Why are most Hollywood sex symbols manlets?

Why are most Hollywood sex symbols manlets?

Attached: Tom-Cruise-Hottest-Pictures.jpg (400x400, 30K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/930BhfJxFxU
youtube.com/watch?v=I4jo6KkFfIc
celebheights.com/s/Jason-Statham-365.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

The internet has given you unrealistic standards for male height.

because life is a contradiction and you know less than you think.

Most? There is a handfull

Manlets are drawn to cinema because the camera makes them look taller.

as in you could fit all of them in your hand?

Got em

who do you think deserve to be a sex symbol thats not a manlet?

have you ever been on a set?

Tall people are harder to film since they stick out like sore thumbs.

>He thinks that not being a manlet automatically makes him desirable

Lanklet coping ITT is hilarious

jesus, imagine the amount of pusy you'd get just by having a face like that.

Brad Pitt is 5'11, think you're onto something

Because heightists are retarded. It's all in the face.

>jesus, imagine the amount of pusy you'd get just by having a face like that.
Cruise was (and kinda is) so-so looking, but he's got 110% charisma. Without this coolness he has in his behaviour he would be like Ben Stiller.

Forgot pic to prove my point.

Attached: 2825899_TOM_CRUISE_a_YOUNG_UNKNOWN_TEEN_in_COLOR_539x_master.jpg (768x1157, 98K)

COPE

OP is right, what’s your problem?
wait, let me guess ...

Attached: C9B60E41-C3F1-462E-BCAB-41F40564759E.png (474x316, 222K)

Because they fit on the 16x9 format easier, and it saves on budget. When you establish this small person as being the standard height of an average man, it’s much easier to make everything look way bigger and more epic, without having to spend twice as much money on props.

They’re almost all manlets. Manlets seek hyper-validation and are drawn toward the fake adulation. Plus, it saves money on costumes.

tall people look bad on camera. people assume these short guys are tall, until they see them in real life and are disappointed

COPE

Attached: 6D4B3EC3-47ED-4047-B343-CD21598F4F98.jpg (918x918, 65K)

Nobody notices they are manlets on screen.
Everybody notices you are manlet in real life.

Yeah it's FACE not height.

Attached: DxJ0VmR.jpg (1336x1764, 446K)

The real answer is because shorter men age better/more gracefully and tend to have more aesthetic neotenous features to begin with. Hence being more sexually attractive.

Most are relatively tall since good looking men are a preference of hollywood.

>Some cunts make a facebook post for attention
Kek he gets tons of younger women and that are more attractive than them.

Attached: 1514146455116.jpg (1433x1352, 389K)

the attention tom cruise receives isnt fake
cope more lankyloo

>No lanky man looking bitches
Yeah you can keep them

Wow that is one big ugly cunt.

Attached: taylors.jpg (594x438, 94K)

gayest post itt

Attached: 1473517416706.jpg (500x500, 36K)

cope
youtu.be/930BhfJxFxU

Hollywood has the "half-apple". A slang term for a shortened apple box an actor stands on to make himself look taller in scenes with tall females.
They generally are from 6"-12" in height and are used far more often than you know.
Jason Statham looks huge but he's 5'6"

no, u. and stop being gay.

nah he just aged extremely well. tom cruise aged 30-45 looked absolutely god tier

Because short people need to be beautiful or their bloodline dies out instantly. Tall guys can get what they want with needing to be as pretty.

I'd go gay for Cruise

youtube.com/watch?v=I4jo6KkFfIc

manlets are semen receptacles

Hollywood manlets start off as Hollywood boy toys for Hollywood pedojews. They give them special drugs to keep them small for extended child fuckery.

Attached: 6D247CE0-4EEA-46D2-B70F-93BFE66953F6.jpg (250x354, 19K)

Attached: 78A51B98-8062-4490-A6C6-B770B32DC378.jpg (346x404, 48K)

It's easier to make someone look taller than it is to make them look shorter

W-when would you need to look shorter?

When you're in a scene with a costar who is much shorter, but your characters are supposed to be of similar heights.

>5'6
celebheights.com/s/Jason-Statham-365.html

But why wouldn’t they just put the smaller guy on the apple box?

Attached: A5832672-E91F-4E94-985D-03A839BBDC9D.gif (220x180, 603K)

Short (within reason) people make for better shot composition and allow an increased range of workable angles. There is actually no reason to hire tall actors unless being a big guy is part of the character.

This is how fake smiles look like.

>Tall guys can get what they want with needing to be as pretty.
Lmao cope ugly lanklet faggot

You should say “this is what fake smiles look like” or this “how fake smiles look”.

Attached: E9502931-A720-4A54-98B1-DAD8A29A8AE0.jpg (400x400, 41K)

But I’m not tall

100,000 dollars of hollywood cosmetic surgery

*Ugly manlet
Keep coping that height's your problem not your face

Not true. I thought Liam Neeson was a manlet since he looked short in most of his films but it turned out he's something like 6'4.

This is why the 6ft1 Robert Pattinson won out in the end.

Attached: robert-pattinson-kristen-stewart-garticle.jpg (854x1280, 208K)

I would fuck the shit out of Kristen Stewart and whoever her girlfriend is at the time.