthouse thread.

Attached: a-pigeon-sat-on-a-branch-reflecting-on-existence.jpg (2400x1350, 565K)

this is very basic taste
watch something from the new wave

I have seen Songs from the Second Floor recently, it was quite good. Are his other films from the trilogy done in the same style?

One of my favorites

Attached: 3x3.jpg (3264x2122, 2.18M)

Demons (1971) by Matsumoto. Absolute kino.

I saw pigeon as my first Andersson and I was bored to tears. Totallly turned me off to the guy to this day.

Level 1:
Tarantino
Kubrick
Scorsese
Coppola
Leone
Ford
Coens

Level 2:
Welles
Paul Thomas Anderson
Hitchcock
Polanski
Herzog
Kurosawa
Altman

Level 3:
Lynch
Malick
Bergman
Truffaut
Kiarostami
Von Trier
Refn
Jodorosky
Cassavettes
Korine
Argento
Kar-Wai
Lanthimos

Level 4:
Resnais
Bunuel
Godard
Ming-Liang
Fellini
Dreyer
Tarkovsky
Mizoguchi
Kieslowski
Zulawski
Bresson
Fassbinder
Teshigahara

Level 5
Parajanov
Rivette
Tarr
Angelopulos
Kalatozov
Vlacil
Rohmer

Level 6:
Costa
Straub-Huillet
Diaz
Jancso
Benning
Jires
Marker
Anger
Monteiro

Great. Angelopoulos is fantastic, i also oved Eternity and a Day, The Weeping Meadow and Landscape in the Mist. The Beekeeper was kind of disappointing.

Fun

>Monteiro
Imagine him making films now. They would be called problematic all the time. His films are pretty based i have to say.

Le chevalier noir se lève

Yes, "Songs from the Second Floor" is part of a trilogy (along with "you the living" and "a pigeon sat on a Branch and reflected on Existence") all of them are done in the same style, tragi-comic vignettes about normal life.

He is very inspired by paintings and sets up his scenes like paintings without any moving cameras. The trilogy is finished, but he is releasing a new movie this year ("about the eternal" or "about eternity"... Don't know how it will be translated)

My absolute favourite director. I sincerely believe that 'normal' plebs also can like these movies even if they don't like art house cinema. I really don't understand people like this guy .

His scenes have a painterly quality so it is not fast and action packed. But it is not boring.

Attached: l'ascension du chevalier noir.jpg (3414x1152, 604K)

Yes i enjoyed the style. It was dark yet somehow subtly funny. Some of the vignettes i found better than others, but the overall narrative of the guy who burns his own shop was very good. I also like the society that it portrays, it was quite unique. The film seemed quite artificial which was another interesting quality. I really like the way he frames his shots. About Endlessness is his new film i think, some vignettes are supposed to be set in WW2 so that will be interesting. I have to finish the trilogy.

As far as normal people liking it, i think the lack of plot, the vignettes and lack of camera movement won't be for everybody. The film is also quite strange atmosphere and performances may put some people off.

heh!

No

Yes

No

The movie is kinda artificial (every scene, even the outdoors scenes are constructed indoors with painting backdrops), but I think the whole abstract thing makes it more real.

There is a certain lack of plot, but in a way it is similar to a long ad break on TV, but instead of trying to sell you stuff it shows you these human stories. I love the format. Roy Andersson is an absolute gem for anyone who is a bit adventurous. Most beautiful movies I know.

fellas how do i get my attention span back for watching arthouse?
its depleted in recent years

Idk mix it up with some easily digestible schlock that will still give you hipster point for consuming, like kung fu flicks or spaghetti westerns, while reading a book in order to still feel like you are cultivating a smart hobby.

Was expecting not to have seen any of this avant teen shit, but then I saw Nostos: Il Ritorno at the bottom and was pleasantly (?) surprised

is anything else on this chart actually imaginative and interesting, lads, or is it all just static long shots of people crying or emotionless-ly reciting political rhetoric

>Costa
>on a "higher"/"better" "level" than Bresson, for some reason

really makes you think